History / Originality Got a question about 1982-1992 Camaro or Firebird history? Have a question about original parts, options, RPO codes, when something was available, or how to document your car? Those questions, answers, and much more!

House approves $2B more for C4C

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-31-2009, 07:02 PM
  #1  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
CharcoalBird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Plant City, FL
Posts: 2,439
Received 71 Likes on 47 Posts
Car: 1991 Firebird
Engine: 3.1L V6
House approves $2B more for C4C

I would say "HAAAAA!!!!" but this affects me as well....darn it.

a leading Democrat saying "consumers have spoken with their wallets." I'm sure many haven't "spoken" with their wallets, rather, they've taken out a loan of some sort, but...i'm sure many of them will end up having it repo'ed.

I imagine this will get closed but....keep it clean guys.

Last edited by CharcoalBird; 07-31-2009 at 07:14 PM.
CharcoalBird is offline  
Old 07-31-2009, 07:18 PM
  #2  
Senior Member

iTrader: (2)
 
arrowcamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Chester, VA
Posts: 731
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '88 GTA
Engine: L-98
Transmission: T-56
Re: House approves $2B more for C4C

Originally Posted by CharcoalBird
I would say "HAAAAA!!!!" but this affects me as well....darn it.

a leading Democrat saying "consumers have spoken with their wallets." I'm sure many haven't "spoken" with their wallets, rather, they've taken out a loan of some sort, but...i'm sure many of them will end up having it repo'ed.

I imagine this will get closed but....keep it clean guys.
Good to see Uncle taking the steps to keep this program alive. I'm sure its helping people get rid of that old POS that they need to move on from.
arrowcamaro is offline  
Old 07-31-2009, 07:32 PM
  #3  
Junior Member
 
GT150's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Blairsville Ga
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1988 IROC-Z
Engine: 305
Transmission: 5 speed
Axle/Gears: 3.08 posi
Re: House approves $2B more for C4C

I wish I could print my own money.................

mike
GT150 is offline  
Old 07-31-2009, 07:48 PM
  #4  
Banned
iTrader: (12)
 
Stephen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Posts: 12,212
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi
Re: House approves $2B more for C4C

Originally Posted by GT150
I wish I could print my own money.................

mike
Sure you can.......
US Town Prints its Own Money

You can print it, but good luck getting anyone to take it.
Stephen is offline  
Old 08-02-2009, 05:43 PM
  #5  
Member

 
91 Ragtop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Canal Winchester, Ohio
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 Trans Am Convertible
Engine: 305
Transmission: 5-Speed
Re: House approves $2B more for C4C

Saw this victim as I went through a "Clunkers" lot. Pissed me off.


Name:  P1030385.jpg
Views: 46
Size:  120.5 KB
91 Ragtop is offline  
Old 08-02-2009, 06:14 PM
  #6  
Senior Member

 
Awesome-X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Bloomfield, IN
Posts: 880
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 87 Camaro
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700R4
Re: House approves $2B more for C4C

Y'know I always thought to myself "Hey, the government should really give people some sort of incentive to buy a non-emission vehicle like taking their old gas vehicle as a trade in...but they'd never do that" and here they are raking out more money..at least its going to us and not to big companies this time. I know these aren't non-emission vehicles but at least they're a step up I guess...
Awesome-X is offline  
Old 08-02-2009, 07:24 PM
  #7  
Member
 
GeeJenn91RSV8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Pittsburgh Pa
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700 R4
Re: House approves $2B more for C4C

Originally Posted by 91 Ragtop
Saw this victim as I went through a "Clunkers" lot. Pissed me off.

I wonder where the ttops are at. Did the old owner not care to put them back in or did someone rip them off?
GeeJenn91RSV8 is offline  
Old 08-02-2009, 07:52 PM
  #8  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (8)
 
whitedevilTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Northern CT
Posts: 2,412
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Car: 1986 Trans am
Engine: 5.3 LM7
Transmission: T56 6 speed
Axle/Gears: Dana 44 w/ 3.55's
Re: House approves $2B more for C4C

Honestly, this program is a load of bullcrap. Lets rake out a ton of money and send the national debt skyrocketing to crush older cars that less fortunate people can afford, all while probably paying the crushing yards to dispose of them, and helping the car makers get going again after THEIR huge F-up. Sounds like something only obama could come up with. I didn't vote by the way.

Don't get me wrong, I love american cars and have never owned anything BUT american, but enough is enough. They messed up so let them fend for themselves.
whitedevilTA is offline  
Old 08-02-2009, 09:46 PM
  #9  
Member

 
91 Ragtop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Canal Winchester, Ohio
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 Trans Am Convertible
Engine: 305
Transmission: 5-Speed
Re: House approves $2B more for C4C

Originally Posted by GeeJenn91RSV8
I wonder where the ttops are at. Did the old owner not care to put them back in or did someone rip them off?
I saw that too. Probably kept a souvenir of it. I'm guessing it's a V8 because I think the V6 had 19mpg which would have made it ineligible.

There was also a 1990 Mustang 5.0 Convertible there to be destroyed in addition to the 1998 Mercedes SUV and several other cars that someone could have used Couldn't believe it.
91 Ragtop is offline  
Old 08-02-2009, 11:46 PM
  #10  
Member

 
Red90IROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Commerce MI
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 Trans Am
Engine: 5L TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Re: House approves $2B more for C4C

I'm not in favor of the C4C. Sure seems like a massive waste of tax $$. However, it occurred to me today that it might make a lot of parts for 3gens actually cheaper. Yards have six months to strip off parts from C4C trade-in's, before they have to crush or shred the "bones". While I doubt a lot of 3gens are going into C4C (so many are owned now by enthusiasts), those that do will be stripped clean before crushing and a lot of parts will be put into the used market. Meanwhile, the ones that do get crushed will make the good ones that survive in our hands more rare/valuable. It's possible parts will be cheaper for us, and our cars worth more.
Red90IROC is offline  
Old 08-04-2009, 10:29 AM
  #11  
Moderator

 
okfoz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Doghouse ······································ Car: 1989 Formula 350 Vert Engine: 350 L98 Transmission: 700R4 Axle/Gears: B&W 3.27
Posts: 14,235
Received 164 Likes on 119 Posts
Car: 87 Formula T-Top, 87 Formula HT
Engine: 5.1L TPI, 5.0L TPI
Transmission: 700R4, M5
Axle/Gears: Sag 3.73, B&W 3.45
Re: House approves $2B more for C4C

Actually the V6 would qualify if it had the Manual Transmission I just checked and where they almost across the board decrease milage by 2 mpg, they lowered the V6/M5 by 3 for the highway...

John
okfoz is offline  
Old 08-04-2009, 10:53 AM
  #12  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (8)
 
TTOP350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Il
Posts: 11,723
Received 773 Likes on 520 Posts
Car: 1989-92 FORMULA350 305 92 Hawkclone
Engine: 4++,350 & 305 CIs
Transmission: 700R4 4800 vig 18th700R4 t56 ZF6 T5
Axle/Gears: 3.70 9"ford alum chunk,dana44,9bolt
Re: House approves $2B more for C4C

How can our country spend itself rich?


Don't re-elect re-peat spenders
TTOP350 is offline  
Old 08-04-2009, 10:58 AM
  #13  
Junior Member

 
odecca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Strawn, IL
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 89 RS
Engine: 305... for now.
Re: House approves $2B more for C4C

Originally Posted by Intrepid781
at least its going to us and not to big companies this time. I know these aren't non-emission vehicles but at least they're a step up I guess...
You will never see that money, if the program was for you they would buy your car outright. As it is you must buy a new vehicle with the markup so large that the sticker price is usually high enough to absorb the $4500 with the normal trade in value. The positive is when a person buys a car that was made in the states, then at least it is helping those who build them, otherwise it is taking cars off the road that could be an affordable vehicle for someone less fortunate. And it is unfortunate to see classics of automotive history get creamed like this.

I like this idea better: they could give all us thirdgen owners an incentive to buy a LS engine and install it so we get better fuel economy. Or even the new V6 that is in the 2010. With 306hp I'd take that too.
odecca is offline  
Old 08-04-2009, 12:32 PM
  #14  
On Probation
 
rideon1200's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 774
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 2002 Formula
Engine: 5.7 LS1
Re: House approves $2B more for C4C

Why is it not restrcted to buying a economical AMERICAN car. Toyota is loving it. We dont learn, spending American money to go overseas and not stimulate our economy.
rideon1200 is offline  
Old 08-04-2009, 12:40 PM
  #15  
Former Sponsor
 
1Aauto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Westford, MA
Posts: 3,726
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Re: House approves $2B more for C4C

I'm keeping my clunker.it doesn't cost me 300-400/mo to own.
1Aauto is offline  
Old 08-04-2009, 05:40 PM
  #16  
Moderator

 
scottmoyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Florida
Posts: 8,379
Received 170 Likes on 124 Posts
Car: 87 IROC-Z, 82 Pace Car
Re: House approves $2B more for C4C

Not seeing that this is really 3rd gen history related except that there was one located in the "clunker lot", I'm going to close this. Sorry guys, but this is too heated a scenario that I'm afraid opinions and anti-Obama statements could get out of hand. I agree with most of you that this was a bad decision and adding another $2B to our debt is ridiculous.

Here is some good info to close on...
"Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood, the program's chief salesman, has pitched the rebates as good for America, good for car buyers, good for the environment, good for the economy. But it's difficult to determine whether the administration is overselling the claim without seeing what's being sold, what's being traded in and where the cars are being sold.

LaHood, for example, promotes the fact that the Ford Focus so far is at the top of the list of new cars purchased under the program. But the limited information released so far shows most buyers are not picking Ford, Chrysler or General Motors vehicles, and six of the top 10 vehicles purchased are Honda, Toyota and Hyundai."
scottmoyer is offline  




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:17 PM.