Iroc vs 3.1
02-25-2019, 12:50 PM
#3
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: In my trans am
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: I drive trans am. Duh
Engine: Yes, I have one in the trans am
Transmission: I have one of those too In trans am
Axle/Gears: In the rear of trans am
Re: Iroc vs 3.1
Spray the 6 and let her fly away....
02-25-2019, 12:57 PM
#4
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Northwest Ohio
Posts: 6,273
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes
on
18 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: BBC 509 Merlin ii 9.6:1 pump gas
Transmission: ATI pro th350 sfi case. TSI 5500 st
Axle/Gears: Strange S60 4:10s
Re: Iroc vs 3.1
I remember back in about 2003 I raced a 1992 z28 with my little ole 3.1l 1991 RS. I dusted him for 1/8 mile after that I was screwed. He blew by me.
But a turd 305 that had like what 165hp.. it will be a close one. Depends on driver.. tires... mechanicals. I'll bet on the 3.1l just because of the 3.23 gears itll have
But a turd 305 that had like what 165hp.. it will be a close one. Depends on driver.. tires... mechanicals. I'll bet on the 3.1l just because of the 3.23 gears itll have
02-25-2019, 02:39 PM
#6
Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: AL
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes
on
8 Posts
Car: 1985 Firebird
Engine: 3.4 turbo
Transmission: Auto
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Iroc vs 3.1
I had a 92 305 tbi and an 85 2.8, both in mechanically sound shape at the same time, and they'd both hit 90mph at exactly the same spot on my old road.
this was back in 05-06
this was back in 05-06
02-25-2019, 07:13 PM
#7
COTM Editor
iTrader: (22)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 9,904
Likes: 0
Received 1,855 Likes
on
1,270 Posts
Car: '89 Firebird
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: T56
Re: Iroc vs 3.1
I'll tell you one thing for sure, one of you has nothing to lose and the other has everything to lose!
Trending Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
89 Iroc Z
Auto Detailing and Appearance
2
10-31-2001 10:06 AM