What is the difference between a Ttop car chassis and a Hardtop car chassis ?
#1
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,092
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 87 Vette
Engine: 355/195AFR/SR/219CAM/1.6
Transmission: TH700R4/Vigilante
Axle/Gears: D44/3.45
What is the difference between a Ttop car chassis and a Hardtop car chassis ?
Yes ...i was thinking this
when you convert a hardtop into Ttop you lose stability ..
what i s the difference between a Ttop car chassis and a hardtop one ....a convertible chassis is the same as the Ttop chassis ??
what will happen if a hardtop car use a Ttop chassis ??
when you convert a hardtop into Ttop you lose stability ..
what i s the difference between a Ttop car chassis and a hardtop one ....a convertible chassis is the same as the Ttop chassis ??
what will happen if a hardtop car use a Ttop chassis ??
#2
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Doghouse ······································ Car: 1989 Formula 350 Vert Engine: 350 L98 Transmission: 700R4 Axle/Gears: B&W 3.27
Posts: 14,235
Received 163 Likes
on
118 Posts
Car: 87 Formula T-Top, 87 Formula HT
Engine: 5.1L TPI, 5.0L TPI
Transmission: 700R4, M5
Axle/Gears: Sag 3.73, B&W 3.45
Several people claim that the T-tops cars used heavier sheetmetal in the unibody for strengthening the car. I think theat might actually be the case. But I have never seen anything from GM confirming this.
I know the T-top cars have an extra couple of piece at the back of the door that actually wedges the door. It is there to strengthen the body, because there is a loss of rigidity with the T-top cars. The door then takes some of the flex. Other than that I have found nothing. Both cars use the same frame connectors, so there is nothing added underneath.
There are companies that convert Hard-tops over to T-tops, and I have never heard of an actual problem with doing this. I hear lots of speculation, but no first hand experience.
John
I know the T-top cars have an extra couple of piece at the back of the door that actually wedges the door. It is there to strengthen the body, because there is a loss of rigidity with the T-top cars. The door then takes some of the flex. Other than that I have found nothing. Both cars use the same frame connectors, so there is nothing added underneath.
There are companies that convert Hard-tops over to T-tops, and I have never heard of an actual problem with doing this. I hear lots of speculation, but no first hand experience.
John
Last edited by okfoz; 01-02-2002 at 07:28 AM.
#3
Supreme Member
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Happy Valley, Oregon
Posts: 3,625
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think the sheetmetal thing is an old wives tale. I have both, and have never been able to notice any difference whatsoever. Like okfoz, the only thing I've ever found is the little door clip. BTW, my hardtop car is a C&C t-top conversion, and I do notice a little more flex in the body over bumps than with my factory t-top car, but that will be solved with subframe connectors within the next year.
#4
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
You loose a lot of structural rigidity when the roof is cut into as it is the main 'meeting' point of all the stresses. To compensate for this the body is reinforced, adding weight. The convert has to be reinforced more as there is no roof and is thus heavier than the t-top car, and so on.
Hope this helps
Hope this helps
#6
Let me reiterate what Blue502 stated on a similar post. I also have a hardtop/t-top car at home to compare. Where exactly is this reinforcement, because outside of the doors, I can see no difference in the chassis.
My suspicion as to why they shipped t-top cars. Less material to cut.
On the 4th gens, the chassis is exactly the same, and I doubt they were different on 3rd gens due to cost. It costs a lot more to manufacture two different chassis.
Later, Dave '91 GTA, '91 T/A, '01 WS6
My suspicion as to why they shipped t-top cars. Less material to cut.
On the 4th gens, the chassis is exactly the same, and I doubt they were different on 3rd gens due to cost. It costs a lot more to manufacture two different chassis.
Later, Dave '91 GTA, '91 T/A, '01 WS6
#7
Supreme Member
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Happy Valley, Oregon
Posts: 3,625
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Jim85IROC
I suspect that there is some truth to the t-top reinforcement issue for the simple fact that all of the cars that GM sent to ASC for conversion were all t-top cars. I don't think that would have been the case if there was no difference structurally.
I suspect that there is some truth to the t-top reinforcement issue for the simple fact that all of the cars that GM sent to ASC for conversion were all t-top cars. I don't think that would have been the case if there was no difference structurally.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Linson
Auto Detailing and Appearance
40
08-21-2015 02:12 PM
NBrehm
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
0
08-05-2015 07:57 PM
car, cars, convertible, converting, difference, eibach, fbody, frames, hard, hardtop, heavyer, springs, top, ttop, weight