Carburetors Carb discussion and questions. Upgrading your Third Gen's carburetor, swapping TBI to carburetor, or TPI to carburetor? Need LG4 or H.O. info? Post it here.

Performance options for an LG4?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-13-2010, 06:46 PM
  #101  
Junior Member
 
Kevy Kev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: San Leandro, CA
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1987 Camaro Z28
Engine: 5.0L LG4 (Going LSX down the road)
Transmission: T-5 (Going T-56 down the road)
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: Performance options for an LG4?

With the below completed, what should one expect as far as power is concerned?

Originally Posted by sofakingdom
No, no one. Ever.

Seriously...

The choke points in that setup are, in the order they should be fixed:

1. Exhaust
2. Cam
3. Air cleaner
4. Electric fan
5. Gears
6. Heads
7. Converter (if it's an auto)

Notice that at NO POINT did I mention the carb, intake, or ignition system; hacking off any emissions eqpt; aftermarket "chips"; add-on ignition boxes; or other typical wastes of money. The reason those are wastes of money, is that THEY ARE NOT THE THINGS LIMITING THE CAR'S PERFORMANCE. Note also that I said "car", not "engine"; as not all of the things that make those slow, are under the hood.

1. Exhaust - needs to be replaced, as an entire unit. Every piece from the heads to the back bumper. The replacement MUST NOT be designed to fit LG4; because if it is, it will PRESERVE the LG4 exhaust bottleneck, namely, the itty bitty Y-pipe. Get one of the quality brands of headers SPECIFICALLY for one of these cars, BUT NOT for the LG4; get the ones for a TPI 350. Get a high-flow cat such as a Catco from Summit, and your choice of cat-back. All of this for something like 89 TPI 350 without G92 (single-cat setup). This will retain emissions legality (except for the EFE valve).

2. Look at cams in the 210 - 215 degree @ .050" range on the intake, with a larger exhaust lobe. Comp's XE256 and XE262 are known to work well. Crane has cams of somewhat similar specs that also give good results; I think it's the Energizer 272 but I could be wrong. Lunati's new Voodoo series is the right design for this, and may have something in the right duration range for it. Whatever cam you pick, avoid choosing it based on "sound"; any cam that "sounds" "good" will probably be too much for the rest of the engine and car. Replace the valve springs and their hardware, and the timing set, along with the cam. DO NOT try to use a modern cam under stock springs; you'll probably break something.

3. Get a dual-snorkel one from L69. This will give several HP over a typical open element, since it will give the motor cold (dense) air instead of hot, thin underhood air.

4. If your car has a clutch fan, it uses a good solid 12 HP just to run the fan. An electric fan will give you back those HP. Watch the classifieds on this site for a used fan setup.

5. Those cars were always the "sacrificial lambs" to CAFE in the V8 F-body product lineup. At the time they were new, the people who bought them were looking for the "image", not the "substance", of performance. Since anybody that was buying a new car and was seriously interested in performance avoided those like the plague, I guess GM figured they could nut them as much as they wanted to get their fuel mileage up, and nobody that bought them would care (might even like them better in fact, if they were cheaper to drive; no matter how slow). So they always got crappy gears. The best they ever got, standard, was 3.23; and most years they got 2.73 or the like. 3.42 or 3.73 makes an AMAZING difference to a 2.73 car. If yours already has 3.23s, it's not quite so urgent; but once you get the motor to breathe, it will benefit from 3.73s. In stock condition though, 3.73s will force the engine RPM so quickly up into a range where the motor has no power, that it won't really be any faster than stock; even though it will feel like it has this huge launch off the line.

6. The heads themselves are fine, entirely adequate for 305; except that they can use some porting, and larger intake valves. There is a great deal of HP available here.

7. This is like gears. The stock converter pins the motor to a very low RPM range, especially from a stop. Once you get it to where the motor has some higher-RPM power, letting it rev up when you punch it will give it a much harder "leave".


I cannot emphasize enough, RESIST THE TEMPTATION to un-bolt and re-bolt big shiny things that sit up there where everybody can see them, on top of the motor. There's an old saying you'll hear at the race track, from the people who WIN: "Chrome don't bring the money home". People who spend their limited cash on "dress-up" are choosing the path to a slow expensive car that loses races.

The parts that produce performance are INVISIBLE. Don't let that discourage you from doing the right thing. Spending your money on things you can "see", will produce little or no results; except maybe, the car will be lighter, because the driver's wallet will be thinner.

Which reminds me of another whole set of things you can do to make the CAR faster; and that is, lose weight. I don't advise hacking stuff off; few things make me puke as bad as all the people who hack off their AC, for example. But, any time you replace something, make an effort to get something lighter in its place. For example, a "mini-starter", a plastic/aluminum radiator instead of copper/brass, an aluminum drive shaft, lighter wheels, lighter flywheel if it's a 5-speed, aluminum bumper support to replace the steel one, the 82-83 "composite" hood, etc. etc. etc. You can shave an easy hundred pounds off of it that way, maybe more.
Old 01-14-2010, 12:35 PM
  #102  
Moderator

iTrader: (14)
 
five7kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 43,169
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes on 34 Posts
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Depending upon the cam, in the 275-300 "gross" flywheel range. "Net" flywheel would be in the 200-240 range.
Old 01-14-2010, 02:34 PM
  #103  
Junior Member
 
Kevy Kev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: San Leandro, CA
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1987 Camaro Z28
Engine: 5.0L LG4 (Going LSX down the road)
Transmission: T-5 (Going T-56 down the road)
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: Performance options for an LG4?

Originally Posted by five7kid
Depending upon the cam, in the 275-300 "gross" flywheel range. "Net" flywheel would be in the 200-240 range.
Cool! Well, the car that I am probably buying this weekend (depending on the sale of my commuter) has A/C delete already as well as an electric fan.

Looks like I'll get some headers, full exhaust and better air cleaner first.

Cam will come next (it's a 5-speed car with 3.42 gears).
Old 01-14-2010, 04:40 PM
  #104  
Moderator

iTrader: (14)
 
five7kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 43,169
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes on 34 Posts
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
"San Leandro, CA" - I assume you have emissions testing and inspection. If that's the case, the only CA emissions legal headers for carb'd cars are the Edelbrock TES. The L69 headers are much better than the LG4 type, but if you have an LG4, you need an L69 EFE valve and L69 cat & cat-back to get the most out of it. However, an alert inspector may fail you for not having the headers and cat for your particular car.
Old 01-14-2010, 06:25 PM
  #105  
Junior Member
 
Kevy Kev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: San Leandro, CA
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1987 Camaro Z28
Engine: 5.0L LG4 (Going LSX down the road)
Transmission: T-5 (Going T-56 down the road)
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: Performance options for an LG4?

Originally Posted by five7kid
"San Leandro, CA" - I assume you have emissions testing and inspection. If that's the case, the only CA emissions legal headers for carb'd cars are the Edelbrock TES. The L69 headers are much better than the LG4 type, but if you have an LG4, you need an L69 EFE valve and L69 cat & cat-back to get the most out of it. However, an alert inspector may fail you for not having the headers and cat for your particular car.
Good call (I'm in CA and emissions are a pain here).

Question; are you saying that the L69 version of the TES headers are better than the LG4 version of same header or that the stock L69 manifolds are better than the LG4s?
Old 01-14-2010, 10:40 PM
  #106  
Moderator

iTrader: (14)
 
five7kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 43,169
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes on 34 Posts
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Both.
Old 05-03-2010, 11:57 PM
  #107  
Junior Member
 
david chambers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: knoxville tn
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1986 iroc Z-28
Engine: "LB-9" TPI 305
Transmission: 700-R-4
Axle/Gears: corporate 2:73-1
Re: Performance options for an LG4?

right said, here in minnesota and elswhere where we MUST keep all emissions hardware .so the smart thing is to optimize them
Old 05-04-2010, 12:09 AM
  #108  
Junior Member
 
david chambers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: knoxville tn
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1986 iroc Z-28
Engine: "LB-9" TPI 305
Transmission: 700-R-4
Axle/Gears: corporate 2:73-1
Re: Performance options for an LG4?

compression beyond 8.6-1 REQUIRES better gas than 87 octane my fresh LB9 with 9.6-1 compression will only run on 92 or better gas.if you can afford avgas it is 100 octane you will notice avgas has NO ethanol .as ethanol destroys aluminum it should be avoided at ALL costs
Old 05-04-2010, 12:17 AM
  #109  
Junior Member
 
david chambers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: knoxville tn
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1986 iroc Z-28
Engine: "LB-9" TPI 305
Transmission: 700-R-4
Axle/Gears: corporate 2:73-1
Re: Performance options for an LG4?

do NOT waste money for a haynes or a chilton manual they are SOOOO vague and downright dangerous to try to use.i bought a factory service manual online from helm.com and answered ALL my questions DEFINITIVELY once and for all really the quality was well worth the $100 bucks
Old 05-04-2010, 12:30 AM
  #110  
Junior Member
 
david chambers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: knoxville tn
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1986 iroc Z-28
Engine: "LB-9" TPI 305
Transmission: 700-R-4
Axle/Gears: corporate 2:73-1
Re: Performance options for an LG4?

any 305 chevy thats healthy, that has 9.6-1 compression flat top pistons and as much cam lift and duration as possible and TPI induction maybe the 58cc heads and headers will make, say 250 hp and 320 lbs. ft. torque .and thats BEFORE spray if you balance it you can spin it all day to 6000 rpm safely.get my point?13sec time slips are YOUR reality dig?
Old 05-06-2010, 12:14 AM
  #111  
TGO Supporter

iTrader: (3)
 
Kevin84Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Sonoma CO. CA.
Posts: 1,064
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 1984 Camaro Z28
Engine: L69 305 H.O.
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Performance options for an LG4?

Originally Posted by david chambers
compression beyond 8.6-1 REQUIRES better gas than 87 octane my fresh LB9 with 9.6-1 compression will only run on 92 or better gas.if you can afford avgas it is 100 octane you will notice avgas has NO ethanol .as ethanol destroys aluminum it should be avoided at ALL costs
Besides some very technical reasons, that would take a small book to explain, you do not want to put 100 LL (Avgas) in a modern engine. It will clog your Cat and destroy your O2 sensors among other things. There's also a
bromide chemical in 100LL that when it gets in your oil will have a corrosive effect.
Old 05-19-2010, 01:58 AM
  #112  
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
speedfreak180's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: branson mo
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 83 T.A L69 T5 WS6
Engine: L69 5.0 H.O
Transmission: T5 5 SPEED
Axle/Gears: 3.73 POSI TRAC
Re: Performance options for an LG4?

can anyone tell me what this plugs into.
Attached Thumbnails Performance options for an LG4?-photo.jpg  
Old 05-19-2010, 10:18 AM
  #113  
Junior Member
 
david chambers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: knoxville tn
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1986 iroc Z-28
Engine: "LB-9" TPI 305
Transmission: 700-R-4
Axle/Gears: corporate 2:73-1
Re: Performance options for an LG4?

according to my 86 factory service manual it plugs into inline fuse#1 which in turn goes to fuseable link "j" that in turn goes to the starter solenoid thru fuseable link"b" or in simpler terms ,,,a inline fuse holder with a 4 amp fuse to the bat.+ side. since its a mercury switch it only comes on when you open the hood....
Old 05-19-2010, 11:05 AM
  #114  
Moderator

iTrader: (14)
 
five7kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 43,169
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes on 34 Posts
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Uh, I believe that is the 'Bird cowl induction door mechanism, not the underhood light. . .
Old 05-19-2010, 08:11 PM
  #115  
Senior Member
 
stroker_SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 670
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1984 Camaro Berlinetta
Engine: 355
Transmission: Th-350
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: Performance options for an LG4?

Originally Posted by david chambers
compression beyond 8.6-1 REQUIRES better gas than 87 octane my fresh LB9 with 9.6-1 compression will only run on 92 or better gas.if you can afford avgas it is 100 octane you will notice avgas has NO ethanol .as ethanol destroys aluminum it should be avoided at ALL costs
Really, the l03 in my caprice runs just fine on 87, gm states that it has a 9.5:1 cr.
Old 05-21-2010, 01:27 AM
  #116  
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
speedfreak180's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: branson mo
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 83 T.A L69 T5 WS6
Engine: L69 5.0 H.O
Transmission: T5 5 SPEED
Axle/Gears: 3.73 POSI TRAC
Re: Performance options for an LG4?

well i agree with you five7kid. because that plug come from the sylinoid from the cowl induction but what does that plug into. and second how hard is it to swap out carbs wanting to go to an edlebrock but mine has 3 plugs that plugs into the factory carb. the edlebrock doesn't so how do i fix or get around this problem.
Old 05-21-2010, 08:15 AM
  #117  
naf
Supreme Member

iTrader: (7)
 
naf's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Lexington, SC
Posts: 5,291
Likes: 0
Received 58 Likes on 52 Posts
Car: 1987 SC/1985 TA
Engine: 350/vortec/fitech
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9-bolt
Re: Performance options for an LG4?

Did you READ this thread? Particularly post #3 that specifically DOESN'T mention swapping the carb?
Old 05-21-2010, 09:27 AM
  #118  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
87WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,565
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Car: 1992 Formula Firebird
Engine: 305CID (LB9)
Transmission: World Class T5
Axle/Gears: 10-bolt, 4.10 gears
Re: Performance options for an LG4?

Originally Posted by speedfreak180
well i agree with you five7kid. because that plug come from the sylinoid from the cowl induction but what does that plug into. and second how hard is it to swap out carbs wanting to go to an edlebrock but mine has 3 plugs that plugs into the factory carb. the edlebrock doesn't so how do i fix or get around this problem.
My experiences with Edelbrock carbs isn't vast but I've owned one and I know others who have too. If you are going to swap your carb out stay away from the Edelbrock. Its a piece of ****.

Last edited by 87WS6; 08-23-2010 at 05:22 PM.
Old 08-22-2010, 03:54 PM
  #119  
Junior Member
 
Mike85TALimited's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Lake County, IL
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1985 Limited Edition Trans AM
Engine: 305 4BBL LG4
Transmission: 5-Speed Borg Warner, 77MM, 2.95
Axle/Gears: Limited Slip/3.27
Re: Performance options for an LG4?

Any chance on getting a true dual exhaust to fit or would it be better to just cut it off before the Y an run open headers?

P.S. Emissions can kiss my ***, I'm exempt.
Old 08-23-2010, 03:37 PM
  #120  
Moderator

iTrader: (14)
 
five7kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 43,169
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes on 34 Posts
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Could you explain why you posted here?

BTW, you aren't exempt.
Old 08-23-2010, 04:18 PM
  #121  
Member

 
GICATA's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Grand Junction, Co
Posts: 318
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: '83 WS6 T/A 65,000 miles
Engine: 5.0L vin H stock, 406SBC right now
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: Corp. 3.73
Re: Performance options for an LG4?

Originally Posted by speedfreak180
can anyone tell me what this plugs into.
Have you found the other end yet? I can get you a pic tonite if you need one.....
Old 08-23-2010, 06:03 PM
  #122  
Junior Member
 
Mike85TALimited's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Lake County, IL
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1985 Limited Edition Trans AM
Engine: 305 4BBL LG4
Transmission: 5-Speed Borg Warner, 77MM, 2.95
Axle/Gears: Limited Slip/3.27
Re: Performance options for an LG4?

Just wondering if true dual exhaust was an option to put on an 85 with the LG4 to remove airflow restrictions, or if the best bet is to just cut off the Y pipe entirely, since that seems to be the major bottleneck in the system.

Originally Posted by five7kid
Could you explain why you posted here?

BTW, you aren't exempt.
Yes, I am. My car is no longer required to take emissions tests.
Old 08-24-2010, 06:47 AM
  #123  
Member

 
GICATA's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Grand Junction, Co
Posts: 318
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: '83 WS6 T/A 65,000 miles
Engine: 5.0L vin H stock, 406SBC right now
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: Corp. 3.73
Re: Performance options for an LG4?

Originally Posted by Mike85TALimited
Just wondering if true dual exhaust was an option to put on an 85 with the LG4 to remove airflow restrictions, or if the best bet is to just cut off the Y pipe entirely, since that seems to be the major bottleneck in the system.



Yes, I am. My car is no longer required to take emissions tests.
Care to elaborate?
Old 08-24-2010, 09:46 AM
  #124  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
87WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,565
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Car: 1992 Formula Firebird
Engine: 305CID (LB9)
Transmission: World Class T5
Axle/Gears: 10-bolt, 4.10 gears
Re: Performance options for an LG4?

Originally Posted by Mike85TALimited
Just wondering if true dual exhaust was an option to put on an 85 with the LG4 to remove airflow restrictions, or if the best bet is to just cut off the Y pipe entirely, since that seems to be the major bottleneck in the system.



Yes, I am. My car is no longer required to take emissions tests.
I do not believe that these cars got factory dual exhaust until the N10 dual cat option was available. At least not "true dual" exhaust. As for your car no longer being required to take emissions tests, that may be true. However no vehicle produced after 1973 is ever exempt from emissions regulation. You no longer have to pass emissions testing but you are not legally allowed to remove emissions control devices that the car was originally equipped with. If you even so much as throw away the charcoal canister then your car can be failed during visual inspection. Now, many emissions/inspection facilities and their employees do not know that much about emissions laws or specific vehicle models. They may or may not catch the lack of some emissions equipment like a smog pump or charcoal canister. If they do they aren't supposed to pass your vehicle.

Just fair warning. You aren't except from Federal emissions laws, just emissions testing.
Old 08-24-2010, 01:53 PM
  #125  
Moderator

iTrader: (14)
 
five7kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 43,169
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes on 34 Posts
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Originally Posted by five7kid
BTW, you aren't exempt.
Originally Posted by Mike85TALimited
Yes, I am. My car is no longer required to take emissions tests.
Originally Posted by 87WS6
Just fair warning. You aren't except from Federal emissions laws, just emissions testing.
Exactly.
Old 08-24-2010, 09:44 PM
  #126  
Junior Member
 
Mike85TALimited's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Lake County, IL
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1985 Limited Edition Trans AM
Engine: 305 4BBL LG4
Transmission: 5-Speed Borg Warner, 77MM, 2.95
Axle/Gears: Limited Slip/3.27
Re: Performance options for an LG4?

Originally Posted by www.epa.state.il.us
The following vehicles are exempt from vehicle emissions tests:
...
Vehicles of model year 1995 or before that were in compliance with the Illinois Vehicle Emissions Inspection Law on February 1, 2007;
...
...I'm just saying...
Since the car passed three years ago, it never needs to pass again. Therefore no testing, no inspection, nada. It could be blowing pure hydrocarbons out of the tailpipe worn-out cat and they would never know.
Although, that would mean the cylinders weren't firing, and that's another problem entirely.
Old 10-21-2012, 05:31 PM
  #127  
Supreme Member

 
kmcn47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Lynden WA
Posts: 1,929
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Car: 84 Trans Am, 84 Fiero, 86 944
Engine: 5.0, 2.5, 2.5
Transmission: 5spd
Re: Performance options for an LG4?

how did this appear as a hot thread with new posts when the last one was in 2010? also why did noone sticky the first page with all the good advice?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
seiplentz
DFI and ECM
35
08-19-2019 06:02 PM
83 Crossfire TA
Suspension and Chassis
6
09-18-2015 12:01 PM
Trevor Tarry
Engine Swap
3
09-15-2015 02:04 AM
64Chief
Transmissions and Drivetrain
4
09-12-2015 08:05 AM
scottmoyer
Camaros for Sale
3
09-07-2015 07:06 PM



Quick Reply: Performance options for an LG4?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:48 AM.