Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > History / Originality
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

History / Originality Got a question about 1982-1992 Camaro or Firebird history? Have a question about original parts, options, RPO codes, when something was available, or how to document your car? Those questions, answers, and much more!

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-31-2009, 08:02 PM   #1
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Dover, FL
Posts: 1,349
Car: 1991 Firebird
Engine: 3.1L V6

Classifieds Rating: (1)
House approves $2B more for C4C

I would say "HAAAAA!!!!" but this affects me as well....darn it.

a leading Democrat saying "consumers have spoken with their wallets." I'm sure many haven't "spoken" with their wallets, rather, they've taken out a loan of some sort, but...i'm sure many of them will end up having it repo'ed.

I imagine this will get closed but....keep it clean guys.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by 89RsPower! View Post
personally I almost vomit everytime I see a RAII hood on anything but a 4th gen,

Last edited by CharcoalBird; 07-31-2009 at 08:14 PM.
CharcoalBird is offline vBGarage Page  
Old 07-31-2009, 08:18 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
arrowcamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Chester, VA
Posts: 731
Car: '88 GTA
Engine: L-98
Transmission: T-56

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Send a message via Yahoo to arrowcamaro
Re: House approves $2B more for C4C

Quote:
Originally Posted by CharcoalBird View Post
I would say "HAAAAA!!!!" but this affects me as well....darn it.

a leading Democrat saying "consumers have spoken with their wallets." I'm sure many haven't "spoken" with their wallets, rather, they've taken out a loan of some sort, but...i'm sure many of them will end up having it repo'ed.

I imagine this will get closed but....keep it clean guys.
Good to see Uncle taking the steps to keep this program alive. I'm sure its helping people get rid of that old POS that they need to move on from.
arrowcamaro is offline vBGarage Page  
Old 07-31-2009, 08:32 PM   #3
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Blairsville Ga
Posts: 84
Car: 1988 IROC-Z
Engine: 305
Transmission: 5 speed
Axle/Gears: 3.08 posi

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: House approves $2B more for C4C

I wish I could print my own money.................

mike
GT150 is offline vBGarage Page  
Old 07-31-2009, 08:48 PM   #4
Banned
 
Stephen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Posts: 12,214
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi

Classifieds Rating: (12)
Re: House approves $2B more for C4C

Quote:
Originally Posted by GT150 View Post
I wish I could print my own money.................

mike
Sure you can.......
US Town Prints its Own Money

You can print it, but good luck getting anyone to take it.
Stephen is offline vBGarage Page  
Old 08-02-2009, 06:43 PM   #5
Member
 
91 Ragtop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Canal Winchester, Ohio
Posts: 196
Car: 1991 Trans Am Convertible
Engine: 305
Transmission: 5-Speed

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: House approves $2B more for C4C

Saw this victim as I went through a "Clunkers" lot. Pissed me off.


91 Ragtop is offline vBGarage Page  
Old 08-02-2009, 07:14 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
Awesome-X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Bloomfield, IN
Posts: 853
Car: 87 Camaro, 86 Trans Am
Engine: 305, 305
Transmission: 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via Yahoo to Awesome-X
Re: House approves $2B more for C4C

Y'know I always thought to myself "Hey, the government should really give people some sort of incentive to buy a non-emission vehicle like taking their old gas vehicle as a trade in...but they'd never do that" and here they are raking out more money..at least its going to us and not to big companies this time. I know these aren't non-emission vehicles but at least they're a step up I guess...
Awesome-X is offline vBGarage Page  
Old 08-02-2009, 08:24 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
GeeJenn91RSV8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Pittsburgh Pa
Posts: 285
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700 R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: House approves $2B more for C4C

Quote:
Originally Posted by 91 Ragtop View Post
Saw this victim as I went through a "Clunkers" lot. Pissed me off.

I wonder where the ttops are at. Did the old owner not care to put them back in or did someone rip them off?
GeeJenn91RSV8 is offline vBGarage Page  
Old 08-02-2009, 08:52 PM   #8
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Northern CT
Posts: 1,903
Car: 1986 Trans am
Engine: 5.3 LM7
Transmission: T56 6 speed
Axle/Gears: Dana 44 w/ 3.55's

Classifieds Rating: (7)
Re: House approves $2B more for C4C

Honestly, this program is a load of bullcrap. Lets rake out a ton of money and send the national debt skyrocketing to crush older cars that less fortunate people can afford, all while probably paying the crushing yards to dispose of them, and helping the car makers get going again after THEIR huge F-up. Sounds like something only obama could come up with. I didn't vote by the way.

Don't get me wrong, I love american cars and have never owned anything BUT american, but enough is enough. They messed up so let them fend for themselves.
whitedevilTA is offline vBGarage Page  
Old 08-02-2009, 10:46 PM   #9
Member
 
91 Ragtop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Canal Winchester, Ohio
Posts: 196
Car: 1991 Trans Am Convertible
Engine: 305
Transmission: 5-Speed

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: House approves $2B more for C4C

Quote:
Originally Posted by GeeJenn91RSV8 View Post
I wonder where the ttops are at. Did the old owner not care to put them back in or did someone rip them off?
I saw that too. Probably kept a souvenir of it. I'm guessing it's a V8 because I think the V6 had 19mpg which would have made it ineligible.

There was also a 1990 Mustang 5.0 Convertible there to be destroyed in addition to the 1998 Mercedes SUV and several other cars that someone could have used Couldn't believe it.
91 Ragtop is offline vBGarage Page  
Old 08-03-2009, 12:46 AM   #10
Member
 
Red90IROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Commerce MI
Posts: 210
Car: 1984 Z28 HO
Engine: 5L 4BBL
Transmission: 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: House approves $2B more for C4C

I'm not in favor of the C4C. Sure seems like a massive waste of tax $$. However, it occurred to me today that it might make a lot of parts for 3gens actually cheaper. Yards have six months to strip off parts from C4C trade-in's, before they have to crush or shred the "bones". While I doubt a lot of 3gens are going into C4C (so many are owned now by enthusiasts), those that do will be stripped clean before crushing and a lot of parts will be put into the used market. Meanwhile, the ones that do get crushed will make the good ones that survive in our hands more rare/valuable. It's possible parts will be cheaper for us, and our cars worth more.
__________________
1984 Camaro Z28 - blue metallic, L69, MX0
Red90IROC is offline vBGarage Page  
Old 08-04-2009, 11:29 AM   #11
Moderator
 
okfoz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Doghouse ······································ Car: 1989 Formula 350 Vert Engine: 350 L98 Transmission: 700R4 Axle/Gears: B&W 3.27
Posts: 10,326
Car: 87 Formula T-Top, 87 Formula HT
Engine: 5.1L TPI, 5.0L TPI
Transmission: 700R4, M5
Axle/Gears: Sag 3.73, B&W 3.45

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via Yahoo to okfoz
Re: House approves $2B more for C4C

Actually the V6 would qualify if it had the Manual Transmission I just checked and where they almost across the board decrease milage by 2 mpg, they lowered the V6/M5 by 3 for the highway...

John
__________________
87 FORMULA - 5.1 LB9/A4 T-tops 3.73 Modified (Yellow/Black)
87 FORMULA - 5.0 LB9/M5 T-tops 3.45 (Yellow/Gray)
89 FORMULA 350 - CONVERTIBLE 3.27 All original (Red/Gray)
www.3rdgenformula.com
okfoz is offline vBGarage Page  
Old 08-04-2009, 11:53 AM   #12
Supreme Member
 
TTOP350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: central Il USA
Posts: 2,664
Car: 1989-92 FORMULA350 305 92 Hawkclone
Engine: 4++,350 & 305 CIs
Transmission: 700R4 4800 vig 18thtrans t56 ZF6 T5
Axle/Gears: 3.70 9" ford alum chunk

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Re: House approves $2B more for C4C

How can our country spend itself rich?


Don't re-elect re-peat spenders
TTOP350 is offline vBGarage Page  
Old 08-04-2009, 11:58 AM   #13
Junior Member
 
odecca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Strawn, IL
Posts: 79
Car: 89 RS
Engine: 305... for now.

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: House approves $2B more for C4C

Quote:
Originally Posted by Intrepid781 View Post
at least its going to us and not to big companies this time. I know these aren't non-emission vehicles but at least they're a step up I guess...
You will never see that money, if the program was for you they would buy your car outright. As it is you must buy a new vehicle with the markup so large that the sticker price is usually high enough to absorb the $4500 with the normal trade in value. The positive is when a person buys a car that was made in the states, then at least it is helping those who build them, otherwise it is taking cars off the road that could be an affordable vehicle for someone less fortunate. And it is unfortunate to see classics of automotive history get creamed like this.

I like this idea better: they could give all us thirdgen owners an incentive to buy a LS engine and install it so we get better fuel economy. Or even the new V6 that is in the 2010. With 306hp I'd take that too.
odecca is offline vBGarage Page  
Old 08-04-2009, 01:32 PM   #14
On Probation
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 774
Car: 2002 Formula
Engine: 5.7 LS1

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: House approves $2B more for C4C

Why is it not restrcted to buying a economical AMERICAN car. Toyota is loving it. We dont learn, spending American money to go overseas and not stimulate our economy.
rideon1200 is offline vBGarage Page  
Old 08-04-2009, 01:40 PM   #15
Sponsor
 
1ATony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Pepperell
Posts: 1,632

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: House approves $2B more for C4C

I'm keeping my clunker.it doesn't cost me 300-400/mo to own.
__________________
1A Auto Parts
Call Me Direct 1-866-403-3393
Camaro Parts| Pontiac Parts |1AAuto Blog
1ATony is offline vBGarage Page  
Old 08-04-2009, 06:40 PM   #16
Moderator
 
scottmoyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Florida
Posts: 5,118
Car: 87 IROC-Z 350

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: House approves $2B more for C4C

Not seeing that this is really 3rd gen history related except that there was one located in the "clunker lot", I'm going to close this. Sorry guys, but this is too heated a scenario that I'm afraid opinions and anti-Obama statements could get out of hand. I agree with most of you that this was a bad decision and adding another $2B to our debt is ridiculous.

Here is some good info to close on...
"Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood, the program's chief salesman, has pitched the rebates as good for America, good for car buyers, good for the environment, good for the economy. But it's difficult to determine whether the administration is overselling the claim without seeing what's being sold, what's being traded in and where the cars are being sold.

LaHood, for example, promotes the fact that the Ford Focus so far is at the top of the list of new cars purchased under the program. But the limited information released so far shows most buyers are not picking Ford, Chrysler or General Motors vehicles, and six of the top 10 vehicles purchased are Honda, Toyota and Hyundai."
scottmoyer is offline vBGarage Page  
Old 08-04-2009, 06:40 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Closed Thread

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > History / Originality

Tags
1992, c4c, gta, qualifies, trade
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details