k not 3rd gen related but still 60* v6. i want to get an intake on my 95 with the 3.4 but i have seen both the morosso and the K&N. which one is better? is there any difference at all? is there any other brands?i took a good look at my stock one and i cant believe how restrictive it is!

------------------
1995 Camaro
3.4 with 4L60E
Stock...for now

Currently being redone:

1988 Camaro
2.8 with T5
threw a rod...
Soon to have a 350 TPI out of an '85 vette...
http://www.nothingssafe.com

 

I used to have a 94 Camaro 3.4L V6 till my bro totaled it. I've looked at the two intakes you're talking about. I don't see any real difference other than the conical filter used. I would prefer K&N because they specialize in intakes. Also it helps that their main office/factory is only a few miles away from me(Riverside, CA)

------------------
1991 Pontiac Firebird V6 W68
Pioneer DEH-7000R, Pioneer 6X9 4way/4X6 2way speakers, MTX 250watt amp, MTX 400watt sub, custom intake, Flowmaster dual exhaust 80 series, PIAA HID headlamp conversions, custom tail lamps(regular F-bird but amber is now red), soon to have 16" Formula wheels.
Future Mods: Ram Air hood(98-up style), 4th gen style rear wing, custom Pearl white paint, 3.4L V6 engine swap, custom headers, the list never ends....

my webpage: www.geocities.com/lilsap23/SEANs_HOME_PAGE.html

[This message has been edited by 91FIREBIRDGT (edited October 26, 2001).]

 

My brother use to have a 95 3.4 and made some nice power with a Moroso. He also used underdrive pullies, MSD ignition, Hooker Cat back and high flow cat. Made the car real peepy.
I also installed a Moroso on a 97 LT1 camaro and it made noticeable difference. Plus it was about $30 cheaper if I remember correctly.
Its personal choice I guess, but they will bot last a ver long time and will be an improvement over stock.


------------------
89 Trans Am Turbo 3.8L All stock 43,000 miles #1053 of 1555

Past Thirdgen:
86 Trans Am w/ built 355TPI with SLP goodies and too much other stuff to List. One sweet *** car, wish I would have had a good enough Job to pay insurance on three cars so I could keep it, but for a 89 Turbo Trans Am w/ Low miles, I think I made the right choice!

 

This is not intended to sound like a bash, just simple physics...

I calculated out a 2.8 draws about 280 CFM at redline once.. (I think.. been a while) so let's say the 3.4 draws 340 CFM.. 400 in case it has a higher redline.. now. These intakes were designed for LT1s drawing.. oh.. 600 CFM? I don't think you'll notice a difference even if there is one, which I doubt there's much of one. Just get that stock restrictive air box taken care of! =)

------------------
'88 Camaro, dark forest green metallic, T-top
LO3 305 TBI/700r4
Performance mods: None yet
Audio mods: swapping system from v6 and building new fiberglass box

'86 Camaro SC, black /w silver racing stripes
2.8l MPFI/700r4 /w special 2nd gear delete option
Misc Mods: Cut air box, '83 Firebird spoiler.
Performance Parts: Accel 8mm wires, SplitFire plugs, Gabriel hijackers.
Audio Mods: Pioneer DEH-P3000, two 12" Optimus Pro Audio subs in hand-made enclosure each powered by a 260 watt Optimus amp. Working on shaving the box for weight.
My Homepage, with pics.

 

If you think the thirdgen intakes are bad you ought to see the ones on the 4thgen forget about what they we designed for because they dont flow enough for the LT!, not even close. Hell they look like there is a like 1" of space at on point for it to breath through. Get the air intake it will make a difference and sound cool to


------------------
89 Trans Am Turbo 3.8L All stock 43,000 miles #1053 of 1555

Past Thirdgen:
86 Trans Am w/ built 355TPI with SLP goodies and too much other stuff to List. One sweet *** car, wish I would have had a good enough Job to pay insurance on three cars so I could keep it, but for a 89 Turbo Trans Am w/ Low miles, I think I made the right choice!

 

Yeah, I've seen the stock ones.. don't remind me, they're scary. But the intakes I was referring to were the *aftermarket* ones designed for the LT1. EITHER is going to flow far more than a v6 needs, so neither is likely to have any significant advantage over the other... unless of course these intakes are designed just for the v6's (like us thirdgenners ever got treatment like that. heh, right).

------------------
'88 Camaro, dark forest green metallic, T-top
LO3 305 TBI/700r4
Performance mods: None yet
Audio mods: swapping system from v6 and building new fiberglass box

'86 Camaro SC, black /w silver racing stripes
2.8l MPFI/700r4 /w special 2nd gear delete option
Misc Mods: Cut air box, '83 Firebird spoiler.
Performance Parts: Accel 8mm wires, SplitFire plugs, Gabriel hijackers.
Audio Mods: Pioneer DEH-P3000, two 12" Optimus Pro Audio subs in hand-made enclosure each powered by a 260 watt Optimus amp. Working on shaving the box for weight.
My Homepage, with pics.