V6 Discussion and questions about the base carbureted or MPFI V6's and the rare SFI Turbo V6.

160 F Thermostat vs 195 F

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-11-2018, 12:20 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
maroe624's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 728
Received 29 Likes on 22 Posts
Car: 92 Z28
Engine: Ramjet 350
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.23 Torsen
160 F Thermostat vs 195 F

Which is better? I have the 160 and my car really doesn't run like it use to. My temp use to always stay above 200 now I can hardly get above 180. I'm switching back to 195. Its been real cold here in l.a lately.
Old 01-11-2018, 12:42 AM
  #2  
Moderator

iTrader: (2)
 
Six_Shooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,356
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Car: 1973 Datsun 240Z/ 1985 S-15 Jimmy
Engine: Turbo LX9/To be decided
Transmission: 5-speed/T-5
Axle/Gears: R200 3.90/7.5" 3.73
Re: 160 F Thermostat vs 195 F

Run the 180 or 195. The 160 T-Stats are for race cars, or summer only cars that aren't used as daily drivers.
Old 01-11-2018, 12:49 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
maroe624's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 728
Received 29 Likes on 22 Posts
Car: 92 Z28
Engine: Ramjet 350
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.23 Torsen
Re: 160 F Thermostat vs 195 F

Yeah I figured . No wonder my car has been running sluggish.
Old 01-11-2018, 10:11 AM
  #4  
Senior Member

 
zs&tas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: peterborough UK
Posts: 917
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 88 T firebird
Engine: 2.8
Transmission: t5
Re: 160 F Thermostat vs 195 F

I'm running a 180 but thinking of going back to 195 myself. I dont see any gains running 180 , it was more peace of mind not overheating, I think with the fan cutting in at 220 the wider temp range between stat and fan is not a good thing either.
Old 01-11-2018, 02:34 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
maroe624's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 728
Received 29 Likes on 22 Posts
Car: 92 Z28
Engine: Ramjet 350
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.23 Torsen
Re: 160 F Thermostat vs 195 F

Originally Posted by zs&tas
I'm running a 180 but thinking of going back to 195 myself. I dont see any gains running 180 , it was more peace of mind not overheating, I think with the fan cutting in at 220 the wider temp range between stat and fan is not a good thing either.
Yeah 195 is the way to go. I remember when I had it in there and it ran way better. And let me tell you these 3.1s love running hot and they run great too. Ive never had overheating problems ever. I even installed a fan toggle switch just incase.
Old 01-13-2018, 02:04 PM
  #6  
Member

iTrader: (1)
 
Bow_Tied's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 370
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Car: 1987 IROC-Z
Engine: L98 5.7L
Transmission: MD8 700R4
Axle/Gears: G80 GW6 3.27:1
Re: 160 F Thermostat vs 195 F

A lower stat is not going to prevent overheating. It will lower the operating temp if all components are in good OE condition.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
escort_ford84
Cooling
4
01-28-2007 09:10 PM
TransAM Joe
Cooling
10
04-27-2006 08:10 PM
pellmanm
Aftermarket Product Review
13
12-03-2004 08:32 PM
charliet
TBI
3
07-23-2003 10:05 PM
85TA-AZ
Tech / General Engine
5
03-05-2001 08:57 AM



Quick Reply: 160 F Thermostat vs 195 F



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:40 PM.