TPI Tuned Port Injection discussion and questions. LB9 and L98 tech, porting, tuning, and bolt-on aftermarket products.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

305 heads and machine work question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 12, 2005 | 08:11 PM
  #1  
Destructive099's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
From: PA
Car: Dark Blue 1987 Chevy Iroc-Z Camaro
Engine: 5.7 350
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
305 heads and machine work question

I got a good machine shop that does good work for me cheap since i grew up around them now my question is can i get the 305 heads off my L98 which would go on my new motor (350 with lots of work done to it) to flow as good as these heads worth $1200. If i did the machine work id put in 2.01 in 1.60 valves have 3 angle valve job done and all upgrades parts screw in studs ect .. What would be the pro's and con's of doing this would i benefit by getting a brand new set of heads or getting this machine work done since i get it done cheap ?
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2005 | 09:00 PM
  #2  
305sbc's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,428
Likes: 2
From: Fairview Heights Illinois
Car: 1986 Irocz
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.25:1
Converting to LS1 valves (2.0 intake, 1.55 exhaust) would be relatively cheap as you can get used LS1 valves for about $50 with retainers and keepers. The machine shop could install the 8mm guides for you cheap, and you wouldn't need new seat inserts to fit the valves. Then you just get some good conical springs like Comp 918's like the LS1 guys run. Your machine shop can machine your spring pockets to fit your spring or to give you a certain install height with these springs. They will not need to be shimmed on 305 heads.
If you are unaware, the stock LS1 valves are much lighter in weight and flow much better in a stock iron head than a slightly bigger aftermarket valve would do. They are very good quality, and the beehive or conical spring is superior design not likely to bounce the valve off the seat.

To take advantage of the bigger valves the heads would have to be ported and unshrouded. The porting is a lot of work with iron heads. That might cost you a bit. You'll also want to have the EGR holes in the exhaust ports filled in with steel weld and epoxied over on the intake manifold side.

In the end they will be good street heads, but will not be able to out horsepower a set of aftermarket aluminum heads. You will save a lot of money though.

A good port job would allow about 350 RWHP with no problem. If that's about all you're shooting for (which is very reasonable) then the 305 heads will work.

In your post you mention the 305 heads are from an L98 engine. The L98 is a 350. The 305 is the LB9 usually. What are the casting number on these 305 heads?

Last edited by 305sbc; Dec 12, 2005 at 09:04 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2005 | 03:29 PM
  #3  
D's89IROCZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,931
Likes: 1
From: Ontario, Canada
Car: 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7L EFI LTR setup
Transmission: T-5 World Class
I wouldn't step up the valve size if I were you . I have been told by a machienist that the shrouding is large !

I got a pic of a 2.02 valve in the 081 casting here



I have been told by the same machienist , that the shrouding there will negate any gains seen by the bigger valve.
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2005 | 06:38 PM
  #4  
305sbc's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,428
Likes: 2
From: Fairview Heights Illinois
Car: 1986 Irocz
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.25:1
Originally posted by D's89IROCZ
I have been told by the same machienist , that the shrouding there will negate any gains seen by the bigger valve.
That is true UNLESS you open the seat up to 90% the diameter of the valve and do a little unshrouding like you're supposed to when increasing valve size. Then the gains are very large.

The shrouding itself isn't a showstopper. Most of the flow goes across the back of the valve towards the center of the cylinder anyway.

The main point most machinists try to make by telling you this is that for most people (who aren't going to do the extra grinding on the heads) it's not cost effective at all to buy large hi-po valves when the gain in flow will be so low. Taken at face value that is true. Without opening the seat up or doing any unshrouding it is actually possible to lose a little flow with the bigger valve.

Bottom line, if it's done right the gains will be large.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2005 | 04:23 PM
  #5  
D's89IROCZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,931
Likes: 1
From: Ontario, Canada
Car: 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7L EFI LTR setup
Transmission: T-5 World Class
But all the material that needs to come out ...will it not be over the 4.00 bore ? I mean that unshrouded ... will the flow run into the deck surface ( or head gasket )

Or trying to make a visual aid ... from the side it will look kinda like a mushroom ?

Know what I mean ? Just wonering .....
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2005 | 05:46 PM
  #6  
305sbc's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,428
Likes: 2
From: Fairview Heights Illinois
Car: 1986 Irocz
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.25:1
Most people will stay inside the bore-line for a 305 engine, but a few will go further and then chamfer the top of the cylinder.
It doesn't take as much unshrouding as you think. Like I said most of the flow goes across the valve towards the center of the cylinder anyway.

The main restriction to flow isn't the chamber wall, it's the area just below the valve seat. When you go bigger valves and then open the throat & seat area up to 90% the diameter of the valve the flow improves greatly, even with the shrouding on the chamber wall.

Where people mess up is installing larger valves and not opening up the throat and seat area. This would only improve flow up to about 0.100" but then completely kill the high-lift flow.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2005 | 12:32 PM
  #7  
D's89IROCZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,931
Likes: 1
From: Ontario, Canada
Car: 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7L EFI LTR setup
Transmission: T-5 World Class
well , nice to know
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2005 | 08:29 PM
  #8  
scribbles's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 855
Likes: 0
From: California, Sacrameto
Car: 88 gta
Engine: 350 tpi
Transmission: 700r4
don't 305 heads have a smaller combution area witch would up the compresion two much?
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2005 | 09:46 PM
  #9  
Shagwell's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,627
Likes: 3
From: Southwest Florida
Car: projects.......
305 heads do have a smaller combustion chamber, but not neccesaily up the compression too much. That depends on what pistons you use.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2005 | 10:29 PM
  #10  
scribbles's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 855
Likes: 0
From: California, Sacrameto
Car: 88 gta
Engine: 350 tpi
Transmission: 700r4
i didint think bout the idea of using a dished piston. That would take care of the problem. wouldent that cost more than buying the correct heads and porting them? seems like it would be very expencive to rebuild a entire motor, all parts and balanceing just to use 305 heads. steping over a dolar to save a penny. But i am a rookie so i may be way off.
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2005 | 07:43 PM
  #11  
Shagwell's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,627
Likes: 3
From: Southwest Florida
Car: projects.......
upgrade the heads. 305 heads flow well...for a 305. Less inches need less air to rev to the same rpm...
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Frozer!!!
Camaros for Sale
35
Jan 19, 2024 04:55 PM
MustangBeater20
TBI
11
Oct 29, 2022 09:20 PM
84z96L31vortec
Tech / General Engine
7
Aug 20, 2017 12:16 AM
84z96L31vortec
North East Region
1
Aug 10, 2015 08:27 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:19 AM.