Aftermarket Product Review Provide questions and answers about aftermarket parts for the Third Generation F-Body.

K&N filters...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-25-2012, 07:22 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Maroonz2800's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Saskatchewan
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1987 camaro sport (Z28 interior)
Engine: V6, I6, V8, I4, I3
Transmission: auto w/OD, 5-speed, 6-speed
Axle/Gears: u/k
K&N filters...

Are k&n filters worth it? they say they give you a few extra horsepower and better fuel economy blah blah blah blah...do they actually do the job better than your average filter?
Old 02-25-2012, 07:27 PM
  #2  
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Killerz187's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Indian Mound, TN
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '91 Camaro RS T-Top
Engine: 383 Stroker
Transmission: Bulldog 700r-4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: K&N filters...

If they do, I've never felt a difference.

I'd say just stick to one of the cheapos. Purolators have never failed me before, and I can buy a load of them for the price of a K&N.
Old 02-25-2012, 07:34 PM
  #3  
Supreme Member

 
DJP87Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,771
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
Car: 1987 Black IROC-Z (SOLD)
Re: K&N filters...

You either use K&N filters or you don't. I have been using the same K&N's since 1988 (do clean and reoil) and I like them. But do they give extra horsepower, anyones guess.
Old 02-25-2012, 07:39 PM
  #4  
Supreme Member

 
DJP87Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,771
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
Car: 1987 Black IROC-Z (SOLD)
Re: K&N filters...

You either use K&N filters or you don't. I have used the same K&N filters since 1988 (do clean and reoil) and like them. Do they add extra horsepower, it is open to anyones opinion.
Attached Thumbnails K&N filters...-engine-picture-front.jpg  
Old 02-25-2012, 07:48 PM
  #5  
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Killerz187's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Indian Mound, TN
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '91 Camaro RS T-Top
Engine: 383 Stroker
Transmission: Bulldog 700r-4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: K&N filters...

I will give them one thing, they do last forever if they are taken care of, so they're worth it in that regard.
Old 02-25-2012, 09:30 PM
  #6  
Supreme Member

 
Ron U.S.M.C.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Northern, CA
Posts: 4,482
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Car: 1989 Iroc-Z Camaro
Engine: TBI,5.0
Transmission: Automatic 700R4
Axle/Gears: Eaton Posi,3.42,LPW Ultimate Cover
Re: K&N filters...

I prefer this with my cowl hood. Its a Summit brand power lid and filter. It oils and cleans like the K&N
Dose it filter well or better ? I know it sucks air like there no tomorrow put your hand on top and you can feel it.


Last edited by Ron U.S.M.C.; 02-29-2012 at 07:33 PM.
Old 02-26-2012, 01:07 AM
  #7  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (4)
 
InfernalVortex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Macon, GA
Posts: 6,485
Received 20 Likes on 17 Posts
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: Vortec headed 355, xe262
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt 3.70
Re: K&N filters...

Summit K&N knockoff stuff is allegedly made by Spectre. I run a summit K&N type filter too.

Whether they give a power increase or not... Im sure that just depends on whether or not in your entire engine, whether the filter itself is a bottleneck or not. It's entirely plausible than the K&N filters flow better, but the paper filters may not be anywhere near their maximum flow capacity in your engine to begin with.

Personally I Just like them because they look nice. Thats about it. The cleaning and re-oiling... i still think a paper filter is cheaper than maintaining a reusable one, but they sure do look nice.
Old 02-26-2012, 01:37 AM
  #8  
Member

 
ROCFATHER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Los Angeles (310)
Posts: 496
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 89 IROC-VERT
Engine: TPI 305
Transmission: 700R4 Auto
Axle/Gears: 2.77
Re: K&N filters...

More horse power? I doubt it. Your paying more because they last forever if properly maintained. Thats about it.
Old 02-28-2012, 05:38 PM
  #9  
Junior Member
 
ironmansed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: alabama
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 92 camaro rs
Engine: 350 h/o
Re: K&N filters...

how do u maintain them. i know how to clean, but how do you re-oil them
Old 02-28-2012, 06:21 PM
  #10  
Member

 
71nova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1990 Iroc Z
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt
Re: K&N filters...

Originally Posted by ironmansed
how do u maintain them. i know how to clean, but how do you re-oil them
k&n filter oil
Old 02-29-2012, 06:50 AM
  #11  
Supreme Member

 
DJP87Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,771
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
Car: 1987 Black IROC-Z (SOLD)
Re: K&N filters...

Originally Posted by 71nova
k&n filter oil


K&N has a maintance kit with all you need. That kit will last for years, Only warning... DO NOT OVER OIL.
Old 02-29-2012, 11:43 AM
  #12  
Member

iTrader: (10)
 
tater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Altus, Oklahoma
Posts: 202
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: Dad's 87 Bird (Org Owner)
Engine: Vortec 350 Crate Motor
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Posi
Re: K&N filters...

Just wish I would have thought of something that has no proven hp advantage and persuade the majority of the public it is the best thing since sliced bread.....

Just envious, I guess.
Old 02-29-2012, 07:17 PM
  #13  
Supreme Member

 
Ron U.S.M.C.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Northern, CA
Posts: 4,482
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Car: 1989 Iroc-Z Camaro
Engine: TBI,5.0
Transmission: Automatic 700R4
Axle/Gears: Eaton Posi,3.42,LPW Ultimate Cover
Re: K&N filters...

"To me" paper looks cheap, because it is.Even "if" K&Ns flow/filter only a little better than stock, "to me" they still say performance. ?

On a different note..... When I open my hood what do I see ?.This is my daily driver. Its not spotless or have allot of nice bolt on shining up at you. So whats left.Most definitely the K&N style filter and assembly,and my cap, wires .Dang it even the filter has to come off to pass smog here.Kind of limits what I can do with it.

There is another thread just like this one somewhere on debating the subject extensively.

Last edited by Ron U.S.M.C.; 02-29-2012 at 08:28 PM.
Old 02-29-2012, 07:24 PM
  #14  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
DeathStarr89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Davenport, Iowa
Posts: 1,598
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: Still a 3rd Gen
Engine: 450HP 355
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 9" with 4.11's
Re: K&N filters...

Power gains depend on what you started with.. If it's an undersized paper filter then sure there is going to be a gain with one that flows more air.



They last forever, that's the real advantage.
Old 02-29-2012, 08:48 PM
  #15  
Senior Member

 
Dizturbed One's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sacramento, California
Posts: 992
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 92 RS
Engine: a slow one
Transmission: a crunchy one
Axle/Gears: a whiny one
Re: K&N filters...

A K&N isn't about HP gains, they are about economy.

Sure they flow better, when you're pushing a ping pong ball with a fan in an autozone display... LOL. Nothing your car will use though. And they let A LOT more dust through them than a paper filter does.

But they save a lot of money in the long haul.
Old 02-29-2012, 10:17 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
ZZ3 Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Chicagoland area
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1986 Z28
Engine: ZZ3
Re: K&N filters...

A Fram 327 filter for my car is less than 6 bucks at AZ and the K&N filter is $40+. If I replaced the filter once a year (the car is summer only) it would take me about 7 years for a ROI. I'll stick with the paper filter and forgo the "increased horsepower" myth.
Old 03-01-2012, 02:29 AM
  #17  
Senior Member

 
IROCtheRoad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Hurlburt Field
Posts: 738
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 84 Z28, '15 Colorado
Engine: L69
Transmission: A4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: K&N filters...

I've always used K&N filters and am very happy with them.
Old 03-01-2012, 06:20 AM
  #18  
Supreme Member

 
eseibel67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Kitchener, ON
Posts: 2,327
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Car: 1988 GTA
Engine: LB9
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.45
Re: K&N filters...

Originally Posted by Dizturbed One
A K&N isn't about HP gains, they are about economy.

Sure they flow better, when you're pushing a ping pong ball with a fan in an autozone display... LOL. Nothing your car will use though. And they let A LOT more dust through them than a paper filter does.

But they save a lot of money in the long haul.
This is the biggest disadvantage of K&N. Also, if your engine uses a MAF, the oil from the filter will contaminate the sensor and give inaccurate readings.

If you've ever cleaned and oiled a K&N, it's not a nice job. I'd rather buy a new filter paper, and I'm the epitome of cheap.
Old 03-01-2012, 07:19 AM
  #19  
Supreme Member

 
DJP87Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,771
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
Car: 1987 Black IROC-Z (SOLD)
Re: K&N filters...

Originally Posted by eseibel67
This is the biggest disadvantage of K&N. Also, if your engine uses a MAF, the oil from the filter will contaminate the sensor and give inaccurate readings.

If you've ever cleaned and oiled a K&N, it's not a nice job. I'd rather buy a new filter paper, and I'm the epitome of cheap.
Don't like to get your hands dirty. Only nasty when you go overboard with the oil which most people do. They are not suposed to be dripping oil. Used the same TPI type K&N filters for 24 years (with simple maintance once a year) and NEVER had ANY problems with my Maf Sensor..
Old 03-01-2012, 07:26 AM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
dctrouant1995's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: dothan, al
Posts: 668
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1988 pontiac trans am
Engine: None
Transmission: None
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt
Re: K&N filters...

just put one on yesterday, along with spark plugs, wires, and a cap and rotor kit. Do I notice any difference? not really, fuel economy is better and it a tad more power than it did before. Its not noticeble but you can kinda tell
Old 03-01-2012, 10:47 AM
  #21  
2011 Norwood Gathering
ThirdGen Firebird Rep

 
Jason E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Sarasota FL
Posts: 3,435
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 99 WS6 / 00 SS / 11 CTS-V / 13 300
Engine: LS1 / LS1 / LSA / 5.7 Hemi
Transmission: 4L60E / T-56 / 6L80E / W5A80
Axle/Gears: 3.23 / 3.42 Auburn / 3.23 / 2.62
Re: K&N filters...

In a stock third gen Camaro air cleaner, 2 fresh K&Ns with the removable baffles taken out yielded a little bit snappier throttle response on a 21k mile 350 in perfect health. Other than that, I couldn't tell ya...but all my performance cars have always used K&Ns. I get paper ones for the DDs every 20k or so...
Old 03-01-2012, 12:45 PM
  #22  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (4)
 
chazman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 9,668
Received 546 Likes on 376 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: K&N filters...

Originally Posted by Jason E
In a stock third gen Camaro air cleaner, 2 fresh K&Ns with the removable baffles taken out yielded a little bit snappier throttle response on a 21k mile 350 in perfect health. Other than that, I couldn't tell ya...but all my performance cars have always used K&Ns. I get paper ones for the DDs every 20k or so...
That's how it starts Jason. First you take out the baffles, the you drill holes, then you simply cut the bottoms out.....


As far as K&N's, I've been using them forever and have put hundreds of thousands of miles on them. Did they increase my performance? I don't know. I guess compared to the dirty paper filters they replaced.
Old 03-01-2012, 12:50 PM
  #23  
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
justcallmeclassy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Springfield Missouri
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1992 Camaro RS Z03 T-Top
Engine: L98 with TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.73...
Re: K&N filters...

Originally Posted by InfernalVortex
Summit K&N knockoff stuff is allegedly made by Spectre. I run a summit K&N type filter too.

Whether they give a power increase or not... Im sure that just depends on whether or not in your entire engine, whether the filter itself is a bottleneck or not. It's entirely plausible than the K&N filters flow better, but the paper filters may not be anywhere near their maximum flow capacity in your engine to begin with.

Personally I Just like them because they look nice. Thats about it. The cleaning and re-oiling... i still think a paper filter is cheaper than maintaining a reusable one, but they sure do look nice.
Summit K&N IS Spectre... I've got one. You can go get them at O'Riellys, Pep Boys, Auto Zone they're a lot cheaper and do the same thing
Old 03-01-2012, 01:02 PM
  #24  
Senior Member

 
keeslinger31's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Missouri
Posts: 614
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: Camaro RS
Engine: obd2 350 lt1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: K&N filters...

Sure they do the same thing. Filter air. But do that do it as well as a k&n? I would rather have a paper filter than a spectre and a k&n over the paper.
Old 03-01-2012, 01:19 PM
  #25  
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
justcallmeclassy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Springfield Missouri
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1992 Camaro RS Z03 T-Top
Engine: L98 with TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.73...
Re: K&N filters...

Originally Posted by keeslinger31
Sure they do the same thing. Filter air. But do that do it as well as a k&n? I would rather have a paper filter than a spectre and a k&n over the paper.
And for what reason? Every review I've ever read on Spectre says they perform EXACTLY like a K&N, in both longetivity and performance gains. Just because they're cheaper and don't come with a nice sticker for your rear window doesn't mean its an inferior product. Hell the only way you can tell the difference on a PROPERLY MANTAINED one is that it say SPECTRE right on it
Old 03-01-2012, 01:27 PM
  #26  
Senior Member

 
keeslinger31's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Missouri
Posts: 614
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: Camaro RS
Engine: obd2 350 lt1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: K&N filters...

Because a spectre filter to me screams cheap teenager from autozone rice rocket pvc looks like ***** filter
Old 03-01-2012, 02:10 PM
  #27  
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
justcallmeclassy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Springfield Missouri
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1992 Camaro RS Z03 T-Top
Engine: L98 with TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.73...
Re: K&N filters...

Oh I see. Wanting to save money on an identical product is a bad thing now and makes you riced out.
Old 03-01-2012, 07:50 PM
  #28  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (4)
 
InfernalVortex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Macon, GA
Posts: 6,485
Received 20 Likes on 17 Posts
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: Vortec headed 355, xe262
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt 3.70
Re: K&N filters...

I don't think spectre's filters are of any lesser quality than k&n and I've had multiple examples of both. I'm not worried about it in the least. Got a k&n in the closet and a spectre on the car.
Old 03-01-2012, 09:07 PM
  #29  
Junior Member
 
RSCAMAROGUY91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Maynardville, TN
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 RS Camaro w/ Factory T-Tops
Engine: Built 355 ci SBC w/ Carb
Transmission: Borg Warner T-5
Axle/Gears: 4.10 with Posi-Trac
Re: K&N filters...

Personally I've got a K&N filter on my Camaro, and a K&N intake system on my 2000 K2500. I've never had any problems. When I put the filter in the Camaro I didn't notice any real difference in the performance mainly because I already had several other mods done to it. The K2500 was a little different. I noticed That there wasn't as much of a "sucking" sound during acceleration, and I check my millage, and it has consistently gotten about 1-2 mpg better than the stock system. But the main reason that I've gone with K&N is the ability to reuse them.
Old 04-09-2012, 10:50 AM
  #30  
Junior Member
 
Ian Irvine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: K&N filters...

I have had the same K&N on my 84 Z28 since 95...still works. I am running a supercharged 383 and there is no power loss with or without the filter on the dyno. I'm a believer.
Old 04-09-2012, 12:35 PM
  #31  
Senior Member

 
DethVenture's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Kennesaw, GA
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: L03 5.0L
Transmission: 700R4 Auto
Re: K&N filters...

Originally Posted by Maroonz2800
Are k&n filters worth it? they say they give you a few extra horsepower and better fuel economy blah blah blah blah...do they actually do the job better than your average filter?
Me and my dad put a K&N Air Filter on the family Suburban and it made a difference in engine response and bumped the MPG up to 17-18 from 15-16.
Old 04-09-2012, 01:23 PM
  #32  
Supreme Member

 
8t2 z-chev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: belle fourche,s.d.
Posts: 2,148
Received 60 Likes on 54 Posts
Car: '82 z28
Engine: L83 5.7
Transmission: 700r4-1985
Axle/Gears: 3.42 posi
Re: K&N filters...

I use K&N on my CFI z28 and my porsche and have
found K&N filter and flow very good-whenever i clean
the filters(very easyBTW)i always carefully inspect for
any dust getting past-has always been very clean past
the filters with no dust foundAlso the K&Ns fit well,
further protecting against dust getting past.
Old 04-10-2012, 06:57 AM
  #33  
Member
 
white1991rs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Michigan
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS/1989 Formula
Engine: 5.0 L03 V8
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: K&N filters...

I'd say K&N filters are worth it because they claim its lifetime filter. You can wash it and its brand new and I think there's a warranty if anything happens to it.
Old 04-10-2012, 10:17 AM
  #34  
Senior Member

iTrader: (3)
 
calebzman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 805
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: '85 TA
Engine: 350 turbo
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.70 posi 9bolt
Re: K&N filters...

Unless the engine is carbureted, you will not see a mpg change with an air filter change. That myth has been debunked.

I use K&N cone filters in both the TA and cobalt ss.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Maverick H1L
Tech / General Engine
1
07-26-2014 01:24 AM
churchofruss
Tech / General Engine
2
09-08-2012 05:10 PM
nighthawk355x
TPI
16
04-25-2010 11:14 PM



Quick Reply: K&N filters...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:54 AM.