Transmissions and Drivetrain Need help with your trans? Problems with your axle?

10bolt carrier, seriesIIorIII???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-29-2011, 12:32 PM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
irocarter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: logan,ohio
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 89 iroc
Engine: 5.7 trick flow heads t-ram
Transmission: wct5
Axle/Gears: 3.42
10bolt carrier, seriesIIorIII???

I have a 10 bolt carrier and don't know if it's a seriesII or seriesIII. Is there away to measure it to find out. There is no ring gear on it. Thanks
Old 12-29-2011, 02:10 PM
  #2  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
sofakingdom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 26,097
Received 1,683 Likes on 1,278 Posts
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: 10bolt carrier, seriesIIorIII???

No need to even measure... you can spot em from 100 yards away by eye.



2 series on the left. The difference is, how far the flange for the ring gear is located, away from the center of the pinion. Since "ratio" is NOT ONLY the ratio of the # of teeth on the 2 gears, BUT ALSO the ratio of their DIAMETER, then since the ring is always the same size for any given model of rear, as the ratio DECREASES, the pinion diameter INCREASES. Meaning, for a very low ratio, the pinion is very large, therefore the ring has to be located very far from its center. Now that you've thought through that, note how the ring flange on the carrier on the left is almost flat on the back, but the back side of it on the carrier on the right is visibly cone-shaped. THat's because in this model of rear, the difference in the flange placement is about 3/8".
Old 12-29-2011, 05:00 PM
  #3  
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
irocarter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: logan,ohio
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 89 iroc
Engine: 5.7 trick flow heads t-ram
Transmission: wct5
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: 10bolt carrier, seriesIIorIII???

Thanks Sofa. I had to read your post about 10x but I think I understand.
Just to make sure, If I had a seriesII and III sitting on a bench,with the ring gear side down on the bench,the seriesII ring gear flange would be closer to the bench?
Old 12-29-2011, 05:43 PM
  #4  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
sofakingdom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 26,097
Received 1,683 Likes on 1,278 Posts
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: 10bolt carrier, seriesIIorIII???

Exactly.

About .375 - .400" closer to the bench than a 3 series would be.

Imagine taking the 2 units in the pic and setting them up on their bottom.

It's pretty straightforward actually. If you have a 2.73 R&P, then the pinion is 7.625" / 2.73 diameter, or about 2.8". Radius (distance from center to outer edge) is therefore about 1.4".

OTOH if you have a 3.73 gearset, then the pinion is 7.625" / 3.73 in diameter, or about 2.04", or about 1.02" radius. Approximately {drum roll please} .4" difference.

Therefore the ring has to be about .4" closer to the center of the pinion in the 3.73 than the 2.73, if all else is equal (which it isn't, but the point should be obvious). Thick gears are MUCH more expensive to make than thin ones. So if you imagine the factory starting out with the lowest possible # they could ever use, let's say 2.21 which would be 19 pinion teeth and 42 ring teeth, they'd make the ring as thin as possible and the teeth still stay stuck to it, and locate the carrier flange as far from the pinion as it needs to be. Then as progressively higher ratios were created, the pinion would get smaller and smaller, and the ring would get thicker and thicker so that it would still mesh with it, until at some point, the cost starts to rise steeply. At that point, they'd create a new carrier "series" by moving the flange over, and start over with the thinnest posssible ring. In the 7½" 10-bolt, that happens between 3.08 (13 & 40) and 3.23 (13 & 42). In some other models of rear especially ones used in trucks, there might be another step between a 3 series carrier and a 4 series.

Which is why the ring flange on that 2 series stock Auburn posi POS in my pic is nearly flat on the back, but the flange on the 3 series Auburn "hi perf" POS is cone shaped.
Old 12-29-2011, 07:42 PM
  #5  
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
irocarter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: logan,ohio
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 89 iroc
Engine: 5.7 trick flow heads t-ram
Transmission: wct5
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: 10bolt carrier, seriesIIorIII???

Thanks again Sofa. I believe I fully understand the difference of the two carriers now.
1 more question-factory gm carriers could possibly have had a 3.08 with either carrier?
Old 12-29-2011, 08:49 PM
  #6  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
sofakingdom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 26,097
Received 1,683 Likes on 1,278 Posts
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: 10bolt carrier, seriesIIorIII???

No; that's 2 series. 3.23 is the lowest 3 series. (in this model of rear)
Old 03-17-2015, 02:39 PM
  #7  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
-=Z28=-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,072
Received 46 Likes on 39 Posts
Car: 84 Z28
Engine: 383 Stroker
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: 10bolt carrier, seriesIIorIII???

Originally Posted by sofakingdom
Exactly.

About .375 - .400" closer to the bench than a 3 series would be.

Imagine taking the 2 units in the pic and setting them up on their bottom.

It's pretty straightforward actually. If you have a 2.73 R&P, then the pinion is 7.625" / 2.73 diameter, or about 2.8". Radius (distance from center to outer edge) is therefore about 1.4".

OTOH if you have a 3.73 gearset, then the pinion is 7.625" / 3.73 in diameter, or about 2.04", or about 1.02" radius. Approximately {drum roll please} .4" difference.

Therefore the ring has to be about .4" closer to the center of the pinion in the 3.73 than the 2.73, if all else is equal (which it isn't, but the point should be obvious). Thick gears are MUCH more expensive to make than thin ones. So if you imagine the factory starting out with the lowest possible # they could ever use, let's say 2.21 which would be 19 pinion teeth and 42 ring teeth, they'd make the ring as thin as possible and the teeth still stay stuck to it, and locate the carrier flange as far from the pinion as it needs to be. Then as progressively higher ratios were created, the pinion would get smaller and smaller, and the ring would get thicker and thicker so that it would still mesh with it, until at some point, the cost starts to rise steeply. At that point, they'd create a new carrier "series" by moving the flange over, and start over with the thinnest posssible ring. In the 7½" 10-bolt, that happens between 3.08 (13 & 40) and 3.23 (13 & 42). In some other models of rear especially ones used in trucks, there might be another step between a 3 series carrier and a 4 series.

Which is why the ring flange on that 2 series stock Auburn posi POS in my pic is nearly flat on the back, but the flange on the 3 series Auburn "hi perf" POS is cone shaped.
Well put man! nice to read threads of such depth and knowledge!! What is your opinion on eaton vs auburn? I built my rear with auburn with 373 richmond gears. obviously new bearings and seals. kept stock axles. I dont plan on dragging the car. street only. but i have a 500hp 383... so far it has handled it. figure if Im not launching it...... Thanks again mang!
Old 03-17-2015, 06:33 PM
  #8  
Supreme Member
 
big gear head's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,777
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: 10bolt carrier, seriesIIorIII???

The Auburn is junk, but if you treat it well it will last a long time. If you abuse it then you will be replacing it soon. Don't do any water burnouts or any burnouts while holding the brake.
Old 03-18-2015, 11:06 PM
  #9  
Supreme Member

 
Ron U.S.M.C.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Northern, CA
Posts: 4,482
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Car: 1989 Iroc-Z Camaro
Engine: TBI,5.0
Transmission: Automatic 700R4
Axle/Gears: Eaton Posi,3.42,LPW Ultimate Cover
Re: 10bolt carrier, seriesIIorIII???

big gear head ,
Can you get the steel clutch plates for the 7.5in Eaton Posi anymore or are they all carbon fiber ?
Old 03-19-2015, 07:22 AM
  #10  
Supreme Member
 
big gear head's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,777
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: 10bolt carrier, seriesIIorIII???

I think the 7.5 clutches are smaller than the others. I have never replaced the clutches in one of them, so I can't say for sure. The 18 disc steel clutches are available for the 8.2 10 bolt and the 12 bolt.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
UltRoadWarrior9
Tech / General Engine
336
04-28-2020 10:39 PM
gord327
Transmissions and Drivetrain
19
10-03-2015 01:25 PM
georgiaslim45
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
1
09-09-2015 08:12 PM
georgiaslim45
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
3
09-09-2015 08:11 PM
UltRoadWarrior9
Transmissions and Drivetrain
3
09-02-2015 08:24 PM



Quick Reply: 10bolt carrier, seriesIIorIII???



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:10 PM.