Auto Detailing and Appearance Share tips and tricks on how to make your Third Gen shine! Get opinions on products or how something tasteful looks on your Chevrolet Camaro or Pontiac Firebird.

What do you think of my car lowered?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 23, 2003 | 11:21 AM
  #1  
IROC57TPI's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 936
Likes: 0
From: Motor City born and raised
What do you think of my car lowered?

Too low?
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2003 | 11:22 AM
  #2  
IROC57TPI's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 936
Likes: 0
From: Motor City born and raised
Might help if I put the pic up
Attached Thumbnails What do you think of my car lowered?-leftsidelow.jpg  
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2003 | 11:22 AM
  #3  
MdFormula350's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 11,634
Likes: 3
From: Maryland; USA
never mind, thats pretty low! do the tires rub?

Last edited by MdFormula350; Jan 23, 2003 at 11:25 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2003 | 11:24 AM
  #4  
91Bird305's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 2,977
Likes: 1
From: Davison / Troy ,Michigan
Car: 1991 Pontiac Firebird
Engine: 3.8
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: Dana 60
thats too low.
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2003 | 11:44 AM
  #5  
deadtrend1's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,509
Likes: 0
From: Maple Shade, NJ
if you put it that low, how would you get over speed bumps without sea-sawing them?
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2003 | 11:49 AM
  #6  
Viprklr's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,462
Likes: 4
From: N. Illinois
Car: 92 GTA/ 00 TA
Engine: 383/350
Transmission: 700R4/T-56
too low.
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2003 | 12:15 PM
  #7  
TransAm12sec's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,076
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Car: 1982 Trans Am
Engine: LG4
Transmission: 200C
Axle/Gears: 3:73
Ehh, its not bad imo. Maybe a different wheel size and tire combo would help.

Lets see if from the front.
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2003 | 12:26 PM
  #8  
Cruzin Kaz's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,331
Likes: 0
From: Welland, Ontario, Canada
Car: 85 Monte Carlo SS...
Engine: T.P.I L98.
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 3:73 Posi
Yeah a bit to low.. I can see you replaceing GFX really soon at that ride height. Looks cool but...
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2003 | 12:35 PM
  #9  
uk89camaro's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 749
Likes: 0
From: Midlands, UK
Looks good to me

it that achieved through lowered springs? Can the 3rdgens get air suspension?
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2003 | 12:37 PM
  #10  
devianb's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,029
Likes: 6
From: Illinois
Car: 1988 Trans Am
Engine: 305 TPI
In my opinion, a perfect dropped stance is when there is zero a just a tad bit of a gap between the top the the tire and the fender. What you seem to have is a negative ride height where the wheels looked tucked under the lip. I don't like that look. It is a bit low for me. I would rather take the stock ride height than have it slammed that much.
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2003 | 01:08 PM
  #11  
louie's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From: Sioux Falls, SD
Car: 91 Firebird
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700r4
Look good, now you should think about bigger rims and some low-pro tire, maybe.
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2003 | 01:10 PM
  #12  
bluegrassz's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,449
Likes: 7
From: LONDON, KY
Car: Camaro
Engine: Carbed L98
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Would be nice if you were running air bags. With the option to raise it. But yeah, for car shows or just sitting around in the parking lot it looks good that low.
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2003 | 02:45 PM
  #13  
Sonar_un's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,201
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Car: '86 T/A
Engine: 350/LT1 Intake
Transmission: 700R4 - Built
Axle/Gears: 4th gen 3.42
Yeah, its a little too low, and an obvious photoshop jobbie too :P
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2003 | 02:46 PM
  #14  
Scania's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,017
Likes: 1
From: Uppsala Sweden
Car: 1989 Corvette
Engine: 350 Tpi
Transmission: ZF 6 speed
Axle/Gears: Dana 44 3,33
Looks good to me.
I want to do that to my car
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2003 | 06:22 PM
  #15  
Kandied91z's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 13,039
Likes: 0
From: michigan
you went and looked at my car didn't you.............
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2003 | 09:27 PM
  #16  
'89 IROC Vert's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 358
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Texas
Looks to me like you could still drop another 2 inches before reaching the ground. I'm gonna go against the tide - drop it some more.
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2003 | 09:50 PM
  #17  
scrawnywhiteguy's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburg, CA
I think I like the look of it that low, not very good for driving around though, I'd say w/ airbags it'd be cool, cause you could slam it when your parked and raise it back up when you're driving around. I for one wouldn't ever lower a car that much, unless it was gonna be a show car.


:hail:Tim
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2003 | 09:54 PM
  #18  
WillWood's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
From: Millersville, Md
Car: 1966 Volkswagen Beetle
Engine: Flat-4
Transmission: swing axle
thats way too low
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2003 | 09:58 PM
  #19  
85SportCoupeto89RS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 2,760
Likes: 0
From: Cove, Arkansas
Car: 85 Camaro SC
Engine: V6
Transmission: 700r4
Raise it up about 1.5 to 2.0 inches and it will be perfect. Soon I will be lowering my car as soon as I raise the funds for the project.
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2003 | 10:15 PM
  #20  
MetalliCamaroRS's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 8,030
Likes: 1
Car: 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: 383 stroker
Transmission: 700R4 3500 stall, TransGo shift kit
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 4.11:1
I think it looks too low.
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2003 | 10:17 PM
  #21  
IROC57TPI's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 936
Likes: 0
From: Motor City born and raised
Ok...its low
Good thing its P.S.'d but I am going to get a set of springs this summer and don't want to go too low.

Thanks for all the comments.
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2003 | 11:59 PM
  #22  
Sickness91Z28's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,226
Likes: 6
From: Chesterfield, Indiana
Car: 1991 Z28 Camaro
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: Jasper 700R4 Stage II
Axle/Gears: 3.23 For Now
yeah...that looks to low. Id go with a 1 3/4 inch drop...they look great dropped about that much.....here is a pic of my old 84 Z28 )1992 Z28 clone) Had it lower 1 3/4 inch with Eibach Sport Line Springs....it looked very aggressive!
Attached Thumbnails What do you think of my car lowered?-shawns1984z28.jpg  
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2003 | 12:08 AM
  #23  
Squeeks83's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 973
Likes: 0
From: Avondale, AZ, used to be seattle, washington
Car: 1978 Chevrolet C10
Engine: 350
Transmission: Turbo 350
thats a good photoshop, but it would look sweet that low, just would get highcentered on pot holes
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2003 | 04:55 PM
  #24  
z28onTweenkies's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 673
Likes: 0
From: Northern California
Car: 1992 Camaro Z28 & 2k3 Cadillac CTS
Engine: LB9
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3:43
Geez I really thought that was an actual picture its the first picture of an iroc thats lower then mine in the front. I still havent taken pictures of the iroc yet becuase im lazy but I tuck the 245-45-16's that are on the car right now (in the front). The rear might have been lowered a bit i'm not sure but it has a little bit of a rake. And yes, I need to replace my front spoiler its taken quite a few on the chin from the previous owner.
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2003 | 12:37 PM
  #25  
TexasLT1's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,819
Likes: 3
From: Angleton, TX
Car: '92 RS
trust me when I say you do not want it that low. When I first got my car the guy before me had cut the springs so low that it was seriously no travel in the front suspension. To reach the top of the tire under the fender you had to reach up and under the edge of the fender atleast an inch. The ride sucked, felt like an indy car, plus I couldn't drive over anything. By lowering it that low it sudeenly becomes a pain in the *** to drive it because you are always worried about scaping on something or ripping off the ground effects or something.
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2003 | 02:43 PM
  #26  
SMURFN' Z28's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,602
Likes: 0
From: Lakewood, CO
Car: 1994 Jeep Wrangler
Originally posted by '89 IROC Vert
Looks to me like you could still drop another 2 inches before reaching the ground. I'm gonna go against the tide - drop it some more.
you gotta be kidding me....
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2003 | 02:50 PM
  #27  
87LB9B4Z's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Car: See ID
Engine: See ID
Transmission: M39
I agree with devianb. Just the tiniest gap above the wheels.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2003 | 10:47 AM
  #28  
roxieshotrod's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
From: Hamilton, MI
Car: '91 RS
Engine: 383
Transmission: Turbo 350
lay that baby on the ground (with air bags of course)! my hubbys s10 lays frame now (his winter project) and it looks SO nice. I never used to like things that low, but it grows on ya, and now I want to do it to mine next winter.. that is if I win the lotto. Air bags rule!
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2003 | 11:26 AM
  #29  
Andy Fanshawe's Avatar
Senior Member
25 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 796
Likes: 0
From: Derbyshire, United Kingdom
Car: 91 camaro rs
Engine: 350
Transmission: T5
Is there such a thing as too low? Surely not.

:hail: :hail: :hail: :hail:
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2003 | 11:32 AM
  #30  
brodyscamaro's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,144
Likes: 2
From: CC, TX
Car: 1999 Yamaha Banshee
Engine: 379cc twin cyl 2-stroke stroker
Transmission: 6 spd manual
Axle/Gears: 14/41 tooth
i agree with devianb just the tiniest gap
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2003 | 11:33 AM
  #31  
fast83camaro's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 839
Likes: 0
From: Valley Head, AL
Car: 1983 Camaro "SC-350"
Engine: Mild 350 4-bolt
Transmission: 700R4 w/ TCI Stall
Too low.....
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2003 | 11:34 AM
  #32  
Andy Fanshawe's Avatar
Senior Member
25 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 796
Likes: 0
From: Derbyshire, United Kingdom
Car: 91 camaro rs
Engine: 350
Transmission: T5
uk89camaro
Watch my red Camaro's web site for an answer to your question "Can the 3rdgens get air suspension?"

He he!!
How low can you go?

Andy.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2003 | 12:25 PM
  #33  
iroc2nv's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,951
Likes: 1
From: pefferlaw ontario
Car: 1987 iroc-z custom
Engine: 355 tuned port
Transmission: 5spd baby, only way to go
Axle/Gears: 3.45
i love it...

i wish that i could go lower with mine...(almost a 5 inch drop front and 4 on the back)

but the damned roads here are not forgiving when it comes to bumps...

i have to do it right and get sportlines...maybe even konis...depending on if they actually help lower the car...any ideas on the konis??

sorry to highjack your thread dude..

i say do it though

iroc2nv
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2003 | 04:23 PM
  #34  
87WS6's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,565
Likes: 10
From: Texas
Car: 1992 Formula Firebird
Engine: 305CID (LB9)
Transmission: World Class T5
Axle/Gears: 10-bolt, 4.10 gears
I think you should raise it a little bit. I don't typically like lowered cars especially when it's that far down. If your rubbing fenders you need to raise it.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2003 | 04:31 PM
  #35  
johnyIROC's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,364
Likes: 4
From: London, Ontario, CANADA
I _LOVE_ the look of a slammed thirdgen... but driveability would be an issue. I had my car low enough at one point that you couldn't roll a pop can under the chin spoiler.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2003 | 08:26 PM
  #36  
TorchRay's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 704
Likes: 0
From: Granby, Ma US
Car: 89 WS6 Formula
Engine: 305 TPI w/ some mods done
Transmission: Modified THM700R4
yeah to low for my taste....IMO though......your car dude....make it the way you like it.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2003 | 12:17 PM
  #37  
formul8!!'s Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,609
Likes: 0
From: www.thirdgentech.com
Car: 2004 GTO
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T-56
Go start collecting IROC front nose clips, you'll need them if it is that low.

Also, if you notice when a car is "slammed"like that, the ride becomes very uncomfortable because of no suspension travel.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2003 | 02:25 PM
  #38  
FyreLance's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,445
Likes: 1
From: Huber Heights, OH
Car: 00 TA, 91 Formula, 89 RS
Engine: LS1 / 305 / 2.8, respectively
Transmission: T-56 / auto / auto
Looks cool but probably pretty impractical.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2003 | 02:25 PM
  #39  
Dale's Avatar
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,819
Likes: 3
From: AR
Car: 1991 Camaro RS Vert
Engine: 350 S-TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: GU5/G80/J65
Yea, needs to go lower If its not throwing sparks, its not low enough!!!!!

True mini trucker, lol.

But on serious note, if its dialy driver, that is two low. Whoever said tire even with fender lip, or finger between tire/fender lip is right. Best for ride and apperence.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2003 | 05:28 PM
  #40  
Kandied91z's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 13,039
Likes: 0
From: michigan
you sure are getting some opinions mike!

i say go lower.........cut the fenders and rework the suspension so you can sit the frame on the ground! who needs gfx's...
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2003 | 10:20 PM
  #41  
denis's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Car: 80 Z28
Engine: just another 350
Transmission: th350
Perfect!

now can someone Photochop a white formula like that?

much appreciated

Last edited by denis; Jan 28, 2003 at 10:35 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2003 | 07:12 AM
  #42  
camaro3's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: Thorold, Ontario, Canada
Car: 88 IROC-Z
Engine: none
Transmission: none
Its nice but you might not like it.

I own a '88 IROC-Z and mine islower then that. I am tucking 45 series tires int he front on stock 16"IROC-Z Wheels, and in the rear about .5" away from tucking 55 series. I Chopped my springs, cutting 1 1/2 Coils out of the front & 3 in the rear. The car rode pretty good, but I lost a ****load of turning radius, and it bottoms out alot, and what will really hit that low is your cat, you can gurantee it. Another thing, have fun jacking it up or getting it on a hoist. You cant just lift it, you have to jack it up from the horns on the front & behind the rear tire on the pinch weld. It ****ing handles mint though, but I am redoing my whole car, and for this spring I plan to have the Eibach Drag Spring kit installed.
Attached Thumbnails What do you think of my car lowered?-front.jpg  
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2003 | 08:48 AM
  #43  
Steve89GTA's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,566
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, Ont
You'll have serious traction problems going that low. The car might look good parked but it won't look so hot when a civic si takes you off the line cause you can't put the power down and hook up!
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2003 | 09:47 AM
  #44  
Zepher's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 7,964
Likes: 4
From: Norfolk, VA. USA
Car: 86 Trans Am, 88 Formula
Engine: 95LT4, 305TPI
Transmission: T56, T5
This is a good height,







(I know, I am picture post *****)

Last edited by Zepher; Feb 11, 2003 at 09:53 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2003 | 11:43 AM
  #45  
Knight350's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 205
Likes: 1
From: Rexdale, Toronto
Looks amazing, but it will ride like a box cart!
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2003 | 02:17 PM
  #46  
denis's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Car: 80 Z28
Engine: just another 350
Transmission: th350
Zepher,
what did you have to do in order to fit those particular 4th gen rims under your car?
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2003 | 02:41 PM
  #47  
wkeilnj's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
From: Monmouth NJ
IMO the lower the better!
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2003 | 08:39 PM
  #48  
Zepher's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 7,964
Likes: 4
From: Norfolk, VA. USA
Car: 86 Trans Am, 88 Formula
Engine: 95LT4, 305TPI
Transmission: T56, T5
Originally posted by denis
Zepher,
what did you have to do in order to fit those particular 4th gen rims under your car?
I put 2.25" wheel adaptors on all 4 corners. I didn't need that size for the rear, but I knew that I was getting a 4th gen rear and that it would be easier to sell 2 wheel adaptors sized for the front.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2003 | 09:35 PM
  #49  
iroc2nv's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,951
Likes: 1
From: pefferlaw ontario
Car: 1987 iroc-z custom
Engine: 355 tuned port
Transmission: 5spd baby, only way to go
Axle/Gears: 3.45
heres what mine looked like last year...ive changed it since...not sure if its higher or lower though..

and yes..its one colour now...
Attached Thumbnails What do you think of my car lowered?-johnnys-1.jpg  
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2003 | 10:54 PM
  #50  
Kandied91z's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 13,039
Likes: 0
From: michigan
terrible picture, i know how it is to not have a nice digital camera though.


glad to see you picked a color; i was beginning to wonder. i could deal with everything but the two colors.....
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:59 PM.