T56 questions with pics
Thread Starter
Supreme Member

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 4
From: Charleston, SC
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
T56 questions with pics
i got this trans from a guy... but he pulled it for me.. all i got were the parts and a box of bolts, so im just double checking where i think everything goes... im pretty confident with the ones i have labled, but i looked all over the trans and still cant figure out where the other, unlabled parts go.... either im missing somthing, or he gave me extra parts.. lol
so can anyone tell me what my mystery bolts/nut/washer are? id guess that the single bolt is the one that goes to the TQ arm bracket, but it looks too long.
also, if i labed any wrong, please lettme know.

also heres my guess on the connectors....
im assuming they're regular weatherpack connectors..... are they, or are they diffrent somehow? is everything labled right?

can anyone positivly tell me what shifter this is? going off of what a friend just told me, i THINK its the hurst shifter option (yay) but im not positive...
so can anyone tell me what my mystery bolts/nut/washer are? id guess that the single bolt is the one that goes to the TQ arm bracket, but it looks too long.
also, if i labed any wrong, please lettme know.

also heres my guess on the connectors....
im assuming they're regular weatherpack connectors..... are they, or are they diffrent somehow? is everything labled right?

can anyone positivly tell me what shifter this is? going off of what a friend just told me, i THINK its the hurst shifter option (yay) but im not positive...
Supreme Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,391
Likes: 1
From: Newark, DE
Car: '86 Camaro, '02 WRX, '87 K5, '67
Engine: 350 TPI, 2.0turbo, 383 in the works, 289-4BBL, 232, A-head 4-cylinder
Transmission: T56, 5-speed, 700R4, C4, T176, semi-auto 2-speed
Axle/Gears: 3.73, 3.90, 4.88, 3.55, 3.54, 7.00
Everything you labeled is correct.
The shifter is stock.
Some of the mystery hardware may be for the torque arm mount.
The shifter is stock.
Some of the mystery hardware may be for the torque arm mount.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 4
From: Charleston, SC
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Originally posted by TKOPerformance
Everything you labeled is correct.
Everything you labeled is correct.
Originally posted by TKOPerformance
The shifter is stock.
The shifter is stock.
Originally posted by TKOPerformance
Some of the mystery hardware may be for the torque arm mount.
Some of the mystery hardware may be for the torque arm mount.
Supreme Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,391
Likes: 1
From: Newark, DE
Car: '86 Camaro, '02 WRX, '87 K5, '67
Engine: 350 TPI, 2.0turbo, 383 in the works, 289-4BBL, 232, A-head 4-cylinder
Transmission: T56, 5-speed, 700R4, C4, T176, semi-auto 2-speed
Axle/Gears: 3.73, 3.90, 4.88, 3.55, 3.54, 7.00
That shifter is totally stock as far as I can tell. It looks just like the one that cam off mine ('95 Z28).
Those self tappers definately don't go into the trans. All the trans case holes are tapped for metric thread bolts.
Those self tappers definately don't go into the trans. All the trans case holes are tapped for metric thread bolts.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 4
From: Charleston, SC
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Originally posted by ScreaminDeamin85Z
the mystery bolts could be for that dust shield dealy
the mystery bolts could be for that dust shield dealy
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,753
Likes: 560
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
That could be the slp shifter. It resembles the stock piece very well. What color is the shifter handle. My 95 shifter handle is black and didn't think it could be unbolted like that. I thought they were a one piece design like the T5 shifter. Whatever it is it is stamped and garbage. Pro5.0 time.
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
Supreme Member

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 4
From: Charleston, SC
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Originally posted by ShiftyCapone
That could be the slp shifter. It resembles the stock piece very well. What color is the shifter handle. My 95 shifter handle is black and didn't think it could be unbolted like that. I thought they were a one piece design like the T5 shifter. Whatever it is it is stamped and garbage. Pro5.0 time.
That could be the slp shifter. It resembles the stock piece very well. What color is the shifter handle. My 95 shifter handle is black and didn't think it could be unbolted like that. I thought they were a one piece design like the T5 shifter. Whatever it is it is stamped and garbage. Pro5.0 time.
black handle.... best pic i have of it sitting on there: http://josh.swoca.net/board/mrdude/newpics/IM000160.JPG
so when you get a pro 5.0, is it just the stick and base? my understanding is theres just a cup under there, and the entire linkage is internal.... so do you pull apart the trans and redo the linkage, or does the pro50 just change the throw ratio and fit tighter into the "cup"
because if its just a tighter fit that makes it feel better, then i can make that work...... :lala:
im probly not going to mess with it right now though.... i want it IN the car and runnin.. then i'll worry about shifter quality
Supreme Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,391
Likes: 1
From: Newark, DE
Car: '86 Camaro, '02 WRX, '87 K5, '67
Engine: 350 TPI, 2.0turbo, 383 in the works, 289-4BBL, 232, A-head 4-cylinder
Transmission: T56, 5-speed, 700R4, C4, T176, semi-auto 2-speed
Axle/Gears: 3.73, 3.90, 4.88, 3.55, 3.54, 7.00
The Pro 5.0 is just a bolt on deal. You don't need to touch the insides of the trans. The shift rail system is internal, but the shifter controls the pre-load of the gates and leverage ratio of the shift arm. The Pro 5.0 is designed to raise the pivot point, which means that the throw is shorter due to a different leverage ratio, not just a cut down stick. It is the most precise, smoothest shifting shifter I've ver used.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 18,457
Likes: 16
From: Loveland, OH, US
Car: 4
Engine: 6
Transmission: 5
Looks exactly like the stock shifter sticking out of the one I have sitting in my garage at the moment.... so I'd be inclined to say it's stock.
I agree, it's stamped sheet metal, it's garbage. If you want it to be as good as possible you should get something else.
I agree, it's stamped sheet metal, it's garbage. If you want it to be as good as possible you should get something else.
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,753
Likes: 560
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Now that you posted the pic with the shifter, that is stock. That is exactly the way mine looks in my 95. I just can't see the base of mine so I thought maybe it could be something else. I also didn't realize that the stock shifter was a two piece deal. The Pro5.0 is cake to install and is also a two piece deal. You will see that the little ball that goes into the tranny is the same as stock. It is in the shifter that makes the throws shorter, and in the base that makes the shifter stronger. The whole unit won't flex like the stock one will. TKO described it perfectly.
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 55
Likes: 6
From: N. KY
Car: 99 T/A Firehawk, 1991 Formula
Engine: LS-1, LB9
Transmission: M6, M5
Axle/Gears: 3.42, 3.42
That shifter IS the Optional Hurst Shifter... exactly like the one I pulled out of my car...
Thread Starter
Supreme Member

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 4
From: Charleston, SC
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Originally posted by HawkFanatic
That shifter IS the Optional Hurst Shifter... exactly like the one I pulled out of my car...
That shifter IS the Optional Hurst Shifter... exactly like the one I pulled out of my car...
cool.. finially someone who realizes im talking about the STOCK OPTION one.. even though i said it earlier
but what makes you so sure? how do i tell them apart?
i looked at a friends trans lastnight, his looked just like mine, but he also says he thinks he has the hurst option.
is the non hurst stock one black instead of gold or what?
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 55
Likes: 6
From: N. KY
Car: 99 T/A Firehawk, 1991 Formula
Engine: LS-1, LB9
Transmission: M6, M5
Axle/Gears: 3.42, 3.42
The optional hurst I think is the only one with the curve in the stick. It should have a rubber isolation bowl at the bottom where it meets the shifter. the shifter (gold part on the tranny) should be very tight to try and shift... move it back and foorth and it should give alot of resistance...
Thread Starter
Supreme Member

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 4
From: Charleston, SC
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Originally posted by HawkFanatic
The optional hurst I think is the only one with the curve in the stick. It should have a rubber isolation bowl at the bottom where it meets the shifter. the shifter (gold part on the tranny) should be very tight to try and shift... move it back and foorth and it should give alot of resistance...
The optional hurst I think is the only one with the curve in the stick. It should have a rubber isolation bowl at the bottom where it meets the shifter. the shifter (gold part on the tranny) should be very tight to try and shift... move it back and foorth and it should give alot of resistance...
it does..
i dont have the shifter to handle bolts, so i cant get a feel for exactly how tight it is.. but it did have that notchy hurst option feel when i did get it to move thru the gears...
but i wasnt positive.
in anycase, i like the stock hurst shifter.... true ive never driven a car with a pro5.0, but until i can afford one, i dont think i even want to try it.... lol. i have more important places to spend my money right now.... like on the supercharger multipoint injection setup... (sooo close, yet so far to go..):lala:
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 55
Likes: 6
From: N. KY
Car: 99 T/A Firehawk, 1991 Formula
Engine: LS-1, LB9
Transmission: M6, M5
Axle/Gears: 3.42, 3.42
The shifter to handle bolts are short little gold pieces... 13mm wrench IIRC.... should be able to pick them up at a junkyard or through the stealer...
The stock hurst is a decent piece, and much better than stock, but doesnt compare to an aftermarket shifter... much better feel..
the problem with the stock hurst is that rubber isolator... doesnt feel as good as a solid metal to metal IMO..
anyway, good luck with the tranny install
The stock hurst is a decent piece, and much better than stock, but doesnt compare to an aftermarket shifter... much better feel..
the problem with the stock hurst is that rubber isolator... doesnt feel as good as a solid metal to metal IMO..
anyway, good luck with the tranny install
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,753
Likes: 560
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by HawkFanatic
The optional hurst I think is the only one with the curve in the stick. It should have a rubber isolation bowl at the bottom where it meets the shifter. the shifter (gold part on the tranny) should be very tight to try and shift... move it back and foorth and it should give alot of resistance...
The optional hurst I think is the only one with the curve in the stick. It should have a rubber isolation bowl at the bottom where it meets the shifter. the shifter (gold part on the tranny) should be very tight to try and shift... move it back and foorth and it should give alot of resistance...
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 55
Likes: 6
From: N. KY
Car: 99 T/A Firehawk, 1991 Formula
Engine: LS-1, LB9
Transmission: M6, M5
Axle/Gears: 3.42, 3.42
He may have the factoy optioned hurst shifter, but it might have a Short Stick.... is he the original owner
Thread Starter
Supreme Member

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 4
From: Charleston, SC
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Originally posted by ShiftyCapone
The stock shifter in my 95 has a curve just like that in that pic. I am pretty sure mine is not a hurst unless you could get it as an option back in 95. My roomate has the hurst factory option in his 02 SS and his does not look like that and is considerably shorter.
The stock shifter in my 95 has a curve just like that in that pic. I am pretty sure mine is not a hurst unless you could get it as an option back in 95. My roomate has the hurst factory option in his 02 SS and his does not look like that and is considerably shorter.
you could get the option with the T56 cars too.
and the LS1 hurst option shifter is the same height as the stock one.... the external diff is that it has the "H" molded into the handle...
my roomate has a 2002 WS6 with the hurst option. its def the stock height.
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,753
Likes: 560
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by MrDude_1
you could get the option with the T56 cars too.
and the LS1 hurst option shifter is the same height as the stock one.... the external diff is that it has the "H" molded into the handle...
my roomate has a 2002 WS6 with the hurst option. its def the stock height.
you could get the option with the T56 cars too.
and the LS1 hurst option shifter is the same height as the stock one.... the external diff is that it has the "H" molded into the handle...
my roomate has a 2002 WS6 with the hurst option. its def the stock height.
Pic one is a good one of the handel
Thread Starter
Supreme Member

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 4
From: Charleston, SC
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Originally posted by HawkFanatic
The shifter to handle bolts are short little gold pieces... 13mm wrench IIRC.... should be able to pick them up at a junkyard or through the stealer...
The shifter to handle bolts are short little gold pieces... 13mm wrench IIRC.... should be able to pick them up at a junkyard or through the stealer...
Originally posted by HawkFanatic
The stock hurst is a decent piece, and much better than stock, but doesnt compare to an aftermarket shifter... much better feel..
the problem with the stock hurst is that rubber isolator... doesnt feel as good as a solid metal to metal IMO..
The stock hurst is a decent piece, and much better than stock, but doesnt compare to an aftermarket shifter... much better feel..
the problem with the stock hurst is that rubber isolator... doesnt feel as good as a solid metal to metal IMO..
then make 3 or 4 of them... and sell em.
ive found that if you're makign one part for your car... and it doesnt suck, others want one too.. so i usually make back the cost of what i made by making a couple extras.... ive gotten several "free" parts and tools that way.

thoes with my stuff, you know who you are

Originally posted by HawkFanatic
anyway, good luck with the tranny install
anyway, good luck with the tranny install
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,753
Likes: 560
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Here is another pic after I took apart the console a bit. I new about the 'H" in the handle but I have the regular old ball. Unless the "H" never came on the handle in a LT1 car.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 4
From: Charleston, SC
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
ive never seen the "H" handle in a LT1 car...
but you do have the leather wrapped ****..
check your RPO codes for BBS = Hurst Shifter Linkage
i THINK thats the correct code...
should be on a sticker on the drivers door or doorframe.
but you do have the leather wrapped ****..
check your RPO codes for BBS = Hurst Shifter Linkage
i THINK thats the correct code...
should be on a sticker on the drivers door or doorframe.
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,753
Likes: 560
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by MrDude_1
ive never seen the "H" handle in a LT1 car...
but you do have the leather wrapped ****..
check your RPO codes for BBS = Hurst Shifter Linkage
i THINK thats the correct code...
should be on a sticker on the drivers door or doorframe.
ive never seen the "H" handle in a LT1 car...
but you do have the leather wrapped ****..
check your RPO codes for BBS = Hurst Shifter Linkage
i THINK thats the correct code...
should be on a sticker on the drivers door or doorframe.
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 55
Likes: 6
From: N. KY
Car: 99 T/A Firehawk, 1991 Formula
Engine: LS-1, LB9
Transmission: M6, M5
Axle/Gears: 3.42, 3.42
BBS is the option code, but I think its for 99-up only...
Are you the original owner?
very easily someone could have picked one up cheap on ebay and installed it...
Are you the original owner?
very easily someone could have picked one up cheap on ebay and installed it...
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,753
Likes: 560
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by HawkFanatic
BBS is the option code, but I think its for 99-up only...
Are you the original owner?
very easily someone could have picked one up cheap on ebay and installed it...
BBS is the option code, but I think its for 99-up only...
Are you the original owner?
very easily someone could have picked one up cheap on ebay and installed it...
Well I have looked at numerous f-body RPO decoders and none of them list or reconise the BBS code. I have tried it for all camaros from 67 to 02. Unless it was an RPO less option. Could that be? Could it be inside the door like SLP options are listed?
Last edited by ShiftyCapone; Feb 18, 2004 at 05:14 PM.
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 55
Likes: 6
From: N. KY
Car: 99 T/A Firehawk, 1991 Formula
Engine: LS-1, LB9
Transmission: M6, M5
Axle/Gears: 3.42, 3.42
Well its a GM option, so SLP shouldnt have anything to do with it... the only dcoder I tried is the one on www.firehawk.org
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,753
Likes: 560
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Well my shifter is 100% stock so you can use that as comparison. The guys over on camaroz28.com confirmed me. They said the hurst option didn't appear on LT1's untill the SS and firehawk returned in 96 and 97.
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,753
Likes: 560
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by HawkFanatic
did you show them the pics you took?
did you show them the pics you took?
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 55
Likes: 6
From: N. KY
Car: 99 T/A Firehawk, 1991 Formula
Engine: LS-1, LB9
Transmission: M6, M5
Axle/Gears: 3.42, 3.42
hmmm... well I dont know what to to tell you.. but both those shifters look exactly like mine, and now that I think about it, my buddies 02 ws6 looked like it, and they are both Hurst equipped cars....
as far as it not being an option in 95 for your car, that doesnt mean someone didnt put it on before you got it....
as far as it not being an option in 95 for your car, that doesnt mean someone didnt put it on before you got it....
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,753
Likes: 560
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by HawkFanatic
that doesnt mean someone didnt put it on before you got it....
that doesnt mean someone didnt put it on before you got it....
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 3,544
Likes: 19
From: WI,USA
Car: 89 FORMULA 350, 91 Z28 Convertible
Engine: ls1, LB9
Transmission: t56, Auto
Axle/Gears: S60/ 3.73
the shifter in the picture is clearly stock gm not a hurst by any streach. look at the base plate its thin stamped sheetmetal. an I am sure yours says something like.. pat. no. 456924 and possiably a 52561 and 86023 written some where on it or very simmilar . the hurst ones that came on the f-bodys have a thicker base plate that mounts to the trans. and the aftermarket gm ones look a little differant yet and I think? have stops but, may not?
Supreme Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,391
Likes: 1
From: Newark, DE
Car: '86 Camaro, '02 WRX, '87 K5, '67
Engine: 350 TPI, 2.0turbo, 383 in the works, 289-4BBL, 232, A-head 4-cylinder
Transmission: T56, 5-speed, 700R4, C4, T176, semi-auto 2-speed
Axle/Gears: 3.73, 3.90, 4.88, 3.55, 3.54, 7.00
The exhaust hanger for the T56 is a bracket with a rubber insulator that recieves a hook from the cat assembly. The end that bolts to the trans is held in place by the torque arm mount bolts (nut side). This hanger can be made to work if you section the arm part 1.5". Then just fab up a simple bracket to go from your cat to the hanger. Works like factory.
Maybe the guy that bought the old shifter off my trans that I sold on eBay put it on yours. I never even installed the stock shifter in my car. It's been Pro 5.0 since day one.
Maybe the guy that bought the old shifter off my trans that I sold on eBay put it on yours. I never even installed the stock shifter in my car. It's been Pro 5.0 since day one.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1992 Trans Am
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
1
Aug 8, 2015 08:16 PM








