Secondary Cross Member? Junk it.
Thread Starter
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 19,282
Likes: 103
From: Lawrence, KS
Car: Met. Silver 85 IROC/Sold
Engine: 350 HO Deluxe (350ci/330hp)
Transmission: T-5 (Non-WC)
Axle/Gears: Limited Slip 3.23's
Secondary Cross Member? Junk it.
Some, but not all thirdgen cars, were equipped with a secondary cross member as seen below. While the five OE rubber mounts (four donuts and the main trans mount) nicely dampen vibration, they also make the car feel sloppy, I think, especially compared to a one-piece OE cross member or an after market version. At the very, very least, I'd recommend a one-piece OE with an OE rubber mount.
JamesC
JamesC
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 12,812
Likes: 110
From: Central NJ
Car: 86 Trans Am
Engine: 408 stroker sbc
Transmission: TKO600
Axle/Gears: Moser full floater m9, 3:70 trutrac
Re: Secondary Cross Member? Junk it.
i have that on my 92. Its quite the contraption, but nothing like the liquid filled mounts.
It will find its way to the scrap yard one of these days.
It will find its way to the scrap yard one of these days.
Re: Secondary Cross Member? Junk it.
It seems the 2 piece crossmember was used on some early V8's and most V6 cars. If that crossmember is original to your 85 Iroc, that's the latest V8 car I've ever heard of with that setup. My 86 Firebird parts car (base model LG4/auto) had the 1pc, as did my 86 T/A's.
Senior Member
iTrader: (15)
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 753
Likes: 0
From: Ogden UT
Car: '88 Camaro (Gone...)
Re: Secondary Cross Member? Junk it.
Those 2 piece crossmembers aren't nearly as bad as the "donut" transmission mount crossmembers some '88 and '89 cars I believe came with (including mine).
Consider yourselves lucky
Consider yourselves lucky
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Street Lethal
Power Adders
634
Apr 30, 2019 12:14 PM










