Brakes Looking to upgrade or get the most out of what you have stock? All brake discussions go here!

Worth the effort?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-03-2005, 07:42 AM
  #1  
Member

Thread Starter
 
88TTFB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 88 TA
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Worth the effort?

Is it worth my time to do this upgrade?
Currently I have rear drum. I got a complete rearend/MC from an 86 TA rear disc. I was going to just swap to the rear disc but i read that they are not really that good performance wise. I was looking into 1le and seems costly and alot of work...i want to get rid of the drums but and kind of clueless what to do...breaking is not my depratment...thats why im asking you.
Old 06-03-2005, 09:22 AM
  #2  
Member

Thread Starter
 
88TTFB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 88 TA
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Just another question....why does GM have the passenger caliper in the front and the driver in the rear on the axle....atleast this is what my service manual shows......is LT1 a direct bolt on if you get plates and all from a donor car? I have the 7.5 10bolt rear and the 16x8 formula wheels?
Old 06-03-2005, 10:01 AM
  #3  
Supreme Member
 
RB83L69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Loveland, OH, US
Posts: 18,457
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
Car: 4
Engine: 6
Transmission: 5
1. IMHO, no. If you want an actual upgrade that actually works better than your drums reliably, and not just something for looks so that you see crotors instead of drums, you want the 89-92 rear discs. There's a reason you can pick up those old Saginaw brakes so cheap; and it ISN'T because they're so great that everybody's jumping all over them.

2a. Because that way, the same caliper fits both sides.

2b. Yes, if you start out with a 89-92 disc rear. Not if you start out with ANY OTHER axle housing. But then there wouldn't be much point in it, because they're not really significantly different from the 89-92 brakes.
Old 06-03-2005, 11:47 PM
  #4  
Member

Thread Starter
 
88TTFB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 88 TA
Engine: 5.7 TPI
I have an 86 disk rear and an 88 drum...both complete. both MC's and prop valves...What would be the best way for me to go? Scrap both rears and get and 89+?
Old 06-04-2005, 05:47 AM
  #5  
Moderator

iTrader: (5)
 
JamesC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Lawrence, KS
Posts: 19,282
Received 93 Likes on 68 Posts
Car: Met. Silver 85 IROC/Sold
Engine: 350 HO Deluxe (350ci/330hp)
Transmission: T-5 (Non-WC)
Axle/Gears: Limited Slip 3.23's
Here's what I did to my 85 IROC's rear discs:

https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...hreadid=246768

JamesC
Old 06-04-2005, 04:33 PM
  #6  
Member

Thread Starter
 
88TTFB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 88 TA
Engine: 5.7 TPI
The 89+ backingplates wont fit an eairlier year? I have access to a machine shop so if thats the only setback i can machine custom plates.
Old 06-04-2005, 08:43 PM
  #7  
Moderator

iTrader: (5)
 
JamesC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Lawrence, KS
Posts: 19,282
Received 93 Likes on 68 Posts
Car: Met. Silver 85 IROC/Sold
Engine: 350 HO Deluxe (350ci/330hp)
Transmission: T-5 (Non-WC)
Axle/Gears: Limited Slip 3.23's
The 89+ will fit earlier rear disc brake rear ends. Take another look at the link. You might also consider a search as this is a common topic.

JamesC
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SRKLEGIN
Interior Parts Wanted
5
10-12-2015 07:28 AM
skinny z
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
5
10-05-2015 06:23 PM
bjpotter
History / Originality
17
10-04-2015 07:48 PM
gord327
Transmissions and Drivetrain
19
10-03-2015 01:25 PM
6998poncho
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
0
09-25-2015 02:56 PM



Quick Reply: Worth the effort?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:24 PM.