V6 Discussion and questions about the base carbureted or MPFI V6's and the rare SFI Turbo V6.

4.5L caddy v8

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 14, 2001 | 11:16 AM
  #1  
Ryan_Alswede's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 0
From: Garland, TX, USA
Car: 1992 Camaro RS & 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1 L v6 & 305 (5.0L) v8
Transmission: 4L60 Auto
4.5L caddy v8

What is a 4.5L caddy V8, is it a 305 just storked shorter and anyway or use of this in a camaro.
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2001 | 07:06 PM
  #2  
KED85's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,604
Likes: 1
From: ****SoCal, USA****
What do yo mean, is it a NorthStar Engine?
That can fit the F-Body V-6 tranny (700R4).
Was it an engine option under this F3 hood?
No.
Wana be the first?
I think it would be a superb swap.
Wiring would be hell, tho!

------------------
Chat Soon,
KED85
Karl
1985 Firebird 2.8 to 3.4 swap project for Smog Happy LA, CA
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2001 | 07:30 PM
  #3  
Brian K's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,218
Likes: 1
From: Orlando,Fl, USA


I once heard caddy v8's were 60 degree and would bolt to our trannys...
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2001 | 09:19 PM
  #4  
87CamaroLT's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
From: Spotsylvania, Va.
Oh really? Hmmm.... this could become interesting. God knows any motor that can move a 5500lb. Caddy that fast could definitely motivate our little (big) F-Bodies...
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2001 | 09:41 PM
  #5  
Ryan_Alswede's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 0
From: Garland, TX, USA
Car: 1992 Camaro RS & 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1 L v6 & 305 (5.0L) v8
Transmission: 4L60 Auto
I'm talking about the small caddy V8 in those early 90's caddys, I don't know if they were rear wheel drive but will check, that would be neat in a way but better of just doing the 350 because of the wiring, just a thought out of no where.
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2001 | 10:14 PM
  #6  
85maro's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
From: monett , mo usa
My parents had a 92 caddy 4.5, first of all the engine sat side ways and all caddys are front wheel drive so i guess it will no work.

Tim
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2001 | 10:26 PM
  #7  
Project: 85 2.8 bird's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,461
Likes: 0
From: BFE, MD
Car: 13 Ram 1500/ 78 Formy
Engine: 5.7 / 7.4
Transmission: 6sp / TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.55 posi / 3.23
my dad has a 92 deville w/a 4.9engine. This was the last year before the northstars came out. It is fwd, about the size of the late 80's bonnevilles.

------------------
85 Firebird. $150.00
2.8 Auto.
Blown Head Gasket.
Mods Galore to Come....
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2001 | 10:56 PM
  #8  
Ryan_Alswede's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 0
From: Garland, TX, USA
Car: 1992 Camaro RS & 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1 L v6 & 305 (5.0L) v8
Transmission: 4L60 Auto
Not really a great engine, anybody know any more v6s other then the 3.4L that we could use and COULD the 3.4L block be bored out more for more diplacement????
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2001 | 06:45 AM
  #9  
Project: 85 2.8 bird's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,461
Likes: 0
From: BFE, MD
Car: 13 Ram 1500/ 78 Formy
Engine: 5.7 / 7.4
Transmission: 6sp / TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.55 posi / 3.23
Isn't the "ShortStar", as found in the soon-to-be defunct Oldsmobile, a 60* v6? if so, ther you have it, enjoy the swap and a 500 cuss word limit while doing the rewiring.
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2001 | 08:24 AM
  #10  
Deimos's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
From: houston,tx
If you can actually get your hand on a 1984-1987 regal gran national 3.8 turbo or a T-type it can fit our cars. its the same engine that's in the tta except for a smaller head that way it can have clearance. This is what Im thinking of doing. Correct me if im wrong but I do believe that it can hook up to our trannys too.(not to certain though).
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2001 | 09:17 AM
  #11  
Project: 85 2.8 bird's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,461
Likes: 0
From: BFE, MD
Car: 13 Ram 1500/ 78 Formy
Engine: 5.7 / 7.4
Transmission: 6sp / TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.55 posi / 3.23
The 3.8 is a 90* V6, 2.8, 3.1, & 3.4 are 60* V6. if you do the 3.8 swap, you need a new trans.
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2001 | 09:35 AM
  #12  
KED85's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,604
Likes: 1
From: ****SoCal, USA****
The Caddy engine MAY be (in THAT Caddy engine bay) a east-west, but it will adapt to our F3 700R4 tranny, without to much trouble.
MANY hot rodders are doing this MANY!, as the yards are filling up with them, now.
BUT, as I said, wiring would be hell AND if ya gotta deal with emission & smog, NO WAY will it pass, atleast in CA. This engine was never offered in our platform.
NOW, can a 3.4 be bored out?
SURE
BUT, get one with LOW MILES so all ya need do is open, insert and close hood.
Can ya MAKE A TTA 3.8, sure, we've discussed this often, too. And Kyle was kind enough to throw in the details, too.
Ya gotta make a plan, and a budget and work with it.
When I did my swap, I was pushed. I blew my 2.8 and I needed the car back, fast. Did I luck out? I was fortunate to score 4 3.4 engines to choose from. I chose mine & worked it under the hood.
Figure out a budget and a plan and seek out the good for your skills options. I've offered what I can about the 3.4 swap to make it easier for others, because it is a wise option. AND FOR ME, CA emissions played out a big part of my decision, too!
IF ya wanna high horsepower everything, seriously, go get a V-8 car to work on. WAY cheaper in the long run. I've read magainze artilces people buying them (V-8 cars) for as low as $200, running and looking decent.
SO CAN YOU!
All I can say is that it's not the 50's/60's/70's where people were throwing away everything for new cars, then. Back in Feb 22, 1972 at about 6 pm, my Dad bought my 1966 Corvette for $1,750. Complete.
I wish I had a time machine, it would have to be very large for all you guys!!!
PS I also remember exactly when I killed my Baby, Sept 30th, 1975 at about 5-6 pm. The same time James Dean died back in 1955.

------------------
Chat Soon,
KED85
Karl
1985 Firebird 2.8 to 3.4 swap project for Smog Happy LA, CA
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2001 | 09:52 AM
  #13  
Drew's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (58)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 20,309
Likes: 1,064
From: Salina, KS
Why would anyone want a 4.5 in a thirdgen? Thats like taking a step down from the 3.1.
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2001 | 10:34 AM
  #14  
Ryan_Alswede's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 0
From: Garland, TX, USA
Car: 1992 Camaro RS & 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1 L v6 & 305 (5.0L) v8
Transmission: 4L60 Auto
Just a thought!!!!
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2001 | 11:05 AM
  #15  
KED85's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,604
Likes: 1
From: ****SoCal, USA****
Actually, GM Engineering did this with a NEW Monte Carlo.
They were very pleased.
BUT, the engine was too "old" to make it pass current US Smog laws, so.........

------------------
Chat Soon,
KED85
Karl
1985 Firebird 2.8 to 3.4 swap project for Smog Happy LA, CA
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2001 | 05:14 PM
  #16  
Tas's Avatar
Tas
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 4,310
Likes: 1
geeze lots of good and bad infor in this post I'm not sure where to start. Caddy v8s are 90* but have the same bolt pattern as the 60* chevy v6s becaus they are FWD. You can get it to pass smog in CA as long as the engine is the same year or newer as your car and have all the smog stuff hooked up. The only sumbling point I see is if the DOHC engine will fit between our shock towers. Caddy FWD engines have been all aluminum since the late 80's.

------------------
-Tas
'89 Formula WS-6

305, TBI, auto, 14x3 chrome flat based open element with K&N, Milodon 160* thermo, functional Formula hood, cross-flow Flowmaster, '99z28 rear pipes and tips....

To be installed eventually far far far into the future: Yours if the price is right and I don't have to ship :
Hooker 1-5/8" 50 state legal headers, Dynomax 3" I pipe (PN 44063 and 43248), Catco 3" cat, and injector spacer.

Super GRK_Taz World
F-Body Dual Exaust
EFI & Intake Options
AOL IM: superGRtaz
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2001 | 05:27 PM
  #17  
KED85's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,604
Likes: 1
From: ****SoCal, USA****
Hi Tas, FROM MY UNDERSTANDING, if that ENGINE IS AN UPGRADE USED ON THE SAME PLATFORM, it has a chance to clear CA smog laws.
BUT, you gotta get it past the smog ref, first.
Am I correct in my understanding?
I mean, our F bodies can have a Turbo 3.8, as it came in a 1989 Firebird (for the cars up to 1989 model year) and ya can throw in a V-8, as they came in all the F3 years.
I THINK, ya can squeeze by on a cat's whisker, if ya want to put a 3.8 turbo in a 1990 & later year 3rd gen.
Educate me, please.
Would love to give others more engine (SMOG LEGAL) options than just a 3.4 & a turbo 3.8 set up.


------------------
Chat Soon,
KED85
Karl
1985 Firebird 2.8 to 3.4 swap project for Smog Happy LA, CA
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2001 | 06:03 PM
  #18  
Tas's Avatar
Tas
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 4,310
Likes: 1
you can put any gas engine from any vehicle that is the same year or newer that is in the same class size. Diesals are another issue

[This message has been edited by Tas (edited August 15, 2001).]
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ex-x-fire
History / Originality
31
Jan 12, 2024 01:58 PM
ChrisFormula355
Power Adders
24
Apr 25, 2002 09:01 PM
kevm14
TBI
14
Apr 11, 2002 06:10 AM
yOp 84 Recaro
Auto Detailing and Appearance
5
Mar 8, 2002 03:12 PM
yOp 84 Recaro
Third Gen Association of Ontario
2
Mar 7, 2002 07:21 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:26 AM.