V6 Discussion and questions about the base carbureted or MPFI V6's and the rare SFI Turbo V6.

Should I buy it???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 2, 2006 | 01:15 PM
  #1  
dark_daku89's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
From: Winnipeg, MB
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 355 Carbed
Transmission: Th350
Axle/Gears: 2.73
Should I buy it???

Hi,
I'm pretty new to this place so i guess u gotta bare with me. Currently, I was looking at an 89 Camaro Rs v6 with 93,000 km's on it. The body is in mint condition and all of the mechanics are good. The only thing i was worried about is the engine because i was told by my mechanic that 2.8 l v6 mpfi engines aren't reliable. Is this true? What problem areas should i also look for? I would really like to get this car because of its condition. Everything in the car is original.
Thanks
Chris
Reply
Old May 2, 2006 | 01:20 PM
  #2  
Slow2.8's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
I'm sorry to say this, but your mechanic is wrong. The chevy 2.8 is on the strongest v6's ever made by chevy. I have a 89 RS also with 150,000 miles and she still runs strong and is a very reliable car that is driven/raced daily.
Reply
Old May 2, 2006 | 01:23 PM
  #3  
Drew's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (58)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 20,310
Likes: 1,068
From: Salina, KS
The only reliability problem is that the 2.8 doesn't like abuse. They tend to drop rods through the block if they're abused. The best way to judge the car is on overall condition. Are the tires bald? Oil burnt? Transmission fluid burnt? Low levels?

Then ask yourself why you're interested in a V6 Fbody... if its because you want to go fast, then definitely pass. A V6 Fbody won't scratch that itch very long and making it faster costs more money then the same car with a V8. Parts aren't cheap anymore. They aren't hard to work on, but at the same time if you don't know what you're doing its just as hard as any other car.

With regular oil changes, and 10w-30 oil, a 2.8 should be able to go 150,000 miles with no problem.
Reply
Old May 2, 2006 | 01:43 PM
  #4  
daves12secV6's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,472
Likes: 1
From: Sayreville NJ
[QUOTE=Drew]The only reliability problem is that the 2.8 doesn't like abuse. They tend to drop rods through the block if they're abused. [QUOTE]
lmfao ive got a 2.8 here with 135,000 on it it sees 7,000+rpm daily,if thats not abuse i dont know what is,and the cars never missed a beat
Reply
Old May 2, 2006 | 02:07 PM
  #5  
Slow2.8's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
Exactly dave, i do the same thing, these motors are SOLID. just change the oil every 2,500 at most or when its black.
Reply
Old May 2, 2006 | 02:10 PM
  #6  
Drew's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (58)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 20,310
Likes: 1,068
From: Salina, KS
What do you guys want? A picture of 5 2.8 blocks with daylight showing through the holes? Keep em turning 7,000+, I hope you have another engine ready to go in. Get em hot, let the oil pressure drop and they'll blow just as easily as anything else out there. If you don't believe it you've never been around many of them.
Reply
Old May 2, 2006 | 02:12 PM
  #7  
Xophertony's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,733
Likes: 2
From: Or-eh-gun
Car: 2012 Nissan Leaf
Engine: 80-kW AC synchronous electric motor
Transmission: Automatic
Axle/Gears: n/a
i also used to beat the hell out of mine... i think drew means "boost" style abuse. as long as you leave it mostly stock i don't think you will blow it up no matter how hard you try. believe me, i tried

but one thing is for certain... drew is right, they are not fast. they "can be fast", but so can anything with money. i spend under 5K and bought myself an 88 Trans AM GTA, 350 V8. that is a fast car. makes the 2K i bought the v6 for and the ~3K i spent building it up (suspension mostly) look like a waste of money. great cruisers though. also alot of fun in the corners... handles way better then my GTA. another thing to be aware of. my well tuned GTA gets 15.5 MPG . the 2.8 in ok tune got 23 MPG. at one point when it was in better tune (and more stock) i got 35MPG highway (portland to LA in two days)

also if it's an auto run away. you will hate life. nothing is slower then an auto 2.8. my sister used to have one. it's almost as much of an embarassment as an iron duke (2.5L 4 cyl)
Reply
Old May 2, 2006 | 02:17 PM
  #8  
Slow2.8's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
I have an auto 2.8 and its not UNbelievable slow, it has some nice power to it with a few mods here and there.
Reply
Old May 2, 2006 | 02:18 PM
  #9  
daves12secV6's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,472
Likes: 1
From: Sayreville NJ
xophertony mines an auto,though its far from stock but it is a 14sec car now soon to be much faster with the new turbo motor
Reply
Old May 2, 2006 | 02:28 PM
  #10  
Drew's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (58)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 20,310
Likes: 1,068
From: Salina, KS
The 2.8 is inclined to high rpm failure. Check with the guys who run them and they'll tell you the same thing. It doesn't take much to knock out the bearings and catastrophic failure isn't far behind. Treat them right and they'll last, but abuse them much and they won't hold together.

ps the 700R4 is junk regardless of what its bolted to... put much power to it, abuse it, and it'll cause all kinds of grief. Not to mention its extremelly expensive and difficult to replace. The labor is easy, finding a good used one or getting one rebuilt, that's the hard part.
Reply
Old May 2, 2006 | 02:40 PM
  #11  
daves12secV6's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,472
Likes: 1
From: Sayreville NJ
one thing i agree with is the 700r4 in stock form is junk,mostly prone to losing 4th gear,and just gennerally burning up behind anything with power,mine happens to run the 2004r swaped out along time ago,but with the new turbo engine going in im swaping back to a built 700r4 and converter(deff was not cheap)
drew gm rates the bottom end in stock form to 7000 rpm,but granted if u run anyhting hot/low on oil/old oil etc @ hi rpms its not gonna last long,same goes for detonation pinging etc,the engine must be kept in top tune/running order to survive under these conditions

The only problem ive had with mine is valve start to float around 7,8-7,900 rpm,but that should be fixed with the new ls1 valve springs on the turbo motor
Reply
Old May 2, 2006 | 03:18 PM
  #12  
dark_daku89's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
From: Winnipeg, MB
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 355 Carbed
Transmission: Th350
Axle/Gears: 2.73
thanks guys, this will help me out alot! Yeah i'm not the one that abuses cars,
Reply
Old May 2, 2006 | 03:26 PM
  #13  
Xophertony's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,733
Likes: 2
From: Or-eh-gun
Car: 2012 Nissan Leaf
Engine: 80-kW AC synchronous electric motor
Transmission: Automatic
Axle/Gears: n/a
i would liketo point out that everyone who said their auto is not slow has modded it. i am talking 150K stock engine. plus autos suck. i want to put a six speed in my GTA.
Reply
Old May 2, 2006 | 03:34 PM
  #14  
Toehead's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,123
Likes: 0
From: North Central Mass.
Car: 1985 Berlinetta
Engine: Megasquirted TPI
Transmission: Transgo 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
my auto 2.8 is pretty slow. It is also the only motor i've ever had that doesnt turn the oil black in a hundred miles. My 2000k oil is almost the same color it went in.
Reply
Old May 2, 2006 | 03:57 PM
  #15  
TomP's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 13,414
Likes: 6
From: Central NJ, USA
Car: 1986 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 V6
Transmission: 700R4
Originally Posted by Drew
The only reliability problem is that the 2.8 doesn't like abuse. They tend to drop rods through the block if they're abused.
Funny, after my 12 years of driving my car, I've got it up to 286,000 miles- and I regularly stomped the throttle. The only internal thing I've done was the timing chain.

Then again, I never pushed it up to 7000 RPMS. I'd expect any production 80's motor to fail at that point!
Reply
Old May 5, 2006 | 11:58 AM
  #16  
1988CamaroSC's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 711
Likes: 2
From: Adirondacks, New York
Car: 92 Camaro RS
Engine: 5.0L
Transmission: AUTO, 56k orig
ANYWAY, to the starter or this thread, if the price is right, the car is in good shape, and you just want a cruiser, BUY IT, ive had a blast with my 88 2.8 maro AUTO...she only has 71 going on 72 k but still, no issues, granted it has nothing on my x 85 trans am but, like i said above, go for it! any motor head can swap in a 350 in a weekend with a couple beers down the road....
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BrianChevy
Wheels and Tires
10
Aug 8, 2019 02:16 PM
Reid Fleming
TPI
2
Oct 10, 2015 09:56 PM
Agent507943
Firebirds Wanted
1
Oct 2, 2015 07:18 AM
IROC ZELLER
Engine Swap
6
Sep 29, 2015 03:00 PM
J. Chris Davis
Interior Parts Wanted
2
Sep 28, 2015 11:55 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:27 AM.