DIY PROM Do It Yourself PROM chip burning help. No PROM begging. No PROMs for sale. No commercial exchange. Not a referral service.

The 60 Code Is Alive ! ! !!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-12-2004, 07:52 PM
  #1  
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
 
Grumpy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: In reality
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
The 60 Code Is Alive ! ! !!!

Yep, just in from the first real test drive with the 60 code. For those just tuning in, it was the 58 Mask but now is labeded 60 so as to identify it as a .bin derived from Source Code.

From closed throttle VE to the boost multiplier, TCC it all seems to be working now.

Still a ways to go to get it GN friendly, but light years closer then even yesterday.

YEHAAAAAAAAA.
Old 05-12-2004, 08:13 PM
  #2  
Supreme Member

 
SATURN5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: the garage
Posts: 1,612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 84 SVO
Engine: Volvo headed 2.3T
Transmission: WCT5
Axle/Gears: 8.8" 3.73
Re: The 60 Code Is Alive ! ! !!!

Originally posted by Grumpy
Yep, just in from the first real test drive with the 60 code. For those just tuning in, it was the 58 Mask but now is labeded 60 so as to identify it as a .bin derived from Source Code.

From closed throttle VE to the boost multiplier, TCC it all seems to be working now.

Still a ways to go to get it GN friendly, but light years closer then even yesterday.

YEHAAAAAAAAA.

Good deal.. Looks like all your time spent decyphering $58 is paying off..

I haven't had much time to mess with the Malibu lately, I did finally manage to clean up the garage a bit.. just need to sort out my tool box and one bench top. Boy was it a complete mess. BW
Old 05-12-2004, 09:18 PM
  #3  
Member

 
YenkoZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 Z28
Engine: 305 TPI under 14 psi
Transmission: aftermarket T56
Axle/Gears: Moser 12 bolt 3.08 gears
I take it your $60 version of the sy/ty code is changed to work with the dis system on your GN. What other changes have you done to seperate this code from the $58?
Old 05-12-2004, 09:19 PM
  #4  
Supreme Member
 
funstick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: great lakes
Posts: 1,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
some how i sense things just got a bit more interesting.
Old 05-12-2004, 10:07 PM
  #5  
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
 
Grumpy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: In reality
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
Originally posted by YenkoZ28
I take it your $60 version of the sy/ty code is changed to work with the dis system on your GN. What other changes have you done to seperate this code from the $58?
Yes.

The 58 code ran in a 16K .bin file, and the 60 is a 32K .bin, so there is lots of room for patches.

The final .asm will include lots of tuning notes.
Old 05-16-2004, 10:07 AM
  #6  
Supreme Member

 
gta324's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: sweden
Posts: 2,441
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: GTA -89
Engine: Blown 415"
Transmission: 4L80E
Axle/Gears: Strange 12-bolt
Does this mean that the $60 code cant be used on a 350 TPi engine?

/N.
Old 05-16-2004, 11:23 AM
  #7  
Supreme Member

 
SATURN5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: the garage
Posts: 1,612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 84 SVO
Engine: Volvo headed 2.3T
Transmission: WCT5
Axle/Gears: 8.8" 3.73
Originally posted by gta324
Does this mean that the $60 code cant be used on a 350 TPi engine?

/N.

$60 can be adapted to just about anything.. BW
Old 05-16-2004, 11:40 AM
  #8  
Supreme Member

 
gta324's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: sweden
Posts: 2,441
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: GTA -89
Engine: Blown 415"
Transmission: 4L80E
Axle/Gears: Strange 12-bolt
Exacly what is $60, what is diffrent from $58 besides its 32k?

just read the first line by grumpy

/N.

Last edited by gta324; 05-16-2004 at 11:46 AM.
Old 05-16-2004, 02:38 PM
  #9  
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
 
Grumpy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: In reality
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
Originally posted by gta324
Exacly what is $60, what is diffrent from $58 besides its 32k?
just read the first line by grumpy
Nothing other then a huge leap forward for humanity.
Old 08-02-2004, 08:50 PM
  #10  
Senior Member

 
c4boom's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: concord New Hampshire
Posts: 569
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 87 iroc and 88 k2500 tbi truck
Engine: l98 and lo5
Transmission: 700 r4's babby
what would it take to get it to run on a tbi motor with a turbo
Old 08-02-2004, 09:43 PM
  #11  
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
 
Grumpy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: In reality
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
Originally posted by c4boom
what would it take to get it to run on a tbi motor with a turbo
Deoends on the amount of boost you want to run, and how familiar you are with turbos, and TBI.

Even with 90 PPH injectors you'd be fuel limited.

Then there's the matter of if you run a fuel pressure regulator referenced to man vac/boost. With enough fuel pressue you can get some decent HP, but it all gets kinda complex.

Patience, and hard work can make alot of things work, but sometimes it takes an incredible amount of both.
Old 08-02-2004, 10:55 PM
  #12  
Senior Member

 
c4boom's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: concord New Hampshire
Posts: 569
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 87 iroc and 88 k2500 tbi truck
Engine: l98 and lo5
Transmission: 700 r4's babby
i was thinking some where in the 8-10 psi rang. i just think it would be cool if i was able to get a bit finer tuning i would pbly still run a FMU and maybe a set of back up injectors
Old 08-03-2004, 12:05 AM
  #13  
Supreme Member

 
Craig Moates's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Baton Rouge, LA, USA
Posts: 1,577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 87 T/A
Engine: 441 SBC 12.5:1 0.680" Lift
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 4.10 TruTrac Moser 9"
PLEASE DO NOT ATTEMPT TO DISTRIBUTE THE $60 MATERIAL!

It is a derivative work of the $58 source code, and might be protected under some nonsense similar to that other deal. I'd hate for us to all end up in jail over this.

Seriously, though, good job Bruce!

Also seriously, can someone with at least half a 'nad take that stupid sticky down about the $58 ECU? It's really annoying to have to look at that crap every time I logon here.
Old 08-03-2004, 06:58 AM
  #14  
TGO Supporter/Moderator

iTrader: (12)
 
anesthes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: SALEM, NH
Posts: 11,732
Likes: 0
Received 89 Likes on 75 Posts
Car: '88 Formula, '94 Corvette, '95 Bird
Engine: LC9, 355" LT1, LT1
Transmission: T5, Zf6, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42, Dana44 3.45, 3.23
Originally posted by Craig Moates
PLEASE DO NOT ATTEMPT TO DISTRIBUTE THE $60 MATERIAL!

It is a derivative work of the $58 source code, and might be protected under some nonsense similar to that other deal. I'd hate for us to all end up in jail over this.

Seriously, though, good job Bruce!

Also seriously, can someone with at least half a 'nad take that stupid sticky down about the $58 ECU? It's really annoying to have to look at that crap every time I logon here.
Ugg. No kidding..

-- Joe
Old 08-03-2004, 07:18 AM
  #15  
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
 
Grumpy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: In reality
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
Originally posted by c4boom
i was thinking some where in the 8-10 psi rang. i just think it would be cool if i was able to get a bit finer tuning i would pbly still run a FMU and maybe a set of back up injectors
FMUs as currently used, are often just bandaids to get around the actual calibration not being able to work in S/C or T/C applicaitons. With the proper calibration they're not needed. the more dependent a system is on the mechanical end, the higher the risk of problems. While there can be code problems, a vast majority of something changing while in use is caught thru the checksum routine, so the code probability issue is just about non existant. Whereas there's always the possibility of crude in the fuel, and that can fubar the FMU, and if the FMU is the sole provider of having enough fuel, then a failure on it's part can lead to rather quick engine damage.

If you want to run staged injectors, you might as well just keep the TBI TB, and go with a set of port injectors, and not have to bother with complexity of having two systems.

It's much easier to do things *right* the first time, rather then have to cobble as you go. BTDT
Old 08-03-2004, 07:20 AM
  #16  
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
 
Grumpy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: In reality
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
Originally posted by Craig Moates
It's really annoying to have to look at that crap every time I logon here.
Makes me laugh.
Constant reminder of the book, *The Games People Play*.
Old 08-03-2004, 04:36 PM
  #17  
Senior Member

 
c4boom's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: concord New Hampshire
Posts: 569
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 87 iroc and 88 k2500 tbi truck
Engine: l98 and lo5
Transmission: 700 r4's babby
so your saying the tbi unit with the out the injectors can be used as a tb like in the tpi setup and then weld in a set of port injector bungs inthe intake. then run a set of injectors into the intake ports
Old 08-03-2004, 08:22 PM
  #18  
Junior Member

 
hatebur2001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1992 RS
Engine: 3.1
Transmission: 5 spd
Is the code available for educational review? By that I mean not a complete bin, but enough code for better understanding the layout and functions.
Thanks
Mike
Old 08-03-2004, 10:41 PM
  #19  
Supreme Member
 
funstick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: great lakes
Posts: 1,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Micheal backus is still claiming ownership of the actuall code ???? i fial to understand this logic ??? who did he buy it from. Also where the info on this Prik. short on patience and i got some spare time comming to me soon.
Old 08-04-2004, 12:05 AM
  #20  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
onebinky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Southwest Chicago 'burbs
Posts: 2,031
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you get really bored, here's 32 "micheal backus'" for you to contact

Might even get a trip to alaska, that's where a few of them are located.

http://www.whowhere.com/results.asp?...l%20+backus%22
Old 08-04-2004, 09:06 AM
  #21  
Junior Member

 
hatebur2001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1992 RS
Engine: 3.1
Transmission: 5 spd
Unless someone is attempting financial gain from the code, there is no real damages to recover. I am guessing that the "original" work was derived from GM coding, therefore I cannot understand how an individual can proclaim ownership. This sounds like SCO Unix claiming it owns the rights to all of Unix. His brother must be a lawyer, since there is no money to found in a lawsuit.
It is a shame, but these things do happen. I would have loved to see the work done to the code, but one can't have everything.
Old 08-07-2004, 12:43 AM
  #22  
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (1)
 
novass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Grand Island, NY
Posts: 1,132
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1990 Formula
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: WC T5
What is the actual deal with the $60 code. Is it possible to get a copy of it and the hack? (was craig just joking around or now is the $60 off limits?)
Old 08-07-2004, 01:02 AM
  #23  
Supreme Member

 
Craig Moates's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Baton Rouge, LA, USA
Posts: 1,577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 87 T/A
Engine: 441 SBC 12.5:1 0.680" Lift
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 4.10 TruTrac Moser 9"
I want to ensure that everyone knows my sarcasm is second only to my brilliance.
Old 08-07-2004, 06:40 AM
  #24  
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
 
Grumpy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: In reality
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
Originally posted by Craig Moates
I want to ensure that everyone knows my sarcasm is second only to my brilliance.
Doc's in a meeting right now, where there is some heated debate right now. The only topic on the agenda was that very issue, but they maybe arguing about if Sleepy actually has to be awake for the meeting, to be able to vote afterwards, if there is a resolution.
Old 08-08-2004, 07:24 AM
  #25  
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (1)
 
novass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Grand Island, NY
Posts: 1,132
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1990 Formula
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: WC T5
Originally posted by Grumpy
Doc's in a meeting right now, where there is some heated debate right now. The only topic on the agenda was that very issue, but they maybe arguing about if Sleepy actually has to be awake for the meeting, to be able to vote afterwards, if there is a resolution.
Ok, I the $60 Code and Hack avaliable? Is it possible to get a copy? Is it hosted somewhere or directly from you, or has Doc stolen it and held it for ransom?

Thanks
Old 09-03-2004, 03:08 PM
  #26  
Supreme Member

 
TechSmurf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Tucson, AZ, USA
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '99 Trans Am, '86 Camaro
Engine: LS1, Scrap
Transmission: T56, T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Stock ZT, 3.42 Open
Originally posted by novass
Ok, I the $60 Code and Hack avaliable? Is it possible to get a copy? Is it hosted somewhere or directly from you, or has Doc stolen it and held it for ransom?

Thanks
Ditto!

I'm not sure why Grumpy didn't even respond to my PM.. perhaps there's some surprise lurking over the horizon?
Old 09-03-2004, 07:35 PM
  #27  
Moderator

 
3.8TransAM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Schererville , IN
Posts: 7,015
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 91 GTA, 91 Formula, 89 TTA
Engine: all 225+ RWHP
Transmission: all OD
Axle/Gears: Always the good ones
I'll make it simple, Grumpy hates PM's :-) He hardly answers mine and Im out there on a halfway regular basis.

hit him on email and use somehting pertinent in the subject and Im pretty sure you will get an answer :-)

later
Jeremy
Old 09-04-2004, 12:31 PM
  #28  
Supreme Member

 
JP84Z430HP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Johnstown, Ohio
Posts: 1,416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 84 Z28
Engine: 355 (fastburn heads, LT4 HOT cam)
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt, 3.27
Originally posted by 3.8TransAM
I'll make it simple, Grumpy hates PM's :-) He hardly answers mine and Im out there on a halfway regular basis.

hit him on email and use somehting pertinent in the subject and Im pretty sure you will get an answer :-)

later
Jeremy
I never knew this! He has responded to me before, so I suppose I shoud feel fortunate! Or maybe Doc was the one that actually responded???
Old 10-07-2004, 01:00 PM
  #29  
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (1)
 
novass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Grand Island, NY
Posts: 1,132
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1990 Formula
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: WC T5
I am about to do the $60/$58 conversion. Question, can you use tunerpro to edit the $60 Code or do you have to do it in assembly? How about tunercat $60 file?

Those that are using the $60 what are you using to edit the bin.

How about datalogging?

Last edited by novass; 10-07-2004 at 01:22 PM.
Old 10-07-2004, 03:34 PM
  #30  
Moderator

 
3.8TransAM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Schererville , IN
Posts: 7,015
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 91 GTA, 91 Formula, 89 TTA
Engine: all 225+ RWHP
Transmission: all OD
Axle/Gears: Always the good ones
Get the 60 and check it out :-)

No need for a editor per se, but to use one of the conventional editors you wouldn need to make your own file for it .

Neat setup.

later
Jeremy
Old 10-07-2004, 03:36 PM
  #31  
Supreme Member

 
89 Iroc Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Costal Alabama
Posts: 2,136
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1989 Iroc-Z
Engine: 350, ZZ4 equivalent
Transmission: Pro-Built Road Race 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 Dana 44
Excuse my ignorance but who is doc?
Old 10-07-2004, 04:24 PM
  #32  
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
 
Grumpy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: In reality
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
Originally posted by novass
I am about to do the $60/$58 conversion. Question, can you use tunerpro to edit the $60 Code or do you have to do it in assembly? How about tunercat $60 file?

Those that are using the $60 what are you using to edit the bin.

How about datalogging?
The intent of the 60 is for people to help develope a true *hotroders* code, but to date no one's seemed interested in participating.

It's assembly code, so no editors are needed, thou I have a .tdf file for it, unless someone's going to actually do something, then they might as well just use the stock 58 code.

The ALDL is untouched, so any normal scanner works with it.
Old 10-07-2004, 04:26 PM
  #33  
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
 
Grumpy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: In reality
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
Originally posted by 89 Iroc Z
Excuse my ignorance but who is doc?
You don't know who Doc is?.
Actually now there's two, there is someone subscribed to the list using that name, but the real Doc has been around for eons.
Old 10-07-2004, 06:26 PM
  #34  
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (1)
 
novass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Grand Island, NY
Posts: 1,132
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1990 Formula
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: WC T5
Originally posted by Grumpy
The intent of the 60 is for people to help develope a true *hotroders* code, but to date no one's seemed interested in participating.

It's assembly code, so no editors are needed, thou I have a .tdf file for it, unless someone's going to actually do something, then they might as well just use the stock 58 code.

The ALDL is untouched, so any normal scanner works with it.
I am on the verge of starting on the $60 or $58 code, I haven't yet made the switch, because I am for some odd reason only able to datalog with craig moates software, I can't get any others to work. So I don't want to do the switch till I am able to datalog the $60 or $58. I need to find a software package that will work of me. So far with the $8d only craigs will connect. (However, I don't think that this will work with the $60 or $58)What suggestions for the $58/$60 dataloging, other than tunerpro and datamaster, are available?

What do you mean unless someone's going to actually do something ? You sent me the $60 and I was planning on using it, a .tdf would be helpful. I am still only sort of comfortable editing info using the hex editor in tunercat of tunerpro. Full blown assembly, I am still working on.

Thanks
Tom
Old 10-07-2004, 07:06 PM
  #35  
Senior Member

iTrader: (1)
 
va454ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 785
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 90 454SS
Engine: 454 TBI
Transmission: TH400
Originally posted by c4boom
so your saying the tbi unit with the out the injectors can be used as a tb like in the tpi setup and then weld in a set of port injector bungs inthe intake. then run a set of injectors into the intake ports
Edelbrock's done it for you:

http://www.edelbrock.com/automotive/mpfi_sb.html

http://www.edelbrock.com/automotive/...i_callouts.gif

Grumpy,

Could one use the TBI (with GM injectors in stock location) on the Edel MPFI manifold and use the Edel injectors as supplemental fuel (as in a boosted app)?
Old 10-07-2004, 10:20 PM
  #36  
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
 
Grumpy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: In reality
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
Originally posted by va454ss

Grumpy,
Could one use the TBI (with GM injectors in stock location) on the Edel MPFI manifold and use the Edel injectors as supplemental fuel (as in a boosted app)?
Could?, sure, but what's the point?. Just use the right injectors, and be done with it. Simplicity is the key to design.
Old 10-07-2004, 11:02 PM
  #37  
TGO Supporter/Moderator

iTrader: (12)
 
anesthes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: SALEM, NH
Posts: 11,732
Likes: 0
Received 89 Likes on 75 Posts
Car: '88 Formula, '94 Corvette, '95 Bird
Engine: LC9, 355" LT1, LT1
Transmission: T5, Zf6, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42, Dana44 3.45, 3.23
Originally posted by Grumpy
The intent of the 60 is for people to help develope a true *hotroders* code, but to date no one's seemed interested in participating.

It's assembly code, so no editors are needed, thou I have a .tdf file for it, unless someone's going to actually do something, then they might as well just use the stock 58 code.

The ALDL is untouched, so any normal scanner works with it.
I'm 90% sure the rev limiter code is broke on a v8. Not sure why yet. If I figure it out, i'll submit a patch t you.



-- Joe
Old 10-07-2004, 11:06 PM
  #38  
Senior Member

 
JPrevost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 91 Red Sled
Axle/Gears: 10bolt Richmond 3.73 Torsen
Originally posted by Grumpy
Could?, sure, but what's the point?. Just use the right injectors, and be done with it. Simplicity is the key to design.
Progressive nitrous . Or maybe 9th and 10th injectors to kool down the IATs.
Old 10-08-2004, 07:42 AM
  #39  
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
 
Grumpy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: In reality
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
Originally posted by JPrevost
Progressive nitrous . Or maybe 9th and 10th injectors to kool down the IATs.
Just as a FWIW, the cooling of gases, primarily takes place at the point of expansion. If your into just dropping MATs, then alky would probably do a better job without all the gymfoolery. But, if you want the HP of nitrous, that's another matter.
Old 10-08-2004, 11:30 AM
  #40  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
JP86SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Browns Town
Posts: 3,178
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 86 Monte SS (730,$8D,G3,AP,4K,S_V4)
Engine: 406 Hyd Roller 236/242
Transmission: 700R4 HomeBrew, 2.4K stall
Axle/Gears: 3:73 Posi, 7.5 Soon to break
Adapt to anything...

Can the 60 do N/A or is it strictly for boosted apps?
I want to go boosted in the future but am stuck breathing atmosphere currently (due to the cost of air pressure).
It would be great to start with something to run N/A and then convert the tables up to boosted levels in the future.
With all the extra space available for adding code, mods could all be in place when the changeover to boost is done.
Wiring would all be converted and then multiple harness adaption to switch back and forth could be eliminated.
I'm hopeful.
Old 10-08-2004, 04:23 PM
  #41  
Supreme Member

 
SATURN5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: the garage
Posts: 1,612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 84 SVO
Engine: Volvo headed 2.3T
Transmission: WCT5
Axle/Gears: 8.8" 3.73
Re: Adapt to anything...

Originally posted by JP86SS
Can the 60 do N/A or is it strictly for boosted apps?
I want to go boosted in the future but am stuck breathing atmosphere currently (due to the cost of air pressure).
It would be great to start with something to run N/A and then convert the tables up to boosted levels in the future.
With all the extra space available for adding code, mods could all be in place when the changeover to boost is done.
Wiring would all be converted and then multiple harness adaption to switch back and forth could be eliminated.
I'm hopeful.
In short... yes.

There is a flag in the bin to allow either 1 bar or 2 bar MAP. Set the bin for 1 bar and hook up a 1 bar MAP and go.
Old 10-08-2004, 06:36 PM
  #42  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
JP86SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Browns Town
Posts: 3,178
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 86 Monte SS (730,$8D,G3,AP,4K,S_V4)
Engine: 406 Hyd Roller 236/242
Transmission: 700R4 HomeBrew, 2.4K stall
Axle/Gears: 3:73 Posi, 7.5 Soon to break
Sweet!, I'm game.
Just as I'm grasping at the $8D code finally, something better comes along to really play with.
:hail: :hail:Hail Grumpy (and all the little fellas too!) :hail: :hail:
Is it posted somewhere?
I'm assuming I'll need to repin for the 58 setup or will the 730 I/O work with it?
I'm up for what ever it needs, got all winter.
Polish, port match, new heads, headers, WB, OOooooH-eeee!
Old 10-08-2004, 10:16 PM
  #43  
Supreme Member

 
SATURN5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: the garage
Posts: 1,612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 84 SVO
Engine: Volvo headed 2.3T
Transmission: WCT5
Axle/Gears: 8.8" 3.73
wire your 730 as a Syphoon and your good to go
Old 10-24-2004, 05:32 PM
  #44  
Junior Member
 
gmartin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: chicago
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: monte carlo ss
Engine: l98
Transmission: 200r4
Could someone help me with this $60 vs $58 code. I'm sorry I a newbie to all of this I just went out and got a 730 from the junk yard how ever the chip isn't stock it is a hypertech C 91. I would like to run a turbo on my application and have it all intercooled by a superduty intercooler.
Old 10-24-2004, 08:45 PM
  #45  
Senior Member

 
JPrevost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 91 Red Sled
Axle/Gears: 10bolt Richmond 3.73 Torsen
Grumpy, I'd like to help with the code. Let me know what you might want help with and I'll do my best.
I also need to fix your version of Lockers HUD .
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
89-IROCZ-5.0TPI
TPI
10
02-22-2022 09:26 PM
Falcon50
DFI and ECM
81
08-22-2020 03:26 PM
racereese
Tech / General Engine
14
10-03-2015 03:46 PM
Luigytico09
TPI
0
10-01-2015 08:46 AM
dusterbd
TPI
0
09-29-2015 08:40 AM



Quick Reply: The 60 Code Is Alive ! ! !!!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:50 PM.