TPI Tuned Port Injection discussion and questions. LB9 and L98 tech, porting, tuning, and bolt-on aftermarket products.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

SuperRam rpm range?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-21-2003, 02:25 PM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
mastrdrver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SuperRam rpm range?

I'm planning on building a 400 that will rev to 6500 to 7000. Will the SuperRam be able to breathe enough to keep up, or will it die off about at 6000. Is a MR/LT1 in order for this setup?

Thanks,
Jeremy
Old 02-21-2003, 03:22 PM
  #2  
Supreme Member
 
D Stroy H8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1990 Iroc-Z
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
The superram will top out around 6,000 but that's not to say you can't port the superram yourself to make it better. The miniram and LT1 have superior topend but aren't emissions legal.
Old 02-21-2003, 06:27 PM
  #3  
Supreme Member

 
BuckeyeROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 1,054
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 2015 Camaro Z/28 & 2013 Super Bee
Engine: LS7 and 392 HEMI
As said by D Stroy H8, the SR will run out of breathe around 6000 rpm. I'd definitely port it on a 400 too. You can have a very streetable car that is easily in the 11's though. If your set on revving to 6500-7000, you will need a MR/LT1 or maybe a Stealth Ram.
Old 02-21-2003, 06:35 PM
  #4  
Member

 
jeffsbluez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 z28
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Why do you need to turn the motor that much? Do you race? The SuperRam will peak around 6500 RPM with a ton of port work and a killer set of heads on that size of motor. Good luck!

Last edited by jeffsbluez; 02-21-2003 at 06:38 PM.
Old 02-21-2003, 07:04 PM
  #5  
Supreme Member
 
D Stroy H8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1990 Iroc-Z
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Yes but who the hell wants to pay 1100 bucks for a superram and then have to put time into porting it? I say if emissions aren't a concern to you, go with the stealthram. It's very budget minded and a real bastard of an intake.
Old 02-21-2003, 07:08 PM
  #6  
Member

 
jeffsbluez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 z28
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
I totally agree with D Stroy H8. I myself am getting a stealth ram! It looks to be much easier to work on.

Last edited by jeffsbluez; 02-22-2003 at 03:36 PM.
Old 02-22-2003, 01:19 PM
  #7  
Junior Member
 
HyperSpeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: CALI
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If look at the original design of the SuperRam by Lingenfelter, the intake is all about mid-range torque. Most of his designs used matched setups to peak torque in the midrange and top out HP in the upper 5000's (basically this would be the most optimum on a heavy street driven third gen). Look at his 383 L98 with a midrange cam, ported aluminum Corvette heads, 1 3/4" headers, 58mm thottle body, and a stock SuperRam base/plenum. The torque peaks at 4500 RPM with 481 ft-lbs and his horsepower is at its max at 5250 RPM with 442 hp. Matching parts is the most important part. If you want top end hp, get an LT1 type intake like the MiniRam, a larger duration cam and some better flowing heads.
Bottom line is this: If you consider many factors, the SuperRam is the most streetable from all of the dyno numbers I have run across. With a heavy car like our Camaros and Firebirds, we need that low-midrange torque to get us going.
Whatever you do, good luck.
Old 02-22-2003, 03:35 PM
  #8  
Supreme Member

 
IROCZZ3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,053
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 87 Buick GN
Engine: 3.8L (231 cid) V6
Transmission: 200-4R
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt G80/ 3.42
7000 rpm on a 400? Carb intake converted to EFI would be my choice. When it's all said and done you probably would've spent as much as a Miniram. But IMO if you're doing a high rpm 400, price won't be a concern anymore so why skimp on the intake selection?

Last edited by IROCZZ3; 02-22-2003 at 03:39 PM.
Old 02-23-2003, 03:28 PM
  #9  
Banned
 
Ragtop89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Ragtopia
Posts: 574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My S-Rammed 355 has seen 6800 several times with no probs.

It is ported to match the big mouth manifold.

You can hear it here - http://www.lastgen.com/videos/RagtopsRide.avi

Hopefully the link still works.

A friend is hosting it for me.

I rap out the car to just under 7000 rpms several times in the vid.



Old 02-23-2003, 05:06 PM
  #10  
Supreme Member
 
D Stroy H8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1990 Iroc-Z
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Right - you portmatched it. He was asking in terms of "out of the box". Like I said - I would not buy an 1100.00 intake and then port it for performance... just seems like I could have focused funds elsewhere if I found myself in that situation. Once again - if emissions wasn't a concern I'd ditch my plans to make a "hi-flowing ltr setup" and buy a stealthram in two heartbeats! It screams value.
Old 02-23-2003, 05:11 PM
  #11  
Supreme Member
 
D Stroy H8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1990 Iroc-Z
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Hmmm, you might look into an EFI adapatation project on a carb manifold...

https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...61#post1161961

I asked how high it would rev and I imagine, well, pretty high.
Old 02-23-2003, 05:21 PM
  #12  
Banned
 
Ragtop89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Ragtopia
Posts: 574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by D Stroy H8
Right - you portmatched it. He was asking in terms of "out of the box". Like I said - I would not buy an 1100.00 intake and then port it for performance... just seems like I could have focused funds elsewhere if I found myself in that situation. Once again - if emissions wasn't a concern I'd ditch my plans to make a "hi-flowing ltr setup" and buy a stealthram in two heartbeats! It screams value.
Actually, I bought it used.

You're right - I would not buy an $1100 intake and then port it for performance. That's nuts!

I bought the ported $1100 intake for $300 from a guy that wrecked his IROC.

Made perfect sense to me!
Old 02-23-2003, 05:59 PM
  #13  
Member
 
xformula79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Hammond, In
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
7000 rpm on a 400 sounds a little wild. The bore/stoke ratio of a 400 makes it a perfect street engine to maximize torque in the low end and hp up to 6000. I wouldn't really want to spin a 400 to 7 grand simply to avoid piston side-loading which will decrease the lifespan of an engine (or at least piston rings). If you are dead set on achieving 7000 rpm, put a 350 crank, 5.7" rods, and custom pistons in that 400 block to make a higher winding 377.
Old 02-23-2003, 06:38 PM
  #14  
Supreme Member
 
'87FAKE-IROC-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 1,078
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: Damn
Engine: This
Transmission: New Stuff
Originally posted by Ragtop89
My S-Rammed 355 has seen 6800 several times with no probs.


I rap out the car to just under 7000 rpms several times in the vid.


Are you saying that you're pulling at that rpm. I too have spun my SR 357 up in the 7000 range (accidentally), and I assure you that just because it spun that high, it is not making power there.
Mine is port matched also with ported runners, that doesn't make it pull to 7k.

If you want 7000 rpm on any engine, the SR is not your prime candidate when compared to the others that are designed for that range.

Last edited by '87FAKE-IROC-Z; 02-23-2003 at 06:42 PM.
Old 02-23-2003, 07:08 PM
  #15  
Supreme Member
 
D Stroy H8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1990 Iroc-Z
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
What about the damn Carb manifold to EFI conversion? Noone said anything yet, I think that'd be a good idea. Then again, everyone is right - why are you looking to spin a 400 to 7k? Sounds like a project an eccentrist with alot of bucks would do to me. I'd be fine with a 400 that spun to 5500rpm, and plus it'll last longer.
Old 02-24-2003, 03:40 AM
  #16  
Member
Thread Starter
 
mastrdrver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I will be shifting at 6500 to 7000, don't know about the cam yet, I was just looking at my options to match the intake to the cam. Don't want to end up with a cam that would make me shift at 6500, but a intake that wouldnt let the motor breathe to those levels. I was looking at a 242/248 or 248/254 HR XE on a 400 so that was why I was asking.
Old 02-24-2003, 04:04 AM
  #17  
Banned
 
aziroc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: avondale, az
Posts: 1,147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 86 IROC-Z
Engine: 406
Transmission: 700R4
r u making ur powerband go past 5500 rpms ie u make 400 hp at 6500 rpms? if so y noy just get a damn s2000 that goes to 9k? 400's werent made to go really high in RPMS.
Old 02-24-2003, 11:09 PM
  #18  
Member
 
xformula79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Hammond, In
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Back to the topic... carb manifold to efi conversion probably a big waste of money when you can buy out of the box kits that have everything already and probably will look a hell of a lot better than some custom make-shift setup.
Old 02-25-2003, 01:07 AM
  #19  
Supreme Member
 
D Stroy H8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1990 Iroc-Z
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Right I inquired earlier in a diff. post how much one of those kits cost. If hes looking to spin to 7,000 (once again I must voice my disapproval on this crazy idea) then that would be a good choice. The best of both worlds, EFIs efficiency and a Carbs virtually limitless top-end!
Old 02-25-2003, 01:37 AM
  #20  
Senior Member

 
RedFirebird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: San Rafael, CA
Posts: 649
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1988 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 5.7L TPI (L98)
Transmission: 700RJunk
If you want a carb-style EFI manifold, get the accel pro-ram manifold. It already has the injector bungs, fuel rail provisions, etc etc......
Old 04-01-2003, 07:44 PM
  #21  
Supreme Member
 
OMINOUS_87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Mesa, AZ: Transplanted from Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
7000rpm is pretty lofty rpm for any big cube small block, that is HITHERE pretty expensive range to build into. Before intake manifolds are compared HITHERE set of heads need to be chosen and the bottom line is they better be big, like 210 or more. With set of heads that big your gonna need some serious cam like the earlier mentioned 242/248 or 248/254, but you need to get that silly HR notion off the table as the valves are gonna float like crazy above 6200rpm. Now getting to the intake, it doesnt matter what gets the nod as it will have to be ported to match those bigass heads. About the SR, no way, it doesnt matter how much you hog it out it will peak HP at 6000rpm or less on HITHERE 406 no matter what the head and cam combo is. HITHERE would vote for HITHERE converted Victor Jr or Team G, they are proven to make power in that range with big cubes.

My .02
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Zeek1041
Theoretical and Street Racing
12
09-30-2015 11:00 AM
tuningnewb
DIY PROM
3
09-23-2015 07:06 PM
R13_Braz
LTX and LSX
22
09-18-2015 05:00 PM
ULTM8Z
DIY PROM
1
09-16-2015 09:15 AM
IROCtometal
TPI
3
09-09-2015 10:01 AM



Quick Reply: SuperRam rpm range?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:47 PM.