Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Carburetors
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Carburetors Carb discussion and questions. Upgrading your Third Gen's carburetor, swapping TBI to carburetor, or TPI to carburetor? Need LG4 or H.O. info? Post it here.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-13-2010, 07:46 PM   #101
Junior Member
 
Kevy Kev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: San Leandro, CA
Posts: 22
Car: 1987 Camaro Z28
Engine: 5.0L LG4 (Going LSX down the road)
Transmission: T-5 (Going T-56 down the road)
Axle/Gears: 3.23

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Performance options for an LG4?

With the below completed, what should one expect as far as power is concerned?

Quote:
Originally Posted by sofakingdom View Post
No, no one. Ever.

Seriously...

The choke points in that setup are, in the order they should be fixed:

1. Exhaust
2. Cam
3. Air cleaner
4. Electric fan
5. Gears
6. Heads
7. Converter (if it's an auto)

Notice that at NO POINT did I mention the carb, intake, or ignition system; hacking off any emissions eqpt; aftermarket "chips"; add-on ignition boxes; or other typical wastes of money. The reason those are wastes of money, is that THEY ARE NOT THE THINGS LIMITING THE CAR'S PERFORMANCE. Note also that I said "car", not "engine"; as not all of the things that make those slow, are under the hood.

1. Exhaust - needs to be replaced, as an entire unit. Every piece from the heads to the back bumper. The replacement MUST NOT be designed to fit LG4; because if it is, it will PRESERVE the LG4 exhaust bottleneck, namely, the itty bitty Y-pipe. Get one of the quality brands of headers SPECIFICALLY for one of these cars, BUT NOT for the LG4; get the ones for a TPI 350. Get a high-flow cat such as a Catco from Summit, and your choice of cat-back. All of this for something like 89 TPI 350 without G92 (single-cat setup). This will retain emissions legality (except for the EFE valve).

2. Look at cams in the 210 - 215 degree @ .050" range on the intake, with a larger exhaust lobe. Comp's XE256 and XE262 are known to work well. Crane has cams of somewhat similar specs that also give good results; I think it's the Energizer 272 but I could be wrong. Lunati's new Voodoo series is the right design for this, and may have something in the right duration range for it. Whatever cam you pick, avoid choosing it based on "sound"; any cam that "sounds" "good" will probably be too much for the rest of the engine and car. Replace the valve springs and their hardware, and the timing set, along with the cam. DO NOT try to use a modern cam under stock springs; you'll probably break something.

3. Get a dual-snorkel one from L69. This will give several HP over a typical open element, since it will give the motor cold (dense) air instead of hot, thin underhood air.

4. If your car has a clutch fan, it uses a good solid 12 HP just to run the fan. An electric fan will give you back those HP. Watch the classifieds on this site for a used fan setup.

5. Those cars were always the "sacrificial lambs" to CAFE in the V8 F-body product lineup. At the time they were new, the people who bought them were looking for the "image", not the "substance", of performance. Since anybody that was buying a new car and was seriously interested in performance avoided those like the plague, I guess GM figured they could nut them as much as they wanted to get their fuel mileage up, and nobody that bought them would care (might even like them better in fact, if they were cheaper to drive; no matter how slow). So they always got crappy gears. The best they ever got, standard, was 3.23; and most years they got 2.73 or the like. 3.42 or 3.73 makes an AMAZING difference to a 2.73 car. If yours already has 3.23s, it's not quite so urgent; but once you get the motor to breathe, it will benefit from 3.73s. In stock condition though, 3.73s will force the engine RPM so quickly up into a range where the motor has no power, that it won't really be any faster than stock; even though it will feel like it has this huge launch off the line.

6. The heads themselves are fine, entirely adequate for 305; except that they can use some porting, and larger intake valves. There is a great deal of HP available here.

7. This is like gears. The stock converter pins the motor to a very low RPM range, especially from a stop. Once you get it to where the motor has some higher-RPM power, letting it rev up when you punch it will give it a much harder "leave".


I cannot emphasize enough, RESIST THE TEMPTATION to un-bolt and re-bolt big shiny things that sit up there where everybody can see them, on top of the motor. There's an old saying you'll hear at the race track, from the people who WIN: "Chrome don't bring the money home". People who spend their limited cash on "dress-up" are choosing the path to a slow expensive car that loses races.

The parts that produce performance are INVISIBLE. Don't let that discourage you from doing the right thing. Spending your money on things you can "see", will produce little or no results; except maybe, the car will be lighter, because the driver's wallet will be thinner.

Which reminds me of another whole set of things you can do to make the CAR faster; and that is, lose weight. I don't advise hacking stuff off; few things make me puke as bad as all the people who hack off their AC, for example. But, any time you replace something, make an effort to get something lighter in its place. For example, a "mini-starter", a plastic/aluminum radiator instead of copper/brass, an aluminum drive shaft, lighter wheels, lighter flywheel if it's a 5-speed, aluminum bumper support to replace the steel one, the 82-83 "composite" hood, etc. etc. etc. You can shave an easy hundred pounds off of it that way, maybe more.
Kevy Kev is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2010, 01:35 PM   #102
Moderator
 
five7kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 39,564
Car: 82 Berlinetta(2)/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1 (LS1)/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E (T56)/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 10B 3.73(9" 4.11)/8.2" 4.11

Classifieds Rating: (11)
Depending upon the cam, in the 275-300 "gross" flywheel range. "Net" flywheel would be in the 200-240 range.
five7kid is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2010, 03:34 PM   #103
Junior Member
 
Kevy Kev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: San Leandro, CA
Posts: 22
Car: 1987 Camaro Z28
Engine: 5.0L LG4 (Going LSX down the road)
Transmission: T-5 (Going T-56 down the road)
Axle/Gears: 3.23

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Performance options for an LG4?

Quote:
Originally Posted by five7kid View Post
Depending upon the cam, in the 275-300 "gross" flywheel range. "Net" flywheel would be in the 200-240 range.
Cool! Well, the car that I am probably buying this weekend (depending on the sale of my commuter) has A/C delete already as well as an electric fan.

Looks like I'll get some headers, full exhaust and better air cleaner first.

Cam will come next (it's a 5-speed car with 3.42 gears).
Kevy Kev is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2010, 05:40 PM   #104
Moderator
 
five7kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 39,564
Car: 82 Berlinetta(2)/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1 (LS1)/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E (T56)/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 10B 3.73(9" 4.11)/8.2" 4.11

Classifieds Rating: (11)
"San Leandro, CA" - I assume you have emissions testing and inspection. If that's the case, the only CA emissions legal headers for carb'd cars are the Edelbrock TES. The L69 headers are much better than the LG4 type, but if you have an LG4, you need an L69 EFE valve and L69 cat & cat-back to get the most out of it. However, an alert inspector may fail you for not having the headers and cat for your particular car.
five7kid is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2010, 07:25 PM   #105
Junior Member
 
Kevy Kev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: San Leandro, CA
Posts: 22
Car: 1987 Camaro Z28
Engine: 5.0L LG4 (Going LSX down the road)
Transmission: T-5 (Going T-56 down the road)
Axle/Gears: 3.23

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Performance options for an LG4?

Quote:
Originally Posted by five7kid View Post
"San Leandro, CA" - I assume you have emissions testing and inspection. If that's the case, the only CA emissions legal headers for carb'd cars are the Edelbrock TES. The L69 headers are much better than the LG4 type, but if you have an LG4, you need an L69 EFE valve and L69 cat & cat-back to get the most out of it. However, an alert inspector may fail you for not having the headers and cat for your particular car.
Good call (I'm in CA and emissions are a pain here).

Question; are you saying that the L69 version of the TES headers are better than the LG4 version of same header or that the stock L69 manifolds are better than the LG4s?
Kevy Kev is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2010, 11:40 PM   #106
Moderator
 
five7kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 39,564
Car: 82 Berlinetta(2)/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1 (LS1)/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E (T56)/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 10B 3.73(9" 4.11)/8.2" 4.11

Classifieds Rating: (11)
Both.
five7kid is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2010, 12:57 AM   #107
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: knoxville tn
Posts: 86
Car: 1986 iroc Z-28
Engine: "LB-9" TPI 305
Transmission: 700-R-4
Axle/Gears: corporate 2:73-1

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via MSN to david chambers
Re: Performance options for an LG4?

right said, here in minnesota and elswhere where we MUST keep all emissions hardware .so the smart thing is to optimize them
david chambers is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2010, 01:09 AM   #108
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: knoxville tn
Posts: 86
Car: 1986 iroc Z-28
Engine: "LB-9" TPI 305
Transmission: 700-R-4
Axle/Gears: corporate 2:73-1

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via MSN to david chambers
Re: Performance options for an LG4?

compression beyond 8.6-1 REQUIRES better gas than 87 octane my fresh LB9 with 9.6-1 compression will only run on 92 or better gas.if you can afford avgas it is 100 octane you will notice avgas has NO ethanol .as ethanol destroys aluminum it should be avoided at ALL costs
david chambers is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2010, 01:17 AM   #109
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: knoxville tn
Posts: 86
Car: 1986 iroc Z-28
Engine: "LB-9" TPI 305
Transmission: 700-R-4
Axle/Gears: corporate 2:73-1

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via MSN to david chambers
Re: Performance options for an LG4?

do NOT waste money for a haynes or a chilton manual they are SOOOO vague and downright dangerous to try to use.i bought a factory service manual online from helm.com and answered ALL my questions DEFINITIVELY once and for all really the quality was well worth the $100 bucks
david chambers is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2010, 01:30 AM   #110
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: knoxville tn
Posts: 86
Car: 1986 iroc Z-28
Engine: "LB-9" TPI 305
Transmission: 700-R-4
Axle/Gears: corporate 2:73-1

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via MSN to david chambers
Re: Performance options for an LG4?

any 305 chevy thats healthy, that has 9.6-1 compression flat top pistons and as much cam lift and duration as possible and TPI induction maybe the 58cc heads and headers will make, say 250 hp and 320 lbs. ft. torque .and thats BEFORE spray if you balance it you can spin it all day to 6000 rpm safely.get my point?13sec time slips are YOUR reality dig?
david chambers is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2010, 01:14 AM   #111
TGO Supporter
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Sonoma CO. CA.
Posts: 1,054
Car: 1984 Camaro Z28
Engine: L69 305 H.O.
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Re: Performance options for an LG4?

Quote:
Originally Posted by david chambers View Post
compression beyond 8.6-1 REQUIRES better gas than 87 octane my fresh LB9 with 9.6-1 compression will only run on 92 or better gas.if you can afford avgas it is 100 octane you will notice avgas has NO ethanol .as ethanol destroys aluminum it should be avoided at ALL costs
Besides some very technical reasons, that would take a small book to explain, you do not want to put 100 LL (Avgas) in a modern engine. It will clog your Cat and destroy your O2 sensors among other things. There's also a
bromide chemical in 100LL that when it gets in your oil will have a corrosive effect.
Kevin84Z28 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2010, 02:58 AM   #112
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: branson mo
Posts: 19
Car: 83 T.A L69 T5 WS6
Engine: L69 5.0 H.O
Transmission: T5 5 SPEED
Axle/Gears: 3.73 POSI TRAC

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: Performance options for an LG4?

can anyone tell me what this plugs into.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg photo.jpg (168.6 KB, 27 views)
speedfreak180 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2010, 11:18 AM   #113
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: knoxville tn
Posts: 86
Car: 1986 iroc Z-28
Engine: "LB-9" TPI 305
Transmission: 700-R-4
Axle/Gears: corporate 2:73-1

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via MSN to david chambers
Re: Performance options for an LG4?

according to my 86 factory service manual it plugs into inline fuse#1 which in turn goes to fuseable link "j" that in turn goes to the starter solenoid thru fuseable link"b" or in simpler terms ,,,a inline fuse holder with a 4 amp fuse to the bat.+ side. since its a mercury switch it only comes on when you open the hood....
david chambers is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2010, 12:05 PM   #114
Moderator
 
five7kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 39,564
Car: 82 Berlinetta(2)/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1 (LS1)/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E (T56)/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 10B 3.73(9" 4.11)/8.2" 4.11

Classifieds Rating: (11)
Uh, I believe that is the 'Bird cowl induction door mechanism, not the underhood light. . .
five7kid is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2010, 09:11 PM   #115
Senior Member
 
stroker_SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 663
Car: 1984 Camaro Berlinetta
Engine: 355
Transmission: Th-350
Axle/Gears: 3.23

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Performance options for an LG4?

Quote:
Originally Posted by david chambers View Post
compression beyond 8.6-1 REQUIRES better gas than 87 octane my fresh LB9 with 9.6-1 compression will only run on 92 or better gas.if you can afford avgas it is 100 octane you will notice avgas has NO ethanol .as ethanol destroys aluminum it should be avoided at ALL costs
Really, the l03 in my caprice runs just fine on 87, gm states that it has a 9.5:1 cr.
stroker_SS is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2010, 02:27 AM   #116
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: branson mo
Posts: 19
Car: 83 T.A L69 T5 WS6
Engine: L69 5.0 H.O
Transmission: T5 5 SPEED
Axle/Gears: 3.73 POSI TRAC

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: Performance options for an LG4?

well i agree with you five7kid. because that plug come from the sylinoid from the cowl induction but what does that plug into. and second how hard is it to swap out carbs wanting to go to an edlebrock but mine has 3 plugs that plugs into the factory carb. the edlebrock doesn't so how do i fix or get around this problem.
speedfreak180 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2010, 09:15 AM   #117
naf
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Lexington, SC
Posts: 3,244
Car: 1987 SC/1985 TA
Engine: 350/vortec/ccc q-jet
Transmission: 700-R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9-bolt

Classifieds Rating: (4)
Re: Performance options for an LG4?

Did you READ this thread? Particularly post #3 that specifically DOESN'T mention swapping the carb?
__________________
"A man who voluntarily drives a car like that and still manages to maintain such impervious confidence that it will faithfully start the next time he turns that key is an encouragement for us all to take greater risks in life."

naf is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2010, 10:27 AM   #118
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,553
Car: 1992 Formula Firebird
Engine: 305CID (LB9)
Transmission: World Class T5
Axle/Gears: 10-bolt, 4.10 gears

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via MSN to 87WS6
Re: Performance options for an LG4?

Quote:
Originally Posted by speedfreak180 View Post
well i agree with you five7kid. because that plug come from the sylinoid from the cowl induction but what does that plug into. and second how hard is it to swap out carbs wanting to go to an edlebrock but mine has 3 plugs that plugs into the factory carb. the edlebrock doesn't so how do i fix or get around this problem.
My experiences with Edelbrock carbs isn't vast but I've owned one and I know others who have too. If you are going to swap your carb out stay away from the Edelbrock. Its a piece of ****.

Last edited by 87WS6; 08-23-2010 at 06:22 PM.
87WS6 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2010, 04:54 PM   #119
Junior Member
 
Mike85TALimited's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Lake County, IL
Posts: 20
Car: 1985 Limited Edition Trans AM
Engine: 305 4BBL LG4
Transmission: 5-Speed Borg Warner, 77MM, 2.95
Axle/Gears: Limited Slip/3.27

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Performance options for an LG4?

Any chance on getting a true dual exhaust to fit or would it be better to just cut it off before the Y an run open headers?

P.S. Emissions can kiss my ***, I'm exempt.
Mike85TALimited is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2010, 04:37 PM   #120
Moderator
 
five7kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 39,564
Car: 82 Berlinetta(2)/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1 (LS1)/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E (T56)/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 10B 3.73(9" 4.11)/8.2" 4.11

Classifieds Rating: (11)
Could you explain why you posted here?

BTW, you aren't exempt.
five7kid is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2010, 05:18 PM   #121
Member
 
GICATA's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Humid South Carolina
Posts: 261
Car: '83 WS6 T/A
Engine: 5.0L vin H
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: Corp. 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Performance options for an LG4?

Quote:
Originally Posted by speedfreak180 View Post
can anyone tell me what this plugs into.
Have you found the other end yet? I can get you a pic tonite if you need one.....
GICATA is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2010, 07:03 PM   #122
Junior Member
 
Mike85TALimited's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Lake County, IL
Posts: 20
Car: 1985 Limited Edition Trans AM
Engine: 305 4BBL LG4
Transmission: 5-Speed Borg Warner, 77MM, 2.95
Axle/Gears: Limited Slip/3.27

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Performance options for an LG4?

Just wondering if true dual exhaust was an option to put on an 85 with the LG4 to remove airflow restrictions, or if the best bet is to just cut off the Y pipe entirely, since that seems to be the major bottleneck in the system.

Quote:
Originally Posted by five7kid View Post
Could you explain why you posted here?

BTW, you aren't exempt.
Yes, I am. My car is no longer required to take emissions tests.
Mike85TALimited is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2010, 07:47 AM   #123
Member
 
GICATA's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Humid South Carolina
Posts: 261
Car: '83 WS6 T/A
Engine: 5.0L vin H
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: Corp. 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Performance options for an LG4?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike85TALimited View Post
Just wondering if true dual exhaust was an option to put on an 85 with the LG4 to remove airflow restrictions, or if the best bet is to just cut off the Y pipe entirely, since that seems to be the major bottleneck in the system.



Yes, I am. My car is no longer required to take emissions tests.
Care to elaborate?
GICATA is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2010, 10:46 AM   #124
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,553
Car: 1992 Formula Firebird
Engine: 305CID (LB9)
Transmission: World Class T5
Axle/Gears: 10-bolt, 4.10 gears

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via MSN to 87WS6
Re: Performance options for an LG4?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike85TALimited View Post
Just wondering if true dual exhaust was an option to put on an 85 with the LG4 to remove airflow restrictions, or if the best bet is to just cut off the Y pipe entirely, since that seems to be the major bottleneck in the system.



Yes, I am. My car is no longer required to take emissions tests.
I do not believe that these cars got factory dual exhaust until the N10 dual cat option was available. At least not "true dual" exhaust. As for your car no longer being required to take emissions tests, that may be true. However no vehicle produced after 1973 is ever exempt from emissions regulation. You no longer have to pass emissions testing but you are not legally allowed to remove emissions control devices that the car was originally equipped with. If you even so much as throw away the charcoal canister then your car can be failed during visual inspection. Now, many emissions/inspection facilities and their employees do not know that much about emissions laws or specific vehicle models. They may or may not catch the lack of some emissions equipment like a smog pump or charcoal canister. If they do they aren't supposed to pass your vehicle.

Just fair warning. You aren't except from Federal emissions laws, just emissions testing.
87WS6 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2010, 02:53 PM   #125
Moderator
 
five7kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 39,564
Car: 82 Berlinetta(2)/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1 (LS1)/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E (T56)/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 10B 3.73(9" 4.11)/8.2" 4.11

Classifieds Rating: (11)
Quote:
Originally Posted by five7kid View Post
BTW, you aren't exempt.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike85TALimited View Post
Yes, I am. My car is no longer required to take emissions tests.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 87WS6 View Post
Just fair warning. You aren't except from Federal emissions laws, just emissions testing.
Exactly.
five7kid is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2010, 10:44 PM   #126
Junior Member
 
Mike85TALimited's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Lake County, IL
Posts: 20
Car: 1985 Limited Edition Trans AM
Engine: 305 4BBL LG4
Transmission: 5-Speed Borg Warner, 77MM, 2.95
Axle/Gears: Limited Slip/3.27

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Performance options for an LG4?

Quote:
Originally Posted by www.epa.state.il.us
The following vehicles are exempt from vehicle emissions tests:
...
Vehicles of model year 1995 or before that were in compliance with the Illinois Vehicle Emissions Inspection Law on February 1, 2007;
...
...I'm just saying...
Since the car passed three years ago, it never needs to pass again. Therefore no testing, no inspection, nada. It could be blowing pure hydrocarbons out of the tailpipe worn-out cat and they would never know.
Although, that would mean the cylinders weren't firing, and that's another problem entirely.
Mike85TALimited is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2010, 10:44 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Carburetors

Tags
274, 38, 416, cam, camaro, cast, gm, heads, intake, iron, lg4, list, maximum, motor, performance, removing
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details