Two questions for the masters!!!!
01-12-2005, 08:40 PM
#1
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 Pontiac Trans Am
Engine: 383 Stroker
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: Borg Warner 9-Bolt, with 3.42 Gears
Two questions for the masters!!!!
Question 1:
My water pump is about to take a dump and I was wondering if any company made a high performance one?
Question 2:
I have a laptop computer. Could you guys and gals tell me what software and what cables I would need so I can tune my car in the future?
All of you help is very apprecciated.
My water pump is about to take a dump and I was wondering if any company made a high performance one?
Question 2:
I have a laptop computer. Could you guys and gals tell me what software and what cables I would need so I can tune my car in the future?
All of you help is very apprecciated.
01-12-2005, 08:46 PM
#2
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: AR
Posts: 6,819
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS Vert
Engine: 350 S-TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: GU5/G80/J65
I really havent found a true high performance one. I found one that claimed to more more gpm, but I cant really notice it.
Since you have a 90-92 that uses the 7730 ECM, nobody has made a program to read the v6 ECM. Member here "Pasky" was working on one, and I was trying to assist. Never did get one that connected properly.
Since you have a 90-92 that uses the 7730 ECM, nobody has made a program to read the v6 ECM. Member here "Pasky" was working on one, and I was trying to assist. Never did get one that connected properly.
01-12-2005, 09:28 PM
#3
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Plano, Texas
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1986 Pontiac Firebird
Engine: 173, 2.8litre MPFI V6
Transmission: 700R4
You might Try www.jegs.com. They probably have what you are looking for. As for comp programs. It was rummored a few years ago that Popular Mechanice and writted several CDs that had everything anyone could ever need for car service. You might see if you can still find one
01-12-2005, 10:21 PM
#5
Supreme Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
Correct - TunerPro R/T will read the .730, and modify it.
To burn chips, I'd suggest the GP1 and FnB from Moates.net!
To burn chips, I'd suggest the GP1 and FnB from Moates.net!
01-12-2005, 10:55 PM
#6
Supreme Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 86 Berlinetta 84 MonteCL
Engine: 3.4 MPFI 3.8 229
Transmission: 700r4 T350
What about the MAF ecms? What software do I use?
I ahve the ALDL thingy, burner, laptop and a few pieces of software
I ahve the ALDL thingy, burner, laptop and a few pieces of software
01-12-2005, 10:59 PM
#7
Supreme Member
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Tucson, AZ, USA
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '99 Trans Am, '86 Camaro
Engine: LS1, Scrap
Transmission: T56, T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Stock ZT, 3.42 Open
So far as I have found, the 7302 guys are stuck using Diacom and TunerCATS. Supposedly WinALDL will work with the 2.8s, but I haven't gotten it to communicate quite yet (haven't tried very hard either, though)
Trending Topics
01-12-2005, 11:01 PM
#8
Supreme Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
'302 uses WinAldl, but you have to ignore the data coming through - it reads it fine, but screws up teh conversion.
I've been using the RAW output, and converting myself!
I've been using the RAW output, and converting myself!
01-12-2005, 11:11 PM
#9
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Yes I'm Dean
Posts: 1,238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Agood2.8,
Engine: V6rsr,
Transmission: Afrikingoodtime
Airtex makes a good waterpump for our cars. The impellor is nicer than the Delco units. Its what I'm using currently and gets very good flow. I will be swapping out soon though for an electric pump (custom setup) so the motor robs less power.
w/b! 
01-13-2005, 09:17 AM
#11
Supreme Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Bonner Springs, KS
Posts: 1,751
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: 1995 Corvette
Engine: LT1
Transmission: 6 spd Manual
Axle/Gears: Dana 44, 3:45:1
I've made a .ads for a '91-'94 3.1L LH0 motor (uses the $A1 code mask on a 7730).. You can create one from the datastream definitions... Is there still not a .ads for use with 90-92 F-body V6's in TunerPro RT??? If not, I'll make one... Somebody will have to test it though, as I don't have a V6 f-body..
01-14-2005, 05:36 PM
#14
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 5.0L TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.73
Originally posted by thirdgen88
I've made a .ads for a '91-'94 3.1L LH0 motor (uses the $A1 code mask on a 7730).. You can create one from the datastream definitions... Is there still not a .ads for use with 90-92 F-body V6's in TunerPro RT??? If not, I'll make one... Somebody will have to test it though, as I don't have a V6 f-body..
I've made a .ads for a '91-'94 3.1L LH0 motor (uses the $A1 code mask on a 7730).. You can create one from the datastream definitions... Is there still not a .ads for use with 90-92 F-body V6's in TunerPro RT??? If not, I'll make one... Somebody will have to test it though, as I don't have a V6 f-body..
How about an ADS for the 1227302 used on the 2.8L cars?
01-14-2005, 05:40 PM
#15
Supreme Member
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Tucson, AZ, USA
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '99 Trans Am, '86 Camaro
Engine: LS1, Scrap
Transmission: T56, T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Stock ZT, 3.42 Open
Originally posted by LinuxGuy
How about an ADS for the 1227302 used on the 2.8L cars?
How about an ADS for the 1227302 used on the 2.8L cars?
01-14-2005, 06:05 PM
#16
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 5.0L TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.73
I took a peak at the ALDL Definition editing in TunerPro R/T. If Doward could send the data he has my way, I wouldn't mind playing around with it to see if I could get something going...
I did find a generalized stream definition in ALDLstuff.zip at ftp.diy-efi.org/pub/gmecm - file A20 in the ZIP, but I would like all the info I can get.
I did find a generalized stream definition in ALDLstuff.zip at ftp.diy-efi.org/pub/gmecm - file A20 in the ZIP, but I would like all the info I can get.
Last edited by LinuxGuy; 01-15-2005 at 02:21 AM.
01-14-2005, 06:14 PM
#17
Supreme Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
Originally posted by TechSmurf
Doward has the info to do this (what variables are where in the stream and the conversion calculations).. just need to modify one of the existing 160 baud stream definitions to suit.
Doward has the info to do this (what variables are where in the stream and the conversion calculations).. just need to modify one of the existing 160 baud stream definitions to suit.
01-15-2005, 02:20 AM
#18
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 5.0L TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.73
Originally posted by Doward
Already done, but the 160 baud in the current TunerPro is... flaky... at best. I already spoke with Mark about it - it'll be coming either in TunerPro 4, or shortly after, in an update.
Already done, but the 160 baud in the current TunerPro is... flaky... at best. I already spoke with Mark about it - it'll be coming either in TunerPro 4, or shortly after, in an update.
01-15-2005, 06:17 AM
#19
Supreme Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Bonner Springs, KS
Posts: 1,751
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: 1995 Corvette
Engine: LT1
Transmission: 6 spd Manual
Axle/Gears: Dana 44, 3:45:1
160 baud support will be better in Tunerpro 4... I'll see if I can make a .ads for that; you can test, correct?
01-15-2005, 07:59 AM
#20
Supreme Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
Originally posted by LinuxGuy
So you mean to say that you've made a 1227302 ALDL Stream Definition and it will be available upon the next release of TunerPro?
So you mean to say that you've made a 1227302 ALDL Stream Definition and it will be available upon the next release of TunerPro?
01-15-2005, 11:48 PM
#21
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 5.0L TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.73
Originally posted by thirdgen88
160 baud support will be better in Tunerpro 4... I'll see if I can make a .ads for that; you can test, correct?
160 baud support will be better in Tunerpro 4... I'll see if I can make a .ads for that; you can test, correct?
Originally posted by Doward
Correct - I've already got a .ads built of the full '302 datastream.
Correct - I've already got a .ads built of the full '302 datastream.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
