RS v/s Z28 GFX
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 574
Likes: 0
From: Richlands N.C.
Car: '92 RS
Engine: 350 carb'd
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 4.10
RS v/s Z28 GFX
I have a set of GFX from a 91 RS camaro. I got all but the rear bumper cover. Is it any different than than a Z28 bumper cover? I forgot the rear brackets for the side skirts so I got to go back to the pick a part and get them and can get the bumper if needed. MY buddy said he thought his RS car flared out more at the bottom on the bumper.
Member

Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
From: ashland city, tn
Car: 91 z28/2014 charger
Engine: 350/ v6
Transmission: 700r4/ auto
no different, from everything i've read on here. the only diffence is the emblem in the bumper but that is easily replaceable. the 'z' emblem and 'rs' emblems are the same size
Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
From: Daytona Beach, Florida
Car: 1986 CAMARO Z28 +++
Engine: 496
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 456
well it all depends on what year camaro u have....if its a 85-90 then ur ground effects are totally different from the 91-92 style ones, u would need the side the door pieces, rear bumper, rear bumper extentions, and the front lip to complete the swap.....but other wise there the same if urs is a 91-92....
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 852
Likes: 0
From: Springfield, Oregon
Car: 85 Z28, 88 GTA, 68 Cutlass S
Engine: 305TPI X2 ;), Chevy 250
Transmission: T5, 700R4, powerslide >:(
Axle/Gears: posi, and posi w/discs :D.
91-92 had "Aero" GFX. all camaros made in 91 and 92 had them. they were all the same from the Z28 to base model V-6 with power nothing. in 85-90 they had GFX that bassicly just extended the body down 2-3 inches. but in 82-84 the GFX had slots in the nose and were shorter than the rest. oh and only the Z-28, IROC and RS got the GFX from 82-87. from 88 on ALL camaros regardless of options had them.
alot of people like the 91-92 aero style GFX better. id personally like to get some, but no $$$
alot of people like the 91-92 aero style GFX better. id personally like to get some, but no $$$
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 574
Likes: 0
From: Richlands N.C.
Car: '92 RS
Engine: 350 carb'd
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 4.10
Originally Posted by zippinz
u would need the side the door pieces, rear bumper, rear bumper extentions, and the front lip to complete the swap..
----------
Originally Posted by purpleZ-28
alot of people like the 91-92 aero style GFX better. id personally like to get some, but no $$$
If there is a yard around you , you might wanna check it out. Last edited by chevymec; Apr 11, 2006 at 06:07 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Member
iTrader: (-1)
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
From: Springfield, MO
Car: 89 Firebird Formula(Totalled), 91 C
Engine: Mild 350
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.73 :-(
The rear bumper cover on a 91-92 curls out at the bottom whereas the earlier one is flat at the bottom.
Junior Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
From: New York City
Car: 1985 Camaro
Engine: 2.8L V6
Transmission: T5
So all the bumper covers (Z-28/IROC) from 85-92 are pretty much the same, except for the rear covers right?
Last edited by Kyuusei; Apr 11, 2006 at 01:18 PM.
Trending Topics
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,258
Likes: 6
From: O'Fallon, MO
Car: 1991 Z28 convertible built 3/1/1990
Engine: Cammed 6.0L LSX
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: custom Ford 8.8", 4.10 gears
Originally Posted by Kyuusei
So all the bumper covers (Z-28/IROC) from 85-92 are pretty much the same, except for the rear covers right?
well...yes and no...
the rear bumper covers are different in '91 and '92, correct...
the FRONT bumper covers are the same, but the front valance piece (the front lip that goes under the bumper cover) is also different for '91 and '92. you can use either the pre-'91 valance piece OR the '91/'92 style with the same front bumper. they are interchangable. so yes you are correct in a sense, but if you're gonna buy a front bumper from an IROC-Z you're gonna have to get the matching '91 and '92 front clip to match the rear bumper and the side skirts of your car
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 852
Likes: 0
From: Springfield, Oregon
Car: 85 Z28, 88 GTA, 68 Cutlass S
Engine: 305TPI X2 ;), Chevy 250
Transmission: T5, 700R4, powerslide >:(
Axle/Gears: posi, and posi w/discs :D.
Originally Posted by BlueZee28
well...yes and no...
the rear bumper covers are different in '91 and '92, correct...
the FRONT bumper covers are the same, but the front valance piece (the front lip that goes under the bumper cover) is also different for '91 and '92. you can use either the pre-'91 valance piece OR the '91/'92 style with the same front bumper. they are interchangable. so yes you are correct in a sense, but if you're gonna buy a front bumper from an IROC-Z you're gonna have to get the matching '91 and '92 front clip to match the rear bumper and the side skirts of your car
the rear bumper covers are different in '91 and '92, correct...
the FRONT bumper covers are the same, but the front valance piece (the front lip that goes under the bumper cover) is also different for '91 and '92. you can use either the pre-'91 valance piece OR the '91/'92 style with the same front bumper. they are interchangable. so yes you are correct in a sense, but if you're gonna buy a front bumper from an IROC-Z you're gonna have to get the matching '91 and '92 front clip to match the rear bumper and the side skirts of your car

Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1Aauto
Sponsored Vendors
6
Sep 13, 2017 12:58 PM
BADNBLK
Convertibles
65
Feb 10, 2016 03:36 PM
blackz281le
Camaros for Sale
8
Jan 11, 2016 07:51 AM






