ram air hood scoop.
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 649
Likes: 0
From: logan co. wv
Car: 86 camaro
Engine: 2.8 multiport cross fire injection
Transmission: 5 speed
ram air hood scoop.
hi al i got some recent pics posted on the 5th. page of my ram air hood scoop.
if anyone interested in yes a scoop not hood then go check it out alot cheaper then the ram air hood but its alot of work as well.
heres the link..
http://www.cardomain.com/memberpage/509905/5
also its now primered so it looks a ton better because all the forming and molding it in work is done and primered.
i have to get some pics up tho later because my scanners fried,
digital cam sucks and needs batteries, and i have'nt got new ones yet w/ 35 mm.
but 35 mm would have to be finished and sent out developed and come back so il do my best to get newer pics up asap .
trust me looks 10000000000000000 times better w/ it primered and molded in.
if anyone interested in yes a scoop not hood then go check it out alot cheaper then the ram air hood but its alot of work as well.
heres the link..
http://www.cardomain.com/memberpage/509905/5
also its now primered so it looks a ton better because all the forming and molding it in work is done and primered.
i have to get some pics up tho later because my scanners fried,
digital cam sucks and needs batteries, and i have'nt got new ones yet w/ 35 mm.
but 35 mm would have to be finished and sent out developed and come back so il do my best to get newer pics up asap .
trust me looks 10000000000000000 times better w/ it primered and molded in.
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 649
Likes: 0
From: logan co. wv
Car: 86 camaro
Engine: 2.8 multiport cross fire injection
Transmission: 5 speed
tell me about i i friggin hate it!!!!!!!!
what i had to do was this.....
my digital cam sucks period.
u have to have it directly facing light in order to take pics.
as of now i need batteries for it.
so takin pics w/ it alone were out.
this is a cheapo digital cam fomr wal mart. lol
35 mm camera was how theese pics were taken. but my scanner fried other day tried scanning others wouldn't work.
tried using my moms everytime id resize them down it would cut out pics.
cuz i was scanning 3 at a time w/ hers on under the other and u select them all and resize n it would cut top pic in half and cut the others completely off.
so only thing i could do to get them up was to take the developed 35 mm pics and take a digital pic of them w/ my dig cam which completely bits ***.
so they sucked awefuly.
im goin get batteries soon so i can take straight digital cam ones and try use a good scanner to do my pics w/.
so im sorry for poor quality i was in rush to try post them so ppl could see them.
so ill post on here once i got better ones guys sorry tho.
what i had to do was this.....
my digital cam sucks period.
u have to have it directly facing light in order to take pics.
as of now i need batteries for it.
so takin pics w/ it alone were out.
this is a cheapo digital cam fomr wal mart. lol
35 mm camera was how theese pics were taken. but my scanner fried other day tried scanning others wouldn't work.
tried using my moms everytime id resize them down it would cut out pics.
cuz i was scanning 3 at a time w/ hers on under the other and u select them all and resize n it would cut top pic in half and cut the others completely off.
so only thing i could do to get them up was to take the developed 35 mm pics and take a digital pic of them w/ my dig cam which completely bits ***.
so they sucked awefuly.
im goin get batteries soon so i can take straight digital cam ones and try use a good scanner to do my pics w/.
so im sorry for poor quality i was in rush to try post them so ppl could see them.
so ill post on here once i got better ones guys sorry tho.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1992 Trans Am
History / Originality
27
May 10, 2023 07:19 PM
IROCZDAVE (88-L98)
Exterior Parts for Sale
0
Aug 24, 2015 06:52 AM





