Problems / Help / Suggestions / Comments Let us know if you're having any problems with the site or board software. Post any ideas you might have for ThirdGen.Org here.
View Poll Results: should there be an iron duke section?
yes
9
40.91%
no
13
59.09%
Voters: 22. You may not vote on this poll

iron duke vote

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 19, 2005 | 02:09 PM
  #1  
wellington's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
From: earf
Car: 83 firebucket
Engine: less then a geo
Transmission: 5speed crap box
iron duke vote

i feel it should only be duke owners to vote.

but everyone feel free to put in your $.02.


1
Old Sep 20, 2005 | 07:03 AM
  #2  
wellington's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
From: earf
Car: 83 firebucket
Engine: less then a geo
Transmission: 5speed crap box
all right,its a mandate!!!!

Old Sep 28, 2005 | 11:23 AM
  #3  
wellington's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
From: earf
Car: 83 firebucket
Engine: less then a geo
Transmission: 5speed crap box
its still a mandate.

3-5 we win.
Old Sep 28, 2005 | 12:06 PM
  #4  
Apeiron's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 11
From: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
You can't obtain a mandate without a quorum.
Old Sep 28, 2005 | 12:10 PM
  #5  
wellington's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
From: earf
Car: 83 firebucket
Engine: less then a geo
Transmission: 5speed crap box
i was just making fun of w at the last election.i thought it was funny.

Old Sep 28, 2005 | 12:43 PM
  #6  
Inwo's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,108
Likes: 1
From: Western NY
Car: 2007 Saturn Sky Redline
Engine: 2.0 turbo
Transmission: m5
Axle/Gears: 3.91 LSD
Originally posted by wellington
i was just making fun of w at the last election.i thought it was funny.

Looks like you're all alone on this one.
Old Sep 28, 2005 | 02:24 PM
  #7  
wellington's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
From: earf
Car: 83 firebucket
Engine: less then a geo
Transmission: 5speed crap box
only a coward is afraid to be alone.go huddle around the saftey of your v8.
Old Sep 28, 2005 | 04:03 PM
  #8  
Inwo's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,108
Likes: 1
From: Western NY
Car: 2007 Saturn Sky Redline
Engine: 2.0 turbo
Transmission: m5
Axle/Gears: 3.91 LSD
Originally posted by wellington
only a coward is afraid to be alone.go huddle around the saftey of your v8.
You mean my v8 that gets better fuel economy than your Duke while still going 10 seconds faster in the 1/4? Will do.
Old Sep 29, 2005 | 11:53 AM
  #9  
wellington's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
From: earf
Car: 83 firebucket
Engine: less then a geo
Transmission: 5speed crap box
other dukes are claiming 37mpg.i doubt your v8 is getting even close to that.

mine is getting crappy mileage because the car was neglected and abused when i bought it.

no one had even changed the fluids before[except oil],and it had 140,000 miles on it.22 years with absolutly no maintinence kinda hurts gas milage.


after i get the new computer and suspension i should be getting 30mpg city and 35 hiway.

maybe more depnding on what else it needs or i get for it.
Old Sep 29, 2005 | 05:26 PM
  #10  
I-rocin's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
From: petaluma/two rocks, california
Car: 87 iroc-z28
Engine: vortec tpi 350
Transmission: built 700r4
my vote is.......put a V8 in there
Old Sep 30, 2005 | 11:46 AM
  #11  
wellington's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
From: earf
Car: 83 firebucket
Engine: less then a geo
Transmission: 5speed crap box
i willing to bet most of those people dont have a duke.



since it would only concern people with the duke,it should only apply to duke owners.

its like having a national election for a mayor.
its only the locals who SHOULD get to vote.
Old Sep 30, 2005 | 11:49 AM
  #12  
Apeiron's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 11
From: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
When Alaska became a state, was it only Alaskans that had a say about it?
Old Sep 30, 2005 | 01:17 PM
  #13  
wellington's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
From: earf
Car: 83 firebucket
Engine: less then a geo
Transmission: 5speed crap box
good point.

if thats the case,then lets put the poll somehwere else and get a broader perspective.

wheres a good place to put it?
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 12:54 AM
  #14  
82knightrider's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,492
Likes: 0
From: Arcadia ,Ca
Car: 82 firebird s/e 83 Trans Am
Engine: 5.0L 305ci 4b carb.....CFI
Transmission: TH200C....700R4
auto detailing board...that has lots of traffic.You might be able to get some replies before metallicamaroRS locks it
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 09:41 PM
  #15  
Dee555's Avatar
Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
Car: 89 Iroc - 84 Trans Am -84 Corvette
Engine: 350 TunedPort
Transmission: 700R/T-5 World Class
Axle/Gears: Posi/Ausi/Disc/3.08
Re: Iron Duke

Camaro's and Firebird's were always known for their high performance image. The use of these motors was one of the poorest ideas the General ever made with these machines. It did the f body line no justice aside from not even being able to get off the line. I hope that all those poor Camaro's and Firebird's that drove off the assembly lines are dead and buried it was such ashame that these machines had to go through life with such a sabby power plant, those motors weren't even worthy of an oil change they were just under powered junk. I'm even surprised they ran on gasoline and not baby formula.

Last edited by Dee555; Oct 3, 2005 at 09:43 PM.
Old Oct 4, 2005 | 03:05 AM
  #16  
wellington's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
From: earf
Car: 83 firebucket
Engine: less then a geo
Transmission: 5speed crap box
if gm had decided to put in superduty cosworth 2.7 ,the v8 would not be the main motor in the fbody.

the super duty cosworth made 270hp carbed,it would have eaten every v8 at the time.

its sad that gm decided to discontinue the cosworth,but they usualy screw up their own good ideas.


Old Oct 4, 2005 | 03:16 AM
  #17  
Apeiron's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 11
From: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
Highly unlikely that GM would have used a racing engine in a production vehicle. While it may have beaten a stock production V8 at the time, it wouldn't have come close to touching a similarly equipped V8 racing engine.
Old Oct 4, 2005 | 03:18 AM
  #18  
82knightrider's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,492
Likes: 0
From: Arcadia ,Ca
Car: 82 firebird s/e 83 Trans Am
Engine: 5.0L 305ci 4b carb.....CFI
Transmission: TH200C....700R4
you dont see us CFI guys whining
Old Oct 4, 2005 | 02:12 PM
  #19  
wellington's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
From: earf
Car: 83 firebucket
Engine: less then a geo
Transmission: 5speed crap box
im just saying, gm could have offered a tuned down version.

but they have zero vision of the future,they just assumed people would not buy a hopped up four banger when the v8 was a cheap option.

im willing to bet half the v8 guys would have bought the super duty cosworth instead had it been availble.


but we will never know for sure.
Old Oct 4, 2005 | 02:41 PM
  #20  
Apeiron's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 11
From: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
They did offer a tuned down version, the Iron Duke. There's nothing magical about the SD4, if it had been tuned for emissions it would have made about 80 HP too.
Old Oct 4, 2005 | 02:52 PM
  #21  
wellington's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
From: earf
Car: 83 firebucket
Engine: less then a geo
Transmission: 5speed crap box
no the super duty cosworth was capable of over 500hp na.

the 270hp WAS tuned down.



and it seems gm used emmisions as an excuse to make a bunch of dirt slow cars.


hell a cat and fuel injection should get most cars emmisions down below the legal limit without sacrificing hundreds of hp.

i just wish gm would have been more competitive at the time.

now the cosworth is gone,but the old v8 passes emmisions and makes 400 hp.

it sucks because the cos would have 300hp and pass emmisions with modern tech.


it makes me kinda sad.
Old Oct 4, 2005 | 03:52 PM
  #22  
I-rocin's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
From: petaluma/two rocks, california
Car: 87 iroc-z28
Engine: vortec tpi 350
Transmission: built 700r4
ths had turned into a wellington vs TGO battle,

if you really want a board that bad, swap a v8 in and there you go
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Linson
Auto Detailing and Appearance
28
Oct 24, 2025 02:00 PM
Linson
Auto Detailing and Appearance
12
Oct 1, 2015 09:50 PM
Linson
Auto Detailing and Appearance
61
Oct 1, 2015 05:33 PM
mfp189
Transmissions and Drivetrain
1
Sep 27, 2015 09:25 AM
Angie Coots
Organized Drag Racing and Autocross
4
Sep 23, 2015 07:42 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:31 AM.