Door Bar Removal
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Buford, GA
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1986 ****** Camaro
Engine: 355
Transmission: th350
Axle/Gears: 3.42 10 bolt - temporary
Door Bar Removal
Anyone have any idea how to remove the door crash bar? They do it pretty easy in the 4th gens, but it seems kinda hard on the 3rd. Has anyone sucessfully done it? What is the weight difference on a manual door vs power?
These doors just seem sooooo heavy.
These doors just seem sooooo heavy.
#2
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: glenwood IL
Posts: 1,674
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 85z28,
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700r4
If u are going to drive your car on the street i would leave the doors alone.. But if u wanted them out drill the spot welds out. And pry them out.. Going to mess up the door.
#3
Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Newmarket, NH
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91Z28
Engine: 305
Transmission: WC T-5
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt Posi, 3.08
It would probably cause the door skin to warp or buckle. Thats the only thing keeping that body line there. Wouldnt be too safe unless you welded in an aluminum bar or something.
#4
Supreme Member
iTrader: (45)
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Northern, VA
Posts: 3,970
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Pair of 92 Z28s
Re: Door Bar Removal
Originally posted by LETZ RUN
Anyone have any idea how to remove the door crash bar? They do it pretty easy in the 4th gens, but it seems kinda hard on the 3rd. Has anyone sucessfully done it? What is the weight difference on a manual door vs power?
These doors just seem sooooo heavy.
Anyone have any idea how to remove the door crash bar? They do it pretty easy in the 4th gens, but it seems kinda hard on the 3rd. Has anyone sucessfully done it? What is the weight difference on a manual door vs power?
These doors just seem sooooo heavy.
You bought a third gen deal with the heavy *** door...deal with it. Is taking that bar out really a practical thing to do?
#5
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: glenwood IL
Posts: 1,674
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 85z28,
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700r4
The guy is just asking. Don't have to jump all over him.... I'm not for sure but on some year 3rd gens they had door with smaller crash bars in them. Not sure what years but i have seen them.
#6
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Washington
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 86 t/a
Engine: 383 sbc on nitrous
Transmission: Th350 with trans brake
Axle/Gears: 9in ford
if it is a race car that only see's the track why not. we used to do it in the g bodys all the time, took out about 12 pounders per side. but for a race only car why not put on fiberglass doors.
Nathan
Nathan
#7
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Buford, GA
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1986 ****** Camaro
Engine: 355
Transmission: th350
Axle/Gears: 3.42 10 bolt - temporary
yeah it is a race car. thanks for those offered advice. for the bashers, i asked a technical question. i didnt ask for feedback from the peanut gallery.
The following users liked this post:
MikeJR1991 (01-21-2021)
Trending Topics
#8
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska
Posts: 1,047
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1988 Firebird, 2000 GTP
Engine: 327
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9" posi, 4.11
I can't remember which issue it was in, but the bar in the door is actually part of the frame. Since it's a Uni-body, they utilize the doors as part of the frame, that is the reason for them being so heavy and the hinges going out on them. I'll look through my CHP magazines and see if I can find the article about it.
It's in the March 2006 on P.24
http://www.andyz28.com/3rdGen/article/BodyIntegrity.htm
It's in the March 2006 on P.24
http://www.andyz28.com/3rdGen/article/BodyIntegrity.htm
#9
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
I can't remember which issue it was in, but the bar in the door is actually part of the frame. Since it's a Uni-body, they utilize the doors as part of the frame, that is the reason for them being so heavy and the hinges going out on them. I'll look through my CHP magazines and see if I can find the article about it.
It's in the March 2006 on P.24
http://www.andyz28.com/3rdGen/article/BodyIntegrity.htm
It's in the March 2006 on P.24
http://www.andyz28.com/3rdGen/article/BodyIntegrity.htm
how is the door going to have any kind of structural support for the body of the car?!? one end of the door is a latch which can slide back and forth,up/down, or however it wants. the other end of the door is a friggin' hinge.
its not adding anything to the body. its in there for the same reason the 4th gen cars have them. side impact.
#10
Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Jenkintown, PA
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 00 F-bird/84 F-bird/88 Formula
Engine: 3.8L/2.8L/5.0L 305
its what going to save your a$$ though when someone tbones you....wouldn't be a pretty site. i would vote go with fiberglass doors or equally reinforce them with aluminum or other lighter metal...i wouldn't risk TOO much safety over weight...
good luck!
and p.s. no idea how to remove the supports...never looked at mine...
good luck!
and p.s. no idea how to remove the supports...never looked at mine...
#11
Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Fort Wayne, Indiana
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 87 camaro sc
Engine: 357 w/ cc qjet
Transmission: 700 r4
so if the front and back of the doors are "fixed" how would that not keep the body straighter. seems to me that it would help alot with body flex. it si a 3foot long peace of the car that when closed adds a horizontal "bar" about 1.5 ft above the frame of the car. so when the car wants to twist from a hard launch lets say it will resist the flex of the frame.
hmmmmm
hmmmmm
#12
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 556
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1986 Z28
Engine: LT1
Transmission: T5 WC
Axle/Gears: 3.42 T2R
its what going to save your a$$ though when someone tbones you....wouldn't be a pretty site. i would vote go with fiberglass doors or equally reinforce them with aluminum or other lighter metal...i wouldn't risk TOO much safety over weight...
good luck!
and p.s. no idea how to remove the supports...never looked at mine...
good luck!
and p.s. no idea how to remove the supports...never looked at mine...
Some of the door skins I've seen gutted are just pinned on. I don't see a point of wasting money on fiberglass doors, cause just the skin doesn't weigh jack.
As far as getting the beam off, my roommate and I used a cutoff wheel on his Monza to get the beam out of the rally car.
#13
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Saskatchewan
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 84 Z28HO
Engine: 350 summit block
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73 10bolt
I can't remember which issue it was in, but the bar in the door is actually part of the frame. Since it's a Uni-body, they utilize the doors as part of the frame, that is the reason for them being so heavy and the hinges going out on them. I'll look through my CHP magazines and see if I can find the article about it.
It's in the March 2006 on P.24
http://www.andyz28.com/3rdGen/article/BodyIntegrity.htm
It's in the March 2006 on P.24
http://www.andyz28.com/3rdGen/article/BodyIntegrity.htm
#14
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: MA
Posts: 1,775
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1995 Formula; 1976 Trans Am
Engine: LT1; None
Transmission: T56; None
I've never fully understood the quest to rid cars of every extra ounce for insignificantly lower quarter mile times.
Seems like it'd be more sensible to build a more potent engine or swap in a lower rear gear than to remove structural pieces.
Or, go on a diet and shed 5, 10, even 20 lbs. That's more weight than will be removed if the door bars are taken out.
And I'm not bashing or joking about the diet, it is a valid way to remove weight from the car.
Seems like it'd be more sensible to build a more potent engine or swap in a lower rear gear than to remove structural pieces.
Or, go on a diet and shed 5, 10, even 20 lbs. That's more weight than will be removed if the door bars are taken out.
And I'm not bashing or joking about the diet, it is a valid way to remove weight from the car.
#15
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Buford, GA
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1986 ****** Camaro
Engine: 355
Transmission: th350
Axle/Gears: 3.42 10 bolt - temporary
I've never fully understood the quest to rid cars of every extra ounce for insignificantly lower quarter mile times.
Seems like it'd be more sensible to build a more potent engine or swap in a lower rear gear than to remove structural pieces.
Or, go on a diet and shed 5, 10, even 20 lbs. That's more weight than will be removed if the door bars are taken out.
And I'm not bashing or joking about the diet, it is a valid way to remove weight from the car.
Seems like it'd be more sensible to build a more potent engine or swap in a lower rear gear than to remove structural pieces.
Or, go on a diet and shed 5, 10, even 20 lbs. That's more weight than will be removed if the door bars are taken out.
And I'm not bashing or joking about the diet, it is a valid way to remove weight from the car.
You probably dont understand it because you are not a racer.
#16
Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1987 Camaro
Engine: 400 sbc
Transmission: 700R4
To some people it's not worth it, to others it is.....
- Justin
#19
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: MA
Posts: 1,775
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1995 Formula; 1976 Trans Am
Engine: LT1; None
Transmission: T56; None
Maybe. But that is a supposition.
Remember the Swiss Cheese Catalinas from the 60's? They had numerous circular holes cut in the frames to eliminate weight. Cars ended up being weaker than desireable, so the practice was scrapped.
The link above has some important info regarding the function that the doors on our cars serve in strengthening the entire chassis. I read that a few weeks ago when researching the door hinge kits that are out there.
At any rate, good luck with whatever path you choose, and whatever race you enter.
Remember the Swiss Cheese Catalinas from the 60's? They had numerous circular holes cut in the frames to eliminate weight. Cars ended up being weaker than desireable, so the practice was scrapped.
The link above has some important info regarding the function that the doors on our cars serve in strengthening the entire chassis. I read that a few weeks ago when researching the door hinge kits that are out there.
At any rate, good luck with whatever path you choose, and whatever race you enter.
#20
Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1987 Camaro
Engine: 400 sbc
Transmission: 700R4
#21
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Il
Posts: 11,723
Received 773 Likes
on
520 Posts
Car: 1989-92 FORMULA350 305 92 Hawkclone
Engine: 4++,350 & 305 CIs
Transmission: 700R4 4800 vig 18th700R4 t56 ZF6 T5
Axle/Gears: 3.70 9"ford alum chunk,dana44,9bolt
Take Door bars out, install rollcage dump all the weight you can The door bars do help in a front crash also.... they help keep the pass compartment from collapsing(sp) thats the reason you use a cage..
I cut my mine out in 3 or 4 pieces to get them out
DEATH TO THE SAFETY ***** !!!!!!!!!!!!!! Ralf Nader can eat a D*ck
I cut my mine out in 3 or 4 pieces to get them out
DEATH TO THE SAFETY ***** !!!!!!!!!!!!!! Ralf Nader can eat a D*ck
Last edited by TTOP350; 11-16-2006 at 09:17 AM.
#22
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
this is obviusly not intended for a street car... lol
the bar is for side impacts, and offers very little "structural integrity" to the body. i would say almost none.
that being said, if your working on a drag car (like i am), what do you need those bars for? they will just make the door heavier and wear out the hinges sooner....
also, i gotta add this. i have cruised around the 4th gen sites for the past 7 years and only frequent this site on occasion the past 3 years or so. what i have noticed is a majority of the 3rd gen guys are WAAY more cautious and afraid to try new things. which puts most of the people on here in the dark!
not only with this door bar issue, but many other things. im not trying to down the people on this site, i just think people on here should live a little and stop being so afraid to try new things. stuff that dads mechanic told you 15 years ago might not be such a big deal afterall.
the bar is for side impacts, and offers very little "structural integrity" to the body. i would say almost none.
that being said, if your working on a drag car (like i am), what do you need those bars for? they will just make the door heavier and wear out the hinges sooner....
also, i gotta add this. i have cruised around the 4th gen sites for the past 7 years and only frequent this site on occasion the past 3 years or so. what i have noticed is a majority of the 3rd gen guys are WAAY more cautious and afraid to try new things. which puts most of the people on here in the dark!
not only with this door bar issue, but many other things. im not trying to down the people on this site, i just think people on here should live a little and stop being so afraid to try new things. stuff that dads mechanic told you 15 years ago might not be such a big deal afterall.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 678
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '89 Firebird Formula
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: T5
stripped out drag cars never impress me to begin with, I dont care how fast you can go if you stripped out all comforts...... let alone integral safety features like a crash bar... jeex.
build your own ****ing car if you want less weight... literally.. and go faster then 13 secs, cos its getting old considering we've been at the 4 second mark for awhile ;p
now that im done bashing this thread i know there are at least 2 different kinds of door bars, because mine has one of each, one is stamped steel and one is just a tube.. id guess the tube would be easier to cut out and remove, but at the same time theres probably less weight savings to be had in the first place
build your own ****ing car if you want less weight... literally.. and go faster then 13 secs, cos its getting old considering we've been at the 4 second mark for awhile ;p
now that im done bashing this thread i know there are at least 2 different kinds of door bars, because mine has one of each, one is stamped steel and one is just a tube.. id guess the tube would be easier to cut out and remove, but at the same time theres probably less weight savings to be had in the first place
#24
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
this car is not stripped out. it has carpet and interior panels.
its almost in the 10's with a cam'd LT1, and i hope it will be the fastest stock shortblock LT1 car in the country soon.
purpose built rail cars dont interest me much either. who cares about bracket racing?
its almost in the 10's with a cam'd LT1, and i hope it will be the fastest stock shortblock LT1 car in the country soon.
purpose built rail cars dont interest me much either. who cares about bracket racing?
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: South East MI
Posts: 754
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1992 Camaro RS AKA Big Nasty
Engine: Carbed '79 350 block, 360hp/380ftlbs (flywheel)
Transmission: 6speed from an unidentified 4th gen. ask me, ill tell you.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post