cant figure out what engien this is
#1
cant figure out what engien this is
hey guys ive stumped my pals over at z28.com on what engine this is. Im looking at it right now talked to the guy but hes confused (wont tell me but obvious) about what engine is in here can anyone tell just by looking its advertised as a 350 but idk someone let me know.
heres are the pics
http://boston.craigslist.org/car/112456216.html
heres are the pics
http://boston.craigslist.org/car/112456216.html
#2
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes
on
8 Posts
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
Re: cant figure out what engien this is
Originally posted by Hrsepowerz28
can anyone tell just by looking
can anyone tell just by looking
From the factory that car couldn't have had a 350, but one could have been swapped in.
#5
Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Sin City
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '86 IROC, '87 Volvo 240, '09 Malibu
Engine: LB9 5.0L
Transmission: 700R4
Chances are, since the seller said "engine was REBUILT at 120,000 miles", it's the original block -- and that means it's an LB9 305. No thirdgen Camaro came with the L98 350 until 1987.
It'd be easiest if you got the codes, but I'd be willing to bet that it's an LB9.
Also, since the engine was rebuilt at 120k and the car only has 123k on it yet the engine has problems, I think somebody screwed up when they rebuilt the engine. You'll probably have some top-end engine work to do. (This is coming from experience... that's exactly the condition my car was in when I got it.)
It'd be easiest if you got the codes, but I'd be willing to bet that it's an LB9.
Also, since the engine was rebuilt at 120k and the car only has 123k on it yet the engine has problems, I think somebody screwed up when they rebuilt the engine. You'll probably have some top-end engine work to do. (This is coming from experience... that's exactly the condition my car was in when I got it.)
Last edited by Crayz9000; 11-23-2005 at 11:40 PM.
#7
Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Sin City
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '86 IROC, '87 Volvo 240, '09 Malibu
Engine: LB9 5.0L
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by Hrsepowerz28
im thinking he thought it was a 350 and put 350 heads on it and thats whats causing the problem? what was causing ur problem?
im thinking he thought it was a 350 and put 350 heads on it and thats whats causing the problem? what was causing ur problem?
The result was an engine that barely ran. It had a serious lope to it, heated the manifolds cherry red, and screwed the cat over because raw fuel was dumping into it. We had to pull the top end apart and give it a valve job while we got the correct factory replacement cam (though sooner or later I want to put a slightly more radical cam in, like a ZZ4...).
Hopefully this one isn't as bad, it just sounds like the owner doesn't really know what he's doing. All I'm saying is, expect problems.
Trending Topics
#8
Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Sacramento,Ca.
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 90 Formula
Engine: 355 C.I.
Transmission: 5 Speed
Axle/Gears: 3.42
The 3 big numbers on the side of the block will be the last 3 of the casting numbers. That will make it really easy to tell.
#10
Originally posted by Crayz9000
Improperly indexed cam and overtightened lifters. Some idiot at the chop shop that rebuilt the car's engine forgot to index the original cam when he reground it. Then, when installing the cam, they screwed the lifters in too far.
Improperly indexed cam and overtightened lifters. Some idiot at the chop shop that rebuilt the car's engine forgot to index the original cam when he reground it. Then, when installing the cam, they screwed the lifters in too far.
#11
Senior Member
Originally posted by Crayz9000
Improperly indexed cam and overtightened lifters. Some idiot at the chop shop that rebuilt the car's engine forgot to index the original cam when he reground it. Then, when installing the cam, they screwed the lifters in too far.
The result was an engine that barely ran. It had a serious lope to it, heated the manifolds cherry red, and screwed the cat over because raw fuel was dumping into it. We had to pull the top end apart and give it a valve job while we got the correct factory replacement cam (though sooner or later I want to put a slightly more radical cam in, like a ZZ4...).
Hopefully this one isn't as bad, it just sounds like the owner doesn't really know what he's doing. All I'm saying is, expect problems.
Improperly indexed cam and overtightened lifters. Some idiot at the chop shop that rebuilt the car's engine forgot to index the original cam when he reground it. Then, when installing the cam, they screwed the lifters in too far.
The result was an engine that barely ran. It had a serious lope to it, heated the manifolds cherry red, and screwed the cat over because raw fuel was dumping into it. We had to pull the top end apart and give it a valve job while we got the correct factory replacement cam (though sooner or later I want to put a slightly more radical cam in, like a ZZ4...).
Hopefully this one isn't as bad, it just sounds like the owner doesn't really know what he's doing. All I'm saying is, expect problems.
And dumping raw fuel into the cat and cherry red manifolds don't go together.
#12
Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Sin City
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '86 IROC, '87 Volvo 240, '09 Malibu
Engine: LB9 5.0L
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by rjmcgee
How do you screw in lifters?
And dumping raw fuel into the cat and cherry red manifolds don't go together.
How do you screw in lifters?
And dumping raw fuel into the cat and cherry red manifolds don't go together.
As for the cat, let's just say that it was f-ed up. The engine was running far too lean, and the cat was loaded. Now that I think about it, it was probably loaded from before they rebuilt the engine -- if it was running too rich or burning oil that would have loaded it up.
The O2 sensor was what got killed because of the engine running too lean.
Anyway, I don't want to hijack this thread with a discussion about my car, I was just trying to give a friendly warning...
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Windsor Ontario Canada
Posts: 777
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 89 jaguar xjs convertable
Engine: 89 L98 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 dana 44
Who's to say the engine was even rebuilt. Could be the origional 305 thats just been beat to a pulp and never maintained.
#14
Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Albuquerque / Las Cruces, New Mexico
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 camaro z28
Engine: 6.3L, heads, headers, cam,.....
Transmission: 700-R4 w/shift kit and 3-4 WOT kit
Axle/Gears: 4.11
If I was looking at any 85 camaro for $1200 I would be more concerned about the body and undercarge of the car. I would assume that the entire engine and transmission would need a rebuild!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RedLeader289
Tech / General Engine
10
05-28-2019 01:47 PM