Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Aftermarket Product Review
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Aftermarket Product Review Provide questions and answers about aftermarket parts for the Third Generation F-Body.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-23-2007, 10:44 PM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 12

Classifieds Rating: (0)
hughes converter not impressed

I just installed a brand new hughes pro comp 4500 stall converter behind my afr headed 406 and decided to go out and test it tonight after work went out to a dead end road and tried to foot brake the car to my suprise the car actually foot braked to 4200 rpms and when i launched it it would flash to around 55-5600 i know stall speeds are suposed to be approximate but i called hughes before i purchased it the guy i talked to said it should flash around 4500 to 4700 with my setup this is rediclous it only leaves me 2000 rpms before i redline i just thought i would let everyone that i was rather dissapointed with my converter before this i had never heard anything but good things about hughes products. FWIW It does however launch very hard cant wait to take it out and put some spray it
CndypntZ is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2007, 10:59 PM   #2
Member
 
Justin86camaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: York County Va
Posts: 143
Car: 86 Camaro
Engine: 350, aluminum heads, carb
Transmission: TH-700R4
Axle/Gears: 7.5 10 bolt, 3.42:1

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: hughes converter not impressed

thanks for the info i would personally go with a b&M or TCI just because of the name. i have a stock 2025 stall converter and don't have the car tuned right to get the most out of a launch to determine how well it does. thanks again for the advice
Justin86camaro is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2007, 12:30 AM   #3
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 39
Car: 77 Monte Carlo, 89 Firebird Formula
Engine: 355's
Transmission: TH350's
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 8.5 3.73, 9 bolt 3.27

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: hughes converter not impressed

Well they can only assume so much on the engine.. since the engine determines a lot of actual stall speed... anyway its not the converters fault and probably would last forever.. i think its more of maybe lack of research like finding other people with similar setups and asking questions..
77monte is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2007, 04:01 AM   #4
Supreme Member
 
vindeezl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: 707
Posts: 3,025
Car: '92 Z03 / '98 Z28

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: hughes converter not impressed

You bought a 4500 stall converter and it damn near stalls around there and it is the converter's fault?

Perhaps as mentioned earlier you should have researched more and purchased a different stall speed.

FWIW I have a 2500 stall Hughes in my '67 and am pleased.
vindeezl is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2007, 09:20 AM   #5
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Southwest Florida
Posts: 4,367
Car: projects.......

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to Shagwell
Re: hughes converter not impressed

Quote:
Originally Posted by Justin86camaro View Post
thanks for the info i would personally go with a b&M or TCI just because of the name. i have a stock 2025 stall converter and don't have the car tuned right to get the most out of a launch to determine how well it does. thanks again for the advice
Hate to be the barer of bad news, but TCI and B&M build junk. Their old school stuff for T400's/T350's etc is ok, but neither company builds anything worth it's weight for OD transmissions. There's a reason they're 700r converters are less than 1/2 the price of vigilante/precision/edge/etc.

- as for the 4200 foot brake, 55-5600 flash, are sure it's not already moving the car at this point? - Sounds to me more like it stalls around 4500, and reaches full "lock up" around 5500, which wouldn't be to far off from what I'd expect it to do.
For all out performance, I know of MANY race cars that happily enjoy a stall speed at just below their peak power.

- call Hughes and explain what it's doing. They may take it back and change the stall speed for free or minimal cost. Many good converter companies will change stall speed one time for free on a new converter. - this doesn't apply to their cheapies though.....
Shagwell is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2007, 05:30 PM   #6
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 12

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: hughes converter not impressed

I called hughes today they told me that it should not foot brake that high with my setup and that it shouldnt flash that high either he reassured me that it should only be flashing around 4700 or so within a few hundred rpms thay offered to exchange it for another one free of charge wich ill proably pull it out this weekend and send it back. I did lots of research on choosing a converter made lots of phone calls to several engine builders and transmission companies and all gave me the same answer wich was to get around a 4500 stall.
CndypntZ is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2007, 05:37 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
F-BIRD'88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,823
Car: 1988 Firebird S/E
Engine: 406Ci Vortec SBC
Transmission: TH-350/3500stall
Axle/Gears: 7.5" Auburn 4.10 Posi-Traction

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: hughes converter not impressed

Are you sure you're not getting wheel spin?
F-BIRD'88 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2007, 12:19 AM   #8
Senior Member
 
84z28350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Yellowknife, NWT, Canada
Posts: 3,003
Car: 84 Z28
Engine: 357
Transmission: TH-350C
Axle/Gears: 3.43

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: hughes converter not impressed

Are you sure its not the tranny slipping....?
84z28350 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2007, 01:25 AM   #9
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 12

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: hughes converter not impressed

its a rebuilt transmission with less that 2000 miles on it and i never had any problems with it behind my other motor as for the wheel spin the car just burns the tires but i notick the tach hits 5500 before i feel the car start to move
CndypntZ is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2007, 02:36 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
F-BIRD'88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,823
Car: 1988 Firebird S/E
Engine: 406Ci Vortec SBC
Transmission: TH-350/3500stall
Axle/Gears: 7.5" Auburn 4.10 Posi-Traction

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: hughes converter not impressed

Quote:
Originally Posted by CndypntZ View Post
its a rebuilt transmission with less that 2000 miles on it and i never had any problems with it behind my other motor as for the wheel spin the car just burns the tires but i notick the tach hits 5500 before i feel the car start to move
And you want to blame the converter manufacturer?
F-BIRD'88 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2007, 04:14 PM   #11
Supreme Member
 
UnderCover89TBI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Manteca,California. Nor Cal.
Posts: 6,079
Car: 89 Chevrolet Camaro RS
Engine: TBI
Transmission: 700R4 w/ Vigilante Stall Converter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.42 limited slip

Classifieds Rating: (12)
Send a message via Yahoo to UnderCover89TBI
Re: hughes converter not impressed

ive heard that out of the cheaper stuff hu;ghes is the way to go. bm and tci are crapola.
UnderCover89TBI is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2007, 11:23 AM   #12
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Southwest Florida
Posts: 4,367
Car: projects.......

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to Shagwell
Re: hughes converter not impressed

Quote:
Originally Posted by CndypntZ View Post
its a rebuilt transmission with less that 2000 miles on it and i never had any problems with it behind my other motor as for the wheel spin the car just burns the tires but i notick the tach hits 5500 before i feel the car start to move
...I hope you're not going by the factoy tach.....r
Shagwell is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2007, 05:22 PM   #13
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 12

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: hughes converter not impressed

no im running an autometer pro comp tach
CndypntZ is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2007, 09:44 AM   #14
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Southwest Florida
Posts: 4,367
Car: projects.......

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to Shagwell
Re: hughes converter not impressed

good, but as stated, you can't really tell where the converter hits if the tires are spinning.
Shagwell is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2007, 08:07 PM   #15
Supreme Member
 
xpndbl3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Orland Park, IL
Posts: 12,950
Car: 1984 Z28
Engine: SLOW carbed ls
Transmission: TH400 with brake, 8" PTC converter
Axle/Gears: moser 9" 4.11

Classifieds Rating: (5)
Send a message via AIM to xpndbl3
Re: hughes converter not impressed

sounds like the converter is fine, you need to dead hook or being rolling and bounce it in 3rd without a downshift to see where it stalls.
__________________
2011 chicago world of wheels placed in super street class
Best Engine '11 Thirdgenfest
Best Modified Camaro Thirdgenfest '05, '07, '11 Second place Camaro Modified '06, '08, & '10
MFBA March 2008 Featured Calendar Vehicle
xpndbl3 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2007, 12:57 PM   #16
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Medford, Oregon
Posts: 2,808
Car: 1982 Camaro
Engine: 377ci
Transmission: TH350/4200 Stall

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: hughes converter not impressed

Hughes converters are some of the best and their customer service is great.
unknown_host is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2007, 10:06 AM   #17
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 16
Car: 86 Berlinetta
Engine: 454 coming eventually
Transmission: TH-400
Axle/Gears: 4 link and 9" coming eventually

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: hughes converter not impressed

I haven't had any luck with B&M converters, neither have my friends. I had a 3000 stall in my camaro for 2 months and smoked it, I ran a 2000 in my mud truck and smoked that too. My buddy went through one in his chevelle and switched to tci which has held up to his 500 hp small block pretty well. My next one will be a tci or hughes. I've heard mostly good things about both.

B&M shift kits and tranny parts are great. I just wasn't very impressed with their converters. I rebuilt my tranny with one of their overhaul kits and it works great and shifts hard.
Chevyguy496 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2007, 11:12 AM   #18
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Southwest Florida
Posts: 4,367
Car: projects.......

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to Shagwell
Re: hughes converter not impressed

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chevyguy496 View Post
I haven't had any luck with B&M converters, neither have my friends. I had a 3000 stall in my camaro for 2 months and smoked it, I ran a 2000 in my mud truck and smoked that too. My buddy went through one in his chevelle and switched to tci which has held up to his 500 hp small block pretty well. My next one will be a tci or hughes. I've heard mostly good things about both.

B&M shift kits and tranny parts are great. I just wasn't very impressed with their converters. I rebuilt my tranny with one of their overhaul kits and it works great and shifts hard.
B&M and TCI build mass produced low-end mail order parts. TCI has just released a HD input and reaction shell for the 700, a trans that has been around since the early 80's. The reaction shell is one of the most failure prone factory parts available. Other companies that know what they're doing with parts for heavy duty overdrive transmissions have had items like this available for many years. - B&M's "shift-kit" is nothing more than solid shims for the accumulators which creates excessively hard shifts at all throttle levels and is a quick way to help kill a trans.

- There's a reason neither company can build a 700 rated for over 500hp. They build ok parts for mildly modded stock vehicles. Past that you have to spend a little money and buy quality parts.

- now back to topic -
You'll never hook street tires. It's controlled spin. That said, it's hard to say one way or the other where the converter is actually stalling too if the tires are spinning.
__________________
Jp Shawgo - Close E'nuff Racing

1986 camaro - 10.5 outlaw/Outlaw 632
1989 GTA vert
www.sandeperformance.com
www.transmission-specialties.com
Shagwell is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2007, 09:03 PM   #19
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 49
Car: 89 Camaro Iroc-Z
Engine: 350
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.42 7.625 10 bolt

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to Captain Morgan
Re: hughes converter not impressed

B&M converters are TERRIBLE! I bought a new summit street strip TH350 for my car and a B&M holeshot 2400 converter and it was a pile. I drove the car for half a day and the first time i tried to flash the converter it broke one the of bearings inside pumping my brand new transmission full of shavings. Needless to say after i towed my car home i was very impressed. When i called B&M there service was terrible, they kept telling me how my motor shouldnt have broke it and it shouldnt have done that and i am sure i put it in right and did not want to do anything to make it right. So i told them never mind, took the tranny out, took the converter out, returned the converter defective, replaced the front pump in the tranny becuase that was junk from the converter and bought a hughes 2500HD and i LOVE IT. It has been great, it flashes at 2700 and it is still holding up a year of abuse later.
Captain Morgan is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2007, 09:42 PM   #20
Senior Member
 
Mikz86TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Tallahassee, Florida
Posts: 860
Car: '86 Trans Am and '03 S-10
Engine: 355ci and 4.3l
Transmission: 700R4 and NV3500
Axle/Gears: 7.625/3.42 Auburn and 8.5/3.08 Gov-

Classifieds Rating: (4)
Re: hughes converter not impressed

I had to get a new converter for my rebuild. I didnt want a TCI or B&M because I know from experience and others experiences about their stuff. It isnt good experiences either. Im with Shagwell and Da Captain on that issue. Hughes I heard of but no experiences thus far. I had one more option for something I could afford now and that was a brand that Superior Transmission Parts here in Tally use. They are called Precision but its not the same one that makes the Vigilante. Its Precision of New Hampton I believe. I picked up a 2100 stall for under $200. It looks very well built but I will have to wait and see in a few weeks after I get it all going again. With my setup it should be 2500 or a little more and flash higher too. Here is their site if anyone wants to check them out. A few people I talked to swears by them. Guess I will see. http://www.gopnh.com/
Mikz86TA is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2007, 09:10 PM   #21
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 30

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: hughes converter not impressed

Yank > *
CrabhartLS1 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2007, 09:10 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Aftermarket Product Review

Tags
2500, 5500, camaro, chip, converter, converters, convertors, edge, flash, good, hughes, installed, slippage, stall, stalling, tci
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details