2.8 pontiac switch from EFI to carb
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: adirondack newyork
Car: 1982 z28 crossfire
Engine: 5.0
Transmission: 700r4
2.8 pontiac switch from EFI to carb
my daughters 89 firebird has 2.8, switching from fuel injection to carb.have a carbed engine from 84,how do i get the distributor to work with no computer? i can't seem to find an old vaccum type for this engine. thankyou
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 42
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Welcome aboard thirdgen.org.
Although you're talking about a switch to carb, I moved this from the Carburetor forum to the V6 forum. The V6 guys know their cars, while the Carburetor guys tend to be V8-savvy only.
Although you're talking about a switch to carb, I moved this from the Carburetor forum to the V6 forum. The V6 guys know their cars, while the Carburetor guys tend to be V8-savvy only.
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 6,287
Likes: 41
From: Northwest Ohio
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: Lq4 6.0 SBE s485 turbo E85
Transmission: Fsi th400 stage 4. TSI 5500 st
Axle/Gears: Strange S60 4:10s
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,367
Likes: 15
Car: 1973 Datsun 240Z/ 1985 S-15 Jimmy
Engine: Turbo LX9/To be decided
Transmission: 5-speed/T-5
Axle/Gears: R200 3.90/7.5" 3.73
Re: 2.8 pontiac switch from EFI to carb
Just for reference the EFI dizzy will still work with no ECM, there will only be base timing and what little of a curve there is in the ignition control module. You will not have any ability to have a true advance mechanism or change without an ECM connected to it or a proper vacuum advance dizzy.
Why the change away from EFI?
Why the change away from EFI?
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 10,401
Likes: 5
From: Utah
Car: 89 RS 89 iroc 87 firebird
Engine: 3.1 Turbo/ 355 twin turbo
Transmission: a4 w/ 4500 stall/ a4 / t5
Axle/Gears: strange s60 /w 3:42's
Re: 2.8 pontiac switch from EFI to carb
Just for reference the EFI dizzy will still work with no ECM, there will only be base timing and what little of a curve there is in the ignition control module. You will not have any ability to have a true advance mechanism or change without an ECM connected to it or a proper vacuum advance dizzy.
Why the change away from EFI?
Why the change away from EFI?
im not sur eof the icm in the v6 is a diferent part number or not but it operates in the same manner.
there is no curve its a 10* advance at a set rpm
this can be verified on any car by unplugging the est bypass wire and checking the timing at idle then again at 3500 rpms
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: adirondack newyork
Car: 1982 z28 crossfire
Engine: 5.0
Transmission: 700r4
Re: 2.8 pontiac switch from EFI to carb
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,367
Likes: 15
Car: 1973 Datsun 240Z/ 1985 S-15 Jimmy
Engine: Turbo LX9/To be decided
Transmission: 5-speed/T-5
Axle/Gears: R200 3.90/7.5" 3.73
Re: 2.8 pontiac switch from EFI to carb
on a v8 the gm icm has a 10* advance at 2,500 rpms over base timing when not hooked to an ecm
im not sur eof the icm in the v6 is a diferent part number or not but it operates in the same manner.
there is no curve its a 10* advance at a set rpm
this can be verified on any car by unplugging the est bypass wire and checking the timing at idle then again at 3500 rpms
im not sur eof the icm in the v6 is a diferent part number or not but it operates in the same manner.
there is no curve its a 10* advance at a set rpm
this can be verified on any car by unplugging the est bypass wire and checking the timing at idle then again at 3500 rpms
Verifiable, by running the engine up in RPM, with the bypass disconnected and watching the advance come in, it will continue to advance (slightly) as RPM climbs.. You can also look at the latency tables used in the $8D code (and maybe $32/$6E), and see that the latency curve is just that, a curve. This used to be an old trick, on some vehicles, switch from one ICM to another and gain a few degrees of timing in the upper RPMs. I don't recall what the specific applications were off hand that had the lazier curve, but IIRC it was between truck ICMs and car ICMs.
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,367
Likes: 15
Car: 1973 Datsun 240Z/ 1985 S-15 Jimmy
Engine: Turbo LX9/To be decided
Transmission: 5-speed/T-5
Axle/Gears: R200 3.90/7.5" 3.73
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 10,401
Likes: 5
From: Utah
Car: 89 RS 89 iroc 87 firebird
Engine: 3.1 Turbo/ 355 twin turbo
Transmission: a4 w/ 4500 stall/ a4 / t5
Axle/Gears: strange s60 /w 3:42's
Re: 2.8 pontiac switch from EFI to carb
There IS a slight curve in the ICM, hence why you need to match the latency tables correctly in order to have correct timing at the crank to what is being commanded.
Verifiable, by running the engine up in RPM, with the bypass disconnected and watching the advance come in, it will continue to advance (slightly) as RPM climbs.. You can also look at the latency tables used in the $8D code (and maybe $32/$6E), and see that the latency curve is just that, a curve. This used to be an old trick, on some vehicles, switch from one ICM to another and gain a few degrees of timing in the upper RPMs. I don't recall what the specific applications were off hand that had the lazier curve, but IIRC it was between truck ICMs and car ICMs.
Verifiable, by running the engine up in RPM, with the bypass disconnected and watching the advance come in, it will continue to advance (slightly) as RPM climbs.. You can also look at the latency tables used in the $8D code (and maybe $32/$6E), and see that the latency curve is just that, a curve. This used to be an old trick, on some vehicles, switch from one ICM to another and gain a few degrees of timing in the upper RPMs. I don't recall what the specific applications were off hand that had the lazier curve, but IIRC it was between truck ICMs and car ICMs.
its not in the icm , its the delay with increase of rpm of the signal from the icm to the ecm then back to the icm
latency tables are used to correct this foir proper commanded timing
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
theshackle
Tech / General Engine
4
Mar 5, 2017 06:37 PM
beachrodder
Tech / General Engine
7
Aug 25, 2015 08:05 AM
86IROC112
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
4
Aug 17, 2015 02:00 PM








