Body General body information and techniques for restoration, repairs, and modifications.

SUB-FRAME CONNECTORS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-29-2015, 12:04 AM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Wylecoyote08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Michigan
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3:73
SUB-FRAME CONNECTORS

At what point in time should I install sub frame connectors to my camaro? Yes, it is a T-Top.
Old 08-29-2015, 12:16 AM
  #2  
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Zane M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: SLC, UT
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1991 GTA
Engine: LB9
Transmission: T5
Re: SUB-FRAME CONNECTORS

I am of the opinion, unless you are building a factory correct original, all T-Top cars should have sub frame connectors, regardless of "mild to wild".
Old 08-29-2015, 01:07 AM
  #3  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Wylecoyote08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Michigan
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3:73
Re: SUB-FRAME CONNECTORS

I am looking at Hotchkis because I am looking at rebuilding a 4 bolt main 350 with a mild cam and bored .40 over with dish pistons.
Old 08-29-2015, 02:43 AM
  #4  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (13)
 
Night rider327's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Bowdon, GA.
Posts: 2,535
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
Car: 1988 Camaro
Engine: 355, 10.34:1, 249/252 @.050", IK200
Transmission: TH-400, 3500 stall 9.5" converter
Axle/Gears: Ford 9", detroit locker, 3.89 gears
Re: SUB-FRAME CONNECTORS

IMHO as soon as you drove it off the dealer's lot back in the 1980's, 90's lol

Meaning I feel every third gen out there, be it 4, 6, or 8 cyl car, stock or modded should have weld in SFC on them. Heck I think GM should have done it.
Old 08-29-2015, 02:49 AM
  #5  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Wylecoyote08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Michigan
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3:73
Re: SUB-FRAME CONNECTORS

I agree
Old 08-29-2015, 02:55 AM
  #6  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Wylecoyote08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Michigan
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3:73
Re: SUB-FRAME CONNECTORS

http://www.summitracing.com/parts/up...2/model/camaro

even looking at the ones from summit to
Old 08-29-2015, 03:22 AM
  #7  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (13)
 
Night rider327's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Bowdon, GA.
Posts: 2,535
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
Car: 1988 Camaro
Engine: 355, 10.34:1, 249/252 @.050", IK200
Transmission: TH-400, 3500 stall 9.5" converter
Axle/Gears: Ford 9", detroit locker, 3.89 gears
Re: SUB-FRAME CONNECTORS

UMI's are really good. I have Spohn's on mine
Old 08-29-2015, 08:13 AM
  #8  
Supreme Member
 
vinny R's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,707
Received 239 Likes on 185 Posts
Car: 1991 Z28
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3:42 Auburn
Re: SUB-FRAME CONNECTORS

I have a 91 vert and am looking at sub frame connectors from Top down Solutions. They say these are designed for verts and was wondering if anyone used these and are they any good. There are alot of choices out there. these are inside connectors.

Thanks
Old 08-29-2015, 09:56 AM
  #9  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (11)
 
DynoDave43's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: MICHIGAN
Posts: 4,637
Received 751 Likes on 577 Posts
Car: 1988 Trans Am
Engine: L03
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt 2.73 Open
Re: SUB-FRAME CONNECTORS

Originally Posted by Night rider327
Heck I think GM should have done it.


Originally Posted by vinny R
I have a 91 vert and am looking at sub frame connectors from Top down Solutions. They say these are designed for verts and was wondering if anyone used these and are they any good. There are alot of choices out there. these are inside connectors.
Those Alston parts from TDS are what I plan to add when the time comes.
Old 08-29-2015, 10:29 AM
  #10  
Senior Member

iTrader: (5)
 
MoJoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Golden, CO
Posts: 887
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
Car: 87 IROC
Engine: L31 350
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 4.10 D44
Re: SUB-FRAME CONNECTORS

Originally Posted by Night rider327
IMHO as soon as you drove it off the dealer's lot back in the 1980's, 90's
Agreed. My initial answer was "yesterday". Which is, do it before any other modification.

I went with Global West "outer" SFCs. The Alston/TDS inners can ALSO be done.
Old 08-29-2015, 05:56 PM
  #11  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (15)
 
Tibo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Desert
Posts: 5,025
Received 76 Likes on 66 Posts
Car: 1991 Z28 Vert
Engine: 383 single plane efi
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 8.8 with 3.73s
Re: SUB-FRAME CONNECTORS

Originally Posted by vinny R
I have a 91 vert and am looking at sub frame connectors from Top down Solutions. They say these are designed for verts and was wondering if anyone used these and are they any good. There are alot of choices out there. these are inside connectors.

Thanks
You should have the riveted in place subframe connectors already if it's the factory authorized conversion. The subframe connectors from UMI still work in conjunction with the factory connectors. Every car should have at least the connectors the vert came with.
Old 08-29-2015, 06:42 PM
  #12  
Member

iTrader: (1)
 
Hal87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Montana
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: '84 Firebird TA & '87 Camaro LT
Engine: 350 V-8 & V-6
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 & 3.42
Re: SUB-FRAME CONNECTORS

Originally Posted by Night rider327
IMHO as soon as you drove it off the dealer's lot back in the 1980's, 90's lol

Meaning I feel every third gen out there, be it 4, 6, or 8 cyl car, stock or modded should have weld in SFC on them. Heck I think GM should have done it.
I agree. I put UMI's under both of our 3rd Gen's.
Old 08-29-2015, 07:57 PM
  #13  
Supreme Member
 
vinny R's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,707
Received 239 Likes on 185 Posts
Car: 1991 Z28
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3:42 Auburn
Re: SUB-FRAME CONNECTORS

Originally Posted by Tibo
You should have the riveted in place subframe connectors already if it's the factory authorized conversion. The subframe connectors from UMI still work in conjunction with the factory connectors. Every car should have at least the connectors the vert came with.
Yes it is an ASC conversion with the riveted angle. Would it help yo have those welded?
Old 08-29-2015, 09:43 PM
  #14  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (15)
 
Tibo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Desert
Posts: 5,025
Received 76 Likes on 66 Posts
Car: 1991 Z28 Vert
Engine: 383 single plane efi
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 8.8 with 3.73s
Re: SUB-FRAME CONNECTORS

Originally Posted by vinny R
Yes it is an ASC conversion with the riveted angle. Would it help yo have those welded?
http://umiperformance.com/catalog/in...roducts_id=127

I have those on the 91 convertible and they fit great and run alongside the factory connectors. You could weld in the factory connectors and it would probably help but you could skip all the trouble and use these. If you have welding capabilities you could make your set easily enough. I'm making my own inner set out of 1"x2" tubing and 1/8" metal plate.
Old 08-29-2015, 11:31 PM
  #15  
Supreme Member

 
jharrison5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Lincoln, NE.
Posts: 1,255
Received 54 Likes on 45 Posts
Car: '87 IROC
Engine: 5.7 Vortec w/ factory TPI
Transmission: WC T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.45 Posi
Re: SUB-FRAME CONNECTORS

I have owned plenty of 3rd gens and the only ones that held their shape and didn't have door sag issues were the ones with connectors. I parked my 86 on weird angle driveway once and when I went to put the t-tops on that night they wouldn't line up right. Had to back the car onto the street to get them on lol! Granted that car had some hidden rust issues I hadn't found yet, but it was still funny.
Old 08-29-2015, 11:56 PM
  #16  
Supreme Member

 
Ron U.S.M.C.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Northern, CA
Posts: 4,482
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Car: 1989 Iroc-Z Camaro
Engine: TBI,5.0
Transmission: Automatic 700R4
Axle/Gears: Eaton Posi,3.42,LPW Ultimate Cover
Re: SUB-FRAME CONNECTORS

I have a question about lifting the car with lets say UMI sub frame connecters installed.
I've seen photos of the rear right tire lifting when the front right "A" arm is being used as a jack point.
Is that typical with the lift spots on a Third Gen and beefy SFC like the UMI's.


I don't think I would mind because its better then twisting the car but a extra jack stand or two could be in order.

Last edited by Ron U.S.M.C.; 08-30-2015 at 12:04 AM.
Old 08-30-2015, 12:45 AM
  #17  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (13)
 
Night rider327's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Bowdon, GA.
Posts: 2,535
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
Car: 1988 Camaro
Engine: 355, 10.34:1, 249/252 @.050", IK200
Transmission: TH-400, 3500 stall 9.5" converter
Axle/Gears: Ford 9", detroit locker, 3.89 gears
Re: SUB-FRAME CONNECTORS

Yes Sir! That is how good the chassis/body gets tied together with good SFC. Before the roll cage in mine with just SFC I could lift both wheels on 1 side up just with one jacking point.

Now with a 10 pt cage in mine, with the jack placed just right, 3 of the wheels will lift up at the same time.
Old 08-30-2015, 12:14 PM
  #18  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (15)
 
Tibo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Desert
Posts: 5,025
Received 76 Likes on 66 Posts
Car: 1991 Z28 Vert
Engine: 383 single plane efi
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 8.8 with 3.73s
Re: SUB-FRAME CONNECTORS

Picture floating around of a Camaro with inner and outers, over a curb with a wheel dangling and that corner isn't sagging.

When I bought my 91 convertible this year I thought it would have door sagging and panel alignment issues. Didn't have any, thanks to the factory connectors. My 92 with Ttops has some door sagging I've had to adjust.

Last edited by Tibo; 08-30-2015 at 12:17 PM.
Old 08-30-2015, 01:24 PM
  #19  
Supreme Member

 
Ron U.S.M.C.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Northern, CA
Posts: 4,482
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Car: 1989 Iroc-Z Camaro
Engine: TBI,5.0
Transmission: Automatic 700R4
Axle/Gears: Eaton Posi,3.42,LPW Ultimate Cover
Re: SUB-FRAME CONNECTORS

Nice......
Old 08-30-2015, 09:42 PM
  #20  
Junior Member
 
racerkilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Jeffersonvlle
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 85 iroc with 92 ground effects
Engine: 355 11.1 world product heads
Transmission: t56
Axle/Gears: 3.54 dana 44
Re: SUB-FRAME CONNECTORS

I used jegster subframe in my iroc. They are bolt in. I bolted them in and they fit very tight. I also welded them in completely. They do not hang low at all and fit snug against the rocker pinch weld. I was able to weld the pinch weld to the subframe connector almost the length of the connector
Old 09-23-2015, 08:39 PM
  #21  
Senior Member

 
PAFORM350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Fleming Island, FL
Posts: 644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1992 Formula 350
Engine: 5.7 L98
Transmission: 700R4
Re: SUB-FRAME CONNECTORS

Check out S&W race cars. They have a nice set with cross member
Old 09-24-2015, 12:22 AM
  #22  
Supreme Member

 
SbFormula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,225
Received 149 Likes on 122 Posts
Car: '91 Firebird Formula
Engine: SP383 Deluxe FIRST® TPI Intake
Transmission: Tremec T56
Axle/Gears: Moser 9" Eaton Truetrac Motive 3.89
Re: SUB-FRAME CONNECTORS



Originally Posted by Wylecoyote08
I am looking at Hotchkis because I am looking at rebuilding a 4 bolt main 350 with a mild cam and bored .40 over with dish pistons.

I have the Hotchkis. They made a difference but like everyone else will agree on here, GM should have had them factory installed. Hotchkis are welded so you need a guy that knows what he is doing. I did not trust bolt on, just my own preference. They are fine for my application and gives a bit of subtle performance look. The car feels way better with less T-Top squeak and cracking. You will need to modify your exhaust line.
Hotchkis are squared and pretty basic. For better strengthening, I believe tubular is the way to go. SPOHN has some nice ones with 3 points attached and welded to the floor. I would go with those ones if I had to do it all over again. You would need to strip the carpets though for fire prevention while welding!!!

Check out the picture on SPOHN site

http://www.spohn.net/shop/1982-1992-...me-Connectors/

Last edited by SbFormula; 09-24-2015 at 12:32 AM.
Old 09-24-2015, 09:14 AM
  #23  
Member

 
kimnach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: hinckley, oh
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Car: 1988 iroc-z (original owner)
Engine: 305
Transmission: 5-speed manual
Re: SUB-FRAME CONNECTORS

After 27+ years of driving my '88 IROC, it's time for SFCs (probably UMI 2400-R or Spohn). Not sure if I'll do it this year before the car hibernates or next spring.

I have but two simple questions:
1. Should a full alignment be done before having the SFCs welded on? I had one done about 2k miles ago.
2. Speaking of welding. It's said that the carpet should be pulled up. Foolish me, i just put RAAMmat BXTII + Ensolite down this summer. Potential issues with the BXT above the weld--other than melting?

thanks.
Old 09-24-2015, 09:49 AM
  #24  
Supreme Member

 
SbFormula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,225
Received 149 Likes on 122 Posts
Car: '91 Firebird Formula
Engine: SP383 Deluxe FIRST® TPI Intake
Transmission: Tremec T56
Axle/Gears: Moser 9" Eaton Truetrac Motive 3.89
Re: SUB-FRAME CONNECTORS

Originally Posted by kimnach
After 27+ years of driving my '88 IROC, it's time for SFCs (probably UMI 2400-R or Spohn). Not sure if I'll do it this year before the car hibernates or next spring.

I have but two simple questions:
1. Should a full alignment be done before having the SFCs welded on? I had one done about 2k miles ago.
2. Speaking of welding. It's said that the carpet should be pulled up. Foolish me, i just put RAAMmat BXTII + Ensolite down this summer. Potential issues with the BXT above the weld--other than melting?

thanks.
I don't see a need for alignment unless it would be so out of whack that it would flex your structure... Not likely! Maybe you want to considerer replacing struts, shocks and coil first to ensure the right ride height but that's all my 2¢ worth brain can think of. The car should be sitting on "ramp hoist" to keep the structure from flexing while welding.

As far as carpet goes, that was from the Pro! It made sense to me. If you're going to be welding the floor pan (red hot!), I would not trust that heat to conduct into any material (carpet, wires, insulation) and risk to melt it or reach ignite threshold.

Best of luck!

Last edited by SbFormula; 09-24-2015 at 09:52 AM.
Old 09-24-2015, 11:08 AM
  #25  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (15)
 
Tibo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Desert
Posts: 5,025
Received 76 Likes on 66 Posts
Car: 1991 Z28 Vert
Engine: 383 single plane efi
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 8.8 with 3.73s
Re: SUB-FRAME CONNECTORS

Not sure what was meant by ramp hoists but at any rate you must do your best to put the frame in as true a position as possible. You want to use some type of stand underneath the rear through bolts of the front A arms and ensure that the pads on the tops of the stands is absolutely level with each other. A water level would work best and be dirt cheap unless you have a laser level. Rear end needs to be resting on the body mount side of the lower control arms and also ensuring that those pads of the stands are level. If you drive your car to an exhaust shop with a drive up ramp you will have a 99% chance the frame will be welded together crooked.

If you aren't planning on spot welding the sides of the long arms to the floor pan than you probably are fine leaving the carpet in. If you are spot welding the side than I think there's is too great a risk for blow through catching something on fire. Most of the tubes companies use are 1/8-3/16" thick and the floor pan is fairly thin comparatively so it would be easy to blow through.
Old 09-24-2015, 11:12 AM
  #26  
Supreme Member
 
LiquidBlue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,907
Received 176 Likes on 135 Posts
Car: 90 Formula / T-tops
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: MD8
Re: SUB-FRAME CONNECTORS

Anyone find bolt-ons that actually bolt on w/o modifications? (I'm inclined to bolt on to preserve originality, and with limited driving and zero racing it would suffice) I saw a bad review of a bolt on over at Summit, guy said it wouldn't work.
Old 09-24-2015, 11:18 AM
  #27  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
-=Z28=-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,072
Received 46 Likes on 39 Posts
Car: 84 Z28
Engine: 383 Stroker
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: SUB-FRAME CONNECTORS

Before I installed mine, I had the car put on a frame rack and had measurements taken to insure the car was straight.

Could you imagine putting them on a twisted body?? permanent 3 wheel motion.

Would defiantly alter how the car handles.
Old 09-24-2015, 11:23 AM
  #28  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
-=Z28=-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,072
Received 46 Likes on 39 Posts
Car: 84 Z28
Engine: 383 Stroker
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: SUB-FRAME CONNECTORS

Originally Posted by LiquidBlue
Anyone find bolt-ons that actually bolt on w/o modifications? (I'm inclined to bolt on to preserve originality, and with limited driving and zero racing it would suffice) I saw a bad review of a bolt on over at Summit, guy said it wouldn't work.

If you hardly drive the car, and want to keep it original, I wouldn't even put them on. waste of money imo
Old 09-29-2015, 07:29 PM
  #29  
Senior Member
 
WTR388's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Atlantic Canada
Posts: 746
Received 23 Likes on 15 Posts
Car: 87 Trans Am
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Re: SUB-FRAME CONNECTORS

I followed the instructions with my BMR connectors. I made 4 of the same wheel stands, I propped the car up on them so it was level and under it's own weight and welded them in. No need to move the carpet, the part being welded to is the subframe, not the floor... If you have that much heat transfer, you're doing something wrong.

There was a huge difference in the car, even backing out the nearly flat driveway it was obvious. Now for a jacking point I just place the jack under where the front plate of the connector is, car doesn't shift at all.
Old 09-29-2015, 07:43 PM
  #30  
Senior Member

iTrader: (5)
 
MoJoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Golden, CO
Posts: 887
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
Car: 87 IROC
Engine: L31 350
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 4.10 D44
Re: SUB-FRAME CONNECTORS

Originally Posted by WTR388
No need to move the carpet, the part being welded to is the subframe, not the floor... If you have that much heat transfer, you're doing something wrong.
On the other hand, if you also stitch weld the SFC to the rocker rail, you will make the car even stiffer, and possibly set the carpet on fire while doing so. Hence, the general instruction to pull back the carpet.
Old 09-30-2015, 08:56 PM
  #31  
Senior Member
 
WTR388's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Atlantic Canada
Posts: 746
Received 23 Likes on 15 Posts
Car: 87 Trans Am
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Re: SUB-FRAME CONNECTORS

Originally Posted by MoJoe
On the other hand, if you also stitch weld the SFC to the rocker rail, you will make the car even stiffer, and possibly set the carpet on fire while doing so. Hence, the general instruction to pull back the carpet.
Need to rebuild part of a rocker, so didn't do that... But it will happen once I dig in that deep (and carpet will be out)
Old 10-01-2015, 09:18 AM
  #32  
Junior Member

iTrader: (1)
 
dcolaluca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1991 Z28, 1983 Z28, 1984 Z28
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 4.10
Re: SUB-FRAME CONNECTORS

I have a 1991 Convertible, and I have had the car completely disassembled. Engine, transmission and rear axle out of the car. Looking at the riveted frame rails that were installed, it needed some help. One way you can really see why you need SFC's is have your car on jack stands and place a jack in the middle of the car and raise it up a bit and watch the door gap next to the door jamb open up. This is why on T-top and Convertibles there are door jamb wedges to keep the door from contacting the door jamb. These cars flex more than any car I have ever seen.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
91 SrS
Exhaust
5
10-07-2015 04:32 PM
TMZIrocZ350
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
1
10-07-2015 12:09 PM
meeklay812
Camaros for Sale
1
10-01-2015 03:46 PM
tmork454
Transmissions and Drivetrain
0
09-29-2015 06:33 PM
Gordonr1973
Electronics
0
09-29-2015 11:59 AM



Quick Reply: SUB-FRAME CONNECTORS



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:12 PM.