DFI and ECM Discuss all aspects of DFI (Digital Fuel Injection), ECMs (Electronic Control Module), scanners, and diagnostic equipment. Fine tune your Third Gen computer system for top performance.

Innovate LC-1 vs AEM UEGO?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-07-2008, 07:17 AM
  #1  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
spills's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Buford, GA
Posts: 996
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 89 RS
Engine: 6.3L Megasquirted HSR
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.70 Posi 9 bolt
Innovate LC-1 vs AEM UEGO?

Me and this guy I work with have been going back and forth over which one's better overall. He's got a blown G35 with the AEM, and Im about to fire off my 383, hopefully with the LC1. His argument has always been "you get what you pay for", which I take with a grain of salt. Ive never really believed that anyway, but what type of WB O2 systems are yall using? I just need the basic controller ans Bosch sensor, Im using Megasquirt right now to display my AFR until I can afford some new gauges. I know on Innovate's website they list like 10 or so mag articles that they've been featured in from CHP to Sport Compact, but Ive also heard that the LC1 can be a little touchy as far as how it likes it's wiring and such (more sensitive to semi-bad grounds and such than the AEM).

One plus I did notice is that the LC1 is able to read voltages in smaller increments (if I was reading it correctly), essentially meaning that the AEM would max out in either the rich or lean values before the LC1 would. This tells me that the LC1 could potentially be "more accurate" than the AEM. Any input on either of these, any experiences?
Old 08-07-2008, 07:55 AM
  #2  
Senior Member

iTrader: (3)
 
calebzman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 805
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: '85 TA
Engine: 350 turbo
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.70 posi 9bolt
Re: Innovate LC-1 vs AEM UEGO?

I have been using the LC-1 with the XD-16 digital gauge for over a year. It has been very helpful with tuning the car and I would definately buy it again.

Old 08-07-2008, 08:45 AM
  #3  
TGO Supporter

iTrader: (2)
 
luvofjah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: PNW
Posts: 2,478
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Car: 91 Black Formula KR
Engine: 305 TPI R69/G92
Transmission: Astro A5-Pro 5.0-McCleod
Axle/Gears: US Gear 3.42 Eaton True Trac
Re: Innovate LC-1 vs AEM UEGO?

I know that LC1 probably sells more, but I also see a bunch that have been broken... Plus the calibration you have to do...

I was looking at the PLX AFR... Haven't heard much bad about it...

I was reading over @ code59.org

Raf
Old 08-07-2008, 09:06 AM
  #4  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Saigon_Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Kissimmee, FL
Posts: 1,941
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 357cid
Transmission: T5 Swap
Axle/Gears: 10bolt 7.5" 3.23 soon to be 3.73
Re: Innovate LC-1 vs AEM UEGO?

Originally Posted by spills
Me and this guy I work with have been going back and forth over which one's better overall. He's got a blown G35 with the AEM, and Im about to fire off my 383, hopefully with the LC1. His argument has always been "you get what you pay for", which I take with a grain of salt. Ive never really believed that anyway, but what type of WB O2 systems are yall using? I just need the basic controller ans Bosch sensor, Im using Megasquirt right now to display my AFR until I can afford some new gauges. I know on Innovate's website they list like 10 or so mag articles that they've been featured in from CHP to Sport Compact, but Ive also heard that the LC1 can be a little touchy as far as how it likes it's wiring and such (more sensitive to semi-bad grounds and such than the AEM).

One plus I did notice is that the LC1 is able to read voltages in smaller increments (if I was reading it correctly), essentially meaning that the AEM would max out in either the rich or lean values before the LC1 would. This tells me that the LC1 could potentially be "more accurate" than the AEM. Any input on either of these, any experiences?
Hey spills Ive seen you around the MS forums. (TheRealNap0le0n)

I got my car started and idling. Now i have a hot start issue lol and if i give it gas it dies...

if you wanna trade info dont hesitate to contact me
Old 08-07-2008, 10:40 AM
  #5  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
spills's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Buford, GA
Posts: 996
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 89 RS
Engine: 6.3L Megasquirted HSR
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.70 Posi 9 bolt
Re: Innovate LC-1 vs AEM UEGO?

Originally Posted by luvofjah
I know that LC1 probably sells more, but I also see a bunch that have been broken... Plus the calibration you have to do...
Raf
I thought the calibration was for the sensor and not the controller? I could be wrong, Ive read about calibrating the LC-1 but I thought that was for the Bosch sensor itself and any WB Bosch sensor would have to be calibrated.
Old 08-07-2008, 12:48 PM
  #6  
Member

iTrader: (6)
 
scorchmaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 463
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1984 z28
Engine: BBC
Transmission: TH400
Re: Innovate LC-1 vs AEM UEGO?

do NOT buy the LC-1. The sensor is messed up on half the units. Mine never read accurately and lead me to a million calibrations and 3 bottles of aspirin. Got a replacement and it still didnt work! AEM is one of the most accurate widebands you can buy for the money.
Old 08-07-2008, 02:22 PM
  #7  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
spills's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Buford, GA
Posts: 996
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 89 RS
Engine: 6.3L Megasquirted HSR
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.70 Posi 9 bolt
Re: Innovate LC-1 vs AEM UEGO?

well in that case it would be the controller, not the sensor (I would assume). It's my understanding that 90% of all widebands on the market use the same Bosch sensor, they just make their own controller.
----------
ya know, the more I look at it, I guess the UEGO's controller is built into the gauge itself. It's that's the case, Im gonna look into the compatibility with the megasquirt. The LC-1 sensor and controller alone is $200, without gauge. For $50 more I can get a wideband gauge as well, I might go that route. Hmm...

Last edited by spills; 08-07-2008 at 02:26 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Old 08-07-2008, 11:22 PM
  #8  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Saigon_Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Kissimmee, FL
Posts: 1,941
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 357cid
Transmission: T5 Swap
Axle/Gears: 10bolt 7.5" 3.23 soon to be 3.73
Re: Innovate LC-1 vs AEM UEGO?

Originally Posted by spills
well in that case it would be the controller, not the sensor (I would assume). It's my understanding that 90% of all widebands on the market use the same Bosch sensor, they just make their own controller.
----------
ya know, the more I look at it, I guess the UEGO's controller is built into the gauge itself. It's that's the case, Im gonna look into the compatibility with the megasquirt. The LC-1 sensor and controller alone is $200, without gauge. For $50 more I can get a wideband gauge as well, I might go that route. Hmm...
The price difference isnt $50.

The AEM i saw was like $350 or so... the LC-1 with a gauge is $280
Old 08-08-2008, 05:35 AM
  #9  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
spills's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Buford, GA
Posts: 996
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 89 RS
Engine: 6.3L Megasquirted HSR
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.70 Posi 9 bolt
Re: Innovate LC-1 vs AEM UEGO?

ebay's got em for $220 right now

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/AEM-G...spagenameZWDVW

Summit's got the AEM listed on eBay for $260. DIYauto has the LC-1 for $290 with gauge, and the gauge is just digital readout, it doesnt have the sweep. Not that big of a deal, but to me its more asthetically(sp) pleasing to me.

Last edited by spills; 08-08-2008 at 06:37 AM.
Old 08-08-2008, 10:03 AM
  #10  
Supreme Member
 
Toehead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: North Central Mass.
Posts: 2,123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1985 Berlinetta
Engine: Megasquirted TPI
Transmission: Transgo 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Innovate LC-1 vs AEM UEGO?

wow what a deal.. I think i'm all over that. My megasquirt runs great but it could use some tuning for gas mileage


Did you ever find out if the AEM has an analog output that the megasquirt can use?
Old 08-08-2008, 10:17 AM
  #11  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
spills's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Buford, GA
Posts: 996
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 89 RS
Engine: 6.3L Megasquirted HSR
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.70 Posi 9 bolt
Re: Innovate LC-1 vs AEM UEGO?

I think that guy I work with says that it does have an analog output. Im gonna look into it though
Old 08-08-2008, 10:22 AM
  #12  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
spills's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Buford, GA
Posts: 996
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 89 RS
Engine: 6.3L Megasquirted HSR
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.70 Posi 9 bolt
Re: Innovate LC-1 vs AEM UEGO?

ya, just looked at AEM's website:

"User-programmable 0-5v analog output included for use with data loggers and virtually any engine management system"

sounds like we may have a winner!
Old 08-08-2008, 10:33 AM
  #13  
Supreme Member
 
Toehead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: North Central Mass.
Posts: 2,123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1985 Berlinetta
Engine: Megasquirted TPI
Transmission: Transgo 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Innovate LC-1 vs AEM UEGO?

Wow that's snazzy. It looks good too!
Old 08-08-2008, 10:41 AM
  #14  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
spills's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Buford, GA
Posts: 996
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 89 RS
Engine: 6.3L Megasquirted HSR
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.70 Posi 9 bolt
Re: Innovate LC-1 vs AEM UEGO?

and ya know, I think one of the reasons I didnt want to go with AEM is becuase I really dont hear about domestics with AEM parts, just seems like an import-designed product base. But after reading about it, I may give them a shot. I havent heard any negative reviews about them yet, where as the LC-1 has a few against them. Ill let ya know as soon asI get it installed.
Old 08-08-2008, 10:42 AM
  #15  
Supreme Member
 
Toehead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: North Central Mass.
Posts: 2,123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1985 Berlinetta
Engine: Megasquirted TPI
Transmission: Transgo 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Innovate LC-1 vs AEM UEGO?

One of the NECF members just had his LC-1 die on him randomly . It just stopped working.
Old 08-08-2008, 10:51 AM
  #16  
Member
 
kennn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1990 Nissan 240SX
Engine: GMPP Gen0 350 small block
Transmission: WC T5
Axle/Gears: Nissan R200 3.133, Tomei 2-way
Re: Innovate LC-1 vs AEM UEGO?

Originally Posted by spills
and ya know, I think one of the reasons I didnt want to go with AEM is becuase I really dont hear about domestics with AEM parts, just seems like an import-designed product base. But after reading about it, I may give them a shot. I havent heard any negative reviews about them yet, where as the LC-1 has a few against them. Ill let ya know as soon asI get it installed.
I'm going through the same issue. I hear you, but exhaust is exhaust. What's the difference where it's coming from?

I was set on the LC-1 but I'm having second thoughts from all the bad reviews.
Old 08-08-2008, 12:54 PM
  #17  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
spills's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Buford, GA
Posts: 996
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 89 RS
Engine: 6.3L Megasquirted HSR
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.70 Posi 9 bolt
Re: Innovate LC-1 vs AEM UEGO?

Theres a local shop that sells the LC-1, and I love giving them my business (and they dont carry the AEM), but I think Im gonna have to pass them up this time.

Anyone have any positive experiences with other O2 systems? luvofjah said something about PLX, never heard of them, any others out there?
Old 08-08-2008, 02:41 PM
  #18  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Saigon_Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Kissimmee, FL
Posts: 1,941
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 357cid
Transmission: T5 Swap
Axle/Gears: 10bolt 7.5" 3.23 soon to be 3.73
Re: Innovate LC-1 vs AEM UEGO?

Originally Posted by Toehead
wow what a deal.. I think i'm all over that. My megasquirt runs great but it could use some tuning for gas mileage


Did you ever find out if the AEM has an analog output that the megasquirt can use?
The MS has a setting for the UEGO so i'd suppose it would be an easy set up... kinda wish i'd have seen those deals tho!

I got my LC-1 for $180 plus shippin w/o the gauge
Old 08-11-2008, 02:09 PM
  #19  
Junior Member

iTrader: (9)
 
sideways87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Niles, Ohio
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Innovate LC-1 vs AEM UEGO?

New to this, so does the o2 sensor also have a nb for the computer or do I have to add another bung for this one?
Old 08-11-2008, 02:33 PM
  #20  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Saigon_Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Kissimmee, FL
Posts: 1,941
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 357cid
Transmission: T5 Swap
Axle/Gears: 10bolt 7.5" 3.23 soon to be 3.73
Re: Innovate LC-1 vs AEM UEGO?

Originally Posted by sideways87
New to this, so does the o2 sensor also have a nb for the computer or do I have to add another bung for this one?
The lc-1 has a digital out for Innovate products so you can "daisy chain" and has two analog outs that are programable.

IE wideband out and NB out or what ever you want
Old 08-11-2008, 09:04 PM
  #21  
TGO Supporter

iTrader: (2)
 
luvofjah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: PNW
Posts: 2,478
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Car: 91 Black Formula KR
Engine: 305 TPI R69/G92
Transmission: Astro A5-Pro 5.0-McCleod
Axle/Gears: US Gear 3.42 Eaton True Trac
Re: Innovate LC-1 vs AEM UEGO?

plx uses the Bosch 02 sensor...

http://plxdevices.com/

http://www.plxdevices.com/products/sm/afr/

They have this amazing organic display (though I will probably just get the OMeter from Moates)...

On code59, many have both... LC1 sells more, so I see more reports there too of it being broken...

Raf
Old 08-13-2008, 11:02 PM
  #22  
Supreme Member
 
Toehead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: North Central Mass.
Posts: 2,123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1985 Berlinetta
Engine: Megasquirted TPI
Transmission: Transgo 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Innovate LC-1 vs AEM UEGO?

Spills,


Hate to use you as a guinea pig, but did you ever buy the gauge? I'm back from vaca and i'm def eying one.
Old 08-14-2008, 05:33 AM
  #23  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
spills's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Buford, GA
Posts: 996
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 89 RS
Engine: 6.3L Megasquirted HSR
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.70 Posi 9 bolt
Re: Innovate LC-1 vs AEM UEGO?

no not yet, that project's on hold until I can get my credit card payed down a good bit. But I think I am definitely going with the AEM now. I have yet to see the one my buddy's got, but just from reviews I think it's getting a thumbs up from me.
Old 08-14-2008, 07:50 AM
  #24  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Saigon_Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Kissimmee, FL
Posts: 1,941
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 357cid
Transmission: T5 Swap
Axle/Gears: 10bolt 7.5" 3.23 soon to be 3.73
Re: Innovate LC-1 vs AEM UEGO?

Just as aa FYI i've been running mine for a few days (LC-1) with no problems... it was cheap and easy.

Now if it craps out ill try to get it replaced under warranty.. if not im getting a PLX... I wish i had the money/ knowledge about them. The OEL gauges are sexxx
Old 08-14-2008, 09:31 AM
  #25  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
spills's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Buford, GA
Posts: 996
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 89 RS
Engine: 6.3L Megasquirted HSR
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.70 Posi 9 bolt
Re: Innovate LC-1 vs AEM UEGO?

thats the thing about price though, I always thought the AEM was more expensive until I realized that the gauge itself IS the controller. With that in mind, if you are wanting an AFR gauge as well, then the AEM would be cheaper. I think the LC-1 with the gauge is about $299 IIRC, and the AEM is cheaper than that. If you're just wanting a standalone controller with sensor and don't mind not having a gauge, then the LC-1 would be cheaper overall. I dont want to have to get out my laptop each time I want to see what kind of AFR readings Im getting, so I think Im going with the AEM.
Old 08-14-2008, 09:52 AM
  #26  
Supreme Member
 
Toehead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: North Central Mass.
Posts: 2,123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1985 Berlinetta
Engine: Megasquirted TPI
Transmission: Transgo 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Innovate LC-1 vs AEM UEGO?

Want me to be the guinea pig?

Paypal of course... I don't wanna get screwed!
Old 08-14-2008, 09:55 AM
  #27  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
spills's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Buford, GA
Posts: 996
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 89 RS
Engine: 6.3L Megasquirted HSR
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.70 Posi 9 bolt
Re: Innovate LC-1 vs AEM UEGO?

you mean for the LC1 or AEM? I havent gotten mine yet, so I guess you'll have to be the guinea pig if you're going AEM
Old 08-14-2008, 09:55 AM
  #28  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Saigon_Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Kissimmee, FL
Posts: 1,941
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 357cid
Transmission: T5 Swap
Axle/Gears: 10bolt 7.5" 3.23 soon to be 3.73
Re: Innovate LC-1 vs AEM UEGO?

Originally Posted by spills
thats the thing about price though, I always thought the AEM was more expensive until I realized that the gauge itself IS the controller. With that in mind, if you are wanting an AFR gauge as well, then the AEM would be cheaper. I think the LC-1 with the gauge is about $299 IIRC, and the AEM is cheaper than that. If you're just wanting a standalone controller with sensor and don't mind not having a gauge, then the LC-1 would be cheaper overall. I dont want to have to get out my laptop each time I want to see what kind of AFR readings Im getting, so I think Im going with the AEM.
LC-1 minus the gauge paid $180 + shippin
----------
Originally Posted by Saigon_Bob
LC-1 minus the gauge paid $180 + shippin
plus i dont have anywhere to put a guage right now.

I might get the autometer C2 wideband gauge seeing that I made a custom gauge cluster with all Autometer C2 gauges and i want it to match..


BTW guys i drove my car to work today!!! ran pretty decent for a rough tune and i got a kick *** datalog of city driving AND Highway. so hopefully i can use it to get my cruise VE's down

Last edited by Saigon_Bob; 08-14-2008 at 09:58 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Old 08-14-2008, 10:40 AM
  #29  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
spills's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Buford, GA
Posts: 996
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 89 RS
Engine: 6.3L Megasquirted HSR
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.70 Posi 9 bolt
Re: Innovate LC-1 vs AEM UEGO?

ya, and now that you got LC1 in, you can use megatune to to a quick autotune and get you pretty close to where you need to be.
Old 08-14-2008, 11:18 AM
  #30  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Saigon_Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Kissimmee, FL
Posts: 1,941
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 357cid
Transmission: T5 Swap
Axle/Gears: 10bolt 7.5" 3.23 soon to be 3.73
Re: Innovate LC-1 vs AEM UEGO?

Originally Posted by spills
ya, and now that you got LC1 in, you can use megatune to to a quick autotune and get you pretty close to where you need to be.
I am finding right now ( and with research on the ms forums ) that autotune isnt really that great.

I suppose it should work awesome with a decent med tune ( it wont do well on a rough ) to fine tune it.

Right now my VE's are too far off and the autotune can only change within a set parameter. also as of yet if EGO correction is on the car runs shitty cuz its trying to make drastic changes so i am tuning by AFR readout and feel manually as well as running the datalogs thru the VEAnalyzer in MS log viewer.


Word of caution: if you use the log viewer VE Analyzer save the update VE table separate IE export it and make a descriptive name.

If you let MS logviewer just save the new table to the MSQ the VE table will be corrupted and jumbled and un usable.
Old 08-14-2008, 01:57 PM
  #31  
Supreme Member
 
Toehead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: North Central Mass.
Posts: 2,123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1985 Berlinetta
Engine: Megasquirted TPI
Transmission: Transgo 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Innovate LC-1 vs AEM UEGO?

ok, I just bit.

Let's see how it goes
Old 08-19-2008, 02:16 PM
  #32  
Junior Member

iTrader: (9)
 
sideways87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Niles, Ohio
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Innovate LC-1 vs AEM UEGO?

So I can just use the o-5v analog lead for the computer?
Thanks
Old 08-19-2008, 02:22 PM
  #33  
TGO Supporter

iTrader: (2)
 
luvofjah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: PNW
Posts: 2,478
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Car: 91 Black Formula KR
Engine: 305 TPI R69/G92
Transmission: Astro A5-Pro 5.0-McCleod
Axle/Gears: US Gear 3.42 Eaton True Trac
Re: Innovate LC-1 vs AEM UEGO?

Need more input...

Which Computer?

Unless you have modified your cars ecm & possibly repined it to run code59, you can't plug the 5v (wide band O2) to it...

If you're using Tuner Pro with the AutoProm / Breakout Box set for 5v, instead of 1v (narrow band), yes... it can plug in there...

All the Wide band o2's I've seen have a Narrow and wide band output...

Raf
Old 08-28-2008, 11:55 AM
  #34  
Supreme Member
 
Toehead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: North Central Mass.
Posts: 2,123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1985 Berlinetta
Engine: Megasquirted TPI
Transmission: Transgo 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Innovate LC-1 vs AEM UEGO?

Got it, installed it.


Very nice unit. Is actually a pretty sweet looking gauge. It has an auto dimming display with 3 brightness levels.

No problems hoking it up to the megasquirt at all.

It does produce a little radio interference, even when hooked up directly to the battery.
Old 08-28-2008, 05:05 PM
  #35  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
spills's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Buford, GA
Posts: 996
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 89 RS
Engine: 6.3L Megasquirted HSR
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.70 Posi 9 bolt
Re: Innovate LC-1 vs AEM UEGO?

You got the AEM right?

I've had to put mine on hold. I just had to throw down $2k on a trans for the Monte Carlo (daily driver), so as soon as I get that paid off Im goin back to the Camaro

What kind of interference are you having?
Old 08-28-2008, 11:47 PM
  #36  
Supreme Member
 
Toehead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: North Central Mass.
Posts: 2,123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1985 Berlinetta
Engine: Megasquirted TPI
Transmission: Transgo 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Innovate LC-1 vs AEM UEGO?

mild radio whine you can only hear with the car not running.... whatever, i'm not losing sleep over it.


I would def recommend the gauge tho. Very solid construction, good quality parts, and everything you need.

Did you know these don't need free air calibration? Pretty snazzy.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
amargari
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
6
11-10-2015 02:09 PM
tmellott89
DIY PROM
7
10-14-2015 02:06 PM
sleprock
Power Adders
16
10-01-2015 09:39 AM
va454ss
DIY PROM
2
11-04-2004 08:24 AM



Quick Reply: Innovate LC-1 vs AEM UEGO?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:11 PM.