Just curious....what is this car realistically worth...
#1
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: In the paint booth!
Posts: 2,659
Received 1,161 Likes
on
654 Posts
Car: 1986 Camaro Drag Car
Engine: 383 on Ethanol
Transmission: Automatic
Axle/Gears: 3.90 Currie 9 inch
Just curious....what is this car realistically worth...
The last Norwood IROC-Z. I mean, seriously....what is the car worth in your opinion? It has like 100k miles, and has been meticulously restored. It's the last Norwood built car, but does that really add any value? I mean, Leonard's 92 Z28 is THE very last third gen. I really don't see where this car is even anywhere near the same ballpark as Leonard's 92 Z28. I can see where the last Norwood car would have sentimental value to people that worked at that particular plant or whatever.....but does that car REALLY matter to anyone else? I was just looking at pics of the car....and seeing the awesome restoration made me wonder if the car was really worth the amount that the restoration would have cost. I mean....a LOT of car plants have had a last car......but there were also a crap load of third gens built after the Norwood car. What are your thoughts? Personally, i don't know if the car could fetch $30,000.... $40,000..... $50,000............ $60,000??...but.....the big money seems to be going to the ORIGINAL cars. There probably isn't a single original thing on this car other than the plaque on the center console....
I'm not trying to bash this car in any way. It's gorgeous. And it's a pretty cool part of history and being a third gen fan, I am super glad that it is restored. I'm just curious as to what number is a realistic price for the car. Obviously an insurance company has an agreed value on it....
I'm not trying to bash this car in any way. It's gorgeous. And it's a pretty cool part of history and being a third gen fan, I am super glad that it is restored. I'm just curious as to what number is a realistic price for the car. Obviously an insurance company has an agreed value on it....
Last edited by dagwood; 12-21-2020 at 10:50 PM.
#2
Re: Just curious....what is this car realistically worth...
to me it isnt a big deal if its the last norwood car built .. now the last third gen camaro ever built with all those sigs and no miles on it is a different story .. a restored 100k mile iroc isnt worth a whole lot to me .. maybe 10k cause i dont care about the history
The following 2 users liked this post by ray jr:
BizJetTech (12-25-2020), dmccain (12-25-2020)
#3
Community Administrator
iTrader: (1)
Re: Just curious....what is this car realistically worth...
While I agree that I can't see the last Norwood Camaro being in the same league as the last Van Nuys Camaro, to me, it does have added value as it's a marker in the Camaro and Norwood history. I'm mixed about the restoration. The car may look like what it did when it left the assembly line but what is original to the car? To me, it's more about the car and it's history than what it looks like.
The following users liked this post:
BizJetTech (12-25-2020)
#4
Member
Re: Just curious....what is this car realistically worth...
I see what you guys are saying. But, I also see the other flip of the coin. If you look at other, older desirable cars. Say a 1st gen, or late 70's/early 80's T/A. Heck, even your old Mopars, GTO's. etc., they can fetch a good amount coin now a days. This wasn't always the circumstances. I remember these cars littered all over, and you could pick them up for little to nothing. As they aged, and became more scarce, the values exceeded more than I would have dreamed on most of them. This includes ones that have been ran into the ground and then restored. I can remember friends fathers restoring some of these and putting in time and money I never would have thought they could ever get back out. Yes they are still some low mileage examples out there that are huge money, but even the restored ones that are done right have become desirable now and command good money (think 70 Nova SS's). So in time, I think this could be a desirable and profitable car. Just not there yet, like the older muscle cars that were easy to get years ago were. Just my observation/2 cents.
#5
Senior Member
Re: Just curious....what is this car realistically worth...
Its a bit of a catch-22.......if I don’t make the car available to see, people think I should be doing something different with the car, rather than just storing it.........if I offer to show it to people, they think I’m bragging about it. I have learned not to show it to people that aren’t “car people”, because they don’t understand why I have it. I actually have an employee from the Van Nuys Plant, that worked on the car, who is coming to see it next Spring/Summer. See..... I do make it available to see, when someone is truly interested.
The following 3 users liked this post by LeonardS:
#6
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: In the paint booth!
Posts: 2,659
Received 1,161 Likes
on
654 Posts
Car: 1986 Camaro Drag Car
Engine: 383 on Ethanol
Transmission: Automatic
Axle/Gears: 3.90 Currie 9 inch
Re: Just curious....what is this car realistically worth...
Its a bit of a catch-22.......if I don’t make the car available to see, people think I should be doing something different with the car, rather than just storing it.........if I offer to show it to people, they think I’m bragging about it. I have learned not to show it to people that aren’t “car people”, because they don’t understand why I have it. I actually have an employee from the Van Nuys Plant, that worked on the car, who is coming to see it next Spring/Summer. See..... I do make it available to see, when someone is truly interested.
I would have loved to have seen it again.....but someone MOVED TO NORTH DAKOTA
#7
Senior Member
Trending Topics
#8
Community Administrator
iTrader: (1)
Re: Just curious....what is this car realistically worth...
Its a bit of a catch-22.......if I don’t make the car available to see, people think I should be doing something different with the car, rather than just storing it.........if I offer to show it to people, they think I’m bragging about it. I have learned not to show it to people that aren’t “car people”, because they don’t understand why I have it. I actually have an employee from the Van Nuys Plant, that worked on the car, who is coming to see it next Spring/Summer. See..... I do make it available to see, when someone is truly interested.
#9
COTM Editor
iTrader: (22)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 9,928
Likes: 0
Received 1,860 Likes
on
1,274 Posts
Car: '89 Firebird
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: T56
#10
Senior Member
Re: Just curious....what is this car realistically worth...
Don't misunderstand. I'm glad that a person like you, with the ability to store it and know the value it has, owns the car so that it continues to be preserved. You know some people think the car needs to be driven, should be driven, that cars have feelings and other stuff. There's other ThirdGens for that. Someone was asking me about the car recently, and aside what you stand to profit from the car *when* you do sell it, I started to understand their view of how it's basically locked away from everyone. Which leads me to..
I thought it was just me! Don't feel too bad, the car got moved without me getting to see it.
I thought it was just me! Don't feel too bad, the car got moved without me getting to see it.
Last edited by LeonardS; 12-22-2020 at 05:29 PM.
#11
Senior Member
#12
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: MA
Posts: 732
Received 18 Likes
on
15 Posts
Car: 92 & 91 Z28 1LEs, 87 IROC-Z, 90 ZR1
Engine: L98, LT5
Transmission: 700R4, 6-speed
Axle/Gears: 3.45, 3.42, 3.73, 3.27
Re: Just curious....what is this car realistically worth...
The last Norwood car does nothing for me. There are a number of things on it that were never finished. If I remember correctly, the steering wheel and power window switches were still worn out. If you are going to go through that level of effort on a car like that, finish it. It's a restored car and restored cars to me will never have the same draw to me as an original in any condition. It's also a 305 / automatic car too. Leonard's car on the other hand was hugely influential to me growing up. I still have newspaper articles about it and is the reason I love the high rise wing cars so much. I'm super happy that he preserved it all these years and I hope to be able to see it some day in person
#13
Senior Member
Re: Just curious....what is this car realistically worth...
The last Norwood car does nothing for me. There are a number of things on it that were never finished. If I remember correctly, the steering wheel and power window switches were still worn out. If you are going to go through that level of effort on a car like that, finish it. It's a restored car and restored cars to me will never have the same draw to me as an original in any condition. It's also a 305 / automatic car too. Leonard's car on the other hand was hugely influential to me growing up. I still have newspaper articles about it and is the reason I love the high rise wing cars so much. I'm super happy that he preserved it all these years and I hope to be able to see it some day in person
The following users liked this post:
ev305tpi (12-24-2020)
#14
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: South Ms
Posts: 4,434
Received 723 Likes
on
492 Posts
Car: 89 Firebird
Engine: 355 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt.Posi-3.73s
Re: Just curious....what is this car realistically worth...
The car is worth whatever a nicely restored 100k mile Iroc goes for, and not one of the better ones either..350...305TPI/ 5spd
The following users liked this post:
BizJetTech (12-25-2020)
#15
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: *member since 1999, I think - just can't remember my old name, and the big site crash...*
Posts: 1,199
Received 151 Likes
on
105 Posts
Car: 89 GTA ASC Conv., Prev: 89 GTA 6.3L
Engine: 5.7L L98 TPI
Transmission: 700r4 Automatic
Axle/Gears: 3.27:1 w/ JG1 Options:B2L, N10, U1A
Re: Just curious....what is this car realistically worth...
No more than any other high mile IROC. There's a reason Norwood closed and Van Nuys remained open.
#16
Community Administrator
iTrader: (1)
Re: Just curious....what is this car realistically worth...
Van Nuys was not known for the best paint quality. It's been explained as, in part, due to their location and what they had to comply with. It's true that the later ThirdGens, which came some time after Norwood's closure, are known for better structural qualities but wasn't that more of normal product development that wasn't exactly about the plant itself?
#17
Supreme Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 9,668
Received 546 Likes
on
376 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: Just curious....what is this car realistically worth...
It's an interesting story on how the car was found and restored.
But I'm not sure I'd value this car over another one with low(er) miles.
But I'm not sure I'd value this car over another one with low(er) miles.
#18
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: *member since 1999, I think - just can't remember my old name, and the big site crash...*
Posts: 1,199
Received 151 Likes
on
105 Posts
Car: 89 GTA ASC Conv., Prev: 89 GTA 6.3L
Engine: 5.7L L98 TPI
Transmission: 700r4 Automatic
Axle/Gears: 3.27:1 w/ JG1 Options:B2L, N10, U1A
Re: Just curious....what is this car realistically worth...
What reason was that and what did it provide to the customer to benefit from a Van Nuys built ThirdGen? Did it result in better quality and value for the customer? Or simply more for the business and same (or worse) product?
Van Nuys was not known for the best paint quality. It's been explained as, in part, due to their location and what they had to comply with. It's true that the later ThirdGens, which came some time after Norwood's closure, are known for better structural qualities but wasn't that more of normal product development that wasn't exactly about the plant itself?
Van Nuys was not known for the best paint quality. It's been explained as, in part, due to their location and what they had to comply with. It's true that the later ThirdGens, which came some time after Norwood's closure, are known for better structural qualities but wasn't that more of normal product development that wasn't exactly about the plant itself?
I think it was due to the overall unit cost for production, and the shipping costs, as so many of the F-Body cars were sold west of the Mississippi.
Quality of paints were a problem at GM overall in the 1980s It was not limited to just the f-body line.
Also, the underside of the hood and some engine bay surfaces were not class a finished surfaces, and that was a GM decision. They were intentionally not sprayed thoroughly.
#19
Community Administrator
iTrader: (1)
Re: Just curious....what is this car realistically worth...
I think it was due to the overall unit cost for production, and the shipping costs, as so many of the F-Body cars were sold west of the Mississippi.
Quality of paints were a problem at GM overall in the 1980s It was not limited to just the f-body line.
Also, the underside of the hood and some engine bay surfaces were not class a finished surfaces, and that was a GM decision. They were intentionally not sprayed thoroughly.
Quality of paints were a problem at GM overall in the 1980s It was not limited to just the f-body line.
Also, the underside of the hood and some engine bay surfaces were not class a finished surfaces, and that was a GM decision. They were intentionally not sprayed thoroughly.
At the Norwood gathering several years ago, the topic about why some Norwood cars went West and some Van Nuys cars went East was discussed. If I recall correctly, it's been 10 years ago, we were told the shipping cost was the same to GM due to their agreements they had and so it didn't cost GM any different for transport costs if a Van Nuys car came to OH or a Norwood car went to CA.
Norwood paint was known for being better. Van Nuys had to comply with California regulations.
#20
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: *member since 1999, I think - just can't remember my old name, and the big site crash...*
Posts: 1,199
Received 151 Likes
on
105 Posts
Car: 89 GTA ASC Conv., Prev: 89 GTA 6.3L
Engine: 5.7L L98 TPI
Transmission: 700r4 Automatic
Axle/Gears: 3.27:1 w/ JG1 Options:B2L, N10, U1A
Re: Just curious....what is this car realistically worth...
You said there was a reason Norwood closed while Van Nuys remained open while discussing the topic concerning the value of the last Norwood car. The reasons you're describing mostly benefit GM and not the buyer with better product or value.
At the Norwood gathering several years ago, the topic about why some Norwood cars went West and some Van Nuys cars went East was discussed. If I recall correctly, it's been 10 years ago, we were told the shipping cost was the same to GM due to their agreements they had and so it didn't cost GM any different for transport costs if a Van Nuys car came to OH or a Norwood car went to CA.
Norwood paint was known for being better. Van Nuys had to comply with California regulations.
At the Norwood gathering several years ago, the topic about why some Norwood cars went West and some Van Nuys cars went East was discussed. If I recall correctly, it's been 10 years ago, we were told the shipping cost was the same to GM due to their agreements they had and so it didn't cost GM any different for transport costs if a Van Nuys car came to OH or a Norwood car went to CA.
Norwood paint was known for being better. Van Nuys had to comply with California regulations.
Not sure if you have any experience in production or manufacturing, but there is little to no care on the benefits to a consumer when these kind of things are being considered.
#21
Community Administrator
iTrader: (1)
Re: Just curious....what is this car realistically worth...
My point was, your initial response made it sound like you were tying a perceived lower value to this car because it was a Norwood car and that Norwood was closed before Van Nuys. That Norwood closed before Van Nuys would seem otherwise irrelevant to this car's value if you weren't implying Norwood's cars were inferior. Norwood's cars have a better reputation to some in our group and it's partly due to the paint quality and difference used between the plants.
#22
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 2,674
Likes: 0
Received 241 Likes
on
181 Posts
Car: 1987 Formula (original owner)
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt/3.45
Re: Just curious....what is this car realistically worth...
I was also curious to read the "reason" for Norwood being the first to close. I'd have guessed simple economics, which is what research shows to be the case.
Apparently, it had been decided by 1984 that one of the of the plants was to be closed. The quality and sales of Japanese imports were killing GM, and 3rdgens were already obsolete anyway. Norwood was producing better cars, so GM originally planned to close Van Nuys. But Van Nuys was the newer, larger, more versatile facility, and it employed a lot more people than Norwood. So GM and the UAW in good ole CA worked out an agreement to implement "Japanese techniques" to try to improve quality and production, which made the decision to close Norwood, instead. Ironically, the efforts to make Van Nuys better, made everything worse, which led to its eventual demise.
Several good articles online about the closings of both plants. One mentions Leonard, by name, and his "custom-built," last 1992 Camaro. I work with someone who worked on the assembly line at Van Nuys when it closed. I'll ask if he got to sign it.
The article linked below features a picture of Norwood's 'last car' rolling out. Whether or not being the 'last car' adds anything to its value, there were just as many tears over this one, as there were over Leonard's.
General Motors Employees Discuss Norwood Plant Closure | GM Authority
Apparently, it had been decided by 1984 that one of the of the plants was to be closed. The quality and sales of Japanese imports were killing GM, and 3rdgens were already obsolete anyway. Norwood was producing better cars, so GM originally planned to close Van Nuys. But Van Nuys was the newer, larger, more versatile facility, and it employed a lot more people than Norwood. So GM and the UAW in good ole CA worked out an agreement to implement "Japanese techniques" to try to improve quality and production, which made the decision to close Norwood, instead. Ironically, the efforts to make Van Nuys better, made everything worse, which led to its eventual demise.
Several good articles online about the closings of both plants. One mentions Leonard, by name, and his "custom-built," last 1992 Camaro. I work with someone who worked on the assembly line at Van Nuys when it closed. I'll ask if he got to sign it.
The article linked below features a picture of Norwood's 'last car' rolling out. Whether or not being the 'last car' adds anything to its value, there were just as many tears over this one, as there were over Leonard's.
General Motors Employees Discuss Norwood Plant Closure | GM Authority
#24
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 2,674
Likes: 0
Received 241 Likes
on
181 Posts
Car: 1987 Formula (original owner)
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt/3.45
Re: Just curious....what is this car realistically worth...
#25
Senior Member
Re: Just curious....what is this car realistically worth...
We call him Machete. He's a rather imposing-looking, Hispanic gentlemen who resembles actor, Danny Trejo, from the Machete movies. Quite a character LOL. But our place of employment has been closed since March and isn't likely to reopen until spring or summer, so it will be awhile before I see him or talk to him. I don't know what his specific assignment was at Van Nuys, but he probably didn't look much different 30 years ago than he does today. So if you remember meeting a younger-looking version of someone like that, then it could only have been Machete! But I will let you know...
The following users liked this post:
GASPEDDLER (12-26-2020)
#26
Member
Re: Just curious....what is this car realistically worth...
My thoughts on this. The value of clean thirdgens has been steadily climbing. A perfect restored thirdgen will NEVER bring as much money as a perfect low mile original car. History at the auctions has shown us that time and time again. But, I do feel like being the very last car ever to roll out of that plant will add value to it......not staggering amounts of value.....but surely a bit more than another perfectly restored example of the same year car with the same options. Guessing 5-10% more. A complete and correct restoration will have cost much more than the car is currently worth. Another 10 years down the road.........it will be a different story.
#27
Supreme Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 9,668
Received 546 Likes
on
376 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: Just curious....what is this car realistically worth...
I remember seeing this car at MCACN a few years ago and spending time talking to the owner on the car's story and restoration. I kept thinking to myself on what I'd imagine this car would be worth and I had no firm number.
Also at MCACN were cars with $100K-$200K restorations. Those restorations are magnificent, but my preference is always an original and unrestored survivor, even if it's not "perfect".
Also at MCACN were cars with $100K-$200K restorations. Those restorations are magnificent, but my preference is always an original and unrestored survivor, even if it's not "perfect".
The following users liked this post:
dmccain (12-28-2020)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
foxmartin1
History / Originality
5
05-30-2011 08:25 PM