Question For Dimented, and Other 88 TBI Owners...
#1
Question For Dimented, and Other 88 TBI Owners...
Recently nabbed an 88 for cheap, and this is the first Third Generation I've owned that came with TBI. Still a little unsure as to what road I'm going to take with this one... but the 400-sbc is just about finished.
I wanted to ask you, when you had you're 305, and when you yanked the stock intake off... did you notice if you're passenger side swirl port had an EGR port prevalent? It's strange, I yanked off mine a few days back, and noticed the passageway missing.
I thought to myself, hmm... maybe the previous owner installed a drivers side head from a donor LO3 to eliminate it. I honestly went with this concept (as it's not out of the ordinary), but what's strange is, I came across another 88-TBI (Camaro) in the local junkyard, and it too was missing the EGR ports in the passenger head.
I started to think, hmm... how wonderful it would be if GM, somehow, did not install EGR equipped heads on the 88 model year (making them EGR exempt). I did a search in the TBI archives, and there was one poster from awhile back who posed the same question (who happened to have an 88 himself).
If so, then the 88 model year would seem to be quite the exception.... first no speed limiter, and now (possibly) no EGR (even though the intake manifold visually houses one). Again though, TBI is not my strong point... so I don't know much about it's history.
Interesting... nonetheless!
I wanted to ask you, when you had you're 305, and when you yanked the stock intake off... did you notice if you're passenger side swirl port had an EGR port prevalent? It's strange, I yanked off mine a few days back, and noticed the passageway missing.
I thought to myself, hmm... maybe the previous owner installed a drivers side head from a donor LO3 to eliminate it. I honestly went with this concept (as it's not out of the ordinary), but what's strange is, I came across another 88-TBI (Camaro) in the local junkyard, and it too was missing the EGR ports in the passenger head.
I started to think, hmm... how wonderful it would be if GM, somehow, did not install EGR equipped heads on the 88 model year (making them EGR exempt). I did a search in the TBI archives, and there was one poster from awhile back who posed the same question (who happened to have an 88 himself).
If so, then the 88 model year would seem to be quite the exception.... first no speed limiter, and now (possibly) no EGR (even though the intake manifold visually houses one). Again though, TBI is not my strong point... so I don't know much about it's history.
Interesting... nonetheless!
#2
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: New Milford CT
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Trans AM
Engine: 305 TBI LO3
Transmission: W/C T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Open
im pretty sure u got a limitor, i hit mine at 115(88 tbi rebuilt and i got a 5spd) egr i couldnt tell u, maybe they used a diff method?
#3
Originally posted by kyles88birdim pretty sure u got a limitor, i hit mine at 115 (88 tbi rebuilt and i got a 5spd)
Also, I thought the 5-Speed's were not speed limited?
Edit: Yes, both tranny's had the limiter.
Last edited by Street Lethal; 05-08-2005 at 04:59 PM.
#4
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: New Milford CT
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Trans AM
Engine: 305 TBI LO3
Transmission: W/C T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Open
all u gotta do is splice a on/off switch in line wit hte vss, when u get close to the 115 mark, flip the switch to off and u can keep going.
#5
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moorestown, NJ
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
The limiter is disabled in the 88 cals that Ive seen so far. Guess they figured the low horespower would do the limiting for them. Ive seen rumers that the 88's only made 150 HP. Just a rumer, so take it with a grain of salt.
As far as the egr, Ill check the heads on my 400 lb paperweight when I get home. Can you post the casting #s of the heads you have?
EDIT: As far as the egr goes, it is fully enabled in the stock calibration that came with my ecm. It must work somehow, or be completly disabled in some cars.
As far as the egr, Ill check the heads on my 400 lb paperweight when I get home. Can you post the casting #s of the heads you have?
EDIT: As far as the egr goes, it is fully enabled in the stock calibration that came with my ecm. It must work somehow, or be completly disabled in some cars.
Last edited by dimented24x7; 05-08-2005 at 11:42 PM.
#6
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: New Milford CT
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Trans AM
Engine: 305 TBI LO3
Transmission: W/C T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Open
got me on the egr. as for hp rating, it was 170 and 240lb ft. i ahvent done a high speed test, i was in my buddies 91 formula(same motor and tranny as me) when i found out. i dont see the point in going over 80mph really. and besides call me a wussy but i dont wanna end up as a stat
Trending Topics
#8
Head casting is 14102187. After double checking the junkyard heads as well... it too shared the same casting. It's strange. The intake itself has the EGR, with ports, and when I yanked it off, there was heavy carbon deposits everywhere.
It was even on the head (the carbon deposits) in the shape of the ports, in which I initially thought that the EGR head ports were plugged... only to then find out (after scraping the deposits off with a razor blade), that there were no EGR ports even there (on the head)!
Again, when I first noticed this... I thought that previous owner was responsible, but being that this car is ridiculously stock, why would someone swap out one head (and do absolutely nothing else along with it). But still though, I was nonchalant about it.
After coming across the same exact thing though in the junkyard, same year, 88... this is when I got a little curious. Just imagine if these car's (88 model) were accidentally EGR exempt. Hey, with GM's history, anything's possible!
It was even on the head (the carbon deposits) in the shape of the ports, in which I initially thought that the EGR head ports were plugged... only to then find out (after scraping the deposits off with a razor blade), that there were no EGR ports even there (on the head)!
Again, when I first noticed this... I thought that previous owner was responsible, but being that this car is ridiculously stock, why would someone swap out one head (and do absolutely nothing else along with it). But still though, I was nonchalant about it.
After coming across the same exact thing though in the junkyard, same year, 88... this is when I got a little curious. Just imagine if these car's (88 model) were accidentally EGR exempt. Hey, with GM's history, anything's possible!
Originally posted by dimented24x7.The limiter is disabled in the 88 cals that Ive seen so far. Guess they figured the low horespower would do the limiting for them. Ive seen rumers that the 88's only made 150 HP. Just a rumer, so take it with a grain of salt.
As far as the egr, Ill check the heads on my 400 lb paperweight when I get home. Can you post the casting #s of the heads you have?
EDIT: As far as the egr goes, it is fully enabled in the stock calibration that came with my ecm. It must work somehow, or be completly disabled in some cars.
As far as the egr, Ill check the heads on my 400 lb paperweight when I get home. Can you post the casting #s of the heads you have?
EDIT: As far as the egr goes, it is fully enabled in the stock calibration that came with my ecm. It must work somehow, or be completly disabled in some cars.
#9
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moorestown, NJ
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
Originally posted by Crusin' 1980's
What is an EGR? what does it do?
What is an EGR? what does it do?
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: MA
Posts: 849
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 93 GM300 platforms
Engine: LO3, LO5
Transmission: MD8 x2
A thought --- did the light trucks for the 88 model year have EGR? If they didn't and the engine plant was running low on the passenger-car 187s, then they might have used some of the 187s for trucks that (possibly) lacked the EGR port.
A lot of undocumented things can happen along a production line to keep the line going especially if the things don't cause failure and later finger-pointing at the factory.
A lot of undocumented things can happen along a production line to keep the line going especially if the things don't cause failure and later finger-pointing at the factory.
#11
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska
Posts: 1,047
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1988 Firebird, 2000 GTP
Engine: 327
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9" posi, 4.11
I have an 88 LO3 from california
But, the car ended up in Nebraska with me. I'm building a new motor, but I'll tear mine off and take a look when the motor comes out. That is a very interesting idea. I doubt that is the case with mine because I am always throwing EGR codes. That combined with detonation up the ___ led me to build a different engine.
If this post is still around, I'll let ya know.
But, the car ended up in Nebraska with me. I'm building a new motor, but I'll tear mine off and take a look when the motor comes out. That is a very interesting idea. I doubt that is the case with mine because I am always throwing EGR codes. That combined with detonation up the ___ led me to build a different engine.
If this post is still around, I'll let ya know.
#16
Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: NJnorth
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: firebird '89
Engine: 305 tbi
Transmission: it works I'm happy
IT's possible you had a warranty issue and they swapped in new or available heads at a dealership and that would explain your otherwise stock engine but different heads.
I've TPI heads on my car and theres no reason for it but the one above.
I think it was shifty who explained that.
I've TPI heads on my car and theres no reason for it but the one above.
I think it was shifty who explained that.
#17
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moorestown, NJ
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
Originally posted by Street Lethal
Head casting is 14102187. After double checking the junkyard heads as well... it too shared the same casting. It's strange. The intake itself has the EGR, with ports, and when I yanked it off, there was heavy carbon deposits everywhere.
It was even on the head (the carbon deposits) in the shape of the ports, in which I initially thought that the EGR head ports were plugged... only to then find out (after scraping the deposits off with a razor blade), that there were no EGR ports even there (on the head)!
Again, when I first noticed this... I thought that previous owner was responsible, but being that this car is ridiculously stock, why would someone swap out one head (and do absolutely nothing else along with it). But still though, I was nonchalant about it.
After coming across the same exact thing though in the junkyard, same year, 88... this is when I got a little curious. Just imagine if these car's (88 model) were accidentally EGR exempt. Hey, with GM's history, anything's possible!
Head casting is 14102187. After double checking the junkyard heads as well... it too shared the same casting. It's strange. The intake itself has the EGR, with ports, and when I yanked it off, there was heavy carbon deposits everywhere.
It was even on the head (the carbon deposits) in the shape of the ports, in which I initially thought that the EGR head ports were plugged... only to then find out (after scraping the deposits off with a razor blade), that there were no EGR ports even there (on the head)!
Again, when I first noticed this... I thought that previous owner was responsible, but being that this car is ridiculously stock, why would someone swap out one head (and do absolutely nothing else along with it). But still though, I was nonchalant about it.
After coming across the same exact thing though in the junkyard, same year, 88... this is when I got a little curious. Just imagine if these car's (88 model) were accidentally EGR exempt. Hey, with GM's history, anything's possible!
#18
Supreme Member
ill be yanking intake on my stock original 87 truck L03 engine tomorrow, it has an EGR valve, ill see if it has functional egr ports in both heads or not and post here
heh
heh
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post