Carburetors Carb discussion and questions. Upgrading your Third Gen's carburetor, swapping TBI to carburetor, or TPI to carburetor? Need LG4 or H.O. info? Post it here.

Holley or Edelbrock??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-28-2006, 10:06 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
txcamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Wharton, TX
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '86 Camaro Z-28
Engine: 305 V8
Transmission: 5-Speed standard
Holley or Edelbrock??

I've got an 86 with a 305, Holley Street Dominator intake, and Edelbrock 795cfm carb. Can't remember part # on carb, bit it's the Qjet replacement. I've had minor tuning problems, but it seems fine now. Problem seems to be in the choke, but i'm not too worried. I was thinking about a smaller carb though. Somewhere in the neighborhood of a 600 or a 650, but don't know if I should go with a Holley or Edelbrock. I hear pro's and con's for both from my friends. Just thought I'd get some extra input. Are the Holley's that hard to keep tuned?? Any info would be helpful. Thanks.
Old 06-28-2006, 10:22 PM
  #2  
Member

 
ohiothirdgen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If your looking for bolt on and go id probably get an edelbrock. Holley has the street avenger that is like that. I have a 660 holley sa on my iroc and it is pretty horrible. I really dont recommend it at all.
Old 06-29-2006, 07:55 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
'86 350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Tolland, CT
Posts: 577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '86 Camaro SC
I had a 670 street avenger, and I didn't like it at all. I sold it for an Edelbrock Performer 600 and jetted that up. While the Edelbrock is better then the Street Avenger ever was, I still wish I had gone with a carb with Mechanical Secondaries, espescially in my 5 speed.

If I were you I'd go with something like a 600 DP.
Old 06-29-2006, 08:00 AM
  #4  
Member
 
contact's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: North Texas
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Engine: sbc 350
'dominator intake', is different than a stardard flange?
not sure if that is an issue.

both brands of carbs need tuning, to operate
their best. both brands have their advocates.

Edels use metering rods instead of a power valve,
superior, IMO.
Edels use primaries, that are smaller than the secondaries,
IMO, superior for a street car
Holley people contend that the 'air demand valve' in the Edels can cause a delay in the opening of
the secondaries. You have to decide for yourself
how important that is.

If you decide on Edel, consider the Thunderer series
with spring-adjustable air valve, better IMO.
Old 07-10-2006, 06:29 PM
  #5  
Junior Member
 
slow89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Fort worth Tx
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 89 irocz
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 373
i was thinking about getting the holly street avenger and i was wanting to know what u dident like about it
Old 07-10-2006, 08:23 PM
  #6  
Moderator

iTrader: (14)
 
five7kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 43,169
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes on 34 Posts
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Bigger than a 305 needs, basically an over-priced Holley vacuum secondary. SA's are made for marketing, not performance.
Old 07-10-2006, 08:47 PM
  #7  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (13)
 
mw66nova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Harford County, MD
Posts: 13,572
Received 26 Likes on 21 Posts
Car: camaro sportcoupe
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: G-Force GF5R
Axle/Gears: Moser 9"
yeah, the street avenger sucks. if all you want is drivability, then just run an edelbrock 1406, which is the 600cfm version. if performance is what you are looking for, then a 600 holley double pumper is in order here. don't even bother with the holley vacuum secondary carbs.
Old 07-10-2006, 08:59 PM
  #8  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
txcamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Wharton, TX
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '86 Camaro Z-28
Engine: 305 V8
Transmission: 5-Speed standard
i've decided to go with the edelbrock 1406. haven't ordered it yet, but i'm going to try and get it some time next week. i'm hoping the 600 will give me a little better performance than the 795 which i think is too big for the motor that's there. i'm also hoping to score a couple mpgs. everyone i talk to about the holley's say it's hard to keep it tuned properly and i don't want to be under the hood every weekend on my daily driver.
Old 07-11-2006, 01:31 PM
  #9  
Junior Member
 
slow89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Fort worth Tx
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 89 irocz
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 373
is the edelbrock like the street avenger just bold on and go???
Old 07-11-2006, 01:37 PM
  #10  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (13)
 
mw66nova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Harford County, MD
Posts: 13,572
Received 26 Likes on 21 Posts
Car: camaro sportcoupe
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: G-Force GF5R
Axle/Gears: Moser 9"
pretty much.
Old 07-11-2006, 09:21 PM
  #11  
Moderator

iTrader: (14)
 
five7kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 43,169
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes on 34 Posts
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Originally Posted by slow89
is the edelbrock like the street avenger just bold on and go???
Technically, that is completely untrue. The two carbs use completely different concepts to accomplish the same operations.

Practically, the two carbs are both demand-based secondaries (although the way they operate to "demand" is completly different). What it comes down to, is this: If you don't get a Holley double-pumper, keep the q-jet. The primaries are smaller than either the Holley or Performer, the secondaries are demand-based pretty much like the Performer, and it will be no "bigger" than the engine needs when you floor it.
Old 07-11-2006, 11:03 PM
  #12  
Junior Member
 
slow89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Fort worth Tx
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 89 irocz
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 373
well witch one would be better for punch it and go power
Old 07-12-2006, 09:55 AM
  #13  
Supreme Member

 
Sitting Bull's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Republic of Western Canada
Posts: 3,238
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: 1986 Sport Coupé
Engine: 305-4v
Transmission: 700R4 and TransGo2
Originally Posted by slow89
well witch one would be better for punch it and go power
Having used both the Qjet and Edelbrock I'd say six of one and half a dozen of the other. Qjets are truly excellent when tuned correctly. 1406s also deliver really nice performance. One thing I have noticed is that the 1406 is more consistent in the mpg it delivers. The Qjet is fine there, too, but seemed to vary somewhat more than my current 1406.

If I already had a Qjet then I'd stick with it because the 1406 is not superior in performance or mpg.
Old 07-12-2006, 07:18 PM
  #14  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
txcamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Wharton, TX
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '86 Camaro Z-28
Engine: 305 V8
Transmission: 5-Speed standard
so you're saying my mpgs won't change between the 795 cfm and the smaller 600 cfm i'm thinking about getting??
Old 07-12-2006, 07:44 PM
  #15  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (13)
 
mw66nova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Harford County, MD
Posts: 13,572
Received 26 Likes on 21 Posts
Car: camaro sportcoupe
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: G-Force GF5R
Axle/Gears: Moser 9"
it's possible since the larger booster signals will require more fuel, even on a smaller cubic inch motor.
Old 07-12-2006, 08:43 PM
  #16  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (21)
 
82 Iron Duke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,075
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 04 Silverado
Engine: 4.8
Transmission: auto
Originally Posted by slow89
i was thinking about getting the holly street avenger and i was wanting to know what u dident like about it
A little late but I have the Holley 670 carb and I HATE IT!!! I couldn't tune it for chit and I would rather have a QJ or an Edelbrock. My carb is still basically brand new, I didn't choose it but is really SUCKS!!!
Old 07-12-2006, 09:49 PM
  #17  
Member
 
CG_1985_Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1985 Z28 camaro
Engine: lq4
Transmission: th350
holley or edelbrock

i used a edelbrock 650 on my car, i bought it from summit for about 250 or 260 dollars and it worked great right out of the box and is still working with no problems. Bolt it on and go!
Old 07-12-2006, 10:24 PM
  #18  
Member
 
camarojustin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 88 camaro
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73 posi
Wierd you guys are all hating the street avenger, I have it , put the jets my engine guy said to run into it, played with the vacuum secondary springs a bit and never touched it again and it still runs perfect since 2002,
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Pac J
Tech / General Engine
3
05-17-2020 10:44 AM
armybyrd
Carburetors
3
10-20-2015 03:57 AM
Royal_Z
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
4
09-30-2015 08:45 PM
efiguy
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
0
09-27-2015 01:30 PM
Night rider327
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
0
09-25-2015 04:47 AM



Quick Reply: Holley or Edelbrock??



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:40 PM.