Lightning Audio
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Sayreville, NJ
Posts: 589
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 72 Fbird. Want another 3rd gen :(
Engine: Poncho 350
Transmission: Turbo 350
Lightning Audio
anyone heard of it? i got my speakers and deck and it sounds pretty good.. but now maybe adding an amp,, looked at a bunch of lightning stuff.. anyone had em?
#2
Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Savanna, Ok
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: on the hunt for a 3rd gen again
they're made by rockford, but stay away from the bolt (yellow) and the fast and furious (red) series. everything else is fine from what i've heard..........what kind of a budget are you on and what kind of subs do you have?what kind of sound do you want?
#3
Supreme Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Surrey, BC Wheels:KMC Clocker 17"
Posts: 1,101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1985 Trans Am
Engine: upgrading...
Transmission: upgrading...
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Sayreville, NJ
Posts: 589
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 72 Fbird. Want another 3rd gen :(
Engine: Poncho 350
Transmission: Turbo 350
thanks.. i have no subs or anything yet.. thats what im looking into.. im not sure what to get yet
#5
Supreme Member
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: mid GA
Posts: 1,926
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 88 IROC
Engine: 305 TPI w/ l98 cam
Transmission: T5 5-speed
Axle/Gears: 3.45 posi disc 9 bolt
i have a couple of lightning audio 12"s (cast series i think, cant remember) that i wouldnt mind getting rid of. theyre great subs i think i have a link of these in my friends blazer that i bought them from. ill try and get the link up later. but i also have an amp. its a sony explode 1200 watt 2 channel. it puts out 200 watts rms to 2 channels and these subs and this amp are a great combo. lmk if your interested i can get you pics and cut you a good deal if you buy both.
#6
Supreme Member
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: mid GA
Posts: 1,926
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 88 IROC
Engine: 305 TPI w/ l98 cam
Transmission: T5 5-speed
Axle/Gears: 3.45 posi disc 9 bolt
link...
i found the links here they are. let me know if your interested in this stuff.
http://www.realmofexcursion.com/vide...la12flex.1.wmv
http://www.realmofexcursion.com/vide...dio/1214.1.wmv
http://www.realmofexcursion.com/vide...la12flex.1.wmv
http://www.realmofexcursion.com/vide...dio/1214.1.wmv
Trending Topics
#8
Supreme Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: pefferlaw ontario
Posts: 1,951
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1987 iroc-z custom
Engine: 355 tuned port
Transmission: 5spd baby, only way to go
Axle/Gears: 3.45
i had a sponsorship for the lightning audio strike series..but i went with eclipse instead..
not a bad company, but i find that eclipse is better
(strike is the highest brand of lightning)
check em out
iroc2nv
not a bad company, but i find that eclipse is better
(strike is the highest brand of lightning)
check em out
iroc2nv
#10
Supreme Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 3,281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 2000 Trans Am WS6 (Black)
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
just because the video shows the woofer doing some extreme-excursion doesn't mean the woofers are bad...
in my experience once you've damage a woofer, you know right away... a very obvious mistake. It's not like buying a 15-year-old car and having non-stop problems with it. damn third gens.
in my experience once you've damage a woofer, you know right away... a very obvious mistake. It's not like buying a 15-year-old car and having non-stop problems with it. damn third gens.
#11
Supreme Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Surrey, BC Wheels:KMC Clocker 17"
Posts: 1,101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1985 Trans Am
Engine: upgrading...
Transmission: upgrading...
Originally posted by ScrapMaker
just because the video shows the woofer doing some extreme-excursion doesn't mean the woofers are bad...
in my experience once you've damage a woofer, you know right away... a very obvious mistake. It's not like buying a 15-year-old car and having non-stop problems with it. damn third gens.
just because the video shows the woofer doing some extreme-excursion doesn't mean the woofers are bad...
in my experience once you've damage a woofer, you know right away... a very obvious mistake. It's not like buying a 15-year-old car and having non-stop problems with it. damn third gens.
#12
Supreme Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 3,281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 2000 Trans Am WS6 (Black)
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Honestly, it completely depends on the price. If they were the same price, yeah I'd like new subs... but think about it, if he can use them to that extent, you know they are good... it's like he test drove them for you
#13
Supreme Member
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: mid GA
Posts: 1,926
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 88 IROC
Engine: 305 TPI w/ l98 cam
Transmission: T5 5-speed
Axle/Gears: 3.45 posi disc 9 bolt
that video is when they were in my friends blazer. They were not used like that all the time. he ran 200 watts rms at 4 ohms to each sub. we hooked up my amp wich put out 1600 watts at 1 ohm when we took this video. these subs were not killed they were used. and i think my asking price of $100 + shipping for two of the subs is a good deal. but the guy hasnt returned my messages.
#14
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Sayreville, NJ
Posts: 589
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 72 Fbird. Want another 3rd gen :(
Engine: Poncho 350
Transmission: Turbo 350
pm was sent.. sorry for not sending was awawy on vacation and couldnt respond
#15
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 10,763
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73
lightning audios strike line (I thought was their mid line?) is very good. The thing about lightning audio that makes them great, is staggered 4 channel amps. Ever think to yourself: Hey, I could use 40W rms for my fronts, but I want around 80W rms for the rears, how come every 4 channel amp is equal front and rears? Now, along comes lightning audio. Good stuff.
#16
Supreme Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 3,281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 2000 Trans Am WS6 (Black)
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
great stuff... not so much...
why would you ever want 'staggered'?
are you saying you can just turn a dial and set how much power is forward/backward, just like the AWD slider on a WRX Sti?
why would you ever want 'staggered'?
are you saying you can just turn a dial and set how much power is forward/backward, just like the AWD slider on a WRX Sti?
#17
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 10,763
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73
no no, instead of 50W rms x4, you get 90W rms in the rears, and 30W rms in the fronts (the model that my brother has, there are other variations..)... makes sense to me.
If your car came with 6.5" rounds in all 4 corners, a 4 channel amp with equal power on all 4 corners makes sense... however, the 2 GM's i've owned, have had big 6x9's in the rear (which can take more power), and 3.5" or 4'x6" in the fronts, which take less. So less power in the front is better (to me).
Of course you could take your "normal" 4 channel amp, and turn the gain down in the front to get the same effect, (since you don't want to blow your tiny front speakers), but this is kinda neat feature.... For the price of a 50Wx4 rms amp, you get nearly 100W rms in the rear, really making your 6x9s sing, and not too much power to get your teeny fronts popping.
JMHO.
If your car came with 6.5" rounds in all 4 corners, a 4 channel amp with equal power on all 4 corners makes sense... however, the 2 GM's i've owned, have had big 6x9's in the rear (which can take more power), and 3.5" or 4'x6" in the fronts, which take less. So less power in the front is better (to me).
Of course you could take your "normal" 4 channel amp, and turn the gain down in the front to get the same effect, (since you don't want to blow your tiny front speakers), but this is kinda neat feature.... For the price of a 50Wx4 rms amp, you get nearly 100W rms in the rear, really making your 6x9s sing, and not too much power to get your teeny fronts popping.
JMHO.
#18
Supreme Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 3,281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 2000 Trans Am WS6 (Black)
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
except most people have more than 4 speakers in their car.. so with that amp you're referring to, how would you power the kicks/doors, AND the dash speakers?
I'd rather have the standard four channel amplifier that puts out 150rms per channel... at least all of the ones that aren't at best buy/wal-mart.... that gives you enough to run one good speaker per channel, or two decent speakers per channel.
I'd rather have the standard four channel amplifier that puts out 150rms per channel... at least all of the ones that aren't at best buy/wal-mart.... that gives you enough to run one good speaker per channel, or two decent speakers per channel.
#19
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 10,763
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73
most people have more than 4 speakers in their car..
#20
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Sayreville, NJ
Posts: 589
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 72 Fbird. Want another 3rd gen :(
Engine: Poncho 350
Transmission: Turbo 350
yeah id stick with 4 unless you were really into the sound system stuff.. which im not i just want a good system that sounds good.. just adding a little more power to it all
#21
Supreme Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 3,281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 2000 Trans Am WS6 (Black)
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
I guess what I meant is that in most cars, they have more than four, stock... not our cars, but in general.. since you were referring to those amplifiers, in general, being good because they have different power front/rear...
#22
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 10,763
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73
oh yea, sorry, I was just referring to 3rd gens... (and to my old '87 Delta 88, and some older GM's in general)
so for our cars, with upgraded speakers, but in stock locations, which I think is pretty common for the members on these boards, I think those are good amps.
so for our cars, with upgraded speakers, but in stock locations, which I think is pretty common for the members on these boards, I think those are good amps.
#23
Supreme Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 3,281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 2000 Trans Am WS6 (Black)
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
ah I understand... the only cars I've been in with four speakers are the generic 90'ish GM 4-door celebrity/buick, thirdgens, and most trucks.
my '84 Buick had 8 speakers, my Dad's '89 Lincoln has 8 speakers as well... my friend's 2000 camaro has 6 speakers... and any suv/minivan has at least 6-8 speakers...
but in general you have a valid point, when dealing with our cars... but the only thing I don't agree with is that an amp should divide up it's power from channel-to-channel... since a typical upgraded 4x6 takes about 50-75rms watts, and a typical 6x9 takes 75-100rms watts... not that big of a difference... and the higher quality speaker you go, the less the difference is between the two.
Generalizations aside, 30WRMS is way too small for any speaker, unless you seal your windows shut and dynamat the entire car...
my '84 Buick had 8 speakers, my Dad's '89 Lincoln has 8 speakers as well... my friend's 2000 camaro has 6 speakers... and any suv/minivan has at least 6-8 speakers...
but in general you have a valid point, when dealing with our cars... but the only thing I don't agree with is that an amp should divide up it's power from channel-to-channel... since a typical upgraded 4x6 takes about 50-75rms watts, and a typical 6x9 takes 75-100rms watts... not that big of a difference... and the higher quality speaker you go, the less the difference is between the two.
Generalizations aside, 30WRMS is way too small for any speaker, unless you seal your windows shut and dynamat the entire car...
#24
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 10,763
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73
most decks put out 22W rms right? well ok, you're not the kinda guy to stick with a deck to power your speakers eh ?
That model is the "tiny" one, the bigger one is something like 60W rms fronts, 110W rms rears, or something like that...
anyway, now we're just beating this to death...
That model is the "tiny" one, the bigger one is something like 60W rms fronts, 110W rms rears, or something like that...
anyway, now we're just beating this to death...
#25
Supreme Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 3,281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 2000 Trans Am WS6 (Black)
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
point is... I've just never really heard/experienced much positive stuff about lightning audio... no matter what... but I guess if some people like it, more power to 'em.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post