finally got the part in the mail
finally got the part in the mail
for those of you who read my "what do you think of this thing" post...i finally got the part in the mail...this thing looks like a joke. i opened it and went "what a bastard" but im still gonna try it...ill install it tomorrow and let ya know of the outcome....
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 4,541
Likes: 2
Car: 1991 Corvette Coupe
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4/4L60 same trans different name
what post? the one about the electic supercharger?
in a recent magazine, i think either car craft or hot rod, marlan davis explains why they are bogus
the dont compress the air like a REAL supercharger does
compress the air is what creates the higher cylinder pressure
these little pieces of garbage simply direct the same amount of air into the engine that would be going in, if that POS wasnt there
i my opinion, now that i think about it, they probably actually hinder air flow
in a recent magazine, i think either car craft or hot rod, marlan davis explains why they are bogus
the dont compress the air like a REAL supercharger does
compress the air is what creates the higher cylinder pressure
these little pieces of garbage simply direct the same amount of air into the engine that would be going in, if that POS wasnt there
i my opinion, now that i think about it, they probably actually hinder air flow
Supreme Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,282
Likes: 1
From: Elkton MD USA
Car: 1983, 1986
Engine: 2.8 2bbl, 2.8 MPFI
Transmission: 200C 3 speed, 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.08, 3.42
Originally posted by 92RSMuscle
well...def. worth the 6 bucks...gave enough of an increase in HP for me to notice...so its a start...
well...def. worth the 6 bucks...gave enough of an increase in HP for me to notice...so its a start...
there was no 'kit' it actually came in a reg. size emvelope. and there was a 1" x 2" piece of bubble wrap with a little *gulp* resistor, and a piece of paper with instructions...
you simply put one end of the resistor into the IAT sensor plug, and the other end into the otherside of the plug...i notice it works good...but recently i have been noticing its doing its job to well...the car is running like its cold...ALL THE TIME. maybe im not used to it yet, i still gotta go out and abuse the camaro to see if i can get used to it, but all it does is make the car drive like the temp guage is at 100 instead of 220....it seems ok so far...
id say try it out only because its a 6 dollar thing...save up some pocket change and get it...worse comes to worse...ya wont like it...i know at times it has worked fine for me...id say give it a shot
you simply put one end of the resistor into the IAT sensor plug, and the other end into the otherside of the plug...i notice it works good...but recently i have been noticing its doing its job to well...the car is running like its cold...ALL THE TIME. maybe im not used to it yet, i still gotta go out and abuse the camaro to see if i can get used to it, but all it does is make the car drive like the temp guage is at 100 instead of 220....it seems ok so far...
id say try it out only because its a 6 dollar thing...save up some pocket change and get it...worse comes to worse...ya wont like it...i know at times it has worked fine for me...id say give it a shot
Trending Topics
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 687
Likes: 0
From: Tampa Bay, FL
Car: 85 IROC
Engine: LB9
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
or even better than spending the 6 bucks...tell us what kind of resistor it is and we can go to the local electronics depot and get one for less than a $1
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 687
Likes: 0
From: Tampa Bay, FL
Car: 85 IROC
Engine: LB9
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
I cant remember if resistors are the ones with little color bands for their ratings...most electronic components have a bunch of little numbers stamped on the sides to tell their ratings
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 687
Likes: 0
From: Tampa Bay, FL
Car: 85 IROC
Engine: LB9
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
little colored bands....hmm can ya take a picture?...I like the idea of giving people a mod they can do for what it costs for a soda
Did he send you some love lube? you just paid 6 bucks for a .30 cent resistor. When you posted this before I posted what it was cause I emailed the guy asking about it. And yes it will get poor milasge, as it will always be running like its -30 outside.
Originally posted by IROCmonkey
I cant remember if resistors are the ones with little color bands for their ratings...most electronic components have a bunch of little numbers stamped on the sides to tell their ratings
I cant remember if resistors are the ones with little color bands for their ratings...most electronic components have a bunch of little numbers stamped on the sides to tell their ratings
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 218
Likes: 1
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 5.0L TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.73
Starting from the color band that is closest to one end, please give us the colors in order.
Example: (R = red, Br = Brown, G = green)
----------(_|_|___|___)----------
------------R-G---Br
In this case R to the left being the closest to an end.
So, the order is Red, Green, Brown.
Red = 2, Green = 5, Brown = multiplier of 10.
The 2 & the 5 mean "25" (mash the first two digits together), times 10 for the multiplier.
So we get 250 ohms.
Reference:
http://academic.uofs.edu/department/psych/resistor.html
Example: (R = red, Br = Brown, G = green)
----------(_|_|___|___)----------
------------R-G---Br
In this case R to the left being the closest to an end.
So, the order is Red, Green, Brown.
Red = 2, Green = 5, Brown = multiplier of 10.
The 2 & the 5 mean "25" (mash the first two digits together), times 10 for the multiplier.
So we get 250 ohms.
Reference:
http://academic.uofs.edu/department/psych/resistor.html
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 13,414
Likes: 6
From: Central NJ, USA
Car: 1986 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 V6
Transmission: 700R4
It'd be interesting to know what temp the seller chose, by the resistance...<table BORDER=3 CELLSPACING=3 CELLPADDING=3 >
<tr><td><b>Temp F</b></td><td><b>Temp C</b></td><td><b>Ohms</b></td></tr>
<tr><td>210</td><td>100</td><td>185</td></tr>
<tr><td>160</td><td>70</td><td>450</td></tr>
<tr><td>100</td><td>38</td><td>1,600</td></tr>
<tr><td>70</td><td>20</td><td>3,400</td></tr>
<tr><td>40</td><td>4</td><td>7,500</td></tr>
<tr><td>20</td><td>-7</td><td>13,500</td></tr>
<tr><td>0</td><td>-18</td><td>25,000</td></tr>
<tr><td>-40</td><td>-40</td><td>100,700</td></tr>
</table>
Why does it always put a damned space between my text and the table?!? There's no codes there! Even a pre & /pre don't fix it! Dammit! I'm going home.
<tr><td><b>Temp F</b></td><td><b>Temp C</b></td><td><b>Ohms</b></td></tr>
<tr><td>210</td><td>100</td><td>185</td></tr>
<tr><td>160</td><td>70</td><td>450</td></tr>
<tr><td>100</td><td>38</td><td>1,600</td></tr>
<tr><td>70</td><td>20</td><td>3,400</td></tr>
<tr><td>40</td><td>4</td><td>7,500</td></tr>
<tr><td>20</td><td>-7</td><td>13,500</td></tr>
<tr><td>0</td><td>-18</td><td>25,000</td></tr>
<tr><td>-40</td><td>-40</td><td>100,700</td></tr>
</table>
Why does it always put a damned space between my text and the table?!? There's no codes there! Even a pre & /pre don't fix it! Dammit! I'm going home.
Last edited by TomP; Aug 23, 2002 at 03:22 PM.
yea, its puttin more gas into it...its also advancing the Timing...i never looked before...but at the end of third gear im hittin 80 mph...iunno if thats the chip or not...and i used to hit 50 at the end of second now im hittin 55
As far as I know it's just fooling the ECM to stay in the open loop mode, thats why you feel like it's putting more gas into it. I did this long time ago ( the resistor is like 25 cents at RadioShack ) but I didn't feel much difference.
Supreme Member

Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 0
From: Garland, TX, USA
Car: 1992 Camaro RS & 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1 L v6 & 305 (5.0L) v8
Transmission: 4L60 Auto
Say bye bye to gas milage if it's staying in open loop and I would recommand taking it out before going to the smog police.
he can give us the color codes..
easier way out would be to check the resistance across the IAT when the engine is cold and buy a !/2 watt resistor with that value
and use it...
im guessing it must be something liek 4.7K ohms or 3.3K ..i saw it somewhere in the web
another thing he could do is measure the resistance across the part he has received even if the color bands are not visible
easier way out would be to check the resistance across the IAT when the engine is cold and buy a !/2 watt resistor with that value
and use it...
im guessing it must be something liek 4.7K ohms or 3.3K ..i saw it somewhere in the web
another thing he could do is measure the resistance across the part he has received even if the color bands are not visible
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 13,414
Likes: 6
From: Central NJ, USA
Car: 1986 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 V6
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by 89camaroRSV6
easier way out would be to check the resistance across the IAT when the engine is cold and buy a !/2 watt resistor with that value
and use it...
im guessing it must be something liek 4.7K ohms or 3.3K ..i saw it somewhere in the web
easier way out would be to check the resistance across the IAT when the engine is cold and buy a !/2 watt resistor with that value
and use it...
im guessing it must be something liek 4.7K ohms or 3.3K ..i saw it somewhere in the web
Pick a temperature you want to 'fool' your engine into, and use the appropriate resistance. I just wonder what resistance the ebay seller chose to sell. Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 13,414
Likes: 6
From: Central NJ, USA
Car: 1986 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 V6
Transmission: 700R4
It's straight outta the GM Service Manual... part of the code 23 (MAT) chart. I think the CTS (for ECM, not gauge) uses the same values.
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 2,028
Likes: 0
From: St. Louis, MO
Car: 85' Firebird (Project), 92' RS
Engine: 2.8L, LS1
Transmission: 700R4, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Open , 10 Bolt (ukn)
ok, where the hells the IAT at? i have no clue where to put this stupid thing in if i got it for a weekend of testing it out....lol, would love to just start plugging resistors in wherever. thanx
I was thinking of tring something new with the TPS too. Like putting a small 4.7Uf cap in it to boost the signal some... Maybe thats too big though... I will have to put some butt connectors and experiment a little with that.
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 13,414
Likes: 6
From: Central NJ, USA
Car: 1986 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 V6
Transmission: 700R4
The MAT (or IAT) is located in the airbox, sticking out of the sides. On the 85-89 Camaros it's sticking out of the dual snorkel, between the air filters and throttle body.
And someone might have better luck tuning the PROM than trying to fool the TPS into doing anything. :sillylol: As reference for others interested, https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...threadid=86363 And for info: https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...hreadid=104792
And someone might have better luck tuning the PROM than trying to fool the TPS into doing anything. :sillylol: As reference for others interested, https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...threadid=86363 And for info: https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...hreadid=104792
Originally posted by TomP
The MAT (or IAT) is located in the airbox, sticking out of the sides. On the 85-89 Camaros it's sticking out of the dual snorkel, between the air filters and throttle body.
And someone might have better luck tuning the PROM than trying to fool the TPS into doing anything. :sillylol: As reference for others interested, https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...threadid=86363 And for info: https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...hreadid=104792
The MAT (or IAT) is located in the airbox, sticking out of the sides. On the 85-89 Camaros it's sticking out of the dual snorkel, between the air filters and throttle body.
And someone might have better luck tuning the PROM than trying to fool the TPS into doing anything. :sillylol: As reference for others interested, https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...threadid=86363 And for info: https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...hreadid=104792
So dumb a$$ do not talk to me.
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 2,028
Likes: 0
From: St. Louis, MO
Car: 85' Firebird (Project), 92' RS
Engine: 2.8L, LS1
Transmission: 700R4, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Open , 10 Bolt (ukn)
hey camaro hunter, i know uve been around these boards for a while, atleast as long as i have. And i think that you're going in a very wrong direction when you call tom P a dip ****, or a dumb ***, you know just as well as i do that Tomp P has a plethra of f-body information that you only wish you could possess. The mans a walking haynes or chiltons manual, and given the ammount of help he's provided everyone on these boards, i'd most likely suggest that you deserve to give him a little respect. Don't get pissy when he gives a suggestion, and also don't get pissy just cause ur little turbo project fell through, or that no one bought your headers (which is a shame if i say it myself) sorry for any cruel intentions, but i was just a tad bit angered with what i read, showed no intelligence what so ever, and disrespect to a truly remarkable member of this team.
Supreme Member

Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 0
From: Garland, TX, USA
Car: 1992 Camaro RS & 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1 L v6 & 305 (5.0L) v8
Transmission: 4L60 Auto
TomP is right, PROM is still the better way to go because with a resister like that you never get into closed loop and you just **** fuel away and you don't get any real performance benifit.
First off I have been on the boards for over a year now. 2 user names.
And the comp WILL go into closed loop. All I am doing is boosting the signal from the TPS. To have the comp go by a different map.
And F-Bird I am by no means jealous, or wish I knew all that Tom knows. I could care less. I know what I know. And No I will not give respect where it is not deserved.
The header thing I can honestly care less. You all lost out not me.
The turbo thing is by no means dead, the conversion will take place when I get $$$.
And the comp WILL go into closed loop. All I am doing is boosting the signal from the TPS. To have the comp go by a different map.
And F-Bird I am by no means jealous, or wish I knew all that Tom knows. I could care less. I know what I know. And No I will not give respect where it is not deserved.
The header thing I can honestly care less. You all lost out not me.
The turbo thing is by no means dead, the conversion will take place when I get $$$.
Supreme Member

Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 0
From: Garland, TX, USA
Car: 1992 Camaro RS & 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1 L v6 & 305 (5.0L) v8
Transmission: 4L60 Auto
I was refering to the temp senosor that people are adding that resistor to. YES adding the GM TPS kit or making it your self for a faster response is a great idea. They sell a plug in kit version in summit racing.
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 13,414
Likes: 6
From: Central NJ, USA
Car: 1986 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 V6
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by Camar_Hunter_c
Hey dip **** I do not have 300 bucks lying around to buy the prom burning equip do you? and this is just a quick little thing like what this guy got ripped off 6 bucks for a 30 cent resistor. I fiqure nothing can be hurt by it. only thing that would happen is that the signal would be amplified and reach full signal quicker. Which would do more then that 30 cent resistor.
So dumb a$$ do not talk to me.
Hey dip **** I do not have 300 bucks lying around to buy the prom burning equip do you? and this is just a quick little thing like what this guy got ripped off 6 bucks for a 30 cent resistor. I fiqure nothing can be hurt by it. only thing that would happen is that the signal would be amplified and reach full signal quicker. Which would do more then that 30 cent resistor.
So dumb a$$ do not talk to me.
And why don't you go yell at Glenn, and the others, who said that messing with the TPS is stupid? Or did you not read the first message I linked to? I guess you know better than all of them, right?And you lost my respect a long time ago. https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...ll+learn+alot.
Last edited by TomP; Aug 28, 2002 at 03:34 PM.
Supreme Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,676
Likes: 0
From: Fort Belvoir, VA USA
Car: 94 Camaro
Engine: 3.4L
Transmission: 4l60e
Boy, It got violant quick! From my limited knowledge, wouldn't PROM burning be better? Nobody said you have to have your own equipment, Why not try to find someone to do it for you? There are great deals out there, and most of the time the deals won't find you, you ahve to find the deals.
I wouldn't want to do that to my car, but when the time is right, I will get a custom PROM Burned
I wouldn't want to do that to my car, but when the time is right, I will get a custom PROM Burned
Oh and the point of fooling the comp into thinking the TPS is open more then it is is it will go into a better F/A mapp, along with spark table. It will do al ittle more then the resistor thing. and not effect the normal operation of the comp. The comp will still be able to go into closed/open. Just the tables will advance faster.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,612
Likes: 0
From: the garage
Car: 84 SVO
Engine: Volvo headed 2.3T
Transmission: WCT5
Axle/Gears: 8.8" 3.73
Originally posted by Camar_Hunter_c
Same here buddy so butt the fu(k out.
Same here buddy so butt the fu(k out.
Hmmmm, really gets your point across. About as mature as my 4 year old. And I know you will reply back with some assinine response so save it. Also don't try and tell me to read some service manual. Unless of course you are a ASE master mechanic, which I highly doupt. First, why do a hatchet job and try to "fool" the ECM. Theres no reason to tamper with the MAT or CTS, and if the TPS is adjusted correctly having a "hack" to make it appear further open, faster is silly. Had a long chat last weekend with a buddy that has a 11 sec GN. He writes his own code for it and we were talking about relocated MAT sensors. After long hours of testing on a ECM bench and R/L burns the conclusion was that moving the MAT, at least on a blown motor did not add or subtract power. But hey, its your car, engine, etc. cheers, Bob
Oh, I have a nice pile of resistors here, more than happy to sell em at 6 bucks each.... :lala:
Originally posted by SATURN5
Hmmmm, really gets your point across. About as mature as my 4 year old. And I know you will reply back with some assinine response so save it. Also don't try and tell me to read some service manual. Unless of course you are a ASE master mechanic, which I highly doupt.
First, why do a hatchet job and try to "fool" the ECM. Theres no reason to tamper with the MAT or CTS, and if the TPS is adjusted correctly having a "hack" to make it appear further open, faster is silly. Had a long chat last weekend with a buddy that has a 11 sec GN. He writes his own code for it and we were talking about relocated MAT sensors. After long hours of testing on a ECM bench and R/L burns the conclusion was that moving the MAT, at least on a blown motor did not add or subtract power. But hey, its your car, engine, etc. cheers, Bob
Oh, I have a nice pile of resistors here, more than happy to sell em at 6 bucks each.... :lala:
Hmmmm, really gets your point across. About as mature as my 4 year old. And I know you will reply back with some assinine response so save it. Also don't try and tell me to read some service manual. Unless of course you are a ASE master mechanic, which I highly doupt. First, why do a hatchet job and try to "fool" the ECM. Theres no reason to tamper with the MAT or CTS, and if the TPS is adjusted correctly having a "hack" to make it appear further open, faster is silly. Had a long chat last weekend with a buddy that has a 11 sec GN. He writes his own code for it and we were talking about relocated MAT sensors. After long hours of testing on a ECM bench and R/L burns the conclusion was that moving the MAT, at least on a blown motor did not add or subtract power. But hey, its your car, engine, etc. cheers, Bob
Oh, I have a nice pile of resistors here, more than happy to sell em at 6 bucks each.... :lala:
I was thinking of tring something new with the TPS too. Like putting a small 4.7Uf cap in it to boost the signal some... Maybe thats too big though... I will have to put some butt connectors and experiment a little with that.
1) Make it not work if placed in series. Caps are equivalent to an open circuit when in the DC realm.
2) Make the throttle response poor if in parallel. Caps are used to "smooth" voltage spikes in signals due to fact that voltage cannot change quickly thru a cap (current can - but that is irrelavent to this discussion). This is the reason they are used as "booster" for audio amps. They can provide the extra charge for a very short period of time if the demand calls for it.
If you want I could post the equations to map the response for a first order circuit (circuit with a cap or inductor). The math is kinda hairy unless you have a firm grasp of integrals/transforms(Fourier and/or Laplace) and linear systems analysis.
You might want to do some more research before you go off and start making up mods. If it was this easy I'm sure someone else would of thought of it long ago - this is pretty basic Elec Engineering.
Not trying to be confrontational - just an FYI
Dale
Supreme Member
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,612
Likes: 0
From: the garage
Car: 84 SVO
Engine: Volvo headed 2.3T
Transmission: WCT5
Axle/Gears: 8.8" 3.73
Originally posted by 86Chicken
Putting a cap inline with the TPS will:
1) Make it not work if placed in series. Caps are equivalent to an open circuit when in the DC realm.
2) Make the throttle response poor if in parallel. Caps are used to "smooth" voltage spikes in signals due to fact that voltage cannot change quickly thru a cap (current can - but that is irrelavent to this discussion). This is the reason they are used as "booster" for audio amps. They can provide the extra charge for a very short period of time if the demand calls for it.
If you want I could post the equations to map the response for a first order circuit (circuit with a cap or inductor). The math is kinda hairy unless you have a firm grasp of integrals/transforms(Fourier and/or Laplace) and linear systems analysis.
You might want to do some more research before you go off and start making up mods. If it was this easy I'm sure someone else would of thought of it long ago - this is pretty basic Elec Engineering.
Not trying to be confrontational - just an FYI
Dale
Putting a cap inline with the TPS will:
1) Make it not work if placed in series. Caps are equivalent to an open circuit when in the DC realm.
2) Make the throttle response poor if in parallel. Caps are used to "smooth" voltage spikes in signals due to fact that voltage cannot change quickly thru a cap (current can - but that is irrelavent to this discussion). This is the reason they are used as "booster" for audio amps. They can provide the extra charge for a very short period of time if the demand calls for it.
If you want I could post the equations to map the response for a first order circuit (circuit with a cap or inductor). The math is kinda hairy unless you have a firm grasp of integrals/transforms(Fourier and/or Laplace) and linear systems analysis.
You might want to do some more research before you go off and start making up mods. If it was this easy I'm sure someone else would of thought of it long ago - this is pretty basic Elec Engineering.
Not trying to be confrontational - just an FYI
Dale
I was going to let him figure that out for himself.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LT1Formula
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
20
Nov 14, 2015 12:02 AM
Polo Z03
Auto Detailing and Appearance
7
Sep 10, 2015 06:43 PM




