Suspension and Chassis Questions about your suspension? Need chassis advice?

Hotchkis springs-Rear is slightly lower than front.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-17-2004, 01:55 PM
  #1  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
GASGZLR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1991 Camaro Z28 5.7 G92
Engine: L98 Tuned Port Injection
Transmission: TH700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 Posi G80
Hotchkis springs-Rear is slightly lower than front.

I just installed my set of Hotchkis springs two days ago. I have already had the car aligned since then. They handle way better than my old 215,000 mile springs. I did notice that the rear fender gap is slightly smaller than the front gap. It is probably not noticealbe to the average person. The car seems to sit level over all.

Has any one had this happen after a fresh install of springs?

Could the fact that I have a 5 speed and Fiberglass hood make the front sit higher due to less weight?

Will the front settle .5 inch?
Old 06-17-2004, 01:56 PM
  #2  
Supreme Member
 
RB83L69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Loveland, OH, US
Posts: 18,457
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
Car: 4
Engine: 6
Transmission: 5
Yes it will settle.

Give it about 2000 miles.
Old 06-17-2004, 01:59 PM
  #3  
Member
 
frogmanjohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: So Cal
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 89 RS
Engine: 305 TBI 215,000+
Transmission: T-5
Hey bud, did you reuse your sping isolation dampeners on all 4 corners? if you did, you could always take the front spring isolators off, and tat would bring the front down 1/2". a little more vibes from the front. but your fender gaps would be closer.

john
Old 06-17-2004, 02:21 PM
  #4  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
GASGZLR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1991 Camaro Z28 5.7 G92
Engine: L98 Tuned Port Injection
Transmission: TH700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 Posi G80
Yes I did, but my front isolators were thin rubber circles that were maybe 1/8-1/4 of an inch thin. THey were like thick inner tube rubber. THe rears had the stock, maybe 3/4 inch, isolators.

Last edited by GASGZLR; 06-17-2004 at 03:05 PM.
Old 06-17-2004, 06:40 PM
  #5  
Supreme Member

 
TPI-Formula350-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Long Island New York
Posts: 1,644
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 89 Formula 350
Engine: Forged 385 H/C/I
Transmission: 700R4-4300 Stall-lockup
Axle/Gears: BW 9 Bolt 3:70
here a pic of the Hotchkis 1" drop springs installed on my car. think the stance looks correct. I also have a fiberglass hood so I don't think thats your problem.
Old 06-17-2004, 07:31 PM
  #6  
Supreme Member

 
Spdfrk1990's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 2,972
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hotchkis on mine were way lower in the front.
Old 06-17-2004, 08:03 PM
  #7  
TGO Supporter

 
Justins86bird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Another world, some other time
Posts: 3,838
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: 86 LG4 & 92 TBI Firebird
Engine: The Mighty 305!
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
My Hotchkis springs sit about .5" lower in the front.
Old 06-17-2004, 09:49 PM
  #8  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (4)
 
Wishmaster's87IROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Winston salem, NC
Posts: 2,850
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1987 1SICIROC.....1999 TransAm
Engine: 385 HSR.....LS1
Transmission: 700R4 with Midwest 3400 2.4str...M6
Axle/Gears: SLP Zexel Posi unit 3.42's...3.73's
did you index the front and rear springs in the correct position?

Both sets need to be in a specific place for them to sit right.
Old 06-17-2004, 10:16 PM
  #9  
Supreme Member
 
92 zzz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Jacksonville, NC
Posts: 1,886
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: Guess
Engine: Crazy 8
Transmission: So close to being a manual I can taste it
Don't feel bad, I just installed Eibachs in my maro. The front sits a tad higher now than with the worn out stockers up front. The rear looks good though. It will settle. I had put Hotchkis springs in my old Monte a few years ago. Man did that set the car off. Big old thing actually stayed flat in corners, looked and rode pretty good too...They'll settle in...
Old 06-18-2004, 08:41 AM
  #10  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
GASGZLR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1991 Camaro Z28 5.7 G92
Engine: L98 Tuned Port Injection
Transmission: TH700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 Posi G80
I am sure that I indexed my fronts properly. I put the pigtail of the coil between the two holes in the lower control arm. I pulled the rear springs yesterday and put them side by side with the stockers. The Hotchkis springs were almost 2 inches shorter. I put all my weight on them and bounced on em and the stockers were WAY stiffer than the hotchkis. I ended up putting the stockers back on and it sits perfect for now. The rear is about 3/4 of an inch higher than the front, instead of being 3/4 of an inch lower. If the fronts settle more like you guys say, then I may go back to the Hotchkis rears to balance it out. For now the stock rears stay.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
J-money
Suspension and Chassis
15
01-04-2019 09:45 AM
xXIROC ZXx
Wheels and Tires
9
09-15-2015 11:18 PM
Bubbajones_ya
Cooling
23
09-14-2015 08:38 PM
84 TA NV
Firebirds for Sale
1
09-06-2015 08:02 PM
IROCZDAVE (88-L98)
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
0
09-02-2015 08:49 AM



Quick Reply: Hotchkis springs-Rear is slightly lower than front.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:49 AM.