Suspension and Chassis Questions about your suspension? Need chassis advice?

Question about Wilwood Prop. Valve and Tech. Article

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 11, 2003 | 01:04 AM
  #1  
StocRoc's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
Question about Wilwood Prop. Valve and Tech. Article

Can I gut my stock Prop. valve for the front and rear brakes and basically just use it as a junction box. This way it would send full line pressure to front and rear brakes, then I would use the Wilwood Prop. Valve to adjust the rears.

I did a search and only found people that took the piston and spring out for the rear brakes and not the fronts. There is a piston and spring in the Prop. valve for the front brakes, Right???

This way I wouldn't to cut and flare so many lines. This would basically elimintae the T-fitting in the tech article.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2003 | 11:15 AM
  #2  
Brett H. - 89GTA's Avatar
Member
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
From: SW Ohio
Car: 1989 GTA
Engine: 5.7L
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27 BW 9-bolt
Here's the advice I got on the subject.

https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...hreadid=213653

I'm not looking forward to converting the flares either. I did a bunch of flaring work when I put a line lock on my '79 T/A, so I've done it before. It will be a lot less fun flaring lines while they are in the car. The factory lines are made of a harder steel, too.

I'm looking for ISO/double flare converter couplings so I don't have to reflare the lines. I just started looking; if I find some I'll post where I found them.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2003 | 12:08 PM
  #3  
StocRoc's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
Ya, I read that thread earlier, but thanks for the help. I still want to keep the stock Prop. Valve due to the brake pressure sensor. So basically what I want to know is should I gut the stock Prop. Valve for the front brakes or just leave it stock?

thanks again
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2003 | 10:49 PM
  #4  
StocRoc's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
Anybody see any problems w/ this setup? Or have any suggestions?
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2003 | 01:03 AM
  #5  
Chickenman35's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 896
Likes: 1
From: Coquitlam, BC
Car: 86\92 Mutant
Engine: 355CI 430HP
Transmission: T-5 with mods
Axle/Gears: 7.625", Eaton Posi, 3.73
I would stongly suggest that you do NOT gut the stock Proportioning valve. The front and rear circuits have to be kept separate. If you gut the inside of the prop valve, the front and rear master cylinders can now pump fluid back and forth between them. Trust me...you do NOT want this.

I have seen an attempt to do this before on a Datsun 510. Basic fluid circuitry is the same. What happenned was that every time the brake pedal was pushed, fluid was pumped from the front Master cylinder reservoir into the Rear reservoir. As the Datsun used two separate reservoirs, this soon resulted in the front reservoir being drained and the rear reservoir overflowing. Plus it made for a horrible, long soft pedal.

You also cannot use the Stock proportioning valve with an adjustable rear plumbed in as an extra. This will also result in a long, soggy pedal.

Spend a few more minutes doing the job properly. The results are worth it.

Forget about the stock pressure sensor ( Actually it's a hydraulic shuttle valve ). If that switch is ever triggered, you ain't gonna need no stinkin' light to tell you somethings gone wrong. Light won't come on till pedal is pushed......at the same time your foot goes to the floor

Last edited by Chickenman35; Dec 12, 2003 at 01:08 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2003 | 01:39 AM
  #6  
StocRoc's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
So you're telling me that with the wire unhooked I won't get any light on? If this is the case, then I will do away w/ the stock Prop. Valve altogether. I was just worried about having a warning light on at all times.

thanks
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2003 | 10:25 PM
  #7  
Chickenman35's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 896
Likes: 1
From: Coquitlam, BC
Car: 86\92 Mutant
Engine: 355CI 430HP
Transmission: T-5 with mods
Axle/Gears: 7.625", Eaton Posi, 3.73
Originally posted by StocRoc
So you're telling me that with the wire unhooked I won't get any light on? If this is the case, then I will do away w/ the stock Prop. Valve altogether. I was just worried about having a warning light on at all times.

thanks
Yep..wire disconnected...light is off.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
specialized
TPI
27
Jun 18, 2022 09:26 AM
Cameeeero
Tech / General Engine
22
Sep 18, 2015 04:00 PM
red90IROCls1
Transmissions and Drivetrain
10
Aug 25, 2015 06:56 AM
1985chevydude
Engine Swap
5
Aug 20, 2015 12:29 AM
redmaroz
LTX and LSX
7
Aug 16, 2015 11:40 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:42 PM.