92 Camaro Wheel/Tire woes...
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Car: '92 RS
Engine: Stock 5.0
Transmission: 700R4
92 Camaro Wheel/Tire woes...
Hi All,
3rd Gen newbie here. Recently purchased a '92 Camaro RS model with a 5.0L TBI motor. The car has 203K miles on it. It has what I believe to be the original stock wheels on it but I could be wrong. They are 5 spoke wheels. The rear wheels have a different offset than the front wheels. The steering knuckles may have been changed on the car. The disc brake calipers have the old allen head retaining bolts - everything I've seen indicates '89 and up had a pin/clip retaining system. The car has rear drum brakes.
Anyway, the suspension on this car was shot so I rebuilt it. New everything - struts, springs, tie-rods, LCA bushings, ball joints, etc. When I was putting the front wheels back on, I noticed that one of the wheels (on the passenger side) had "Rear" stamped/cast in it. It would not go back on the front passenger side although that's where it came from. The outer tie-rod on that side was also bent. Go figure. I found one of the wheels on the rear was supposed to be on the front. So I switched them out and now have fronts on front and rears on rear.
Now, the tire placard on the driver door states that the original tire size was 235/55/16. The current tires are 225/60/16.
And finally, the problem - both the driver and passenger side tires rub on the sway bar and the frame rail. The rub is actually preventing me from doing what I would call "normal" turning. I cannot turn the steering wheel even one full revolution in either direction. The car has what I would call standard duty brakes (10.5 inch rotor, single piston calipers). I would think (though often when I do it's a mistake) that if everything was as it should be, the steering would hit it's limit before the tire could rub on anything.
Any ideas? I can't see the steering knuckles having anything to do with it - the tie-rod ends, ball joints, etc. are the same regardless of year.
Thanks,
David
3rd Gen newbie here. Recently purchased a '92 Camaro RS model with a 5.0L TBI motor. The car has 203K miles on it. It has what I believe to be the original stock wheels on it but I could be wrong. They are 5 spoke wheels. The rear wheels have a different offset than the front wheels. The steering knuckles may have been changed on the car. The disc brake calipers have the old allen head retaining bolts - everything I've seen indicates '89 and up had a pin/clip retaining system. The car has rear drum brakes.
Anyway, the suspension on this car was shot so I rebuilt it. New everything - struts, springs, tie-rods, LCA bushings, ball joints, etc. When I was putting the front wheels back on, I noticed that one of the wheels (on the passenger side) had "Rear" stamped/cast in it. It would not go back on the front passenger side although that's where it came from. The outer tie-rod on that side was also bent. Go figure. I found one of the wheels on the rear was supposed to be on the front. So I switched them out and now have fronts on front and rears on rear.
Now, the tire placard on the driver door states that the original tire size was 235/55/16. The current tires are 225/60/16.
And finally, the problem - both the driver and passenger side tires rub on the sway bar and the frame rail. The rub is actually preventing me from doing what I would call "normal" turning. I cannot turn the steering wheel even one full revolution in either direction. The car has what I would call standard duty brakes (10.5 inch rotor, single piston calipers). I would think (though often when I do it's a mistake) that if everything was as it should be, the steering would hit it's limit before the tire could rub on anything.
Any ideas? I can't see the steering knuckles having anything to do with it - the tie-rod ends, ball joints, etc. are the same regardless of year.
Thanks,
David
Re: 92 Camaro Wheel/Tire woes...
Yes, for one those wheels are marked "front" & "rear" are axle specific and should only be used on those locations. Now comparing tire height.
235/55/16 stock.....26.187 dia
225/60/16 on car......26.63 dia
245/50/16 option....25.65 dia
Your tires overall are larger then stock.
235/55/16 stock.....26.187 dia
225/60/16 on car......26.63 dia
245/50/16 option....25.65 dia
Your tires overall are larger then stock.
Last edited by DJP87Z28; Nov 15, 2009 at 08:23 AM.
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Car: '92 RS
Engine: Stock 5.0
Transmission: 700R4
Re: 92 Camaro Wheel/Tire woes...
Thanks DJP87Z28.
So, the overall height/diameter of the wheel + tire causes this? I thought it would be the width more than the height. I think those wheels are 16x8 - the width of the tire on the car is 225, which is smaller than the factory tire width of 235. I'm not having a problem with the tires rubbing the fenders or wheel wells - it's all good there.
Thanks,
David
So, the overall height/diameter of the wheel + tire causes this? I thought it would be the width more than the height. I think those wheels are 16x8 - the width of the tire on the car is 225, which is smaller than the factory tire width of 235. I'm not having a problem with the tires rubbing the fenders or wheel wells - it's all good there.
Thanks,
David
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Car: '92 RS
Engine: Stock 5.0
Transmission: 700R4
Re: 92 Camaro Wheel/Tire woes...
Here's a dumb question:
When the wheels are off the ground (car on jack stands) there is no interference - the tires/wheels do not rub. Is that normal? I know when the car is on jack stands and the weight is off the wheels the suspension geometry is changed...
Thanks,
David
When the wheels are off the ground (car on jack stands) there is no interference - the tires/wheels do not rub. Is that normal? I know when the car is on jack stands and the weight is off the wheels the suspension geometry is changed...
Thanks,
David
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
84z96L31vortec
Tech / General Engine
7
Aug 20, 2017 12:16 AM





