What is the lowest compression ratio you can have?
#1
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Pueblo Co
Posts: 3,974
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: No more birdy
What is the lowest compression ratio you can have?
Sounds a bit odd but I mentioned it in another thread awhile back to see if anyone would bite, they dident.
What is the lowest compression ratio you can have and still have the engine run? Ive heard of people using 76cc heads on dished piston LG4's and they run but is this true? This little project were thinking about undertaking will be a dual fuel setup, propane/gasoline.
Thanks!
What is the lowest compression ratio you can have and still have the engine run? Ive heard of people using 76cc heads on dished piston LG4's and they run but is this true? This little project were thinking about undertaking will be a dual fuel setup, propane/gasoline.
Thanks!
#2
Supreme Member
I'd guess you could go down pretty low, I've an inline 6 in my '31 that is 6:1, IIRC.
No reason a V8 wouldn't run as low or lower.
No reason a V8 wouldn't run as low or lower.
#4
Supreme Member
I some more would have to do with what cam was used to build pressure too.
One thing I didn;t notice was the reference to propane...
But...myL-head 6 in my forklift is propane powered, I'll look through my MoToRs manual to verfiy, but I think it's 7.5:1
One thing I didn;t notice was the reference to propane...
But...myL-head 6 in my forklift is propane powered, I'll look through my MoToRs manual to verfiy, but I think it's 7.5:1
#5
Supreme Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 1,770
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '85 IROC
Engine: LB9
Transmission: 700 R4
https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...threadid=30124
I just dug up this thread that has a discussion of the topic, in case anyone's interested.
I just dug up this thread that has a discussion of the topic, in case anyone's interested.
#6
Supreme Member
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: E.B.F. TN
Posts: 3,187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Tree Huggers
Engine: Do Not
Transmission: Appreciate Me.
Define 'still run'.
IIRC, theoretically, anything greater than 1:1 could sustain internal combustion... just not sure with what fuel. Maybe it was gas, can't remember.
IIRC, theoretically, anything greater than 1:1 could sustain internal combustion... just not sure with what fuel. Maybe it was gas, can't remember.
#7
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Elgin, IL
Posts: 3,085
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1997 Corvette
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.73 IRS
I thought propane liked higher CRs as well since it doesn't contain as much energy per molecule as gasoline. Unless you are going to put this thing under some tremendous boost and want as low of a CR as you can get and then suppress the detonation even more with propane... I thought that propane was kind of used the same way alcohol is sometimes (to prevent detonation).
Trending Topics
#9
Supreme Member
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: E.B.F. TN
Posts: 3,187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Tree Huggers
Engine: Do Not
Transmission: Appreciate Me.
It does (like higher comp) because of the loss of air charge and btu's among other things. It is used to help control charge in a boost app. The octane is RON 112 MON 97 and LPG (which is used a lot rather than propane) is RON 104 MON 89.
#10
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Pueblo Co
Posts: 3,974
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: No more birdy
The use of propane is still up in the air, thats what this application did use as a primary fuel, gasoline was a back up emergency use fuel but that can change. I did search before I posted, guess I used the wrong keywords or somthing.
So If I were to use a set of mexico crate motor heads on an LG4 or similiar low compression (avalible) engine whats the estimated compression ratio? I was assuming 7.3:1 - 7.5:1.
Edit: I remember that thread but it doesent relate to this.
So If I were to use a set of mexico crate motor heads on an LG4 or similiar low compression (avalible) engine whats the estimated compression ratio? I was assuming 7.3:1 - 7.5:1.
Edit: I remember that thread but it doesent relate to this.
Last edited by SSC; 01-09-2005 at 10:47 PM.
#11
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Pueblo Co
Posts: 3,974
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: No more birdy
The cam would be a stock cam nothing special assuming its still good, if it isnt then it will have an MTC-1 since I have one collecting dust.
#12
Supreme Member
I checked my MoToRs manual, and the CR is 7.3:1.
I'm guessng to get the best performance and effeciancy from propane, you run a high CR...high as it can stand...just like you'd go with a gas engine.
But performance and intent for use, isn't the same thing....i/e my lift spends it's life at under 1500rpms, if I were to increase the CR in the engine to it's highest limits, run the appropriate cam to bleed off enough cyl pressure to spin it over, I'd have a misearble piece of equipment to use.
I have another engine I'm putting together right now for proane use...a 218 L head Chysler engine, bored .040, I'm going to polish the combustion chambers and grind a little out tomorrow...if I can mock up something to CC the CC's, I can figure out the exact CR...my initial guess would be in the upper 6's...for sure not in the 7's:1.
I'm guessng to get the best performance and effeciancy from propane, you run a high CR...high as it can stand...just like you'd go with a gas engine.
But performance and intent for use, isn't the same thing....i/e my lift spends it's life at under 1500rpms, if I were to increase the CR in the engine to it's highest limits, run the appropriate cam to bleed off enough cyl pressure to spin it over, I'd have a misearble piece of equipment to use.
I have another engine I'm putting together right now for proane use...a 218 L head Chysler engine, bored .040, I'm going to polish the combustion chambers and grind a little out tomorrow...if I can mock up something to CC the CC's, I can figure out the exact CR...my initial guess would be in the upper 6's...for sure not in the 7's:1.
#13
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Valley of the Sun
Posts: 3,852
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 82 Z28
Engine: Al LT1 headed LG4 305
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.73 posi with spacer
FIW i want to propanize and turbocharge my 78 Ford 300-6. It has 8.5:1 compression so propane and a turbo will work awesome. Mmmm major boost! But 2500rpm redline meow.
#14
Supreme Member
Lawnmower engines are regularly down around 6:1 compression. They'll have cranking compressions down around 80 PSI. I had a really worn out one once that only had about 30 PSI of cranking compression and it would still run..... barely.
You'll also find that engines with holes in the pistons are a lot closer to 1:1 (no compression). Heh heh.
You'll also find that engines with holes in the pistons are a lot closer to 1:1 (no compression). Heh heh.
#15
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Pueblo Co
Posts: 3,974
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: No more birdy
Ok so were talking some where in the 6's and there shouldent be any reason it wouldent rev under load to 5K. This is actually replacing a rusted 440 in a field water pump system that was housed in a shed. Thats why propane was used and it was probably cheaper back then. There isnt a problem changing the enclosure to run gasoline assuming it would run better on 85.
#17
Details of 1932 Cadillac Fleetwood (140" wheelbase, 5560 lbs.)
Seems you can go pretty low if necessary.
Nice one, Damon...
- 45 degree overhead valve
- twelve cylinders
- Cast Iron on aluminum crankcase
- Bore and stroke: 3-1/8 x 4 in.
- Displacement: 368 cu. in.
- Compression ratio: 5.30:1 (std), 5.08:1, 4.90:1 (opt.)
- Brake horsepower: 135 @ 3400 rpm
- SAE/Taxable horsepower: 46.9
- Main bearings: four
- Valve lifters: mechanical with hydraulic silencer on rocker bushing
- Carburetor: Detroit Lubricator Type L-13, R-13/Model 51
Seems you can go pretty low if necessary.
Nice one, Damon...
#18
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Elgin, IL
Posts: 3,085
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1997 Corvette
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.73 IRS
Wow that almost has the same power-to-CI ratio as the '79 400 did, 47 years later. Amazing what the late 70s did to muscle cars...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Damon
Tech / General Engine
8
09-26-2015 04:29 PM
83 Crossfire TA
Suspension and Chassis
0
09-08-2015 12:06 PM