Lightweight or Standard Flywheel/Performance vs. Drivability
#1
Lightweight or Standard Flywheel/Performance vs. Drivability
I started my thirdgen journey as many others: a desire for performance. To that end I modded my original LG4 until it was at least the equivalent of an L69, and when retirement rolled around, I threw in a 350 HO Deluxe mated with a GM lightweight flywheel (16 pounds) and an aluminum drive shaft. Did the combo live up to my expectations? You danged betcha! But...Yeah, there's always a "but." I grew to loathe engaging the clutch from a standstill, I grew to loath the lag between shifts. So? So recently I had a clutch kit installed and I replaced the lightweight flywheel with a standard 24 pounder. The result? I have a new car, one that takes off from a stop without fuss, one that shifts so smoothly that I find myself grinning like an idiot. In my seventh decade, I'm seeking drivability, which is why I tossed the Astro Van steering shaft (the noise was awful), replaced the poly trans mount (something designed for teeth-rattling vibration in the lowest regions of hell), why I set the Koni Yellows on full soft, why I...well you get the idea. My younger self was willing to ignore the price of performance; my weary older self just desires drivability. Do I regret my journey? Not a whit.
JamesC
JamesC
Last edited by JamesC; 09-09-2021 at 09:02 PM. Reason: Error
The following users liked this post:
aliceempire (09-09-2021)
#2
Supreme Member
iTrader: (4)
Re: Lightweight or Standard Flywheel/Performance vs. Drivability
If you're indeed running 3.23 rear gears, it makes good sense heavier flywheel inertia would add to better drivability.
I am of the camp that happily matched gearing is a major factor in a vehicle being a slug, or being enjoyable to drive. Trans. gearing and flywheel weight are major components of all that.
I tolerated a set of not-so-round tires 20 years ago. That's another component of learning that NVH nded not be confused with performance.
I am of the camp that happily matched gearing is a major factor in a vehicle being a slug, or being enjoyable to drive. Trans. gearing and flywheel weight are major components of all that.
I tolerated a set of not-so-round tires 20 years ago. That's another component of learning that NVH nded not be confused with performance.
#3
Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Lascassas TN
Posts: 418
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1989 IROC G92 LB9 MK6
Engine: LB9
Transmission: MK6
Axle/Gears: 3.45
Re: Lightweight or Standard Flywheel/Performance vs. Drivability
Did the 89 IROC 5 speed use the heavy or light flywheel?
#4
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
Re: Lightweight or Standard Flywheel/Performance vs. Drivability
I too considered a lightweight flywheel for my GTA when I was building it. I'm glad that in the end I decided against it.
I was considering a lightweight aluminum at 13lbs. I'm glad I didn't in the end, I would have hated the car tremendously on the street no matter how much fun it would have been on the road course.
I was considering a lightweight aluminum at 13lbs. I'm glad I didn't in the end, I would have hated the car tremendously on the street no matter how much fun it would have been on the road course.
#5
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: 212 is up in this Bit@#
Posts: 2,763
Received 739 Likes
on
565 Posts
Car: Resto-Mod 1987 IROC-Z Clone
Engine: Alky fed L92 Vortec Twin-Turbo 6.8L
Transmission: My own built/ design 4L80M
Axle/Gears: Custom 12 bolt (4.10:1)
Re: Lightweight or Standard Flywheel/Performance vs. Drivability
I personally like an extremely lightweight Fly-Wheel in a Drag-Race only vehicle...
However I absolutely hate it, for street driving.
Forget "Stop and Go" traffic.
I have the most experience (using an extremely lightweight Fly-Wheel) with a Spec brand multi-disc Clutch-System, that included the Fly-Wheel.
This was used in a 3,200 Lbs Third-Gen, with an extremely modified T56 (originally from an SSR-Truck) and the usual modified Fourth-Gen Hydraulics.
This set-up worked well on both Slicks, and the now more popular "Drag-Radials".
However I absolutely hate it, for street driving.
Forget "Stop and Go" traffic.
I have the most experience (using an extremely lightweight Fly-Wheel) with a Spec brand multi-disc Clutch-System, that included the Fly-Wheel.
This was used in a 3,200 Lbs Third-Gen, with an extremely modified T56 (originally from an SSR-Truck) and the usual modified Fourth-Gen Hydraulics.
This set-up worked well on both Slicks, and the now more popular "Drag-Radials".
#6
Member
iTrader: (1)
Re: Lightweight or Standard Flywheel/Performance vs. Drivability
@JamesC
So where did you find a heavier flywheel? I am putting a mostly stock 350 in my 88 and all I can find are the 16-20 pound wheels. I'd love to find a 24 pound that isn't crazy expensive but if I have to pony up, I will.
So where did you find a heavier flywheel? I am putting a mostly stock 350 in my 88 and all I can find are the 16-20 pound wheels. I'd love to find a 24 pound that isn't crazy expensive but if I have to pony up, I will.
Trending Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
88Roc-z
Transmissions and Drivetrain
1
10-06-2009 08:13 PM
BillD91RS
Transmissions and Drivetrain
2
09-03-2002 11:26 AM