Computer cams
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
From: Waco texas
Car: 2004 Chevy Malibu/1988 Iroc Z
Engine: 3.5 v6 Malibu, and 305 camaro
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3:45
Computer cams
Hi fellas, after a failed google search I would like to ask what does a computer compatible cam entail that a regular cam doesn't? I have a lb9, but I'm swapping it for a 880block and 906 heads (hopefully with a modified lt1 intake for compatibility). I got quoted for a 3-400 dyno tune. Once again however, what does the computer compatible part mean?
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,089
Likes: 125
From: SALEM, NH
Car: '88 Formula
Engine: LC9
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.89 9"
Re: Computer cams
Hi fellas, after a failed google search I would like to ask what does a computer compatible cam entail that a regular cam doesn't? I have a lb9, but I'm swapping it for a 880block and 906 heads (hopefully with a modified lt1 intake for compatibility). I got quoted for a 3-400 dyno tune. Once again however, what does the computer compatible part mean?
-- Joe
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
From: Waco texas
Car: 2004 Chevy Malibu/1988 Iroc Z
Engine: 3.5 v6 Malibu, and 305 camaro
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3:45
Re: Computer cams
So one that's not computer compatible would definitely require a custom tune?
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,089
Likes: 125
From: SALEM, NH
Car: '88 Formula
Engine: LC9
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.89 9"
Re: Computer cams
Those heads have a .460 lift limit unless you are having someone machine the pockets, re-valve it, and run comp 987 springs. Keep that in mind when choosing a cam.
Assuming the heads were done right, I'd be running a comp 08-503-8 cam, high 9s compression to 10:1, a good tune. Should make over 400hp.
-- Joe
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
From: Waco texas
Car: 2004 Chevy Malibu/1988 Iroc Z
Engine: 3.5 v6 Malibu, and 305 camaro
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3:45
Re: Computer cams
I'm doing a little head work and hopefully the lt1 intake is someone around here will mod it for me. As well as headers and exhaust. Around 10.5 to 11 compression (so premium gas) but the duration on that cam seems like it would have a lot of overlap (granted I'm new to this with limited knowledge, feel free to correct me if wrong). I don't want to completely destroy my gas mileage. So maybe an lt4 hot cam with 1.5 rockers? If my memory serves me right it doesn't have such tremendous overlap (relatively speaking fir a street car). What's the power band of that hot cam? Do you think it's a good choice?
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
From: Waco texas
Car: 2004 Chevy Malibu/1988 Iroc Z
Engine: 3.5 v6 Malibu, and 305 camaro
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3:45
Re: Computer cams
By Head work I meant port and polish. Also the intake. Eventually a bigger TB, but not at first.
Trending Topics
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,089
Likes: 125
From: SALEM, NH
Car: '88 Formula
Engine: LC9
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.89 9"
Re: Computer cams
The more static compression you run the more overlap you will need to bleed off otherwise you'll be fighting detonation.
The LT1 intake isn't a great idea. You'll need to redrill the bolt pattern, then get the distributor mount hold and hold down in the rear. Then you'll need to modify your heads for water ports, then run a remote thermostat housing. You'll end up chasing air bubbles for a while until you get them all out of the system, and probably pay more money in the end than a used HSR.
-- Joe
The LT1 intake isn't a great idea. You'll need to redrill the bolt pattern, then get the distributor mount hold and hold down in the rear. Then you'll need to modify your heads for water ports, then run a remote thermostat housing. You'll end up chasing air bubbles for a while until you get them all out of the system, and probably pay more money in the end than a used HSR.
-- Joe
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
From: Waco texas
Car: 2004 Chevy Malibu/1988 Iroc Z
Engine: 3.5 v6 Malibu, and 305 camaro
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3:45
Re: Computer cams
Ok, I guess I could also just got aftermarket runners for the tpi and port the base plate
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,089
Likes: 125
From: SALEM, NH
Car: '88 Formula
Engine: LC9
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.89 9"
Member
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
From: Delaware
Car: 92 Firebird, 91 Trans Am
Engine: L31 with HSR, LB9
Transmission: 700R4, 700R4
Axle/Gears: '99 10 bolt 3.90, '01 10 bolt 3.42
Re: Computer cams
Just shell out the cash for the HSR, its worth it. I'd go with the 08-503-8 cam rather than the LT4 hot cam. I've never been satisfied with the power it made in my HSR vortec 350, and I'm running 10.6:1 compression.
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
From: Waco texas
Car: 2004 Chevy Malibu/1988 Iroc Z
Engine: 3.5 v6 Malibu, and 305 camaro
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3:45
Re: Computer cams
I would love a hsr or simiar. But I never see many on ebay. This is a budget build. Hoping for 350rwhp. What do you guys think of a aftermarket runners/ported base? Does it make my goal harder to achieve?
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
From: Waco texas
Car: 2004 Chevy Malibu/1988 Iroc Z
Engine: 3.5 v6 Malibu, and 305 camaro
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3:45
Re: Computer cams
Another question. I've never owned a carbureted car (I'm a 20 yr old college student with a limited knowledge, and a desire to learn, with champagne ideas and beer money haha) and I see these high rise EFI intakes. They look like they're made for a carb, but they have 8 injector sockets. How do these work? How or what type of throttle body do you use?
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,089
Likes: 125
From: SALEM, NH
Car: '88 Formula
Engine: LC9
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.89 9"
Re: Computer cams
Another question. I've never owned a carbureted car (I'm a 20 yr old college student with a limited knowledge, and a desire to learn, with champagne ideas and beer money haha) and I see these high rise EFI intakes. They look like they're made for a carb, but they have 8 injector sockets. How do these work? How or what type of throttle body do you use?
-- Joe
Member
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
From: Delaware
Car: 92 Firebird, 91 Trans Am
Engine: L31 with HSR, LB9
Transmission: 700R4, 700R4
Axle/Gears: '99 10 bolt 3.90, '01 10 bolt 3.42
Re: Computer cams
Aftermarket TPI components are going to run you close to what a Stealth Ram will cost you. 350 RWHP is going to be difficult with TPI unless you want to run high compression and a heavy cam or stroke it. Going with a carb will probably save you some money, but I'd stick to TPI if possible.
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
From: Waco texas
Car: 2004 Chevy Malibu/1988 Iroc Z
Engine: 3.5 v6 Malibu, and 305 camaro
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3:45
Re: Computer cams
Crap... Your right. I keep forgetting the bolt pattern difference... But I wasn't aware they made a Hsr or mini ram for the l31 heads? The only intake I hear about for it is the marine intake....
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,643
Likes: 50
From: Manitoba
Car: '91 GTA
Engine: 421sbc
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9" with 3.89
Re: Computer cams
I actually googled something similar yesterday.
But I was looking for any computer compatible cams that would be solid flat cam.
I currently have a xfi280 flat tappet cam with my sbc400. I had it on my previous engine (sbc 383, with 11-1 compression and made 377rwhp with 1 5/8 shorty headers)
Anyone try a solid flat cam with a computer controlled car? (I have the stock tpi speed density )
But I was looking for any computer compatible cams that would be solid flat cam.
I currently have a xfi280 flat tappet cam with my sbc400. I had it on my previous engine (sbc 383, with 11-1 compression and made 377rwhp with 1 5/8 shorty headers)
Anyone try a solid flat cam with a computer controlled car? (I have the stock tpi speed density )
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
From: Waco texas
Car: 2004 Chevy Malibu/1988 Iroc Z
Engine: 3.5 v6 Malibu, and 305 camaro
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3:45
Re: Computer cams
With the benefits of roller lifters and roller cams, idk why flat tappet still exists. I can't answer your question. I'de PM anesthes tho, that man knows his stuff, he didn't fall off the cabbage wagon yesterday.
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,643
Likes: 50
From: Manitoba
Car: '91 GTA
Engine: 421sbc
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9" with 3.89
Re: Computer cams
Money! That's the only reason why I went with flat tappet.
It would be another $800+ to get a roller cam with roller lifters
It would be another $800+ to get a roller cam with roller lifters
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
From: Waco texas
Car: 2004 Chevy Malibu/1988 Iroc Z
Engine: 3.5 v6 Malibu, and 305 camaro
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3:45
Re: Computer cams
True. Well I have a l31 short block and some 906 heads if your interested!
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,643
Likes: 50
From: Manitoba
Car: '91 GTA
Engine: 421sbc
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9" with 3.89
Re: Computer cams
Did some more searching and found my own thread that I forgot about. D'oh
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/tech...olid-flat.html
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/tech...olid-flat.html
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post











