View Poll Results: how about the ''not v8s'' section?
good idea
3
20.00%
no way
7
46.67%
keep trying
0
0%
i have a v8 and dont care.
5
33.33%
Voters: 15. You may not vote on this poll
how about changing the v6 forums to ''not v8s''.
10-04-2005, 03:09 AM
#1
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: earf
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 83 firebucket
Engine: less then a geo
Transmission: 5speed crap box
how about changing the v6 forums to ''not v8s''.
this new forum would have v6 and l4 motors.
i think this would make everyone happy.
i think this would make everyone happy.
10-04-2005, 04:55 AM
#3
Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: classified,ohmss
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1982-z-28.1987 sc
Engine: 350 on z-28,305 on sc
Transmission: bw t-10 on z-28,700r4 on sc
why don't you just post in the general tech board and retain your memebership,your bound to get banned with that attitude,you know the mods don't take trolls lightly here
10-04-2005, 02:08 PM
#4
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: earf
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 83 firebucket
Engine: less then a geo
Transmission: 5speed crap box
troll? what are you smokin?
this place is about helping people with fbodys,not ridiculing people for not buying a v8.most moderaters dont even seem to understand that.
i just want a place on here where us duke guys can discusse our motors and not your v8 .
the v6 forums allready seem out of place,lets just go the rest of they way and make them the ''not v8''boards.
the fiero forums dont have any knowledge of fbody specific dukes. the engines in the fieros were front weel drive motors and the s10s are diffrent as well.
if you dont like ,i dont care, but people who just talk **** and tell me to just get a v8 are much more of a troll then i ever could be.
im just trying to help a small segment of the fbody population.
why are you so against that?
this place is about helping people with fbodys,not ridiculing people for not buying a v8.most moderaters dont even seem to understand that.
i just want a place on here where us duke guys can discusse our motors and not your v8 .
the v6 forums allready seem out of place,lets just go the rest of they way and make them the ''not v8''boards.
the fiero forums dont have any knowledge of fbody specific dukes. the engines in the fieros were front weel drive motors and the s10s are diffrent as well.
if you dont like ,i dont care, but people who just talk **** and tell me to just get a v8 are much more of a troll then i ever could be.
im just trying to help a small segment of the fbody population.
why are you so against that?
10-04-2005, 02:41 PM
#5
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
i have a V8 and dont care.
but if its any consulation, i think that the V8s that came in these cars were crap too.
but if its any consulation, i think that the V8s that came in these cars were crap too.
10-04-2005, 02:46 PM
#6
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: earf
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 83 firebucket
Engine: less then a geo
Transmission: 5speed crap box
all the early fbodys were seriously underpowered.
its kinda sad.
why does gm screw themselves so much?
they could have had half a dozen better motors then the pushrod v8 and pushrod v6 and pushrod four banger.
the cosworth is proof of that.
its kinda sad.
why does gm screw themselves so much?
they could have had half a dozen better motors then the pushrod v8 and pushrod v6 and pushrod four banger.
the cosworth is proof of that.
10-04-2005, 02:52 PM
#7
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes
on
8 Posts
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
No, they couldn't. They put out as much power as they could given the technology which was available at the time to meet the emissions requirements at the time.
Trending Topics
10-04-2005, 02:58 PM
#8
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: earf
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 83 firebucket
Engine: less then a geo
Transmission: 5speed crap box
gm also said building a freonless ac was impossible.
two kids just made one and won a ton of schiolarships and contracts.
gm is usualy wrong and slow to change.
they refuse to look ahead and plan for it.then they have to play catch up with the rest of the car world.
like fuel economy, like they didnt know gas wouldnt get more expensive.
now they are reduced to a joke,all their sales are slumping,they have been reduced to junk stock status.
gas has been going up in price for five straight years,and they still dont have any solutions to get better milage then a worthless copy cat hybrid that wont be out for another 2 years.
suv sales are falling like stones while hybrids are sold out.
if gm would pull its head from its own *** they might be able to lead a trend in car tech,and not just follow the japanese.
two kids just made one and won a ton of schiolarships and contracts.
gm is usualy wrong and slow to change.
they refuse to look ahead and plan for it.then they have to play catch up with the rest of the car world.
like fuel economy, like they didnt know gas wouldnt get more expensive.
now they are reduced to a joke,all their sales are slumping,they have been reduced to junk stock status.
gas has been going up in price for five straight years,and they still dont have any solutions to get better milage then a worthless copy cat hybrid that wont be out for another 2 years.
suv sales are falling like stones while hybrids are sold out.
if gm would pull its head from its own *** they might be able to lead a trend in car tech,and not just follow the japanese.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Pac J
Tech / General Engine
3
05-17-2020 10:44 AM