V6 Discussion and questions about the base carbureted or MPFI V6's and the rare SFI Turbo V6.

Damaged ECM??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-17-2004, 01:10 AM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
3.1RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Washington, Seattle
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1 MPFI
Transmission: 700R4
Damaged ECM??

Can you damage your ecm from jump starting your car with the key in the on position??
Old 11-17-2004, 04:43 AM
  #2  
Member
 
Jerriko 3.4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Rockford, IL
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1987 Firebird Formula
Engine: 3.4L 207 V6
Transmission: T5 W/C
It's possible but not likely. Are kind of problems are you having to make you think your ECM is bad?
Old 11-17-2004, 01:11 PM
  #3  
Member
Thread Starter
 
3.1RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Washington, Seattle
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1 MPFI
Transmission: 700R4
Well my o2 sensor is sending a rich running signal yet the fuel trim lowering and trying to make the mixture even richer.... if that makes sense. It runs bad at idle and has a slight misfire at mid rpms. Ive checked everything else and thats all i can think of. Do you have any other ideas?
Old 11-17-2004, 01:35 PM
  #4  
Member
 
Jerriko 3.4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Rockford, IL
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1987 Firebird Formula
Engine: 3.4L 207 V6
Transmission: T5 W/C
Originally posted by 3.1RS
Well my o2 sensor is sending a rich running signal yet the fuel trim lowering and trying to make the mixture even richer.... if that makes sense. It runs bad at idle and has a slight misfire at mid rpms. Ive checked everything else and thats all i can think of. Do you have any other ideas?
Is it throwing any codes? How do you know that you are getting a rich signal from the O2? How do you know that fuel trim is trying to make the mixture rich?
Old 11-17-2004, 02:45 PM
  #5  
Member
Thread Starter
 
3.1RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Washington, Seattle
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1 MPFI
Transmission: 700R4
No its not throwing any codes and i know that information because i hooked a GM tech 2 up to the diagnotics port and looked at the data stream.
Old 11-19-2004, 02:30 PM
  #6  
Member
Thread Starter
 
3.1RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Washington, Seattle
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1 MPFI
Transmission: 700R4
Anybody??
Old 11-19-2004, 02:33 PM
  #7  
Supreme Member
 
kretos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: surrey b.c. canada
Posts: 3,383
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 89 Iroc
Engine: lb9
Transmission: wc t-5
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.08 posi
i highly doubt your ecm is screwed
Old 11-19-2004, 03:21 PM
  #8  
Member
 
Jerriko 3.4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Rockford, IL
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1987 Firebird Formula
Engine: 3.4L 207 V6
Transmission: T5 W/C
Originally posted by 3.1RS
No its not throwing any codes and i know that information because i hooked a GM tech 2 up to the diagnotics port and looked at the data stream.
OBD I setups aren't always accurate at diagnosing O2 sensors. The voltage on the scantool isn't update fast enough for you to get a good picture. You need a wideband. Just because the scantool switches back from lean to rich doesn't mean that's what the engine is actually doing. That's just what the computer is trying to do. The easiest way to proceed is to unplug sensor one at a time with the engine running. When the engine runs better, odds are that is the problem area.
Old 11-19-2004, 05:49 PM
  #9  
Member
Thread Starter
 
3.1RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Washington, Seattle
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1 MPFI
Transmission: 700R4
do that to all the sensors??
Old 11-19-2004, 06:27 PM
  #10  
Member
 
Jerriko 3.4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Rockford, IL
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1987 Firebird Formula
Engine: 3.4L 207 V6
Transmission: T5 W/C
Originally posted by 3.1RS
do that to all the sensors??
Yes, but one at a time. I would start with your MAF/MAP and then the TPS.
Old 11-24-2004, 03:27 PM
  #11  
Supreme Member

 
redraif's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Moved... GA still, more garage space!
Posts: 3,266
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 87 Red/Blk Bird loaded 3.4L & 700R4
Transmission: Th700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Originally posted by kretos
i highly doubt your ecm is screwed
Not that is is not possible...I'm on my 3rd. First one was a starting issue. 2nd threw a code and ran like crap. 3rd so far so good. This was all in the course of a year!
Old 11-24-2004, 04:11 PM
  #12  
Member
 
Jerriko 3.4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Rockford, IL
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1987 Firebird Formula
Engine: 3.4L 207 V6
Transmission: T5 W/C
Originally posted by redraif
Not that is is not possible...I'm on my 3rd. First one was a starting issue. 2nd threw a code and ran like crap. 3rd so far so good. This was all in the course of a year!
If you had tried using an ecm with a different burn number, it would run odd. The difference between a 7302 for an automatic and a 7302 for a manual for example.
Old 11-24-2004, 04:17 PM
  #13  
Supreme Member

 
TomP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Central NJ, USA
Posts: 13,414
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Car: 1986 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 V6
Transmission: 700R4
Only thing I'm aware of that could get damaged is the spark module in the distributor... but that's usually if you leave the key in the "on"/test lights/play radio position with the engine off for a long time. Supposedly the ignition module can overheat.

Did all of this happen today? What I'm getting at is, if your battery ran down to crap, and you jumped it, and the battery's okay now, then maybe you just need to reset the computer and go for a long drive so the ECM can re-learn the car.

It's my experience that the ECM will take a lonnng time to re-learn the car if you drive around down; I gotta take my car up on the highway for it to act right (I drive a half hour away, then a half hour to get back home, and I'm good to go).

Of course, none of that makes sense if you're throwing a computer code.
Old 11-24-2004, 04:22 PM
  #14  
Supreme Member

 
Gumby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NWOhioToledoArea
Posts: 8,113
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Car: 86-FireBird
Engine: -MPFI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Re: Damaged ECM??

Originally posted by 3.1RS
Can you damage your ecm from jump starting your car with the key in the on position??
Not quite sure how you mean that??? How else could you jump start it without the key being on???

But since these computer powered cars have came out most manuals and even sticker under the hood say to only hook up the positive to the battery. The negative or ground should be hook to something metal on the engine. It also seams to work better / jump start a car better.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
no green
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
11
01-09-2016 09:22 PM
Bubbajones_ya
Auto Detailing and Appearance
24
10-25-2015 08:01 PM
TheCardinal
Interior Parts Wanted
4
10-09-2015 09:43 PM
88CamZ
Engine Swap
9
10-08-2015 10:29 AM
Galaxie500XL
Suspension and Chassis
2
10-01-2015 01:05 PM



Quick Reply: Damaged ECM??



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:04 PM.