Gloss or flat black engine compartment?
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 334
Likes: 0
From: Gurnee, IL
Car: '86 IROC
Engine: 305 LG4 awaiting the crate Vortec 350
Transmission: 700R4
Gloss or flat black engine compartment?
I'm re-doing my whole car this winter and while i have the engine and everything else out under the hood i might as well paint it to match my car. the car's gonna be black eventually and i was just wondering what your opinions would be on the engine compartment color. obviously black but flat or gloss? i've heard flat because it doesn't show as much of the imperfections, but it is an engine compartment and it's going to have imperfections!! what do ya'll think?
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,857
Likes: 0
From: Maryland...DO I HAVE TO ADMIT TO THAT?!
Car: 1991 Chevy Camaro RS
Engine: 283
Transmission: 700r4 Auto
personally id go with gloss,that way itll look nice & clean all the time,but its your ride
Go gloss, or semi-gloss. You will not be happy with flat, I can tell you from experience. You cannot get a picture of it without it looking grey. It also looks real close to grey in person, no matter how many coats you use. If you're truly set on black, go with gloss, or semi-gloss.
I'm thinking of re-doing mine in the spring and it took forever the first time.
Mathius
I'm thinking of re-doing mine in the spring and it took forever the first time.
Mathius
Trending Topics
Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
From: Finland
Car: "My American Dream"
Engine: V8
Transmission: auto
flat would give impression of worn, dirty and old engine compartment.
Gloss would look more like a new car, needs to be taken care better than flat though.I'd say Definetly gloss but its your ride and not my business if you paint it lime-green
Gloss would look more like a new car, needs to be taken care better than flat though.I'd say Definetly gloss but its your ride and not my business if you paint it lime-green
Satin-
is what I have used for years not shiney but not as dull as flat. Have recieved great service from the satin color and can touch up without looking like a patch job. That is important in a engine bay when you scrape something working on one of these cars!! IMHO
Supreme Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,854
Likes: 0
From: boonton, NJ
Car: 84 camaro Z28
Engine: 434sbc
Transmission: powerglide
Axle/Gears: moser 9" with 411 posi
if your car is black i would go with gloss black. thats what i did. the pic isn't that good but you get the idea.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 334
Likes: 0
From: Gurnee, IL
Car: '86 IROC
Engine: 305 LG4 awaiting the crate Vortec 350
Transmission: 700R4
Hey heavy chevy your car is almost exactly how i want mine to look like after it's done in the spring. your car is IMO one of the best thirdgens on here. i will have almost the same engine combo except in a 350. my props to you and that beautiful car!!:hail:
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 13,622
Likes: 5
From: Orland Park, IL
Car: 1984 Z28
Engine: SLOW carbed ls
Transmission: TH400 with brake, 8" PTC converter
Axle/Gears: moser 9" 4.11
since i have factory 1984 paint i choose to go with the semi-gloss, figured it wouldn't make my fenders and hood look less shiney then. It worked out great and isn't to bad to clean. I would recommend the semi-gloss if your paint isn't exactly up to snuff.
Supreme Member

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 4
From: Charleston, SC
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
semi gloss.... and heres why:
gloss looks great... but if you scratch it, its harder to fix that one part without it looking fixed...
flat gives the impression of dirty, even when clean... athough you can rattle can over it if you scratch it and theres no prob.
semi gloss hides imperfections, is easily fixed with rattle can if you scrape it, yet it looks clean and new... without being over shiny and screaming, "hey look at me, i rattle painted everything underhood!!"
gloss looks great... but if you scratch it, its harder to fix that one part without it looking fixed...
flat gives the impression of dirty, even when clean... athough you can rattle can over it if you scratch it and theres no prob.
semi gloss hides imperfections, is easily fixed with rattle can if you scrape it, yet it looks clean and new... without being over shiny and screaming, "hey look at me, i rattle painted everything underhood!!"
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,449
Likes: 7
From: LONDON, KY
Car: Camaro
Engine: Carbed L98
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.73
another vote for semi-gloss. The factory under hood black is not all that glossy. I had a black z and the engine compartment was in a semi-gloss from the factory.
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 13,579
Likes: 9
From: Readsboro, VT
Car: 85 IROC-Z / 88 GTA
Engine: 403 LSx (Pending) / 355 Tuned Port
Transmission: T56 Magnum (Pending) / T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 / ?
The engine bay is a difficult area to prep & paint properly because of the tight shapes. If you do gloss black, it needs to be prepped perfectly or it'll look terrible.
But... even if it's prepped perfectly, you may still want to go with flat black because it makes touch-up so easy. I did mine flat black because I knew I'd wind up scratching things during future modifications. The flat black is SUPER easy to touch up when you scratch it. Just sand and hit it again in that spot. I don't like the appearance of the flat black as much as a semi-gloss, but it's ease of maintance made it well worth it.
But... even if it's prepped perfectly, you may still want to go with flat black because it makes touch-up so easy. I did mine flat black because I knew I'd wind up scratching things during future modifications. The flat black is SUPER easy to touch up when you scratch it. Just sand and hit it again in that spot. I don't like the appearance of the flat black as much as a semi-gloss, but it's ease of maintance made it well worth it.
Supreme Member

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 4
From: Charleston, SC
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Originally posted by Jim85IROC
The engine bay is a difficult area to prep & paint properly because of the tight shapes. If you do gloss black, it needs to be prepped perfectly or it'll look terrible.
But... even if it's prepped perfectly, you may still want to go with flat black because it makes touch-up so easy. I did mine flat black because I knew I'd wind up scratching things during future modifications. The flat black is SUPER easy to touch up when you scratch it. Just sand and hit it again in that spot. I don't like the appearance of the flat black as much as a semi-gloss, but it's ease of maintance made it well worth it.
The engine bay is a difficult area to prep & paint properly because of the tight shapes. If you do gloss black, it needs to be prepped perfectly or it'll look terrible.
But... even if it's prepped perfectly, you may still want to go with flat black because it makes touch-up so easy. I did mine flat black because I knew I'd wind up scratching things during future modifications. The flat black is SUPER easy to touch up when you scratch it. Just sand and hit it again in that spot. I don't like the appearance of the flat black as much as a semi-gloss, but it's ease of maintance made it well worth it.
post a pic of your under hood and show em.....
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,259
Likes: 0
From: Woodstock, GA
Car: 1987 Trans Am
Semigloss works great, if you're using spraycans. If you have a gun though, I'd use whatever paint you're going to use on the exterior of the car. Either way its much easier with the engine and everything else out, but when we did Redraif's engine compartment in semigloss the engine was still in (though without intake/heads/accessories). I'd still like it better bodycolor, but it has won nearly every national show its been in with the spray painted engine compartment . It is easy to touch up, so its good on a car that's "in progress".
Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 184
Likes: 1
From: N.Battleford
Car: 1983 Trans Am
Engine: 305 LG4
Transmission: T5
How do you guys paint an engine bay with semi-gloss?
Do you just rattlecan it, or do you go to a bodyshop?
If rattlecan, I want to do mine, and is wet sanding recommended if one chooses rattlecan?
Do you just rattlecan it, or do you go to a bodyshop?
If rattlecan, I want to do mine, and is wet sanding recommended if one chooses rattlecan?
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 13,579
Likes: 9
From: Readsboro, VT
Car: 85 IROC-Z / 88 GTA
Engine: 403 LSx (Pending) / 355 Tuned Port
Transmission: T56 Magnum (Pending) / T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 / ?
Originally posted by MrDude_1
post a pic of your under hood and show em.....
post a pic of your under hood and show em.....
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,259
Likes: 0
From: Woodstock, GA
Car: 1987 Trans Am
Originally posted by JLP
How do you guys paint an engine bay with semi-gloss?
Do you just rattlecan it, or do you go to a bodyshop?
If rattlecan, I want to do mine, and is wet sanding recommended if one chooses rattlecan?
How do you guys paint an engine bay with semi-gloss?
Do you just rattlecan it, or do you go to a bodyshop?
If rattlecan, I want to do mine, and is wet sanding recommended if one chooses rattlecan?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
colton_carlson
Firebirds for Sale
7
Mar 8, 2019 12:21 PM









