Article for Doward:
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 1
From: Houston
Car: 86 Berlinetta 84 MonteCL
Engine: 3.4 MPFI 3.8 229
Transmission: 700r4 T350
Article for Doward:
I'm sure he already knows what he's doing (he IS a 60* turbo pioneer after all...
) But I found this article and found it rather informative (especially the math and formulas).
http://www.autospeed.com/cms/article.html?&A=0122
The plenum should be about 80% of the displacement of the engine.....WTF was GM thinking when they made our intakes???!!!
) But I found this article and found it rather informative (especially the math and formulas).http://www.autospeed.com/cms/article.html?&A=0122
The plenum should be about 80% of the displacement of the engine.....WTF was GM thinking when they made our intakes???!!!
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,040
Likes: 1
From: High plains of NM
Car: 89 Firebird
Engine: L98
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.73
In maximum boost they say:
The plenum volume should be a function of engine displacement-in general 50-70%.
On a side note it also says that the plenum should be several times the size of a cylinder.
I have herd of some plenums being the size of the engine or more.
This is strange, How build and mod SBC V-8 cylinder heads says that Al heads are best for turbo but Iron heads make more power. I'll keep my iron heads.
The plenum volume should be a function of engine displacement-in general 50-70%.
On a side note it also says that the plenum should be several times the size of a cylinder.
I have herd of some plenums being the size of the engine or more.
This is strange, How build and mod SBC V-8 cylinder heads says that Al heads are best for turbo but Iron heads make more power. I'll keep my iron heads.
Last edited by oil pan 4; Dec 24, 2004 at 03:21 AM.
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 870
Likes: 1
From: Savannah, GA
Car: 3
Engine: inboard
Transmission: underfloor
What was GM thinking? That they needed to design an intake for the V6's that would fit a variety of vehicle applications- maximum horsepower wasn't the goat!
Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 1
From: Gainesville, FL
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
Eric's got it right, as far as GM's thinking. They were looking for maximum torque, and they did it!
That was a good little article... 80% plenum? That's a bit on the high side for me
That was a good little article... 80% plenum? That's a bit on the high side for me
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 1
From: Houston
Car: 86 Berlinetta 84 MonteCL
Engine: 3.4 MPFI 3.8 229
Transmission: 700r4 T350
Originally posted by Doward
Eric's got it right, as far as GM's thinking. They were looking for maximum torque, and they did it!
That was a good little article... 80% plenum? That's a bit on the high side for me
Eric's got it right, as far as GM's thinking. They were looking for maximum torque, and they did it!
That was a good little article... 80% plenum? That's a bit on the high side for me
). It had nothing to do with power delivery, or generating max torque. Intake design doesn't have that big an effect on turbo applications (unless you're losing boost after the TB). Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 218
Likes: 1
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 5.0L TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.73
it's only used on F-body cars FYI
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 1
From: Houston
Car: 86 Berlinetta 84 MonteCL
Engine: 3.4 MPFI 3.8 229
Transmission: 700r4 T350
Originally posted by LinuxGuy
Just FYI: The intake on the F-Body 2.8L and 3.1L V6 engines is most commonly found under an F-Body hood, however, I've seen it on a few other GM cars. I'm pretty sure the Fieros used a version with just a different angle on the throttle-body neck, and I've seen this intake design on some front-wheel drive GM cars at the local wrecking yard. I think it was a 2.8L Cavalier perhaps, I can't remember for sure...
Just FYI: The intake on the F-Body 2.8L and 3.1L V6 engines is most commonly found under an F-Body hood, however, I've seen it on a few other GM cars. I'm pretty sure the Fieros used a version with just a different angle on the throttle-body neck, and I've seen this intake design on some front-wheel drive GM cars at the local wrecking yard. I think it was a 2.8L Cavalier perhaps, I can't remember for sure...
Trending Topics
Senior Member

Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 694
Likes: 0
From: Glasgow Kentucky
Car: 04 Vette
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.73
Originally posted by FbodTrek
Not the same though, lol. The lower runners are different lengths, the plenums are shaped differently, even the throttle body designs are different. I have a few FWD 2.8L intakes at the shop, as well as an upper manifold for a Fiero. The design used on the RWD F-body is F-body only. The FWD motors, while of the same displacement, were quite different from our RWD counterparts.
Not the same though, lol. The lower runners are different lengths, the plenums are shaped differently, even the throttle body designs are different. I have a few FWD 2.8L intakes at the shop, as well as an upper manifold for a Fiero. The design used on the RWD F-body is F-body only. The FWD motors, while of the same displacement, were quite different from our RWD counterparts.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Street Lethal
Miscellaneous Third Gen Items!
0
Sep 7, 2015 01:09 PM




