wb o2 vs nb o2 tuning
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: kentucky
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 92 Camaro RS
Engine: 3.4/3500 hybrid
Transmission: 5-speed
Axle/Gears: 3.42
wb o2 vs nb o2 tuning
I've seen where some say its better to tune openloop with a wb and run in openloop than to tune closedloop with a nb. Even if its true or not could one use a nb o2 hooked up to a digital multimeter and tune using it instead of a wb? And if one could use the meter to tune pe afr's also.
#2
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Woodland, CA
Posts: 10,494
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: '02 Z06
Engine: L33 5.7
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Stock IRS
Re: wb o2 vs nb o2 tuning
go wideband, a narrowband is only good for basically telling if you are lean or rich but not by how much.
figure its accurate between 14-15:1 afr
wideband is good for something like 11-20:1 afr
figure its accurate between 14-15:1 afr
wideband is good for something like 11-20:1 afr
#3
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: kentucky
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 92 Camaro RS
Engine: 3.4/3500 hybrid
Transmission: 5-speed
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: wb o2 vs nb o2 tuning
so what your saying is that, say .450 volts is 14.7 and if it goes to .850 the .850 maybe 13.0 one time and 11.0 the next, using the nb?
#4
Re: wb o2 vs nb o2 tuning
Sorry for the hijack but kind of on the same topic.....
We all know that a big cam can cause a NB O2 to read wrong because of the unburned fuel- oxygen in the exhaust. Why doesn't the same thing happen to a WB?
Why doesn't the WB see that same oxygen and read false lean?
We all know that a big cam can cause a NB O2 to read wrong because of the unburned fuel- oxygen in the exhaust. Why doesn't the same thing happen to a WB?
Why doesn't the WB see that same oxygen and read false lean?
#5
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Point Pleasant, N.J.
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 87 Trans Am
Engine: L98 350 w/carb
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: wb o2 vs nb o2 tuning
To answer the original question the wideband would definitely be better to tune with. A narrow band isnt as precise for reading purposes the readings will jump all over.
#6
#7
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: kentucky
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 92 Camaro RS
Engine: 3.4/3500 hybrid
Transmission: 5-speed
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: wb o2 vs nb o2 tuning
ok thanks I didn't know that exhaust gas tempeture had an effect on a nb 02 readings.
Trending Topics
#8
TGO Supporter
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: The Bone Yard
Posts: 10,907
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: Death Mobile
Engine: 666 c.i.
Re: wb o2 vs nb o2 tuning
A Narrow Band O2 Sensor was developed to be primarily a "Switching Device". This topic has been discussed numerous times in the past and if you look at some of the past articles, there is even a graph that clearly shows why a NBO2 is ONLY usefull as a "switching device". The graph shows a nearly flat line at the bottom then an abrupt spike to another flat line at the top....just like you would want with a "switch".
For keeping the engine at 14.7:1 (where it "switches around"), it does a reasonably good job of keeping the engine metered at this level with the OBD I computers. Remember, you are dealing with ECMs that were developed BEFORE the original Microsoft Windows was availabe. It's the equivalent of "old MS DOS".
Trying to use a NB O2 as a RELIABLE Air Fuel Measuring device just doesn't work...it was NEVER designed to be used as that. You can obtain fairly good "part throttle" driveablity by tuning around 128/128 but that is because you are tuning around what the NB O2 was designed...just remember that it is "old MS DOS" and that while you MAY have 128/128, you still may be "off".
A WB O2 is designed to be an Air Fuel Measuring device though it too has only a range for fuel measuring. But unless your engine is WAY out of tune (and that can happen), the WB O2 is adequate for the typical tuning ranges we work with.
For keeping the engine at 14.7:1 (where it "switches around"), it does a reasonably good job of keeping the engine metered at this level with the OBD I computers. Remember, you are dealing with ECMs that were developed BEFORE the original Microsoft Windows was availabe. It's the equivalent of "old MS DOS".
Trying to use a NB O2 as a RELIABLE Air Fuel Measuring device just doesn't work...it was NEVER designed to be used as that. You can obtain fairly good "part throttle" driveablity by tuning around 128/128 but that is because you are tuning around what the NB O2 was designed...just remember that it is "old MS DOS" and that while you MAY have 128/128, you still may be "off".
A WB O2 is designed to be an Air Fuel Measuring device though it too has only a range for fuel measuring. But unless your engine is WAY out of tune (and that can happen), the WB O2 is adequate for the typical tuning ranges we work with.
#9
Re: wb o2 vs nb o2 tuning
The sensors dont measure the Oxygen that is in the exhaust. Simply said; what they do is catalytically react the fuel gases present in the exhaust. If fuel is present they transfer Oxygen's from the atmoshere into the chamber sensing the exhaust fuel gases. The transfer gives off a charge of one polarity, if there is no fuel gases present and there is excess oxygen present then they take those oxygens out of the exhaust and shove it back into the atmosphere. In that situation the flow is reversed so the charge is reversed. The meter then reads rich or lean depending on the amount of and direction of transfer. The amount of transfer is related to the speed of catalytic reaction of the different gases.
It seems that the O2 sensor mesures the flow of oxygen through the sensor and the direction of the flow. If this is true then a NB O2 should not be effected by unburned fuel in the exhaust from a large cam.....
I must be missing something.
Again sorry for the hijack. Could a moderator cut my question and posts out of this thread and start a new one?
#10
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Woodland, CA
Posts: 10,494
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: '02 Z06
Engine: L33 5.7
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Stock IRS
Re: wb o2 vs nb o2 tuning
unburnt fuel probably ( im taking a guess here) in a way clogs the narrowband o2 sensor so it cant accurately read the o2 going by.
i dont have a real good answer, all iknow is to go ahead and spring the 200something odd dollars for the inovate lc-1 controller, you will be glad you did.
i dont have a real good answer, all iknow is to go ahead and spring the 200something odd dollars for the inovate lc-1 controller, you will be glad you did.
#11
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Pa.
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 87 Z28
Engine: LB9
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 2:73
Re: wb o2 vs nb o2 tuning
I believe that unburned fuel do to incomplete combustion contains high O2. The High o2 in the exhaust tells the ECM to increase the commanded fuel thinking that the o2 sensor is seeing a lean condition, when if fact the engine is running rich. Allso a low speed miss caused by a faulty plug or wire can cause the o2 to read lean and hydro carbons to go up. That's what the emission book told me. hope it helps
#12
#13
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (1)
Re: wb o2 vs nb o2 tuning
Quote: We all know that a big cam can cause a NB O2 to read wrong because of the unburned fuel- oxygen in the exhaust. Why doesn't the same thing happen to a WB?
Why doesn't the WB see that same oxygen and read false lean.
I believe a WB also will read false lean. However it does not affect fueling(assuming no feedback to ECU). Soo if one understands the effect of overlap-reversion with a large cam one can always tune based on that anticipation. Open loop idle comes to mind. Also exhaust appearance/odor can be examined. Same on plugs. Vacuum reads may be helpfull. I would think as the rpms come up it is less of an issue. I think I was seeing false lean on WB at idle in that I am commanded OL to 13.7 and I see 1.00 lambda(stoich) on WB. Exhaust clean. I dont think WB is 100% accurrate there. Once I get to cruise CL I see 1.00 lamda again which I believe is accurrate.
Why doesn't the WB see that same oxygen and read false lean.
I believe a WB also will read false lean. However it does not affect fueling(assuming no feedback to ECU). Soo if one understands the effect of overlap-reversion with a large cam one can always tune based on that anticipation. Open loop idle comes to mind. Also exhaust appearance/odor can be examined. Same on plugs. Vacuum reads may be helpfull. I would think as the rpms come up it is less of an issue. I think I was seeing false lean on WB at idle in that I am commanded OL to 13.7 and I see 1.00 lambda(stoich) on WB. Exhaust clean. I dont think WB is 100% accurrate there. Once I get to cruise CL I see 1.00 lamda again which I believe is accurrate.
Last edited by Ronny; 12-30-2008 at 04:30 PM.
#14
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Pa.
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 87 Z28
Engine: LB9
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 2:73
Re: wb o2 vs nb o2 tuning
I read that there is a relationship between temperature and the O2 sensor. This may have something to due with the idle reading. Might be because the rich idle mixture doesn't keep the exhaust hot enough to report the proper AFR. I think I saw it on Innovate forum.