Power Adders Getting a Supercharger or Turbocharger? Thinking about using Nitrous? All forced induction and N2O topics discussed here.

SBC SINGLE TURBO PROJECT

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-21-2018, 12:31 AM
  #1  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
GTA Sammy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba. Canada
Posts: 971
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Car: 1989 T-Top GTA
Engine: 5.7L TPI> 6.2L
Transmission: 700R-4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
SBC SINGLE TURBO PROJECT

So I finally did it !!!
Bought a T76 eBay turbo and SBC shortie headers and I've started my turbo project.

The plan is to run the exhaust forward and crossover infront of the accessories, Areomotive 340 pump, tuck the turbo in the front passenger corner, an intercooler & move the battery to the hatch and have EBL Flash control the whole thing

I decided to document the process and post it on YouTube... (Why not , right)
The playlist can be found here...

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?lis...DiuYFEogWjzPxy

"Like, Comment, Subscribe!"
Any help is appreciated
Attached Thumbnails SBC SINGLE TURBO PROJECT-image.jpeg  
Old 01-22-2018, 07:05 AM
  #2  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (20)
 
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 25,749
Received 369 Likes on 298 Posts
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: Strange 12 bolt 3.42
Re: SBC SINGLE TURBO PROJECT

Nice! Goodluck
Old 01-22-2018, 09:23 PM
  #3  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
GTA Sammy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba. Canada
Posts: 971
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Car: 1989 T-Top GTA
Engine: 5.7L TPI> 6.2L
Transmission: 700R-4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: SBC SINGLE TURBO PROJECT

Thanks Orr...
You've been an inspiration to most of us here at one time or another.
You've proven it possible.... To dream and achieve

Last edited by GTA Sammy; 02-13-2018 at 03:48 AM.
Old 01-23-2018, 09:28 AM
  #4  
Senior Member

 
86CamaroDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 631
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Car: 86' IROC
Engine: Supercharged 350
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.45
Re: SBC SINGLE TURBO PROJECT

What are you planning on running for fuel? 11:1 CR seems a bit high.
Old 01-23-2018, 10:46 AM
  #5  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (16)
 
Street Lethal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: NYC / NJ
Posts: 10,464
Received 174 Likes on 152 Posts
Re: SBC SINGLE TURBO PROJECT

Yeah that compression is pretty high. Is the EBL Flash installed yet...?

- Rob
Old 01-23-2018, 09:08 PM
  #6  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
GTA Sammy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba. Canada
Posts: 971
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Car: 1989 T-Top GTA
Engine: 5.7L TPI> 6.2L
Transmission: 700R-4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: SBC SINGLE TURBO PROJECT

No EBL yet... But gonna order soon !
And yeah the compression ratio is high...
Was gonna be a straight up NA car but I couldn't help myself..
I'm thinking that I would start off slow (boost that is), see where it goes.
If I need bigger combustion chambered heads I'll bite the bullet and these AFR's will go up for sale....
One step at a time.
Old 01-23-2018, 09:13 PM
  #7  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (20)
 
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 25,749
Received 369 Likes on 298 Posts
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: Strange 12 bolt 3.42
Re: SBC SINGLE TURBO PROJECT

What size head gasket on it now? Could run a .080 ish mls and be fine
Old 01-24-2018, 05:14 AM
  #8  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
83 Crossfire TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: DC Metro Area
Posts: 7,975
Received 83 Likes on 70 Posts
Car: 87TA 87Form 71Mach1 93FleetWB 04Cum
Re: SBC SINGLE TURBO PROJECT

My instinct is that hot side would be a little too small for a 383, and considering your high compression your best chance of controlling detonation outside of raising compression/race gas/E85 will be to keep boost from coming in too low (If your bottom end will handle the rpm size the turbo so that boost really starts to come in at the top of the rpm range extending the rpm range of the engine).

OTOH, I really don't have a good feel for the sizing on ebay turbos. I know that some are significantly smaller than buying a similar name brand but I can't imagine all of them are.
Old 01-24-2018, 08:42 AM
  #9  
Member
 
Jacobaxeman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 207
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: Hot 355ci
Transmission: Beefed TH350
Axle/Gears: 4:10
Re: SBC SINGLE TURBO PROJECT

Can you post links if the items you used? Interested in doing something similar. Awesome project!

Last edited by Jacobaxeman; 04-20-2018 at 03:44 PM.
Old 01-24-2018, 06:00 PM
  #10  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
GTA Sammy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba. Canada
Posts: 971
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Car: 1989 T-Top GTA
Engine: 5.7L TPI> 6.2L
Transmission: 700R-4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: SBC SINGLE TURBO PROJECT

I'm thinking that a 2.5" would be the absolute biggest hotside crossover I could do.
But we'll see what the mock up looks like.
It's a T4 Flanged, T76 .96 AR
Initially I was planning a smaller AR Turbine for fast response but went this way to be more conservative.

As far as a shopping list I'll try to post things as I go with a Summary every once in a while.
The Shortie Headers are for a 88-97 Chevy Tahoe flipped upside down.


I'm planning on 7 lbs boost max unless i can get it to manage more...
Probably 6000 RPM
The Head gasket is a thin one... I wanna say a .014"
It could always be changed I guess.
Old 01-24-2018, 07:24 PM
  #11  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (20)
 
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 25,749
Received 369 Likes on 298 Posts
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: Strange 12 bolt 3.42
Re: SBC SINGLE TURBO PROJECT

I would change it to drop compression. That turbo is gonna spool instantly so make sure you have a large wastegate and well placed.
Old 01-24-2018, 08:09 PM
  #12  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
GTA Sammy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba. Canada
Posts: 971
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Car: 1989 T-Top GTA
Engine: 5.7L TPI> 6.2L
Transmission: 700R-4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: SBC SINGLE TURBO PROJECT

Gotcha...
Thanks a lot
Old 01-25-2018, 11:25 AM
  #13  
Member
 
Xter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: PA
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 87 Camaro LT
Engine: 383 Twin Turbo - In progress
Axle/Gears: 3.43
Re: SBC SINGLE TURBO PROJECT

Originally Posted by 83 Crossfire TA
considering your high compression your best chance of controlling detonation outside of raising compression/race gas/E85
E85 would be your best bet like said before. Outside of that, maybe you could get away with 93 octane and methanol injection. With your compression and size of the turbo it should compliment the TPI intake pretty well for torque.
Old 01-25-2018, 12:26 PM
  #14  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
GTA Sammy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba. Canada
Posts: 971
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Car: 1989 T-Top GTA
Engine: 5.7L TPI> 6.2L
Transmission: 700R-4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: SBC SINGLE TURBO PROJECT

I was hoping to get away with 93/94 Octane...
We don't have E85 here in Winnipeg Canada.
I've thought about meth injection as a last resort...
But I think for simplicity sake I'll just start with a very conservative spark table and adjust/increase as I'm able.
Old 01-25-2018, 12:33 PM
  #15  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
GTA Sammy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba. Canada
Posts: 971
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Car: 1989 T-Top GTA
Engine: 5.7L TPI> 6.2L
Transmission: 700R-4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: SBC SINGLE TURBO PROJECT

If things don't work well I'll start digging into it more
Thicker gaskets, more reasonable compression ratio (bigger chambered head)
Different cam, bigger exhaust AR

That being said, I appreciate the kind words of advice.
I hope what I have works
But if it doesn't we'll all know and move forward from there.
Old 01-25-2018, 01:07 PM
  #16  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (20)
 
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 25,749
Received 369 Likes on 298 Posts
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: Strange 12 bolt 3.42
Re: SBC SINGLE TURBO PROJECT

Run it rich, so you will need good spark energy. Tighter plug gap. Go cold on the heat range. I would just go thicker head gasket now lol
Old 01-25-2018, 03:28 PM
  #17  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
fasteddi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Northwest Ohio
Posts: 6,274
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes on 19 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: BBC 509 Merlin ii 9.6:1 pump gas
Transmission: ATI pro th350 sfi case. TSI 5500 st
Axle/Gears: Strange S60 4:10s
Re: SBC SINGLE TURBO PROJECT

I know my experience isnt the same but I had a 12.8:1 compression V6.... 3.4L Turboed and on E85. It ran well and spooled super fast with a S366 borg warner turbo. At one time I added a much thicker head gasket and also deshrouded the valves alot and knocked out 5cc in the heads. I did this as E85 was becoming more and more scarce. I wanted to try 93 octane and see if i could get it to work on low boost levels, which it did.


With aluminum heads, from my calc. 10.8:1 compression, a big cam to bleed off the compression(adv. 290/299 242/250@.050 108 Lsa) I ran 6-8psi at the most and never had any issues with spark knock with 93 octane. I ran roughly 24* of total timing at those boost levels. But any more boost or timing, or if the intake temps got outta wack and detonation was everywhere.

Now I got it to work out for me but even with E85 the tuning was always rougher then back when i had 9.6:1 compression and ran 15 or so psi on 93 octane. Eventually i went with larger dished pistons again and dropped the compression back to 9.6:1 and it was a much better turbo engine again.

I definitely think that bigger chambers or any way you can drop that compression 1 point or 1.5 points would help alot and make it much easier to tune and get the power you want.
Old 01-25-2018, 03:44 PM
  #18  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
GTA Sammy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba. Canada
Posts: 971
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Car: 1989 T-Top GTA
Engine: 5.7L TPI> 6.2L
Transmission: 700R-4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: SBC SINGLE TURBO PROJECT

Thanks guys,
Shopping for a wastegate and intercooler as we speak...
Damn those wastegate a can be expensive, but I want a decent one as it's necessary insurance.
Was planning a 60mm as I was gonna need to get rid of exhaust pressure
Old 01-25-2018, 08:02 PM
  #19  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
GTA Sammy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba. Canada
Posts: 971
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Car: 1989 T-Top GTA
Engine: 5.7L TPI> 6.2L
Transmission: 700R-4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: SBC SINGLE TURBO PROJECT

Any recommendations on a wastegate and vendor.
Something middle of the road?
I don't need to have a wastegate that's 3x the cost of the turbo.

I'm not trying to impress with brand name and labels
Old 01-26-2018, 06:15 AM
  #20  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
fasteddi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Northwest Ohio
Posts: 6,274
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes on 19 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: BBC 509 Merlin ii 9.6:1 pump gas
Transmission: ATI pro th350 sfi case. TSI 5500 st
Axle/Gears: Strange S60 4:10s
Re: SBC SINGLE TURBO PROJECT

Originally Posted by GTA Sammy
Any recommendations on a wastegate and vendor.
Something middle of the road?
I don't need to have a wastegate that's 3x the cost of the turbo.

I'm not trying to impress with brand name and labels

I still have my turbosmart gate and bov... saving that for my turbo 385 one day. They are exspencive but will last forever. Don't cheep out too much on a Wastegate. You can look for used ones such as a turbosmart or TIAL also had a God speed at 1 time which work pretty well that 1 was around a 100 bucks. The turbosmart was 300 bucks iirc.
Old 01-26-2018, 10:54 AM
  #21  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (16)
 
Street Lethal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: NYC / NJ
Posts: 10,464
Received 174 Likes on 152 Posts
Re: SBC SINGLE TURBO PROJECT

Originally Posted by fasteddi
... saving that for my turbo 385 one day.
Old 01-26-2018, 10:44 PM
  #22  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
GTA Sammy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba. Canada
Posts: 971
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Car: 1989 T-Top GTA
Engine: 5.7L TPI> 6.2L
Transmission: 700R-4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: SBC SINGLE TURBO PROJECT

I don't mean to be a helpless flip flopper but....
I spent the evening in the garage planning my hotside...

I took the headers off one last time and pointed them forward and down instead of up... And I think it just makes more sense...

The Driver side can run below the crank and I won't have to weave through and around my alternator, water pump etc.
The Passenger side will run a tight 180 upwards and Merge with the Driver side on the way upto the turbo flange...

I turned the wheels to lock in both directions and it clears just fine
I think I'll be able to keep the fans in the stock location this way as well...

Pics to follow

Last edited by GTA Sammy; 04-20-2019 at 12:11 AM.
Old 01-26-2018, 11:18 PM
  #23  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
GTA Sammy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba. Canada
Posts: 971
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Car: 1989 T-Top GTA
Engine: 5.7L TPI> 6.2L
Transmission: 700R-4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: SBC SINGLE TURBO PROJECT

Heres a pic of each header flange from below
Attached Thumbnails SBC SINGLE TURBO PROJECT-img_8287.jpg   SBC SINGLE TURBO PROJECT-img_8289.jpg  
Old 01-26-2018, 11:29 PM
  #24  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
GTA Sammy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba. Canada
Posts: 971
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Car: 1989 T-Top GTA
Engine: 5.7L TPI> 6.2L
Transmission: 700R-4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: SBC SINGLE TURBO PROJECT

I'm not sure why the site is posting these pics sideways...
It's probably how I'm holding my iPhone

The driver side looks messy but Im sure that I can route my power steering hoses better that this.
Attached Thumbnails SBC SINGLE TURBO PROJECT-img_8293.jpg   SBC SINGLE TURBO PROJECT-img_8294.jpg   SBC SINGLE TURBO PROJECT-img_8296.jpg  
Old 01-26-2018, 11:48 PM
  #25  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
GTA Sammy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba. Canada
Posts: 971
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Car: 1989 T-Top GTA
Engine: 5.7L TPI> 6.2L
Transmission: 700R-4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: SBC SINGLE TURBO PROJECT

With the forward facing down swept hot side I don't think that I'll have any trouble running a 3" Crossover if I wanted to.
That would slow down the "hit" somewhat wouldn't it?
I didn't realize that I could be hurting the engine if the boost came on too low in the rpm...
I guess I wanted instant power hehe

I was shopping for a 60mm waste gate, as I was thinking on keeping this thing no more than 7lbs of boost to start.
Would a 50mm waste gate do?
Old 01-27-2018, 07:38 AM
  #26  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (16)
 
Street Lethal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: NYC / NJ
Posts: 10,464
Received 174 Likes on 152 Posts
Re: SBC SINGLE TURBO PROJECT

Sammy, let me know if you're interested in buying a dual gauge pod for the a-pillar with a carbon fiber vac/boost gauge (30/30psi) for your build. I'm even throwing in an autometer wideband gauge minus the O2 sensor. Wideband gauge is being included for free because I "think" the display might be missing a light, making one side of the numbers look deformed (example, a 9 might look like a backward letter F), but hey its free, and more than likely can be fixed. It's all gonna go fast at twenty five bucks in the for sale section so let me know before I throw it up, k...

- Rob
Old 01-27-2018, 08:52 AM
  #27  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
GTA Sammy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba. Canada
Posts: 971
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Car: 1989 T-Top GTA
Engine: 5.7L TPI> 6.2L
Transmission: 700R-4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: SBC SINGLE TURBO PROJECT

Thanks for the offer, it's appreciated, but I already have a triple with wide band, fuel pres and Trans temp...
Guess the Trans temps gotta go

Last edited by GTA Sammy; 04-20-2019 at 12:13 AM.
Old 01-27-2018, 11:12 AM
  #28  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (20)
 
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 25,749
Received 369 Likes on 298 Posts
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: Strange 12 bolt 3.42
Re: SBC SINGLE TURBO PROJECT

You can run twin 38mm gates and get some relatively cheap ones. Put one on each crossover feed.

3" would slow it down some, which may be a good thing lol
Old 01-27-2018, 11:30 AM
  #29  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (16)
 
Street Lethal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: NYC / NJ
Posts: 10,464
Received 174 Likes on 152 Posts
Re: SBC SINGLE TURBO PROJECT

Originally Posted by GTA Sammy
I was shopping for a 60mm waste gate, as I was thinking on keeping this thing no more than 7lbs of boost to start. Would a 50mm waste gate do?
It's a little more complex than just picking a size based on turbo size and the amount of a targeted psi. Exhaust pressure isn't the only thing that moves the turbo shaft, not to mention you need to calculate approximately how much air your engine is moving at that targeted psi based on a naturally aspirated horsepower number. There are some online calculators that can help you narrow down the perfect size based on your end goal horsepower...

- Rob
Old 01-28-2018, 02:33 PM
  #30  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
GTA Sammy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba. Canada
Posts: 971
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Car: 1989 T-Top GTA
Engine: 5.7L TPI> 6.2L
Transmission: 700R-4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: SBC SINGLE TURBO PROJECT

EBL Flash P4 purchased!!!! WooHoo!!!!

I guess my APU1 AutoProm and Chips will be "FOR SALE "soon
Not to mention a set of Heddman 68468 Ceramic Coated Long Tubes

If I understand what you're saying Rob, about the CFM stuff
the calculators say that with a:
6.2L
at 6000RPM
.85 VE
Boost Pressure 0.5 Bar
Equates to;
Presure Ratio of 1.5 (my own 600Hp calc was 1.86)
Amt of air in CFM= 837
Amount of Air in Lbs/min= 58 (my calculation was 66)

Im not sure how this #'s help to decide on which waste gate to choose....
Any help is appreciated.
Old 01-28-2018, 08:45 PM
  #31  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (16)
 
Street Lethal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: NYC / NJ
Posts: 10,464
Received 174 Likes on 152 Posts
Re: SBC SINGLE TURBO PROJECT

It's believed to be a popular misconception that the more power an engine makes, the bigger the wastegate would be needed. The general rule of thumb is not so, regardless of turbo size, is usually; Big/Small Turbo with low boost needs a bigger Wastegate, while Big/Small Turbo with high boost needs a smaller Wastegate. This is what most people tend to agree with in the turbo world in theory. But not every engine makes the same power output at "low", nor at "high" boost, and this is why the majority will still tend to lean towards a larger wastegate regardless of the two scenario's and just run a particular spring in the gate, and control it mechanically, or electronically.

I emphasize control it because by controlling it, and not just running spring pressure, then the larger wastegate, some believe, prove to be more beneficial at higher boost pressure than a smaller gate, which contradicts the theory. In terms of CFM, keep in mind that your engine's intake is also spinning/pulling that turbo shaft. So in theory you can run your 50mm wastegate with low boost and boost controller and be fine, but then again, boost is just an increase in air which is then accompanied with more fuel, so that theory above is really saying "low horsepower equals bigger gate", and "high horsepower equals smaller gate". Do you see what just happened? You're running low boost, but your engine is making higher than normal horsepower. This is why people still tend to lean towards a larger gate no matter what the scenario, but again, some form of boost control would be needed if you go with a larger gate, and none have even been mentioned at this point yet.

Congrats on the EBL-P4 purchase...

- Rob

Last edited by Street Lethal; 01-28-2018 at 08:53 PM.
Old 02-13-2018, 04:02 AM
  #32  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
GTA Sammy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba. Canada
Posts: 971
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Car: 1989 T-Top GTA
Engine: 5.7L TPI> 6.2L
Transmission: 700R-4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: SBC SINGLE TURBO PROJECT

Well, EBL should be here in the morning....
Purchased a Wastegate, Blow off valve, Oil lines and fittings, a turbo blanket and 90* turbo flange...
Been practicing with a Mig welder I purchased last week, and I'm just about ready to buy the exhaust pipe and fuel pump... My fuel injectors wont be big enough in the long term but I'll upgrade them in the future.

Can we uncap our injectors like the LS guys do?
I've got extras.....
Old 02-13-2018, 03:47 PM
  #33  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
GTA Sammy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba. Canada
Posts: 971
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Car: 1989 T-Top GTA
Engine: 5.7L TPI> 6.2L
Transmission: 700R-4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: SBC SINGLE TURBO PROJECT

BooM!!!!
Old 02-23-2018, 03:33 PM
  #34  
Senior Member

 
gbayfisher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Ontario
Posts: 820
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1987 Trans am GTA
Engine: D1sc 383
Transmission: t56
Axle/Gears: 4.11
Re: SBC SINGLE TURBO PROJECT

Subbed, going to be a fun project!
You will love the EBL ecm, just makes tuning easier, and with great support, its hard to beat.
Is your head gasket capable of handling much boost? You should consider a thicker MLS gasket like ORR suggested, and drop compression at the same time, just do it from the start and safe your self some aggravation later. I did it to mine and was happy with this decision.
Old 02-23-2018, 05:22 PM
  #35  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
GTA Sammy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba. Canada
Posts: 971
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Car: 1989 T-Top GTA
Engine: 5.7L TPI> 6.2L
Transmission: 700R-4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: SBC SINGLE TURBO PROJECT

Awe man, I was really hoping not to open this engine "again"...
But I know that getting my CR down will probably save me some headaches later....
My plan was to wait and see...
If I have detonation problems I'd open it up and go thicker MLS or even contemplated meth spray on a switch or something....

Would it it be beneficial to play with my camshaft timing to adjust dynamic compression? I bought a billet 2pc CVR timing chain cover for quick cam changes or adjustments...? Just a thought...

Besides that, parts are rollin in...
Oil lines came in yesterday, as well as a 90* T4 flange that I'm not sure if I'll use yet...
I've ordered all my hotside pipe from mandrelbends.com

Waiting for BOV, Wastegate and turbo blanket.

Havent ordered a fuel pump, MAP sensor or intercooler yet... Was thinking Areomotive 340 and a bar and plate intercooler.
found a 3 bar MAP sensor on GM's site.

Last edited by GTA Sammy; 02-23-2018 at 09:17 PM. Reason: Added info
Old 02-23-2018, 06:14 PM
  #36  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (20)
 
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 25,749
Received 369 Likes on 298 Posts
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: Strange 12 bolt 3.42
Re: SBC SINGLE TURBO PROJECT

Yeah install a cam more retarded. Put intake centerline at like a 112-114 on a cam that has a 112-114 lsa. That will keep intake valve open later and bleed off some

You still have the xfi268? On a 113 lsa? I would def install on a 112-113 icl
Old 02-23-2018, 06:42 PM
  #37  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
GTA Sammy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba. Canada
Posts: 971
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Car: 1989 T-Top GTA
Engine: 5.7L TPI> 6.2L
Transmission: 700R-4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: SBC SINGLE TURBO PROJECT

Yeah it's the xfi268 installed straight up
Old 02-23-2018, 06:56 PM
  #38  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (20)
 
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 25,749
Received 369 Likes on 298 Posts
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: Strange 12 bolt 3.42
Re: SBC SINGLE TURBO PROJECT

Originally Posted by GTA Sammy
Yeah it's the xfi268 installed straight up

As in dot to dot straight up? Cuz they come with 4 deg advance ground in
Old 02-23-2018, 09:04 PM
  #39  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
GTA Sammy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba. Canada
Posts: 971
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Car: 1989 T-Top GTA
Engine: 5.7L TPI> 6.2L
Transmission: 700R-4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: SBC SINGLE TURBO PROJECT

Yeah, right now it's dot to dot.
Soooo retarding the camshaft can help with the dynamic compression.
Would a different cam be better?
In your opinion , if I kept the xfi268 would you go 0 or -4 if I was trying to avoid pulling off the heads.
The bottom end has 6" H beam rods and forged pistons
Old 02-23-2018, 09:09 PM
  #40  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
GTA Sammy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba. Canada
Posts: 971
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Car: 1989 T-Top GTA
Engine: 5.7L TPI> 6.2L
Transmission: 700R-4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: SBC SINGLE TURBO PROJECT

The wastegate has 5,12 and 14lb springs so I was planning on being conservative with the 5 pound spring for awhile ....
Old 02-23-2018, 09:21 PM
  #41  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (20)
 
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 25,749
Received 369 Likes on 298 Posts
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: Strange 12 bolt 3.42
Re: SBC SINGLE TURBO PROJECT

I'd run what you got but retard cam 4 deg. It will act slightly bigger by delaying intake closing. Bleeding off some compression.
Old 02-23-2018, 09:35 PM
  #42  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
GTA Sammy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba. Canada
Posts: 971
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Car: 1989 T-Top GTA
Engine: 5.7L TPI> 6.2L
Transmission: 700R-4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: SBC SINGLE TURBO PROJECT

Great!!!
I was hoping to run what I brung and adapt the set up as needed.

Any opinions on de-capped injectors?
I've gotta set of Accel 24 pounders left over, my current FIC 32s won't cut it
Old 02-25-2018, 05:08 PM
  #43  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
GTA Sammy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba. Canada
Posts: 971
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Car: 1989 T-Top GTA
Engine: 5.7L TPI> 6.2L
Transmission: 700R-4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: SBC SINGLE TURBO PROJECT

Ok, what do you guys run for injectors?
I found these on EBay... EV1 high impedance, looks like the right size, length etc... And the EBL will run them.
80lbs is big, but not too big (room to grow) and they're not maxed out.

https://m.ebay.ca/itm/Siemens-Deka-80-LB-High-Impedance-Fuel-Injectors-EV1-Set-8-110324-FI114992/231243948314?hash=item35d736a11a:g:3ysAAOxyBPZThg3m

And about the AFPR, I currently have one on the HSR (Grand National version if I remember correctly). I shouldn't need a different fuel pressure regulator right?
Old 02-26-2018, 06:44 AM
  #44  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (20)
 
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 25,749
Received 369 Likes on 298 Posts
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: Strange 12 bolt 3.42
Re: SBC SINGLE TURBO PROJECT

Yup 80's will work.
Old 02-26-2018, 07:37 AM
  #45  
Senior Member

 
86CamaroDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 631
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Car: 86' IROC
Engine: Supercharged 350
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.45
Re: SBC SINGLE TURBO PROJECT

I wouldnt run decapped, id run the 80's. I have the 60 lb version and i have no complaints so far. Kirban AFR is a good unit which is boost referenced, Im also running one.
Old 02-27-2018, 06:51 PM
  #46  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
GTA Sammy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba. Canada
Posts: 971
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Car: 1989 T-Top GTA
Engine: 5.7L TPI> 6.2L
Transmission: 700R-4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: SBC SINGLE TURBO PROJECT

Old 02-27-2018, 06:53 PM
  #47  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
GTA Sammy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba. Canada
Posts: 971
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Car: 1989 T-Top GTA
Engine: 5.7L TPI> 6.2L
Transmission: 700R-4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: SBC SINGLE TURBO PROJECT

Thanks Gentleman,
I ordered the 80's
Wastegate came in today
Hotside pipe on its way, hopefully here this week
Old 02-28-2018, 04:37 PM
  #48  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
fasteddi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Northwest Ohio
Posts: 6,274
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes on 19 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: BBC 509 Merlin ii 9.6:1 pump gas
Transmission: ATI pro th350 sfi case. TSI 5500 st
Axle/Gears: Strange S60 4:10s
Re: SBC SINGLE TURBO PROJECT

Originally Posted by GTA Sammy
Thanks Gentleman,
I ordered the 80's
Wastegate came in today
Hotside pipe on its way, hopefully here this week

I'm a union pipefitter welder and have been working at Campbell's soup for a good 6 years. So keep buying that soup!!! Wastegate looks nice.
Old 03-05-2018, 03:35 AM
  #49  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
83 Crossfire TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: DC Metro Area
Posts: 7,975
Received 83 Likes on 70 Posts
Car: 87TA 87Form 71Mach1 93FleetWB 04Cum
Re: SBC SINGLE TURBO PROJECT

Originally Posted by Street Lethal
It's believed to be a popular misconception that the more power an engine makes, the bigger the wastegate would be needed. The general rule of thumb is not so, regardless of turbo size, is usually; Big/Small Turbo with low boost needs a bigger Wastegate, while Big/Small Turbo with high boost needs a smaller Wastegate. This is what most people tend to agree with in the turbo world in theory. But not every engine makes the same power output at "low", nor at "high" boost, and this is why the majority will still tend to lean towards a larger wastegate regardless of the two scenario's and just run a particular spring in the gate, and control it mechanically, or electronically.

I emphasize control it because by controlling it, and not just running spring pressure, then the larger wastegate, some believe, prove to be more beneficial at higher boost pressure than a smaller gate, which contradicts the theory. In terms of CFM, keep in mind that your engine's intake is also spinning/pulling that turbo shaft. So in theory you can run your 50mm wastegate with low boost and boost controller and be fine, but then again, boost is just an increase in air which is then accompanied with more fuel, so that theory above is really saying "low horsepower equals bigger gate", and "high horsepower equals smaller gate". Do you see what just happened? You're running low boost, but your engine is making higher than normal horsepower. This is why people still tend to lean towards a larger gate no matter what the scenario, but again, some form of boost control would be needed if you go with a larger gate, and none have even been mentioned at this point yet.
Huh??? I read that like 3x trying to figure out what you're trying to say. Is there more in there besides trying to describe some relationship between boost pressure and wastegate sizing?

My experience seems to be that there isn't really a good one besides a more efficient hot side = you need less wastegate to control boost with good wastegate placement. Things can go in all sorts of weird directions with this like more HP = more airflow so you need a larger wastegate to control it, but if you have a less efficient hot side with a good wastegate placement that will mean more backpressure and it will take a smaller wastegate to control the boost.

Theory says that the more efficient the hot side is and the closer you get to optimizing the hot side plumbing and the hot side sizing to your power level the smaller the wastegate needs to be to control it, and the closer you get to that point the more power you make (you're not losing power to pumping losses/increasing exhaust to intake pressure ratio), there's also some outside factor of If you don't have to dump as much exhaust out the wastegate (assuming everything else is the same with the exception of the turbo hot side) you should make more power but I'm not sure I've ever wrapped my brain around why that would be (if the exhaust pressure is the same, intake airflow is the same, why would it matter if more or less of your exhaust flow is going out your wastegate?).

Originally Posted by GTA Sammy
Well, EBL should be here in the morning....
Purchased a Wastegate, Blow off valve, Oil lines and fittings, a turbo blanket and 90* turbo flange...
Been practicing with a Mig welder I purchased last week, and I'm just about ready to buy the exhaust pipe and fuel pump... My fuel injectors wont be big enough in the long term but I'll upgrade them in the future.

Can we uncap our injectors like the LS guys do?
I've got extras.....
Old school bosch style injectors can have their metering plates removed to increase flow, like FMS 36's will become 75's and factory ford 36's will become roughly 65's, and even though the accel injectors are externally similar I've never pulled the pintle caps off of them to see what's under there. The ford/bosch 24's that look similar just different colors I believe flow somewhere in the 48-58lb range with the metering plates removed (somewhere I have a chart from when I had an injector flow bench)

Originally Posted by Orr89RocZ
Yeah install a cam more retarded. Put intake centerline at like a 112-114 on a cam that has a 112-114 lsa. That will keep intake valve open later and bleed off some

You still have the xfi268? On a 113 lsa? I would def install on a 112-113 icl
Originally Posted by Orr89RocZ
I'd run what you got but retard cam 4 deg. It will act slightly bigger by delaying intake closing. Bleeding off some compression.
Be aware that that will raise the rpm that it will want to make power at and anything that is marginal now, especially valve springs will be insufficient (boost tends to require slightly larger springs to start with).

I'm pretty sure that I mentioned this early on in this thread, that one way around your compression woes is to just size the turbo to not come in down low and to come in above the current power band. Instead of increasing cylinder pressure (detonation sensitivity) in your power band where it will already be the highest, it will increase cylinder pressure after the power band where the cylinder pressure and detonation sensitivity will be dropping off, just basically extending the power band.

If your turbo is already largish and slow spooling to achieve that then you could end up causing detonation by moving the power band up...

(yea, all this is a long shot but how often do we run into someone with some weird problem that doesn't make sense that turns out it's some weird interaction like that?)
Old 03-05-2018, 06:08 AM
  #50  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (20)
 
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 25,749
Received 369 Likes on 298 Posts
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: Strange 12 bolt 3.42
Re: SBC SINGLE TURBO PROJECT

That turbo is small. Delaying cam intake events will help

The valvesprings should not be marginal on those afr heads if it came with 8017’s but i would prefer 8019’s


Quick Reply: SBC SINGLE TURBO PROJECT



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:03 PM.