Transmissions and Drivetrain Need help with your trans? Problems with your axle?

Differences in Transmissions???

Old Sep 11, 2011 | 05:53 PM
  #1  
Copchaser's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,265
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento Ca
Car: 86 Trans am, 91 Camaro RS
Engine: 355 Sbc, nothin yet
Transmission: 700r4- both
Differences in Transmissions???

Hello all... I am starting to brush up on my information to do a T56 swap in my TA. But I had a couple burning questions I was hoping someone could answer for me... What is the difference between the early LT1 T56s and the later years up thru 97? Is there a certain year I should be looking for? Is one geared better than the other? Is there even a difference between the two!? Any useful and conclusive info would be highly appreciated.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2011 | 07:12 PM
  #2  
sofakingdom's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Community Builder
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 27,918
Likes: 2,448
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: Differences in Transmissions???

94-97. Avoid 93. It has the MUCH wider ratios. The later trans, plus 3.73 gears BARE MINIMUM, are the way to go.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2011 | 08:45 PM
  #3  
Copchaser's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,265
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento Ca
Car: 86 Trans am, 91 Camaro RS
Engine: 355 Sbc, nothin yet
Transmission: 700r4- both
Re: Differences in Transmissions???

So the 93s are "off limits"? Ok I think I can handle that. Any other tips I should be aware of?
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2011 | 08:50 PM
  #4  
sofakingdom's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Community Builder
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 27,918
Likes: 2,448
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: Differences in Transmissions???

No, not a whole lot.

Look at the sticky at the top of this forum, and the post in teh FAQ forum on this site. I don't think there's any possible way anything could come up that isn't addressed in at least one of those.
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2011 | 09:36 PM
  #5  
Copchaser's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,265
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento Ca
Car: 86 Trans am, 91 Camaro RS
Engine: 355 Sbc, nothin yet
Transmission: 700r4- both
Re: Differences in Transmissions???

Thank you sir for your help. I will do that
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2011 | 12:55 AM
  #6  
jmd's Avatar
jmd
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 6,522
Likes: 92
From: Aridzona
Car: `86 SS / `87 SS
Engine: L69 w/ TPI on top / 305 4bbl
Transmission: `95 T56 \ `88 200-4R
Re: Differences in Transmissions???

As far as 1993 boxes...
An RPO M28 unit (GM 10236020 / TTC 1386-006) isn't ideal, ratio-wise, with 3.36 first / .62 sixth.

An RPO M29 unit (GM 10236021 / TTC 1386-007) is actually a good trans with regard to ratios of 2.97 first, .62 sixth and can be converted to .57 sixth.

Either one is weaker due to the lessened gear contact width at the maindrive to countershaft teeth.

I wouldn't hesitate to run an M29 unit, with the understanding that it'll never have ultimate strength, but for an average healthy 350, it's a great choice.

The MN6 units from 94-97 are largely the same internally (mild updates in '95) and have 2.66 / .50 ratios that work great if your rear gears match it well.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
69GTOby
Tech / General Engine
40
Apr 18, 2016 02:34 PM
scottmoyer
History / Originality
3
Sep 20, 2015 11:54 AM
Numbah-1
Transmissions and Drivetrain
19
Sep 12, 2015 08:57 PM
J.C. Denton
Body
0
Sep 8, 2015 05:35 PM
greenyone
TPI
3
Sep 2, 2015 03:39 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:22 PM.