V6 Discussion and questions about the base carbureted or MPFI V6's and the rare SFI Turbo V6.

TQ's lockup or non?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 7, 2003 | 05:19 PM
  #1  
Berlyn0963's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 257
Likes: 1
From: Laurel MD 20707
Car: 91 Camaro RS
Engine: GM PP crate 350
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3:42 spooled 10 bolt
TQ's lockup or non?

i havent been on here much cuz i been so busy working on car
and getting the kinks out
anywayz, i got a 3.1 700r4 auto, does it have lock up or non-lockup Torque Convertor? im just curious
and also? arent the 700R4's electronically controlled to shift gears and all that?


took it to the track again ran open headers... still only few tenths better then stock,. . guess i shoulda took a few things out
oh well,. it does good for wut it is...
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2003 | 10:48 PM
  #2  
Nixon1's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,931
Likes: 0
From: Palm Bay, Florida, USA
Car: 95 E-150 & 07 Kawasaki ZX-6R
Engine: A slow one & a fast one
Transmission: A bad one & a good one
Axle/Gears: A weak one & a chained one
Quick tip on your car...it's a 91, so it's an RS. They eliminated the SC name all together by that time. Just figured I'd tell you since the sig caught my eye.

To answer your questions.. Ours have lockup converters. Nearly all factory cars come with lockup converters. Saves gas mileage. Notice how your car seems to have 5 gears? That extra one is the torque converter locking.

These transmissions are HYDRAULICALLY controlled...there are no electronics to them whatsoever. The shift points and firmness is all controlled with the TV cable, which is linked to the throttle blade. Electronic transmissions didnt start until 93 and up I THINK, but don't quote me on that. But SOMETIME during Gen 4.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2003 | 10:50 PM
  #3  
Doward's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 1
From: Gainesville, FL
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
Hydraulically controlled... yep... hey, what'd you run at the track?
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2003 | 12:01 AM
  #4  
TomP's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 13,414
Likes: 6
From: Central NJ, USA
Car: 1986 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 V6
Transmission: 700R4
A bit more info; shift points and firmness is not controlled by the TV cable. The TV cable affects the line pressure (fluid pressure) inside the trans. And in turn, the line pressure affects shift points and firmness- to an extent. The major function of the TV cable is to keep enough pressure inside the trans so the clutches don't run dry and burn up!!

Just figured I'd give the "rest" of the story as far as that goes
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2003 | 12:14 AM
  #5  
Nixon1's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,931
Likes: 0
From: Palm Bay, Florida, USA
Car: 95 E-150 & 07 Kawasaki ZX-6R
Engine: A slow one & a fast one
Transmission: A bad one & a good one
Axle/Gears: A weak one & a chained one
As usual, Tom chiming in to correct my inaccuracies. Thanks Tom.

Funny side note...I don't know why....but all my Ford friends refuse to believe that they're actually called 'TV cables'. They all refer to them as 'kickdown cables', and when I try to explain that a TV cable and a kickdown cable are not the same, they tell me I'm an idiot and that a TV cable is for a TV not a transmission. Arrgh, I hate people.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
seiplentz
DFI and ECM
35
Aug 19, 2019 06:02 PM
customblackbird
Power Adders
71
Oct 1, 2015 04:30 PM
someone972
Transmissions and Drivetrain
6
Aug 30, 2015 12:52 AM
Eric-86sc
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
0
Aug 24, 2015 09:01 PM
illegal87
Tech / General Engine
3
Mar 29, 2001 07:38 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:50 AM.