My wing is very functional...
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 1,253
Likes: 1
From: Hawaii
Car: 1984 Chevy Camaro
Engine: Built L98
Transmission: T-56 6 speed
My wing is very functional...
I went racing two nights back. And at high speeds the car is alot more stable. Only problem is that my rear springs are to weak to handle the down force (eibach prokit) at speeds over 140mph. If I go over a small bump in the road the tire will scratch the wheel well! Hearing your tire scratch the wheel well at 140+mph is not a nice thing.
Re: My wing is very functional...
Originally posted by REVLIMIT
Hearing your tire scratch the wheel well at 140+mph is not a nice thing.
Hearing your tire scratch the wheel well at 140+mph is not a nice thing.
Supreme Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,676
Likes: 0
From: Fort Belvoir, VA USA
Car: 94 Camaro
Engine: 3.4L
Transmission: 4l60e
i personaly don't like the appearance of it, but if it helps performance, i quess its ok
also, i REALLY admire your oppurtunity to be able drift all the time. I wish there was a place close i could do it legaly
i would probable need a better car to do it in too
but i like my 60* and wouldn't trade it for the world, i'll get an eight one day...
also, i REALLY admire your oppurtunity to be able drift all the time. I wish there was a place close i could do it legaly
i would probable need a better car to do it in too
but i like my 60* and wouldn't trade it for the world, i'll get an eight one day... Trending Topics
Well once i get the 110 mph limiter on my car removed and find place to test it out, I hope to find out if my wing does anything for me...
Mine can also be adjusted over a range of about 45*..
Not nearly as big as your wing, but kinda big...
Mine can also be adjusted over a range of about 45*..
Not nearly as big as your wing, but kinda big...
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 1,253
Likes: 1
From: Hawaii
Car: 1984 Chevy Camaro
Engine: Built L98
Transmission: T-56 6 speed
Originally posted by EvilCartman
In the body shop yet?
In the body shop yet?
Mabey its creating too much down force if the springs are basically stuck down at high speeds.. You might want to play with the angle of it because it looks like it might be angled a bit too far down (if you can adjust it). As for the looks I don't really like the rear ended by a handglider look. But hey its your car not mine so whatever you want to do with it
Supreme Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,319
Likes: 0
From: "No one cares if you're in before the lock!" - Best quote ever.
I say put a stock wing on and see if the car still scrapes at those speeds over small bumps...I remember reading an article as to the particulars of wing/downforce issues, and I wonder how a stock wing would affect things...
Senior Member

Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 841
Likes: 3
From: Silverhill,Al
Car: 92 Camaro RS
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: T-5
You don't need a wing like that to go fast, I have a magazine somewhere that shows this guys 220 MPH late 80's Camaro and he just had a front air dam, small rear spoiler and some undercar streamlining, but no big rice wing.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,817
Likes: 1
From: Plano, TX
Car: 1992 RS
Engine: 406 Stealth Ram
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by DartByU
You don't need a wing like that to go fast, I have a magazine somewhere that shows this guys 220 MPH late 80's Camaro and he just had a front air dam, small rear spoiler and some undercar streamlining, but no big rice wing.
You don't need a wing like that to go fast, I have a magazine somewhere that shows this guys 220 MPH late 80's Camaro and he just had a front air dam, small rear spoiler and some undercar streamlining, but no big rice wing.
Well yeah, you may not need it to "go fast" but if it keeps the car more stable at high speeds, thats good enough reason to have it. Speed/power without control is nothing but dangerous. Iroc-zz4 brings up a good point, maybe adjusting to a shallower angle will still provide adequate stability without overloading the rear. But I figure you might've already thought of this, so don't think I'm callin you stupid for having not tried it.
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 13,414
Likes: 6
From: Central NJ, USA
Car: 1986 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 V6
Transmission: 700R4
Damn, that wing is ugly! But if it -really- works, then, great. How do you know it works? Most of the time, big spoilers like that just create extra drag on the car, and slow it down.
I would say to add a chin spoiler. This is a little piece of plastic, any plastic, really, which goes on the extreme front of your bumper, on the bottom, almost like a beard or moustache. It doesn't get placed far back underneath the car- like the air dam. It goes as far forward as one could put a piece of plastic on the bottom of the bumper.
The chin spoiler doesn't have to be tall, an inch would do it. Oh, and no fancy vents or louvers or any of that garbage, either. You want to lower the air pressure zone under the car, not raise it. Make a chin spoiler that's too tall, and you could overheat the car due to lack of air running past the air dam and over the radiator.
This helps create a lower pressure zone underneath the car. By lowering the air pressure underneath the car, the car itself will lower down, and you'll be more stable at high speeds. This might help the bounce/tire rub condition.
I would say to add a chin spoiler. This is a little piece of plastic, any plastic, really, which goes on the extreme front of your bumper, on the bottom, almost like a beard or moustache. It doesn't get placed far back underneath the car- like the air dam. It goes as far forward as one could put a piece of plastic on the bottom of the bumper.
The chin spoiler doesn't have to be tall, an inch would do it. Oh, and no fancy vents or louvers or any of that garbage, either. You want to lower the air pressure zone under the car, not raise it. Make a chin spoiler that's too tall, and you could overheat the car due to lack of air running past the air dam and over the radiator.
This helps create a lower pressure zone underneath the car. By lowering the air pressure underneath the car, the car itself will lower down, and you'll be more stable at high speeds. This might help the bounce/tire rub condition.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 1,253
Likes: 1
From: Hawaii
Car: 1984 Chevy Camaro
Engine: Built L98
Transmission: T-56 6 speed
I knwo it works cause it feels more stable. And also I've went 130+mph on that road a few tiems before already. And the tire never scratched on those bumps. I mostly put it for looks anyways.
Any time you add downforce to the rear of the car you transfer weight to the rear. This actually creates an imbalance and unloads the front suspension making the front end float in extreme cases of excessive rear downforce. 140 mph with a lot of downforce on the rear and no chin spoiler on the front...... *** help you if you ever have to turn, You'd have understeer from hell at that speed. You got bigger ones than me buddy <you know what I mean> But hey, no guts no glory, right?
Supreme Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,036
Likes: 0
From: Prince Albert, Saskatchewan, Canada
Car: 1987 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 357ci Stealth Ram - Under Pressure
Transmission: Built 700r4/Pro Yank 3400 Extreme
Axle/Gears: 9-Bolt 3.27
coo
Last edited by mike1986fyrbird; Aug 1, 2002 at 02:49 AM.
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (1)
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 2
From: El Paso, Texas
Car: 1987 IROC Z
Engine: 350 TPI L98 block
Transmission: 700R4
Skyline
The skyline GTR34 ( blackbird) is my favorite vehicle on this planet beside My IROC and the Hummer. .... however.. somethings need not be touched....
On another note, go look into the archives of chevy high performance magazine. Their was a guy who was pullin 220mph in his IROC but was using a GTA wing I believe for stability. Should check it out, it was one of their " car of the year " award winners also...
On another note, go look into the archives of chevy high performance magazine. Their was a guy who was pullin 220mph in his IROC but was using a GTA wing I believe for stability. Should check it out, it was one of their " car of the year " award winners also...
Supreme Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,676
Likes: 0
From: Fort Belvoir, VA USA
Car: 94 Camaro
Engine: 3.4L
Transmission: 4l60e
if you do a search, the fastest land record speed was set in a 92 firebird with the 85-89 style T/A Aero Wing
Just to get ya'll thinking
that's the best stock spoiler for our cars. On a side note, they look great too.
You wouldn't be able to scan the pictures of the wing on a IROC would you? I would love to see it on a Camaro, but never have...
Just to get ya'll thinking
that's the best stock spoiler for our cars. On a side note, they look great too.You wouldn't be able to scan the pictures of the wing on a IROC would you? I would love to see it on a Camaro, but never have...
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 13,579
Likes: 9
From: Readsboro, VT
Car: 85 IROC-Z / 88 GTA
Engine: 403 LSx (Pending) / 355 Tuned Port
Transmission: T56 Magnum (Pending) / T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 / ?
I'd be really surprised if that car had the power to propel it to 140mph. Between the front bumper thing and the hang glider on the trunk, the aerodynamics must be pretty similar to a semi with a chute.
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 8,030
Likes: 1
Car: 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: 383 stroker
Transmission: 700R4 3500 stall, TransGo shift kit
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 4.11:1
Originally posted by Jim85IROC
I'd be really surprised if that car had the power to propel it to 140mph. Between the front bumper thing and the hang glider on the trunk, the aerodynamics must be pretty similar to a semi with a chute.
I'd be really surprised if that car had the power to propel it to 140mph. Between the front bumper thing and the hang glider on the trunk, the aerodynamics must be pretty similar to a semi with a chute.
Senior Member

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 648
Likes: 0
From: Newark, OH
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: 700R-4
Originally posted by Jim85IROC
I'd be really surprised if that car had the power to propel it to 140mph. Between the front bumper thing and the hang glider on the trunk, the aerodynamics must be pretty similar to a semi with a chute.
I'd be really surprised if that car had the power to propel it to 140mph. Between the front bumper thing and the hang glider on the trunk, the aerodynamics must be pretty similar to a semi with a chute.
oh well. good for you if it helps, nice job ruining a good car if it doesn't. but to each his own.
Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
From: New Port Richey, Florida
Car: 2001 Firehawk - SLP Longtubes
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
I don't know about downforce, but it sure created some lift. Like when the guy that sold it to you "lifted" the money from your wallet.
Was this 220 mph camaro on an oval or salt flat? I remember it being on the flats, but I could be wrong.
FYI Stock Body Salt Flat cars weigh over 4000 lbs always with no exception. (well, the little 4 bangers that don't go over 120 probably not)
-But monkey, won't that kill the cars acceleration?
Why yes it will, but they get a push start so who cares.
The 300 mph Firebird was over 5000 lbs. They call it free down force.
I guarantee that wing makes downforce. Does it make more drag than downforce? Probably. Does the front end make any downforce? No, but it's got a 500 lb engine and tranny up there that makes up for that a little. Will the wing flip the car over? Only if the good lord starts pushing on it. Come on guys, lets be realistic and for Pete's sake! Also, stop bashing on people just because they want to be different. If he puts it on your car, then you can be pissed.
The best thing to improve out car's aerodynamics is lowering and gfx. A full skirt is going to be more beneficial than a wing. Wings that work well are the '91-'92 if you move it 6 inches back on the car. Essentially it makes the wind think the car is longer, and the maximum low pressure zone occurs farther back, so it doesn't try and lift or drag on the car as much. Pick up a book and read it before posting!
FYI Stock Body Salt Flat cars weigh over 4000 lbs always with no exception. (well, the little 4 bangers that don't go over 120 probably not)
-But monkey, won't that kill the cars acceleration?
Why yes it will, but they get a push start so who cares.
The 300 mph Firebird was over 5000 lbs. They call it free down force.
I guarantee that wing makes downforce. Does it make more drag than downforce? Probably. Does the front end make any downforce? No, but it's got a 500 lb engine and tranny up there that makes up for that a little. Will the wing flip the car over? Only if the good lord starts pushing on it. Come on guys, lets be realistic and for Pete's sake! Also, stop bashing on people just because they want to be different. If he puts it on your car, then you can be pissed.
The best thing to improve out car's aerodynamics is lowering and gfx. A full skirt is going to be more beneficial than a wing. Wings that work well are the '91-'92 if you move it 6 inches back on the car. Essentially it makes the wind think the car is longer, and the maximum low pressure zone occurs farther back, so it doesn't try and lift or drag on the car as much. Pick up a book and read it before posting!
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 8,030
Likes: 1
Car: 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: 383 stroker
Transmission: 700R4 3500 stall, TransGo shift kit
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 4.11:1
Originally posted by ATOMonkey
Was this 220 mph camaro on an oval or salt flat? I remember it being on the flats, but I could be wrong.
FYI Stock Body Salt Flat cars weigh over 4000 lbs always with no exception. (well, the little 4 bangers that don't go over 120 probably not)
-But monkey, won't that kill the cars acceleration?
Why yes it will, but they get a push start so who cares.
The 300 mph Firebird was over 5000 lbs. They call it free down force.
I guarantee that wing makes downforce. Does it make more drag than downforce? Probably. Does the front end make any downforce? No, but it's got a 500 lb engine and tranny up there that makes up for that a little. Will the wing flip the car over? Only if the good lord starts pushing on it. Come on guys, lets be realistic and for Pete's sake! Also, stop bashing on people just because they want to be different. If he puts it on your car, then you can be pissed.
The best thing to improve out car's aerodynamics is lowering and gfx. A full skirt is going to be more beneficial than a wing. Wings that work well are the '91-'92 if you move it 6 inches back on the car. Essentially it makes the wind think the car is longer, and the maximum low pressure zone occurs farther back, so it doesn't try and lift or drag on the car as much. Pick up a book and read it before posting!
Was this 220 mph camaro on an oval or salt flat? I remember it being on the flats, but I could be wrong.
FYI Stock Body Salt Flat cars weigh over 4000 lbs always with no exception. (well, the little 4 bangers that don't go over 120 probably not)
-But monkey, won't that kill the cars acceleration?
Why yes it will, but they get a push start so who cares.
The 300 mph Firebird was over 5000 lbs. They call it free down force.
I guarantee that wing makes downforce. Does it make more drag than downforce? Probably. Does the front end make any downforce? No, but it's got a 500 lb engine and tranny up there that makes up for that a little. Will the wing flip the car over? Only if the good lord starts pushing on it. Come on guys, lets be realistic and for Pete's sake! Also, stop bashing on people just because they want to be different. If he puts it on your car, then you can be pissed.
The best thing to improve out car's aerodynamics is lowering and gfx. A full skirt is going to be more beneficial than a wing. Wings that work well are the '91-'92 if you move it 6 inches back on the car. Essentially it makes the wind think the car is longer, and the maximum low pressure zone occurs farther back, so it doesn't try and lift or drag on the car as much. Pick up a book and read it before posting!
Supreme Member
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,228
Likes: 2
From: Your neighbor's hood, MD
Car: 1987 Camaro Z28 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7L TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42:1
Originally posted by Jim85IROC
I'd be really surprised if that car had the power to propel it to 140mph. Between the front bumper thing and the hang glider on the trunk, the aerodynamics must be pretty similar to a semi with a chute.
I'd be really surprised if that car had the power to propel it to 140mph. Between the front bumper thing and the hang glider on the trunk, the aerodynamics must be pretty similar to a semi with a chute.
Umm, not to point out the obvious folks, but if his speedometer tops out at 110 (nevermind the speed limiter for a sec...
) how did he conclude that he was doing 140+ mph? Just a thought. Why is it so hard for some people to believe 140MPH? Who says his speedo tops out at 110? As for the rev limiter, a chip will solve that problem, which he has. He has increased airflow by porting and adding an open element and he modified his exhaust to flow more also. 140 is a very achievable speed.
Also, that spoiler is functional. It is adjustable allowing him to increase/decrease his downforce as needed.
Also, that spoiler is functional. It is adjustable allowing him to increase/decrease his downforce as needed.
Supreme Member
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,228
Likes: 2
From: Your neighbor's hood, MD
Car: 1987 Camaro Z28 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7L TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42:1
Originally posted by Cuno
Why is it so hard for some people to believe 140MPH? Who says his speedo tops out at 110?
Why is it so hard for some people to believe 140MPH? Who says his speedo tops out at 110?
any monkey with a few tools can easily swap out for a 145MPH speedo. An aftermarket one is even easier to mount.
I agree that there is the prob of too much downforce, I simply stated that it was functional.
I agree that there is the prob of too much downforce, I simply stated that it was functional.
TGO Supporter
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 6,775
Likes: 27
From: So.west IN
Car: 87 Formula/ 00 Xtreme
Engine: TPI 305/ v6
Transmission: struggling t-5/ 4l60E
Axle/Gears: 3.08/ 3.23
Originally posted by ES87iroc
Umm, because he has a 91/92 RS = 110 mph speedometer. Do some homework before you try and pick apart what people are saying. With a HP rating of 170 brand new, getting a 3500 lb. probably 100k+ mile car up to 140+ is going to be tough.
Umm, because he has a 91/92 RS = 110 mph speedometer. Do some homework before you try and pick apart what people are saying. With a HP rating of 170 brand new, getting a 3500 lb. probably 100k+ mile car up to 140+ is going to be tough.
With a "hefty" hp of 215 (give or take year depending), my 305 TPI 5 speed formula could do 130 (speed limited) in 5th at 2800rpm. All I had was headers, AFPR & MSD ignition at the time. I set no records getting to that speed but, I did kick a 72 Dodge Demons *** doing it.
Just because some of you haven't done it, doesn't mean it can't be done. I've reached 115mph in my turd burglar 84 SC camaro (bone stock except for the Accel coil, platinum plugs.. and EMT conduit exhaust)... granted, it wasn't fun for the car or me (well.. yea.. for me it was..) but, I did it and my camaro, it's getting ready to top 300K mi., rods knocking, valves are shot.. the only thing that is good about it is it doesn't burn oil.. it just leaks it all over the driveway :sillylol:
(and some tranny fluid) Don't say it can't be done until you can absolutely prove it can't be. Just because on paper it says it can't be done, doesn't mean in the real world it can't.
Supreme Member
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,228
Likes: 2
From: Your neighbor's hood, MD
Car: 1987 Camaro Z28 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7L TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42:1
Originally posted by deadbird
It's going to be tough.. but not impossible, huh ?
It's going to be tough.. but not impossible, huh ?
Possible, just not something that would make me feel too comfortable.
Last edited by ES87iroc; Aug 2, 2002 at 06:54 AM.
Supreme Member
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,228
Likes: 2
From: Your neighbor's hood, MD
Car: 1987 Camaro Z28 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7L TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42:1
Originally posted by Cuno
any monkey with a few tools can easily swap out for a 145MPH speedo. An aftermarket one is even easier to mount.
I agree that there is the prob of too much downforce, I simply stated that it was functional.
any monkey with a few tools can easily swap out for a 145MPH speedo. An aftermarket one is even easier to mount.
I agree that there is the prob of too much downforce, I simply stated that it was functional.
I was thinking maybe he did the "well my speedometer is this far wrapped around so I -think- I am going X fast" thing, but those clusters have a needle stop on them from what I remember? As far as the wing, yep, at least it is a RWD car.
Supreme Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,266
Likes: 1
From: Moved... GA still, more garage space!
Car: 87 Red/Blk Bird loaded 3.4L & 700R4
Transmission: Th700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Originally posted by TomP
Damn, that wing is ugly! But if it -really- works, then, great. How do you know it works? Most of the time, big spoilers like that just create extra drag on the car, and slow it down.
I would say to add a chin spoiler. This is a little piece of plastic, any plastic, really, which goes on the extreme front of your bumper, on the bottom, almost like a beard or moustache. It doesn't get placed far back underneath the car- like the air dam. It goes as far forward as one could put a piece of plastic on the bottom of the bumper.
The chin spoiler doesn't have to be tall, an inch would do it. Oh, and no fancy vents or louvers or any of that garbage, either. You want to lower the air pressure zone under the car, not raise it. Make a chin spoiler that's too tall, and you could overheat the car due to lack of air running past the air dam and over the radiator.
This helps create a lower pressure zone underneath the car. By lowering the air pressure underneath the car, the car itself will lower down, and you'll be more stable at high speeds. This might help the bounce/tire rub condition.
Damn, that wing is ugly! But if it -really- works, then, great. How do you know it works? Most of the time, big spoilers like that just create extra drag on the car, and slow it down.
I would say to add a chin spoiler. This is a little piece of plastic, any plastic, really, which goes on the extreme front of your bumper, on the bottom, almost like a beard or moustache. It doesn't get placed far back underneath the car- like the air dam. It goes as far forward as one could put a piece of plastic on the bottom of the bumper.
The chin spoiler doesn't have to be tall, an inch would do it. Oh, and no fancy vents or louvers or any of that garbage, either. You want to lower the air pressure zone under the car, not raise it. Make a chin spoiler that's too tall, and you could overheat the car due to lack of air running past the air dam and over the radiator.
This helps create a lower pressure zone underneath the car. By lowering the air pressure underneath the car, the car itself will lower down, and you'll be more stable at high speeds. This might help the bounce/tire rub condition.
Supreme Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,266
Likes: 1
From: Moved... GA still, more garage space!
Car: 87 Red/Blk Bird loaded 3.4L & 700R4
Transmission: Th700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
What about the one in the rear? I have one mounted back there as well, under the back bumper. Or would this cause a lifting instead. I have not researched any of this yet, I just did it for flare. Once I get the V-8, its something I would need to know.
Pic for technical purposes. I know most of you will hate my new spoiler, so I'm not posting it for the "do you like the looks" comments. I just want to consider the technical possibilties. Thanks!
Pic for technical purposes. I know most of you will hate my new spoiler, so I'm not posting it for the "do you like the looks" comments. I just want to consider the technical possibilties. Thanks!
Senior Member

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 648
Likes: 0
From: Newark, OH
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: 700R-4
Did you buy those tires out of an import magazine, geez.... i saw them in one a little while back. and why red tint, i've only seen it once and still dont like it.
but whatever floats ur boat.
but whatever floats ur boat.
Last edited by hot86z-28; Aug 2, 2002 at 01:39 PM.
Supreme Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,266
Likes: 1
From: Moved... GA still, more garage space!
Car: 87 Red/Blk Bird loaded 3.4L & 700R4
Transmission: Th700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
The rims are Niche Serpents and have been discontinued since 2000. I have never seen them in an import mag. The lack of circulation is part of the reason I wanted them. You never see them around. I went to a truck shop and they had Niche brochure on the wall. I decided I liked them and the thrashers then. But the thrashers had to much chrome for my car. Locally I have never seen them on an import. I have seen them on a truck and on some older Ols. I did hear the ones on the ols were on a truck before the guy bought them, but they were initially for an Eclipse.
The red was because I saw it and it looked good on a local guys red probe. So I talked to him and his buddy did the tint. I did not know it at the time, but the red really has helped with my migraines. The light is much less harsh when it comes in the car. I even went out and bought red sunglasses. The only thing the eye doctor and I can come up with is that my eyes must be more senstive to the light spectrum that the red filters out. Though regardless of its function I like the looks alot and its great for shows
The red was because I saw it and it looked good on a local guys red probe. So I talked to him and his buddy did the tint. I did not know it at the time, but the red really has helped with my migraines. The light is much less harsh when it comes in the car. I even went out and bought red sunglasses. The only thing the eye doctor and I can come up with is that my eyes must be more senstive to the light spectrum that the red filters out. Though regardless of its function I like the looks alot and its great for shows
Supreme Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,266
Likes: 1
From: Moved... GA still, more garage space!
Car: 87 Red/Blk Bird loaded 3.4L & 700R4
Transmission: Th700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Oh tires...I must have been replying while you were editing. I'm not sure where I first saw them. Since I don't look much at the import mags, I can't say I have seen them there. I think a buddy of mine told me about them. Anyway I have only seen them on one import. It was a civic around the same time I got mine, in July/Aug 2000. He had a blue set on his silver car. I just love that they match the car. They handle great too.
Since then I have seen them on a Yellow Mustang (yellow), A yellow Cougar (yellow) and a red S10 (red). Most people can't figure out how I got them red. The always ask about red marks on the ground during burnouts.
Since then I have seen them on a Yellow Mustang (yellow), A yellow Cougar (yellow) and a red S10 (red). Most people can't figure out how I got them red. The always ask about red marks on the ground during burnouts.
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 860
Likes: 0
From: Alberta, Canada
Car: 1987 IROC
Engine: Vortec 350 TPI
Transmission: 7004r
I also have my doubt about revlimit's 91 RS reaching speeds "over 140mph."
he said he went racing. What kind? where at?
He would have to be on a course with a looooong straight away or an oval track.
If he DID get that thing up to 140, I'll bet my lunch he will be faster with the wing removed.
the fact that the rear is beginning to squat at high speeds (probably more like 120mph) clearly means he has too much rear downforce. If he was racing, he must have been experiancing some extreme understeer.
he said he went racing. What kind? where at?
He would have to be on a course with a looooong straight away or an oval track.
If he DID get that thing up to 140, I'll bet my lunch he will be faster with the wing removed.
the fact that the rear is beginning to squat at high speeds (probably more like 120mph) clearly means he has too much rear downforce. If he was racing, he must have been experiancing some extreme understeer.



