V6 Discussion and questions about the base carbureted or MPFI V6's and the rare SFI Turbo V6.

dual cats

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 25, 2000 | 10:05 PM
  #1  
Monkie's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 2,356
Likes: 0
From: Greenville, SC
dual cats

Ok, dual cats = more HP right? So can I do this to my car? If so how? Would I have to make it custom? Thanks!

------------------
1992 Camaro RS 3.1L
T5 Manual 5 speed
Open Air Intake
Z-28 Exhaust
8.5mm MSD Ignition wires
TB Coolant bypass

Kills:

95 (****) Probe GT
94 4.6L Mustang
91 CRX (dont ask me why he raced me)
2nd Gen Z28 (350) haha to you V8 guys!
More to come
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2000 | 12:31 AM
  #2  
FAST RS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,937
Likes: 0
From: Moorpark
Car: 1991 CAMARO 1968 FIREBIRD
Engine: CAMARO 3.1L FIREBIRD 455
Transmission: CAMARO 700R4 FIREBIRD TH-400
I dont think dual cats would increase HP if anythign it would give more back pressure also i think it only would work if you have dual exhaust.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2000 | 01:20 AM
  #3  
Grim Reaper's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 10,907
Likes: 5
From: The Bone Yard
Car: Death Mobile
Engine: 666 c.i.
I disagree. Dual cats will reduce the restriction...it got about 10 HP on the L98s when they offered both exhaust options.

But for a V6, a good high-flow 3" single cat would probably be just as effective at a much lower cost.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2000 | 04:41 PM
  #4  
Brian K's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,218
Likes: 1
From: Orlando,Fl, USA


On a V6 exhaust, most of us have a Y-pipe to 1 cat to 1 muffler out in 2 tips right? Then how could tossing anohter cat converter in that series offer any benefit?
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2000 | 06:18 PM
  #5  
Grim Reaper's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 10,907
Likes: 5
From: The Bone Yard
Car: Death Mobile
Engine: 666 c.i.
Brian, Monkie is not talking about having 2 cats in SERIES...he is talking about PARALLEL, like the later model SD L98s and TPI 305 G92 cars. They have one cat off of each bank of cylinders and a y-pipe AFTER the cats into a single intermediate pipe...or into individual duals.

I agree that having 2 cats in series would not be a good move for performance and questionable for emissions. I think that is the method used by cars in certain Eastern Europe for US export.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2000 | 07:11 PM
  #6  
scoob8000's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
From: pittsburgh, pa
Car: 95 Caprice
Engine: 5.7l LT1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.93
as far as a hp gain, dual cats on a single exhaust setup would be pointless..
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2000 | 07:21 PM
  #7  
Jason E's Avatar
2011 Norwood Gathering
ThirdGen Firebird Rep
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 3,435
Likes: 4
From: Sarasota FL
Car: 99 WS6 / 00 SS / 11 CTS-V / 13 300
Engine: LS1 / LS1 / LSA / 5.7 Hemi
Transmission: 4L60E / T-56 / 6L80E / W5A80
Axle/Gears: 3.23 / 3.42 Auburn / 3.23 / 2.62
Dude, it ain't. As Glenn said, it gave 10 extra HP on a 305. Is it wise on a 3.1 though? I dunno...it might give ya an extra 5hp if it gives a 305 10.

At least its a better idea than gutting a cat...but I won't go there

------------------
Jason E
'89 Camaro RS 2.8
Hypertech chip/K&N filters/Accel 8.8 wires,coil/RapidFires
Eclipse CD and 100x4 amp/Boston plates and 6x9s

JasonEE98 on AOL IM
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2000 | 07:43 PM
  #8  
Monkie's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 2,356
Likes: 0
From: Greenville, SC
Im glad SOME of you guys understand what I am talking about. For those guys who are lost I am talking about having the 2 cats BEFORE the Y pipe. And how is it stupid? What was it the IROCs that they did that to? And it gave them 10 HP. So how is it stupid? Anyways to you guys that understand would it be possible and a good idea? Thanks!

------------------
1992 Camaro RS 3.1L
T5 Manual 5 speed
Open Air Intake
Z-28 Exhaust
8.5mm MSD Ignition wires
TB Coolant bypass

Kills:

95 (****) Probe GT
94 Mustang GT
91 CRX (dont ask me why he raced me)
2nd Gen Z28 (350) haha to you V8 guys!
1992 RS 305 TBI (good race)
More to come
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2000 | 12:36 AM
  #9  
FAST RS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,937
Likes: 0
From: Moorpark
Car: 1991 CAMARO 1968 FIREBIRD
Engine: CAMARO 3.1L FIREBIRD 455
Transmission: CAMARO 700R4 FIREBIRD TH-400
Oh i thoght you wanted 2 cats ehind eachother my bad.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2000 | 12:56 AM
  #10  
Tas's Avatar
Tas
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 4,310
Likes: 1
you need to check the area of the pipes to see if its worth it. If the 2 pipes going into the single pipe have more area than the single pipe then its worth it.

On the dual cat v8 cars, 2 cats were on a 2.25" pipe each, and the single cat was on a single 2.75" pipe.
Area of two 2.25" pipes = 7.95 sq. in.
Area of single 2.75" pipe = 5.94 sq. in.

get it?

while I have the calculator out:
Area of single 3" pipe = 7.07 sq. in
dual 2.5" = 9.82
dual 2" = 6.28
single 3.5" = 9.62

------------------
-Tas
'89 Formula WS-6
[soon to be Performace Red =) ]

305, TBI, auto, 14x3 chrome flat based open element with K&N, functional Formula hood, cross-flow Flowmaster, '99z28 rear pipes and tips....

Super GRK_Taz World
EFI & Intake Options
AOL IM: superGRtaz
ICQ 82881207

[This message has been edited by Tas (edited November 27, 2000).]
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2000 | 11:13 AM
  #11  
Jason E's Avatar
2011 Norwood Gathering
ThirdGen Firebird Rep
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 3,435
Likes: 4
From: Sarasota FL
Car: 99 WS6 / 00 SS / 11 CTS-V / 13 300
Engine: LS1 / LS1 / LSA / 5.7 Hemi
Transmission: 4L60E / T-56 / 6L80E / W5A80
Axle/Gears: 3.23 / 3.42 Auburn / 3.23 / 2.62
Tas is right...just remember though Monkie, doing a dual cat setup is pretty costly. I remember seeing aftermarket setups in "Next Generation Restoration and Performance Parts" for like $500 or so...you might be able to construct your own setup though with a pair of Catcos or something...not too sure.

IMO, do some ignition mods or something else first. It'd suck to spend a fair amount of time and money to do this and not get out what you're hoping. Remember, 305s and 350s gained 10hp from this, not V6s

If you want to build the ULTIMATE 6, then I'd say go for it...but only after you get some other stuff done 1st, like a 3.4 swap!
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2000 | 01:15 PM
  #12  
TomP's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 13,414
Likes: 6
From: Central NJ, USA
Car: 1986 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 V6
Transmission: 700R4
For the money it would cost, a gain would be minimal. More of a gain would be seen on a larger (V8) motor.


------------------
-Tom P (Hot rodded 1986 Firebird 2.8l) from http://www.f-body.net/mailbag/3rd/3rd_mailbag.html message boards
---Think your car could be pic of the week? Visit http://www.f-body.net for details!
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2000 | 06:41 PM
  #13  
Monkie's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 2,356
Likes: 0
From: Greenville, SC
Yea I think I will do the 3.4L maybe first.

------------------
1992 Camaro RS 3.1L
T5 Manual 5 speed
Open Air Intake
Z-28 Exhaust
8.5mm MSD Ignition wires
TB Coolant bypass

Kills:

95 (****) Probe GT
94 Mustang GT
91 CRX (dont ask me why he raced me)
2nd Gen Z28 (350) haha to you V8 guys!
1992 RS 305 TBI (good race)
More to come
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LT1Formula
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
7
Oct 8, 2015 08:34 PM
jaridjohn
Exhaust
14
Oct 5, 2015 07:01 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:13 PM.