Maf
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
From: Storrs, CT
Car: Black 89 Camaro RS w/t-tops
Engine: 2.8L (173ci) v6
Transmission: 700r4
Maf
i did a search and looked thorugh some posts but didn't notice any comments about this. Im away from my car for a few days due to exams and stuff, but I was wondering if are MAF sensors are screened, meaning is there a screen surrounding the actual sensor that may hurt air flow. This is just off the top of my head because I remember seeing a post before that suggested using a razor blade to cut the screening out....could have been a different forum...
Thanks,
Dave M.
-----------------------
no comment
Thanks,
Dave M.
-----------------------
no comment
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,111
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, BC
Car: '86 Camaro SC, '16 QX60
Engine: 2.8 V6 POWER, 3.5L V6 N/A
Transmission: T-5, CVT
I recall there being some sort of honeycomb screen in front on the sensor. I wouldn't recommend cutting it out. Whether it's for catching debris or straightening the air I don't know, but I doubt it would help too much and it might even hurt.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
From: Storrs, CT
Car: Black 89 Camaro RS w/t-tops
Engine: 2.8L (173ci) v6
Transmission: 700r4
*** i hope it isn't for catching debris because that means my air filters are junk....but thanks for the info, I was hoping I wasn't a morron, but maybe someone else will catch this thread and let me know what happens when you cut it or if its even been done before.
Dave
Dave
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,111
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, BC
Car: '86 Camaro SC, '16 QX60
Engine: 2.8 V6 POWER, 3.5L V6 N/A
Transmission: T-5, CVT
You wouldn't think it would be for catching debris, but one time when I took a look at the MAF screen there was a few small particles stuck in it. Not sure how they got in there. Maybe the filter got something on the inside before it was put in.
Supreme Member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ, USA
Car: '99 Trans Am, '86 Camaro
Engine: LS1, Scrap
Transmission: T56, T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Stock ZT, 3.42 Open
Our frequency film MAFs are inaccurate without a straight airflow, hence the honeycomb screen. Removal is not reccomended.
Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 1
From: Gainesville, FL
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
Screw inaccuracy - if you remove the screens, you'll screw up the amount of air flowing vs fq signal given, and you'll need to rescale your maf tables in accordance.
Problem is, nobody seems to know what fq vs cfm there is, stock vs screens removed.
Problem is, nobody seems to know what fq vs cfm there is, stock vs screens removed.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
From: Storrs, CT
Car: Black 89 Camaro RS w/t-tops
Engine: 2.8L (173ci) v6
Transmission: 700r4
i think we need to find someone that has the ability to find this information....could be helpful if someone desicovered how to make adjustments.
Guess we'll see...
Dave
Guess we'll see...
Dave
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BumpaD82
Tech / General Engine
37
Feb 26, 2016 02:57 PM
[For Sale] 4" Spectre MAF Housing/LS7 MAF/Coupler
Ikes 91Z
LSX and LTX Parts
0
Sep 13, 2015 09:03 AM




